V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

V6 turbo headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2002 | 10:14 PM
  #1  
LT1maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: USA
V6 turbo headers

alright, i was looking into this. From what i swa, i can get stock headers to work but i will make my own. All i need to do is mound the flange at the bottom of the headers and than hook the turbo onto it. than hook a downpipe to the y pipe, i looked at my car all day to figure this out, i will get it to work in time, in a few monthes, i will post pics. just FYI
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2002 | 10:31 PM
  #2  
Project: 85 2.8 bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
been there, thought that. where exactly are you planning to mount the turbo? I am/will/was going to mount it in the front pass side, right behind the radiator.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2002 | 08:31 AM
  #3  
85f-bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
that's about the only place you can mount it in these cars, I intiailly thought of turning it sideways like the TTA's and GN's did. Hmmmmm, although, u hadm entioned two turbos, so maybe you're going to mount it up kinda like GM did in that twin turbo 5.0 hmm or 5.7 can't remember, that's hidden away in their vault of nice things.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2002 | 09:50 AM
  #4  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Re: V6 turbo headers

Originally posted by LT1maro
alright, i was looking into this. From what i swa, i can get stock headers to work but i will make my own. All i need to do is mound the flange at the bottom of the headers and than hook the turbo onto it. than hook a downpipe to the y pipe, i looked at my car all day to figure this out, i will get it to work in time, in a few monthes, i will post pics. just FYI
Stock headers... you mean stock manifolds?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2002 | 11:01 AM
  #5  
85f-bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
correct, and remember if you're using stock manifolds then the fow still wont' be nearly as "perected" as it should be. The best thing you could do would be to bulid a set of headers to run to the turbo...You should also think about running twin turbos, because if you only run one turbo on one bank of cylinders, you won't get enough gas to create a lot of boost. In other words, u won't get the power monster you're expecting.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2002 | 04:10 PM
  #6  
LT1maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: USA
i was looking at what u said, there is no room for turbos, guess the v8 is going to have to be droped in. thanks for making me look
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2002 | 10:17 PM
  #7  
joezero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: See pic above
Engine: Too Small
Transmission: Broken
Couldn't you take the stock manifolds, and just reverse what side they were on, so that rather than the collector facing the rear of the car, it would face the front. Then you run a pipe from the collector up so that it's inbetween the radiator and the engine. Then you run the turbo off of that (this is assuming a twin turbo design) and have a second pipe out of the turbo that goes down and under the engine, and connects to the Y-pipe. I dunno, it's just a thought.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 08:52 PM
  #8  
michael's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, TX
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 6.2 383 TPIS Miniram
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 4.11
joe no way for one manifolds are hot and headers are even hotter point being why would you even have a cooling fan?? If you have headers/manifods/pipe infront of the engine the heat is going to build up infront and just get blow onto the engine via the cooling fan. also it will keep the radiator coolant hot due to being close to the inlet hose to the water pump it just can't be done. and why would you anyway? just slap a damn vortec or paxton super charger on it and be done with it. after what it will cost you to do it right with turbos spend another 300-400 and do it right and clean
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2002 | 09:35 PM
  #9  
joezero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: See pic above
Engine: Too Small
Transmission: Broken
michael, i've gotta disagree with you on heat from the exhaust system being an issue. Think about any car with a transversly (sp) mounted engine. Nine times outta ten, the exhaust manifold is inbetween the radiator and the engine block. Second, you said that the cooling fan would blow hot air right on the engine. Call me crazy, but the fan comes on to move air past the radiator. The hot air that it's pulling through goes right to the motor. Could it increase underhood temps, sure. But there are simple ways around it. First, put in a 160 thermostat. Second, install a second cooling fan. Third, mount a front spoiler under the car to direct cool air into the engine bay, just like the one that some people have attached to the bottom of their radiator. You've gotta remember that these are water cooled engines, and the radiator would be infront of the turbos, with plenty of access to cool air.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2002 | 10:43 PM
  #10  
D Stroy H8's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Don't mind me - just throwing out something here.
To answer someone's question the twin turbo was a 5.7TT on the firefox. pretty sweet stuff, do a search on the FireFox and youll get tons of stuff.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 02:06 AM
  #11  
elevario's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az, USA
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: T5
Attached Thumbnails V6 turbo headers-twin-turbo-v6-.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 06:14 AM
  #12  
GhostRider84's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
........... (Jaw dropping ..... Drooling going on here)
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 09:14 AM
  #13  
joezero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: See pic above
Engine: Too Small
Transmission: Broken
It should be noted however that that engine is in a porsche 510. I don't think we have that kind of clearance between the engine and the strut towers. Still, to those who say that a twin turbo 2.8L is impossible or impracticle, well, there it is.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 09:17 AM
  #14  
joezero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: See pic above
Engine: Too Small
Transmission: Broken
Here's the website where theat pic came from if you're interested. http://www.bryanf.com/mycars/510V6.htm
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 08:35 PM
  #15  
Camar_Hunter_c's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Originally posted by joezero
It should be noted however that that engine is in a porsche 510. I don't think we have that kind of clearance between the engine and the strut towers. Still, to those who say that a twin turbo 2.8L is impossible or impracticle, well, there it is.
THATS a datsun 510 NOT a porche.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 09:02 PM
  #16  
joezero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: See pic above
Engine: Too Small
Transmission: Broken
I"ll be damned, I always thought that was a Porsche Now I'm really wondering why he used Porsche fuel injection.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 07:02 PM
  #17  
LT1maro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: USA
WOW!!!!!!!, really, does anyone knoe what that ran in the 1/4? that looks fast. And 20lbs boost! wow, that is starting to make me think
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2002 | 07:18 PM
  #18  
joezero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: See pic above
Engine: Too Small
Transmission: Broken
Keep in mind that the engine in that car was built from the ground up. It has much stronger internals than a stock engine. I also wouldn't be surprised if they dropped the compression when they built the engine. I see it like this, if you can build a turbo setup and prove it viable by running like 5-7 pounds of boost on a stock engine, and you can get some respectable power gains, then it might be worth it to either build a second 2.8 with forged internals and 8:1 compression, or alter your current engine to those specs (a complete rebuild). But building the engine isn't the problem, it the getting a turbo setup that will fit and work well in an F-body engine bay.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2002 | 04:35 PM
  #19  
SATURN5's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: the garage
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Originally posted by joezero
I"ll be damned, I always thought that was a Porsche Now I'm really wondering why he used Porsche fuel injection.
To qoute the site..

Fuel and ignition systems: EFI, tuned port injection, Electromotive TEC-II fuel injection and crank-triggered direct ignition computer with Blend PROM, TPI intake manifold, Porsche Turbo throttle body, Bosch fuel pump, Aeroquip fuel lines, GM fuel rail, Accel pressure regulator, Siemens injectors, mechanical water injection, Taylor performance plug sires, Bosch platinum spark plugs. No distributor is needed with the TEC!

its not Porsche injection.. its TEC!
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2002 | 04:38 PM
  #20  
joezero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: See pic above
Engine: Too Small
Transmission: Broken
A modified Porsche fuel injection system was also planned. It turned out that the engine was ideal, as it’s real smooth, very responsive, and has proved to be plenty durable
I think that it may have had a fuel injection system out of a porsche when it was first built and then was upgraded later. Although it was real late when I read through the site, so don't mind me
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2002 | 05:59 PM
  #21  
Y2KFirehawk's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Lehigh Valley, PA
Car: 00 T/A Firehawk
Engine: 346ci LS1
Transmission: MN6
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
Originally posted by elevario
:hail: :hail: I want that in my f-body.... that is a SICK setup...
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2002 | 09:32 AM
  #22  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
I want that in my s10, Wonder if them turbos would clear my ac and upper control arms?? He should have swapped it over to a 3.4l while they were at it.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2002 | 03:37 PM
  #23  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
I think that's a very old car; don't think the 3.4 was out yet.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2002 | 12:42 AM
  #24  
joezero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: See pic above
Engine: Too Small
Transmission: Broken
I gotta agree with Tom on this one. On the site he talks about how a better intake manifold became avaliable that was made for camaros. So I get the idea that the engine was built even before the MPFI F-bodies.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2002 | 11:39 AM
  #25  
3.1 firebird's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: st.louis
I e-mailed the owner awhile back and he said it made nearly 400 hp.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2002 | 12:35 PM
  #26  
joezero's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: See pic above
Engine: Too Small
Transmission: Broken
In a car that tiny! That's just insane. Do they have that guy on suicide watch?
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2002 | 01:57 PM
  #27  
GhostRider84's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Even if you are not going to Turbo - the information about that engine is extremely valueable! The way that it was put together, torn up, put back together, torn up, put back together, etc!! What internals does it have - rods, pistons, cam, etc. Details, I want Details!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
bamaboy0323
Exhaust
7
Sep 12, 2015 07:14 PM
hdis2002
Exhaust
2
Sep 8, 2015 02:52 PM
dmtz956
LSX and LTX Parts
1
Sep 7, 2015 10:16 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 PM.