Ebay Findings. Laughs, and Questions
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Ebay Findings. Laughs, and Questions
Ok, first one is a laugh. They claim Lifters, but show pics of a piston. LOL
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...&category=6770
Next one, is for lifters. I have not had my engine down this far, so the ones that have, please inform me if these are stock style, or "performance" style. And will work in either my 3.1l, or my 3.4l
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...category=33614
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...&category=6770
Next one, is for lifters. I have not had my engine down this far, so the ones that have, please inform me if these are stock style, or "performance" style. And will work in either my 3.1l, or my 3.4l
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...category=33614
Stock replacements.
Will fit a 3.4?
MOST CERTAINLY.
97% of time with a 3.4, substitute 2.8/3.1 & ya got a winner!
Why not throw old ones in kerosene, to clean, refresh & then add HiPo rocker arms on the 3.1?
Good option, too.
Will fit a 3.4?
MOST CERTAINLY.
97% of time with a 3.4, substitute 2.8/3.1 & ya got a winner!
Why not throw old ones in kerosene, to clean, refresh & then add HiPo rocker arms on the 3.1?
Good option, too.
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Stock ones arnt roller like that are they?? I am assuming if their for 2.8/3.1, they will fit in 3.4.
Is roller good option in that part for our engines??
I am wanting to do the 1:52 rockers on camaro. First things first is to get all rides running. Just waiting on cashflow
Is roller good option in that part for our engines??
I am wanting to do the 1:52 rockers on camaro. First things first is to get all rides running. Just waiting on cashflow
IF stock 3.1 set up, go 1.6 I'd say.
NO PROOF, but cam is aggressive, yet mild.
On 3.4's, I'm gonna go for 1.52 one day.
Times two.....
I already have 1.6 roller tip for my V-8.
Awaiting the finished product.
NO PROOF, but cam is aggressive, yet mild.
On 3.4's, I'm gonna go for 1.52 one day.
Times two.....
I already have 1.6 roller tip for my V-8.
Awaiting the finished product.
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
trying to talk her into the 3.4l swap. Place, time, money, engine hoist is all "issues" again.
Btw, think I found a house to look at. In my price range easy. Needs some work. :lala:
Btw, think I found a house to look at. In my price range easy. Needs some work. :lala:
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by KED85
IF stock 3.1 set up, go 1.6 I'd say.
NO PROOF, but cam is aggressive, yet mild.
On 3.4's, I'm gonna go for 1.52 one day.
Times two.....
I already have 1.6 roller tip for my V-8.
Awaiting the finished product.
IF stock 3.1 set up, go 1.6 I'd say.
NO PROOF, but cam is aggressive, yet mild.
On 3.4's, I'm gonna go for 1.52 one day.
Times two.....
I already have 1.6 roller tip for my V-8.
Awaiting the finished product.

You need a roller cam to use roller lifters.
Trending Topics
That first link that you said that they posted a pic of pistons instead of lifters, I think you are mistaken. When I clicked on that to see what you were talking about there was a picture of lifters there.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




