3.1 Turbo from a Z24 - will it fit?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
3.1 Turbo from a Z24 - will it fit?
Its the 60 degree V6 just like ours, turbo'd and clocks about 200hp 200 torque... i am dissapointed they didnt plop it into the base firebirds/camaros... will it pop right into our f-bodys and work with our stock tranny? Its not all THAT powerful, so i figure our stock 700R4s could handle it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
internally, you're 700r4 is the same transmission as that seen in all other camaros and firebirds even v8 cars....Even the Corvette was using the 700R4, so i'm doubting that you're going to be having trouble with 200hp unless your tranny's gone through hell and back, and is starting to crap out already. As far as the turbo setup from the Z24, it wouldn't be a bad place to start. But, because it's an east-west motor, you'd have to still find a wayto use all the piping to sit north south, this is simply because of the direction of the engine, and the routing of the exaust. That's the downfall of the turbo, while ur using you're waste biproduct to create even more horsepower, you're also doing this with an expense of engine space, and on a two banked engine (v6-v8-v10 etc) you'll have a helluva time routing the piping to get it to work. In all truth and honesty, i believe a freakin twin turbo would be simpliar to setup on our motors than the single version would.
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Garland, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
What about the blower on a 2000 grand prix with the 3.1 liter, I guess the hard part would be the emission and plenum??
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
The 2000 grand prix with a blower is supercharged not turbo'd....
plus its a 3.8 i believe.
I was wondering about the 3.1T cause in my belief the F*cking f-bodys shoulda gotten it... NOT the cavaliers!
plus its a 3.8 i believe.
I was wondering about the 3.1T cause in my belief the F*cking f-bodys shoulda gotten it... NOT the cavaliers!
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Ok consider this... what if you also picked up all the stuff to go on the est/wst motor? Aftermarket headers, manifold etc...
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 2
Car: 1991 Corvette Coupe
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4/4L60 same trans different name
Originally posted by D Stroy H8
The 2000 grand prix with a blower is supercharged not turbo'd....
plus its a 3.8 i believe.
I was wondering about the 3.1T cause in my belief the F*cking f-bodys shoulda gotten it... NOT the cavaliers!
The 2000 grand prix with a blower is supercharged not turbo'd....
plus its a 3.8 i believe.
I was wondering about the 3.1T cause in my belief the F*cking f-bodys shoulda gotten it... NOT the cavaliers!
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
From: Garland, TX, USA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
"nah the f-bodies got something called a V8 instead"
DAM RIGHT!!
Like the saying goes, "why make what YOU CAN BUY!!!"
DAM RIGHT!!
Like the saying goes, "why make what YOU CAN BUY!!!"
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Well whatever car it was from, its was the LHO 60 degree, and regardless i dont think it can be done (without superlfuous expenditures)...
thanks for the opinions tho =)
thanks for the opinions tho =)
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, Tx
Car: 92 RS 25th Anniversary
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 700r4
the grand prix are supercharged my friend has one its a 3.8 supercharged v6, producing 240 horses, its slow as **** of the line haha, but somebody was tellin me to throw a TT setup on my v6 and i was like if you can find someone that does it for my car ill do it!
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
that's the new ones, the old ones were turbocharged....oh, they're not to grand until they devolp boost, but....you know that the 3.8L is a much more torquey motor than a 2.8L so it'll burn tires off the line even better than we will (plus fwd makes that easier too). Friend of mine at school drives one, rolls it out to 25mph, slams the throttle down, boost guage came alive and tires smoked through first, and the beginning of second....not to bad .
89-90 McLaren TGP's got a turbo 3.1
91-96 GTP's got a NA T-DOHC (quad cam) 3.4
97+ GTPs get a SC 3800
rpo LHO is the NA 3.1
the only was a SC 3800 GTP would be a dog off the line would be if traction control was on and the due neutral dropped
6.6 0-60 bone stock isn't bad. w/ a little modding they run with (and occasionally beat) LS-1 cars.
they regularily beat up on thirdgens.
before I get flamed check out www.clubgp.com
there are 1/4mile times and mod lists.
FYI there was a turbo sunbird with a I-4 in it. sucked so bad, it didn't stick around long.
LHO If I remember correctly was the same RPO used on the gen 2 3.1's (that included the cavalier)
but if having 5 more horses than a 2.8 is what you want go for it. I think it would be easier to run your maro FWD than to play with the 3.1 to make it work RWD.
91-96 GTP's got a NA T-DOHC (quad cam) 3.4
97+ GTPs get a SC 3800
rpo LHO is the NA 3.1
the only was a SC 3800 GTP would be a dog off the line would be if traction control was on and the due neutral dropped
6.6 0-60 bone stock isn't bad. w/ a little modding they run with (and occasionally beat) LS-1 cars.
they regularily beat up on thirdgens.
before I get flamed check out www.clubgp.com
there are 1/4mile times and mod lists.
FYI there was a turbo sunbird with a I-4 in it. sucked so bad, it didn't stick around long.
LHO If I remember correctly was the same RPO used on the gen 2 3.1's (that included the cavalier)
but if having 5 more horses than a 2.8 is what you want go for it. I think it would be easier to run your maro FWD than to play with the 3.1 to make it work RWD.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
There is a 3.1L T, and it wont fit. Go to http://www.v6z24.com/specs/
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Street Lethal
Power Adders
634
Apr 30, 2019 12:14 PM
355tpipickup
Alternative Port EFI Intakes
2
Aug 26, 2015 04:08 PM





