my street racer
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
From: cali
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
edit: non tech content removed, tech content left
Last edited by ede; Nov 13, 2003 at 03:34 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
PFE Headers, custom mandrel bent 2.5" exhaust, high flow muffler, crane 2030 cam, port/polish the heads, and either 75 shot of nitrous, or a turbo boosting 10psi.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
does no body see what i see here? That has to be the nicest looking non-gfxed camaro i've seen in quite some time. Beautiful car, looks great and factory-ish. I'm up for all those same mods listed above, the 2030 sometimes is considered to "mild" by some, and a more aggressive cam is desireable, do a lil' searching just about every major cam company makes performance cams for our cars so it's not hard to find one. The Q is will it work with the computer, tehre'd be nothing wrose then spending all the time putting a cam in only to discover that it screws the comp so bad that it won't run right, ever. You'd probably find more power w/ 10 lbs on a 2.8L but the nitrous will most likely be cheaper, so that's just a "what ya wanna do" if you're gonna do the real deal 2.8 setup, lee can probably help you find out what you're needing, build urself a good platformed engine with all the forgies then swap that one into your ride and equip the turbo charger, your power gains will be incredible.
P.S. Welcome to the boards
P.S. Welcome to the boards
Trending Topics
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by br()bert
GFX SUCK! Nice car..
GFX SUCK! Nice car..
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Wow, AGood, I never realized you had GFX...
I'm kinda partial to them, personally, but I'm not adding them to the '86 due to an urge to be **** about weight.
I'm kinda partial to them, personally, but I'm not adding them to the '86 due to an urge to be **** about weight.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by AGood2.8
Thank you for your educated opinion. Lets see you sucky car without GFX's, can it top this? DIdn't think so- keep your opinions to yourself
Thank you for your educated opinion. Lets see you sucky car without GFX's, can it top this? DIdn't think so- keep your opinions to yourself
hehe, actually, i didnt realize you even had GFX either..
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
This car is a limited edition Calif RS. They were only offered in Calif in '87 and came from the dealer they way you see it (Except the '87 Chrome Irocs I added) Paint is original from the dealer! Most don't know its only a V6 unless I tell them. It intimidates the heck out of most Fords. Some do know their engine tones though, but very few.
Last edited by AGood2.8; Nov 13, 2003 at 04:48 PM.
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
That antenna is areodynamically bent for speed to 132mph
SSHHHHH! It the secret to making a V6 fast.
SSHHHHH! It the secret to making a V6 fast. Last edited by AGood2.8; Nov 13, 2003 at 04:56 PM.
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by Hawk92z-TDZ
Interesting paint sceem. Look's kinda kool
Interesting paint sceem. Look's kinda kool
Edit: theres that 100 mph antenna again
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Wappingers Falls ,NY
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.45
that car looks like its in great shape man, id take care of it and leave the street racing to the kids who wish they had as nice of a car as you do , but instead have moms old humper to work
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
All very nice cars. I persoanlly like the GFX, I think most people do. Non GFX package cars just look naked to me but I have a factory N-GFX car with GFX now but everyone likes thier cars different.
Agood, Ive seen a car with the same paint as yours in a bone yard a few years back, nothing I needed on it so I dident pay much attention to it. Dident know they were factory like that, just thought someone painted it.
Agood, Ive seen a car with the same paint as yours in a bone yard a few years back, nothing I needed on it so I dident pay much attention to it. Dident know they were factory like that, just thought someone painted it.
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by SSC
All very nice cars. I persoanlly like the GFX, I think most people do. Non GFX package cars just look naked to me but I have a factory N-GFX car with GFX now but everyone likes thier cars different.
Agood, Ive seen a car with the same paint as yours in a bone yard a few years back, nothing I needed on it so I dident pay much attention to it. Dident know they were factory like that, just thought someone painted it.
All very nice cars. I persoanlly like the GFX, I think most people do. Non GFX package cars just look naked to me but I have a factory N-GFX car with GFX now but everyone likes thier cars different.
Agood, Ive seen a car with the same paint as yours in a bone yard a few years back, nothing I needed on it so I dident pay much attention to it. Dident know they were factory like that, just thought someone painted it.
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Well since I'm "on Probation" again- they won't let me edit my spelling errors-
The above was ment to say - This car was the FIRST '87 RS Calif edition Camaro that the dealer recieved.
The above was ment to say - This car was the FIRST '87 RS Calif edition Camaro that the dealer recieved.
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
Originally posted by AGood2.8
Thank you for your educated opinion. Lets see you sucky car without GFX's, can it top this? DIdn't think so- keep your opinions to yourself
Thank you for your educated opinion. Lets see you sucky car without GFX's, can it top this? DIdn't think so- keep your opinions to yourself
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
Originally posted by Doward
*dons flame protective suit*
*dons flame protective suit*
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by br()bert
Not flaming just tired of agood with his "better than most" thought process. All i was saying is i think cars without gfx look better. Some say cars with gfx look better. He comes back at me with the negativity as he does alot on here. Seems like he has a hard time taking in peoples opinions, ive seen him act like this over and over on here. Anyways. To the starter of this thread, nice car, dont ever get gfx if your thinking of it.
Not flaming just tired of agood with his "better than most" thought process. All i was saying is i think cars without gfx look better. Some say cars with gfx look better. He comes back at me with the negativity as he does alot on here. Seems like he has a hard time taking in peoples opinions, ive seen him act like this over and over on here. Anyways. To the starter of this thread, nice car, dont ever get gfx if your thinking of it.
What I have done is try to explain to people the better way to go with things and explain why- Unfortunately that seems to offend some people because (fact is) nobody likes to feel they have wasted their money on something. My opinions are always based on facts and experience- which I happen to have alot of when it comes to 3rd gens- (suspension wise- my opinions have been strongly backed/endorsed by Steve Spohn himself)- you want proof- Ask, I'll find the quote)
My statement on the MSD post was NOT that they sucked!
My opinion on the MSD post WAS that they are simply redondant, and not necessary if the other componants are shipshape.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 5
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by AGood2.8
Well since I'm "on Probation" again- they won't let me edit my spelling errors-
Well since I'm "on Probation" again- they won't let me edit my spelling errors-
and before someone bitches about using PMs or email.... i tried... you cant PM someone when they're on probation.
dude, you might want to enable it so people can email you from the board... that way we can still talk to ya...
What I find funny is when ANYONE on here says anything negative, everyone whines and bitches like little 12 year olds on here.
It's the internet, get over it.
MrDude and AGood, you've both pissed lotsa moderators off apparently.
It's the internet, get over it.
MrDude and AGood, you've both pissed lotsa moderators off apparently.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




