V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

blew my 2.8 need help on finding another

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2002 | 09:36 PM
  #1  
defclimb's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: tennessee
blew my 2.8 need help on finding another

i just picked up a used 89 RS its nice, maroon, T5, trigon wheels, cooper cobra rubber, but the cracker heads who had it before me ran water in the winter months (tennessee) and cracked the block and now it has no compression. (by the way the motor is a 2.8 mpfi) so now im on the hunt for another, a local junkyard has a running 2.8 that comes with fuel injection and a warranty against smoking,knocking, or excessive oil use, it's in a 89 TA with a 700r4, my question is this: I was told by a local mechanic that on those 2.8's that a 2.8 that came factory automatic will NOT work on a manual b/c it vibrates too bad..but i was also told by another that they will interchange all i have todo is change pilot bearings flywhell and possibly harmonic balancer...will the 2.8 out of the automatic TA work in my manual RS?
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2002 | 10:34 PM
  #2  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
Look for answers in my 3.4 long block swap boogie tech article
That should help ya big time
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2002 | 10:56 PM
  #3  
defclimb's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: tennessee
that didnt really help me on answering my question if the engine with a auto will work in my car with a manual
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2002 | 08:21 AM
  #4  
MDv6man's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 1
From: Elkton MD USA
Car: 1983, 1986
Engine: 2.8 2bbl, 2.8 MPFI
Transmission: 200C 3 speed, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
I currently swapped a motor into my automatic v6 86 camaro. The engine came out of a 5-speed camaro and I have not noticed any problems. Just take the new motor and set it aside of the old one after it is pulled and make the new motor look like the old one by swapping all the necessary parts.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2002 | 09:53 AM
  #5  
stuart69427's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
From: Fort Belvoir, VA USA
Car: 94 Camaro
Engine: 3.4L
Transmission: 4l60e
Originally posted by MDv6man
I currently swapped a motor into my automatic v6 86 camaro. The engine came out of a 5-speed camaro and I have not noticed any problems. Just take the new motor and set it aside of the old one after it is pulled and make the new motor look like the old one by swapping all the necessary parts.
couldn't say it better...
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2002 | 11:15 AM
  #6  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
AND that was exactly what I was stating, also.
Thanks, Guys!
GM does not build special motors for a stick shift car.
Even with their pocket book
Special/different parts that work on the same engine block, sure!
When ya get the stuff, side by side, you'll see how easy it can become (any question, you ask yourself as you do the swap boogie!!)
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2002 | 12:03 PM
  #7  
Mikes86SC's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Umm wait a minute here. The yard has a v6 in a 89 Trans Am. Does that sound off an alarm in anyones mind? We all know that there was only one Trans Am that came with a V6. And it just so happens it was built in 1989.

But I guess its possible someone blew their V8 and threw in the first engine they could get. Or someone at the yard thinks every Firebird is a Trans Am.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2002 | 01:08 PM
  #8  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Good catch, Mike! Unless defclimb calls every Firebird a "Trans Am". So many people in HS would ask me "How's your Trans Am doing?" I finally gave up, and stopped correcting them. If they want to think it's a t/a, who am I to argue?
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2002 | 03:13 PM
  #9  
MDv6man's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 1
From: Elkton MD USA
Car: 1983, 1986
Engine: 2.8 2bbl, 2.8 MPFI
Transmission: 200C 3 speed, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Originally posted by Mikes86SC
Umm wait a minute here. The yard has a v6 in a 89 Trans Am. Does that sound off an alarm in anyones mind? We all know that there was only one Trans Am that came with a V6. And it just so happens it was built in 1989.

But I guess its possible someone blew their V8 and threw in the first engine they could get. Or someone at the yard thinks every Firebird is a Trans Am.
I'm going to guess it's one of the two later options because he said the motor was a running 2.8. I'd also venture to guess that of the two options, it was probably the guys at the yard figuring all firebirds are trans ams. Also didnt the TTA come with a 200-4r rather than the 700R4? Again I'm going to say the donor is really a firebird

Last edited by MDv6man; Jun 12, 2002 at 03:16 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2002 | 06:29 PM
  #10  
defclimb's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: tennessee
I know the difference in a firebird and a trans am. like the difference in a rs and a iroc, the trans am should have been a 305/350 with a 700r4 but i am going by what the guy at the junkyard said, i talked to him over the phone he said a 2.8l MPFI engine running guarenteed not to smoke, knock or have excessive oil usage, in a 89 trans am that had a 700r4...maybe he was wrong but since i have not saw the car yet, i went by what he said.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2002 | 10:04 PM
  #11  
stuart69427's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
From: Fort Belvoir, VA USA
Car: 94 Camaro
Engine: 3.4L
Transmission: 4l60e
a lot of people put the t/a gfx on there birds, so that can possible be an easy mistkake sometimes. See them on the road alot too, say firebird on the side, t/a gfx, standard brake lights.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 04:57 PM
  #12  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Didn't mean to offend ya, defclimb, just trying to figure out the 2.8+TransAm mystery. Youll have to go see the car and let us know! Hell, for all we know, the junkyard guy might be talking about a Camaro! I've had people say "Nice Camaro!" to me, when you can see it says "Firebird" right on the fender and the rear taillights.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2002 | 10:51 PM
  #13  
stuart69427's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
From: Fort Belvoir, VA USA
Car: 94 Camaro
Engine: 3.4L
Transmission: 4l60e
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2002 | 11:06 PM
  #14  
85f-bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
easy to mistake the two as we all know, and my firebird is mistaken for both a transam (which doens't bother me to much) and a camaro (which gets me all revved up. ) but also remember that during some of the later years after GFX were available on the Trans Am's they also became available on base birds, but hte fenders remained w/o the brake vents, and no trans am tags, not to mention the hood would be flat w/o trans am vents, and no wrap around spoiler the go wing was still the standard. So, not all of those gfx on birds are aftermarket, some are very much factory. and for all i know the 2.8L from an auto car should bolt up to the one from the manual car, but like was stated b4 i'd really suggest you sit the blocks next to each other and recreate what you saw on your original block onto the new one. and yeh, most likely the car at the yard was a firebird, but if it was a trans am, painted white, and the engine doesn't look quite like your 2.8L, maybe has the word buick stamped on the front, take it in a heartbeat...and then take every piece of metal that goes along with it. hehe. I've heard of people mistaking the word 2.8L for 3.8L, different companies all togehter.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2002 | 03:47 AM
  #15  
laegion's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Foothills of the Blues
Car: 84 Trans Am Ws6
Engine: 305 LG4 "H.O."
Transmission: wc t-5
if you have to money to buy a long block, you should really try to find an early 90's 3.1 litre, you won't regret it those things have some *****. with the mpfi. my friends mom has a olds cutlass supreme with one, and it probably would have wupped my 82 z.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GeneralIesrussi
Carburetors
6
Jun 20, 2024 07:21 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
angel2794
Engine Swap
11
Sep 8, 2015 06:22 PM
IROCZ1989
Transmissions and Drivetrain
2
Sep 4, 2015 11:54 AM
85Special
DIY PROM
1
Sep 3, 2015 04:21 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 PM.