V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

How to make a 2.8L "quick"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2003 | 09:28 PM
  #1  
Soft Taco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
How to make a 2.8L "quick"?

So, i bought a 89 Firebird from a freind for 100$. Long story short, they thought the transmission was blown (700R4) so they sold it to me. Being the genious that i am, i replaced the broke tranny fluid filter and added some tranny fluid and it works fine. Car looks ok, no rust exept for drivers side door and paint needs to be redone, but not critical.

So, now after giveing it a major tune up and replaceing all the tie rod ends, front brake pads, calipers and rotors my car finally works. (not street legal yet)

So, now i want to make it pretty quick without getting a 3.4L or a SB 350. The reason i dont want to do the 3.4L swap is because if im going to get a new engine, i might as well get a 383 stroker or something.

As i understand, an 89 2.8L has around 160hp stock, i would like to get it to at LEAST 190hp. I need a whole new exaust system because mine is rusted to hell and back, so i figure a flowmaster cat back and a Dynomax Catalitic converter would be a wise move.

I wont be doing any racing or anything like that, but i would at least want to be able to dust those ***** punks whenever i get the chance.

So, what do you V6 experts recomend for getting my car to run a little faster than it already does? Im having a very hard time finding any aftermarket parts for the 2.8L

Last edited by Soft Taco; Apr 21, 2003 at 09:41 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2003 | 06:25 AM
  #2  
Quick_Trans_Am's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Northwestern Pennsylvania
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 with stuffs.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Posi
Welcome to the boards. Aftermarket parts for the 60 degree V6 are very hard to come by.
However, There are a couple things you can do to make yours a little quicker.
For starters:

Look into a custom PROM. You can make them yourself for the price of buying a hypertech or jet, and you can tailor them to your specific needs.

Do some port work. Open up the plenum, manifold, etc., whatever you feel comfortable doing.

I know that at one time auto zone sold 2 different camshafts for these cars, one was a direct OEM replacement, and the other was what they called "more performance oriented", although I never looked into it any further. They were both around $100.

Get a shift kit. You should be able to find one of those for that transmission easily.

You can change your rear end gears as well if you like. a 3.42 or 3.73 works nicely, they are quicker off the line, and don't sacrifice too much on the economical end.

If you feel so inclined, you can delete your a/c to recuce weight of the car. Weight reduction goes as extreme as you make it.

Don't forget your exhaust. Headers and a nice pipe setup can make a world of difference.

You don't have to have 190 HP to make your car quick, so keep that in mind, there are lots of "little" things you can do as well, not in the engine alone.

Hope this helps.

Last edited by Quick_Trans_Am; Apr 22, 2003 at 06:31 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2003 | 08:20 AM
  #3  
AGood2.8's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Tell me what you want for your 60*V6 and I'll help you locate that part. I have sources for everything.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2003 | 08:24 AM
  #4  
Joe_L's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, NS,Canada
Car: 1995 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: Built 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23's - Limited Slip
Re: How to make a 2.8L "quick"?

Originally posted by Soft Taco

As i understand, an 89 2.8L has around 160hp stock, i would like to get it to at LEAST 190hp. I need a whole new exaust system because mine is rusted to hell and back, so i figure a flowmaster cat back and a Dynomax Catalitic converter would be a wise move.

First, your starting with 135hp base and 160 lb.ft for torque. Getting 190 would be a challenge. Exhaust, and intake, roller rockers, jet chip would be a great start. Then if your not at the 190, try sheading some weight. 100lbs can make a big difference in the speed of a car.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2003 | 08:29 AM
  #5  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Welcome to the boards also.

A few things, the 89 2.8 is not 160hp stock, it is around 120-125hp. The 3.1 was 140, and the 3.4 is 160. All stock figures.


You are on the right track, repair the general lack of matinace parts first. Along with a good tune up. Some things people overlook in a tune up, so do a search (upper right hand of the screen) type in in user name, tomp, forum v6, tuneup. He did a great artical.

The 2.8 parts are somewhat hard to find, but they are avaliable. Some are a tad pricy.

Ignition
Exhaust
Cams
headers (just now available)
injectors
fuel regualors
TB
stroke/bore kits
rockers
pushrods
timing chain
Heads (just now available)

Like Agood said, what do you want, we will direct you.

Welcome to the boards, sounds like you got a good deal.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2003 | 01:05 PM
  #6  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
As far as shift kits-

1. Don't buy the $20 B&M Shift Improver Kit. Might sound weird to say since I installed mine a few years ago, but it's not a well liked kit on the Trans forum. The "winner" is the TransGo kit, for $120, with an installation video- it replaces/upgrades more parts then the B&M kit does.

2. If your trans is in questionable shape at all, don't put a shift kit in. You'll only destroy the trans faster.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2003 | 02:50 PM
  #7  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Couple things -

First, lighten the car. Seriously, loose all the weight you deem 'excess' such as AIR pump, EGR, etc.

Do the full tune up. Bump the timing to 12-14, depending on the gas you fill up with (89 or 92 respectively)

Port/polish the intake, heads. If you've got the dual snorkel TPI style setup, open up the air boxes under your filters.

Dynomax catback.... if you can, a custom y-pipe would work wonders.

Auto or T5? if a T5, you're golden, as you have the increased gearing + 3.42 rear. Otherwise, get some 28spline axles out of the j-yard, and get the $99 Zexel Torson OEM posi from SLP Performance, with 3.55-3.73 rear end gears.

New LCA's from Spohn.

New cam. Recommend around 204/214 @ .050 with 1.6 roller rockers, and around .420+ lift intake and exhaust on the cam.

That should net you close to 180-190hp, I'd think, running 15's.

Of course, you could just get the 3.4 block from a junkyard, and be miles ahead. If you go 350, you have a lot of work to do - it's NOT just a 'drop and go' like the 3.4 is!
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2003 | 06:25 PM
  #8  
Soft Taco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Doward
Couple things -

First, lighten the car. Seriously, loose all the weight you deem 'excess' such as AIR pump, EGR, etc.

Do the full tune up. Bump the timing to 12-14, depending on the gas you fill up with (89 or 92 respectively)

Port/polish the intake, heads. If you've got the dual snorkel TPI style setup, open up the air boxes under your filters.

Dynomax catback.... if you can, a custom y-pipe would work wonders.

Auto or T5? if a T5, you're golden, as you have the increased gearing + 3.42 rear. Otherwise, get some 28spline axles out of the j-yard, and get the $99 Zexel Torson OEM posi from SLP Performance, with 3.55-3.73 rear end gears.

New LCA's from Spohn.

New cam. Recommend around 204/214 @ .050 with 1.6 roller rockers, and around .420+ lift intake and exhaust on the cam.

That should net you close to 180-190hp, I'd think, running 15's.

Of course, you could just get the 3.4 block from a junkyard, and be miles ahead. If you go 350, you have a lot of work to do - it's NOT just a 'drop and go' like the 3.4 is!
wow, great info guys. So what about this 3.4L swap everyone is talking about? Is the 3.4L the same engine that comes in 4th gen FBody's?

How much do 3.4L's at the junk yard go for? and what about 350's? I dont mind about it not being a "swap n go" type thing, i am willing to put time and effort into my car to make it run great and look great also.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2003 | 06:31 PM
  #9  
Soft Taco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Also, since the engine and tranny both have 197,000 miles on them, should i just swap them out as soon as possible?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2003 | 08:37 PM
  #10  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
At that many miles, I prolly would. I can get a running 40-60k mile 3.4 complete from the junkyard here for $375.

Yes, came in the '93-'95 Camaros. I'd grab a later model 700r4 as well..

See, the problem is that face that the V6 is 60º and the V8 is 90º. But, I'd say if you can find a 350 + tranny in a junkyard, running (HEAR IT RUN) for cheap, you can go that route. You need a 700r4, and the later the year you can get (newer) the better - it seems every year from '87+ got a little better improved...
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2003 | 08:43 PM
  #11  
_max_'s Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: southeast Tennessee
Originally posted by AGood2.8
Tell me what you want for your 60*V6 and I'll help you locate that part. I have sources for everything.
HEADERS
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2003 | 08:51 PM
  #12  
AGood2.8's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by _max_
HEADERS
I own two sets with a third set on the way- They are availible.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2003 | 09:52 PM
  #13  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Originally posted by _max_
HEADERS

See above sticky about group purchase
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2003 | 11:25 PM
  #14  
ChillPhatCat's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: LaFayette, NY
Car: '10 Subaru Forester
Engine: 2.5 Boxer
Transmission: 4EAT
Axle/Gears: 4.44
Originally posted by Doward
At that many miles, I prolly would. I can get a running 40-60k mile 3.4 complete from the junkyard here for $375.

Yes, came in the '93-'95 Camaros. I'd grab a later model 700r4 as well..

See, the problem is that face that the V6 is 60º and the V8 is 90º. But, I'd say if you can find a 350 + tranny in a junkyard, running (HEAR IT RUN) for cheap, you can go that route. You need a 700r4, and the later the year you can get (newer) the better - it seems every year from '87+ got a little better improved...
The 3.8 and 4.3 are also 90 degrees and the 4th gen auto is a 4L60E... that might be a viable option... a little better than the 700R4, but both are excellent trannies... of course you could always do the good old 5 speed tranny swap at the same time...
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 12:53 AM
  #15  
devianb's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Yes, since you want to make your V6 quick without going to a 3.4l or another larger motor, shaving off as much uneccessary weight as possible will be helpfull. Porting and polishing will help out quite a bit too, along with a cam, roller rockers, new timing chain, higher compression pistions, underdrive pulleys (I would leave the alterternator pulley off).

Igintion helps out a bit too, but it can get pricey. I have at least $300 in just my ignition, only because I got tired of dealing with the stock ignition parts failing one me.





Also, what do you consider quick. Just getting into the 15's are hard enough with a heavily modded 2.8l. If you want anything in the 14's or lower, you are going to need some serious forced induction.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 06:55 PM
  #16  
Dennis91RS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
From: Solomons Island Maryland
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 4 bbl 305
Transmission: 700R4
now come on guys

ok first off a 2.8 V6 has 135 horses stock

alls a 3.1 is is a 30 over 2.8

now first thing first

Catco High Flow Converter and a Dynomax Exhaust

DO NOT PUT FLOWMASTERS ON IT

flowmasters on 2.8,3.1,3.4,3.8 Fbody cars sound exactly like weed eaters

dynomax catback exhaust systems have a nice melow tone

then change out the filter to K&N

oh BTW 2.8 cars have 3.42 gears so leave the rear alone don't worry about posi because these cars will not spin from a dead stop trust me i know i have owend 4 fbodys

then what you do is lighten up the car 4th gen fbody cars have aluminum drive shafts,also get a set of aluminum brake drums GTAs and IROC fbodys have these

shift kit is another helper makes the shifts a lot snappier
i recommend B&M Trans Pak it has three levels,off-road,street-strip,or full competiton

i recommend upgrading your ignition to MSD

last thing if your not happy tear down the motor and install stroker kit,cam,roller chain,lifters,rocker arms,and 3.4 heads

edlebrock makes a cam,timing chain,lifters and rocker arms for these motors

and if all else fails...............NOS
:rockon: :rockon:
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 07:33 PM
  #17  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Originally posted by Dennis91RS
now come on guys

ok first off a 2.8 V6 has 135 horses stock

alls a 3.1 is is a 30 over 2.8

now first thing first

Catco High Flow Converter and a Dynomax Exhaust

DO NOT PUT FLOWMASTERS ON IT

flowmasters on 2.8,3.1,3.4,3.8 Fbody cars sound exactly like weed eaters

dynomax catback exhaust systems have a nice melow tone

then change out the filter to K&N

oh BTW 2.8 cars have 3.42 gears so leave the rear alone don't worry about posi because these cars will not spin from a dead stop trust me i know i have owend 4 fbodys

then what you do is lighten up the car 4th gen fbody cars have aluminum drive shafts,also get a set of aluminum brake drums GTAs and IROC fbodys have these

shift kit is another helper makes the shifts a lot snappier
i recommend B&M Trans Pak it has three levels,off-road,street-strip,or full competiton

i recommend upgrading your ignition to MSD

last thing if your not happy tear down the motor and install stroker kit,cam,roller chain,lifters,rocker arms,and 3.4 heads

edlebrock makes a cam,timing chain,lifters and rocker arms for these motors

and if all else fails...............NOS
:rockon: :rockon:
Wow... not sure where to start with the mis-information in this post... ok, here goes! (just ribbing ya man, we're all here to learn, right?)

The 3.1 is NOT a .030" 2.8. It's a stroked 2.8. The bore is the same on the two engines, it is the stroke that is increased to yield 3.1L.

Exhaust is good! Dynomax catback, good choice.

K&N filters, yes.

Not ALL 2.8s have the 3.42 rear. The automatics are 3.23, and the stick shifts are 3.42. I would also HIGHLY recommend a posi, and LCA's. Won't spin from a stop? I can drop the hammer and spin ALL over the place through 1st gear, and that's with sticky 255/50/16's in the back! If I jump off the clutch and onto the brake, I won't move, and instead enjoy a nice, peaceful smoke cloud.

Once more, not all 4th gens use the aluminum driveshaft (to my knowledge... hell, if so, I've got 5 local I can get them from!!) and I'm not sure about the Aluminum brake drums...

Yep, a 75 shot of Nitrous on a healthy 2.8 will suddenly push you along nicely!
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 08:43 PM
  #18  
AGood2.8's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
I fully agree with not using a flowmaster on a stock motor/ stock cat and stock to mild shift kit. They do sound like a spinning top winding down (lag in between shifts- you know, the rrrrrrrrrRRRRRRRRRRUUUUUUUUUUuuuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrRRRRRR: U's representing lag) The car sounds like a tin can when they overrev and come back down do to lack of positive shifts.

Mine however sounds crisp- rrrrrrRRRRRRR-bump-rrrrrrrRRRRRRR-bump-rrrrrRRRR.... (no lag crackling sound). Its all how you build it and what you merry the Flowmaster with.

p.s I have the 80 series Flowmaster with dual outlets and a Gibson high flow cat, Few other motor goodies also combined with a full race trans (you can't drive this car with an open glass of liquid in your hand even driving slow- you'll be wearing it quickstyle when the tranny bumps through the gears )
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 10:29 PM
  #19  
ChillPhatCat's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: LaFayette, NY
Car: '10 Subaru Forester
Engine: 2.5 Boxer
Transmission: 4EAT
Axle/Gears: 4.44
Originally posted by Doward

K&N filters, yes.

I can drop the hammer and spin ALL over the place through 1st gear, and that's with sticky 255/50/16's in the back! If I jump off the clutch and onto the brake, I won't move, and instead enjoy a nice, peaceful smoke cloud.

Once more, not all 4th gens use the aluminum driveshaft (to my knowledge... hell, if so, I've got 5 local I can get them from!!) and I'm not sure about the Aluminum brake drums...
K&N makes great filters, I added one to my '97 and it definitely brought more power down to the ground... it also helped that I hacked off the front of my airbox too...

I wonder about your traction problem if it's not worn swaybar bushings and the such... or do you have a rear swaybar... unless you've got some good solid mods I don't see how good tires would allow this.

The Aluminum driveshafts are on all V8 cars '94 and up... I don't know about the '93's... I think I heard something different about them...

I'd say a set of 3.73's would provide a pretty good increase over 3.23 or 3.42's

Last edited by ChillPhatCat; Apr 23, 2003 at 10:32 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 10:39 PM
  #20  
cac91's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Drop it off a cliff......

.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 10:50 PM
  #21  
2_point8_boy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
I got an '88, 2.8L, and I agree with doward. I have all new suspension components in the back(as far as the bushings, shocks, and springs go), and I can drop the clutch and smoke the tires through 1st, spin them enough in second to make me wobble in the back, and if it's running good that day, I can somtimes chirp 3rd. But that happens on rare occasions now. ALL of the 1988 V6's got the 3.42 gears in the back, even the autos. Check the tech data section if you want...it's there. I think I'm probably gonna be running times like Doward when I finally get up to the track this spring.

P.S. Doward, I cut the bottom off my TPI intake today. Sounds meaner now. I didn't take off the splash sheild that's under there though, the holes that let air past that thing are bigger than the filters themselves, so I don't think there will be a problem with getting air in there anymore.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 10:54 PM
  #22  
ChillPhatCat's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: LaFayette, NY
Car: '10 Subaru Forester
Engine: 2.5 Boxer
Transmission: 4EAT
Axle/Gears: 4.44
Did your car come with a rear swaybar? I'm just wondering... it's surprising sometimes what can and cannot spin tires... No offense intended.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 10:57 PM
  #23  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Originally posted by ChillPhatCat
I wonder about your traction problem if it's not worn swaybar bushings and the such... or do you have a rear swaybar... unless you've got some good solid mods I don't see how good tires would allow this.
No secrets - just removed the cat, bumped up timing, good state of tune, opened the airflow MASSIVELY.

4k rpm, drop the clutch, hammer to the floor, and wheelspin city!

Lest we also forget... it's a one wheeled wonder (or peg leg pete, whichever you prefer)
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 10:57 PM
  #24  
2_point8_boy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
yup, rear sway bar most definitly. if you want, you can have pics of the bar tomorrow...
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 11:01 PM
  #25  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Rear swaybar here also... hey, 2.8 boy, what tires are you running?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 11:05 PM
  #26  
2_point8_boy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
Tires are the standard 215/65R15's. There are brand new Winston "Super Sport" series tires. Cost me all of $200 for the 4 tires. Decent tires to me, don't know seeing as I'm not really into the whole tire scene and down with the spiffy tire lingo...you know, knowing what are good one's and which ones suck a fatty.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 11:09 PM
  #27  
V6camaroman's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
From: Apex North Carolina
try the basics that everybody has been mentioning but to make ur car really quick u need to do some open heart surgery on the old 2.8 like head porting and a cam etc.... check my sig for all my mods. if u have a ques about any of them just ask and ill go more indepth.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 11:10 PM
  #28  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Ha! You're right, ALL 2.8's got 3.42 rear ends! It was the 3.1 with the A4/3.23 and M5/3.42 combos... well dang!

Ahhh.... Man, get some 16's. When I first got the car, I could spin 1st and 2nd with the stock 215s. 255/50/16s (Goodyear Eagle ZR50s) are sooo much stickier. Going from the 215s to the 255s STOPPED (and I mean STOPPED) my wheelspin. When I was able to break them loose again, I KNEW I had increased my power. And also - I haven't been back to the track with the new open air/timing yet... should be upper 16's now!
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2003 | 11:16 PM
  #29  
2_point8_boy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
Originally posted by Doward
Ahhh.... Man, get some 16's.
Yeah, I'm thinkin' about 16's but don't have the mula right now. When I first got the car, I could barley get it to chirp second, of course that was because it had a dead cylinder, but that's not the point. I did some tinkering and got it to spin second enough so that the back end broke loose on me, then finally I got it to be able to chirp third with the new tires. I don't do it much now because I think the tranny is goin' out on me, and I know that's gonna hurt to get it rebuilt. There's no way in hell I'm takin' on that task. I did the rear edn, but the tranny's a big HELL NO.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2003 | 09:20 AM
  #30  
ChillPhatCat's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: LaFayette, NY
Car: '10 Subaru Forester
Engine: 2.5 Boxer
Transmission: 4EAT
Axle/Gears: 4.44
Originally posted by Doward
No secrets - just removed the cat, bumped up timing, good state of tune, opened the airflow MASSIVELY.

4k rpm, drop the clutch, hammer to the floor, and wheelspin city!

Lest we also forget... it's a one wheeled wonder (or peg leg pete, whichever you prefer)

I prefer... One tire fire...
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2003 | 01:16 PM
  #31  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Dennis91RS
now come on guys
(..snip..)
shift kit is another helper makes the shifts a lot snappier
i recommend B&M Trans Pak it has three levels,off-road,street-strip,or full competiton
Er, no, don't go with the B&M TransPak. It doesn't have 3 levels for a 700r4. The B&M Transpak for a 700r4 is the exact same kit as the B&M Shift Improver Kit for a 700r4. Want to know the extra $20 difference? You get a new trans filter with the Transpak. That's IT! Plus like I said the B&M kits are frowned upon for doing more harm then good.

Dennis, were you talking about a full rebuild kit ($300)? Which shift kit are you running?
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2003 | 01:21 PM
  #32  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 2_point8_boy
I don't do it much now because I think the tranny is goin' out on me, and I know that's gonna hurt to get it rebuilt. There's no way in hell I'm takin' on that task. I did the rear edn, but the tranny's a big HELL NO.
Why not? Get a junkyard one for $100 and rebuild it. There's honestly not much in the trans rebuild, from what I've read in the rebuild manuals. The Haynes "GM Transmission Overhaul" book is a great one- photograph by photograph rebuild of the 700r4! There's some places where you need to check clearances, but for the most part, it's remove old, install new parts in the correct order. That's what I'm going to do. The guy that rebuilt mine as a favor only charged me parts, around $300-$400. (I forget the exact number). Lee Myles raped me for $1300 for a trans that lasted a year and a half! Jerks.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2003 | 02:05 PM
  #33  
2_point8_boy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
I have the 5-speed trans. I know I could probably do it, and it would be a great learning experience, but I don't have the money basically. The only thing I'm worried about is not having the right tools to get it done right the first time. My differential still whines from when I rebuilt it. I have to take it apart again to find out exactly why, but i think it's the pinion depth.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2003 | 02:58 PM
  #34  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Oh, duh, I thought you had an automatic. My bad! I have no idea what's involved with rebuilding a manual trans. Those frickin' measurement tools are expensive, too... the woman got me a Mitutoyo dial indicator a few Christmas's ago, but to get a complete collection of everything...ouch. Especially micrometers...
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2008 | 12:08 PM
  #35  
screamineagle's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: neosho missouri
Car: 88 firebird t-top
Engine: 2.8l v6
Transmission: four speed
Re: How to make a 2.8L "quick"?

is there a shift kit that will make a neutral bomb not so damaging and how hard is it to do a manual swap i have all the parts actually a whole other car
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2008 | 12:18 PM
  #36  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: How to make a 2.8L "quick"?

wow this post is 5 years old man lol
anyways nutral droping ur trans is not good no matter what u will break it,i think the hardest part of the 5 speed swap is cuttin a hole for the shifter
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2008 | 01:21 PM
  #37  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Re: How to make a 2.8L "quick"?

Originally Posted by project89
wow this post is 5 years old man lol
anyways nutral droping ur trans is not good no matter what u will break it,i think the hardest part of the 5 speed swap is cuttin a hole for the shifter
I would say getting the holes in the firewall in the propper place is harder then the hole for the shifter.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2008 | 03:40 PM
  #38  
grimmcs's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Western PA
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1/3100 in progress...Turbo Soon
Transmission: 700r4
Re: How to make a 2.8L "quick"?

Originally Posted by screamineagle
is there a shift kit that will make a neutral bomb not so damaging and how hard is it to do a manual swap i have all the parts actually a whole other car
Doing those are hard on any transmission, let alone one thats 20 years old...
But hey...when you destroy your one, you have a back up...

But to answer your question...no a shift kit will not make a neutral drop any easier on your tranny.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 11:57 AM
  #39  
chevyracingrox's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 1
From: IL
Car: 88 IROC, 76 Malibu Classic
Engine: 350 TPI, 350
Transmission: 700R4, 4-speed
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt ????
Re: How to make a 2.8L "quick"?

Originally Posted by screamineagle
is there a shift kit that will make a neutral bomb not so damaging and how hard is it to do a manual swap i have all the parts actually a whole other car
hahaha, yea neutral drops are hard on the poor trannies. i did that once in my cavalier, then i said never again. as for the tranny swap, i'm all for getting that auto out. i'm just wondering if the ecu would match up for manual/auto. that is, if your donor car is carburated and your car mpfi or vise versa. but yea, if its the same years it should be just basically bolt on and cut your holes...i think. if your going to do the swap, i would put a good clutch in too.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2008 | 12:52 AM
  #40  
screamineagle's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: neosho missouri
Car: 88 firebird t-top
Engine: 2.8l v6
Transmission: four speed
Re: How to make a 2.8L "quick"?

thanks guys yea both motors are exactly the same and they are both 88s only diff is one is a wrecked black hard top and one is blue t-top w/bad tranny(it was already fried so i just finished it off) the ecus dont have any thing to do with it beacouse the motor in mine came out of a 5speed camaro and it worked fine with my auto
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
86White_T/A305
LTX and LSX
0
Aug 17, 2015 12:16 AM
BurlyChev
Tech / General Engine
8
Aug 16, 2015 09:08 PM
mustangman65_79
Body
3
Aug 11, 2015 03:17 PM
gwade12
Tech / General Engine
1
Aug 8, 2015 08:17 AM
z28addict8490
Interior
6
Aug 7, 2015 08:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 AM.