swapping a 2.8 for a 4.3....!!!...???
swapping a 2.8 for a 4.3....!!!...???
I was thinking of getting a Bird with a nice body and a blowen 2.8/3.1 V-6 then swapping in the 4.3L V-6 with a 5spd on and auto either way.
just to have a little different cheaply built car that ain't so bad on fuel but still has some power.
i was thinking like a 4.3 TBI with some 3.73 gear's....
just to have a little different cheaply built car that ain't so bad on fuel but still has some power.
i was thinking like a 4.3 TBI with some 3.73 gear's....
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Its been discussed before. You would have to swap as much parts as you would if you were to drop a v8 in.
You would be better off finding a blown 305 RS and dropping a 4.3 infront of that trans. Then quite possibly the ecm would still work on that engine, just modify the prom for it.
You would be better off finding a blown 305 RS and dropping a 4.3 infront of that trans. Then quite possibly the ecm would still work on that engine, just modify the prom for it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Yep. 4.3 is just a 350 minus the #3 and #6 cylinders. Same work as a 350 to get it in there, just smaller.
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Home: Missouri Now: KU
Car: '92 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 Liter v6
Transmission: 700r4 w/shift kit
i agree with dale...find a blown v8 bird and drop the 4.3 in it...no mounts to change and the tranny should bolt right up...
ok well either way ........
I'd still like to do the 4.3l V-6 witch i think they should have done factory as it would have been a better v-6 then the 2.8's in da maro's and da 3.1
s in da bird's.
I'll more then likely never!! buy another 350 F-body again.....
there either poorly maintained and beaten or there way over priced.......
I'm thinking 3 T/A's one with a 406MPI one with a 350TPI and one with a 4.3TBI.....
As i'm starting to get tired of Third gen's..........
i really really want a 67-69 with the 400poncho and 4spd...
slightly tweaked of course
I'd still like to do the 4.3l V-6 witch i think they should have done factory as it would have been a better v-6 then the 2.8's in da maro's and da 3.1
s in da bird's.
I'll more then likely never!! buy another 350 F-body again.....
there either poorly maintained and beaten or there way over priced.......
I'm thinking 3 T/A's one with a 406MPI one with a 350TPI and one with a 4.3TBI.....
As i'm starting to get tired of Third gen's..........
i really really want a 67-69 with the 400poncho and 4spd...
slightly tweaked of course
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
If you're willing to replace the engine, transmission, computer, wiring harness, etc etc etc... should be no problem with the setup. But as noted, a 305 TBI car would be a better platform to start with..
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Originally posted by 91 GTA Ramair2
it would have been a better v-6 then the 2.8's in da maro's and da 3.1
s in da bird's.
it would have been a better v-6 then the 2.8's in da maro's and da 3.1
s in da bird's.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Depends on your area... there's a nice 2.8/A4 for sale, for $500 here. Runs good, too. : /
Originally posted by TechSmurf
Yep. 4.3 is just a 350 minus the #3 and #6 cylinders. Same work as a 350 to get it in there, just smaller.
Yep. 4.3 is just a 350 minus the #3 and #6 cylinders. Same work as a 350 to get it in there, just smaller.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Only reason for any motor to spin a rod bearing in 35k miles is poor workmanship or defective parts.. has absolutely nothing to do with the motor, and especially not a 350, otherwise my 305 with the same crank, rods, and bearings would have gone up in smoke 265k miles ago.
And I picked up my 305 TBI car for 800 with next-to-nothing wrong with it, so it all depends on your area and your connections.
And I picked up my 305 TBI car for 800 with next-to-nothing wrong with it, so it all depends on your area and your connections.
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Temecula, California
Car: Trans Am
Engine: ZZ3 HO
Transmission: 700R-4
to make your swap easier , you'll find many parts out of G-body Monte carlos and El Caminos that came with a 4.3 liter engine. Carb, ecm, and correct motor mounts.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
Aint nothing wrong w/being different, just make dsure you follow thru
having ecm & matching haness doesn't hurt either
having ecm & matching haness doesn't hurt either
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
stock 4.3s aren't all that great either. if you're going to mod one, it might make for a quick car. my dad's s-10 w/ a vortech 4.3 is slower than my car, modded 3.1. the best 1/8 mile he's gotten with 1.6 roller tipped rockers and 3.73 rear gears is a 10.19, i think at like 70 mph. the motor has potential but nearly stock still doesn't do much.
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
At least theres performance parts out there for the 4.3. But it is alot of work just to keep a 6.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
stock 4.3s from trucks aren't going to have a high performance cam in themeither. Look at the 2030 cam for teh 60* mills, you'll see 2 offered, one for low/mid range (good blazer cam) and the other one for upper band power (the f-body).
Originally posted by TechSmurf
Only reason for any motor to spin a rod bearing in 35k miles is poor workmanship or defective parts.. has absolutely nothing to do with the motor, and especially not a 350, otherwise my 305 with the same crank, rods, and bearings would have gone up in smoke 265k miles ago.
And I picked up my 305 TBI car for 800 with next-to-nothing wrong with it, so it all depends on your area and your connections.
Only reason for any motor to spin a rod bearing in 35k miles is poor workmanship or defective parts.. has absolutely nothing to do with the motor, and especially not a 350, otherwise my 305 with the same crank, rods, and bearings would have gone up in smoke 265k miles ago.
And I picked up my 305 TBI car for 800 with next-to-nothing wrong with it, so it all depends on your area and your connections.
the L-98 in my 91 GTA only had 75,000 on it when it spun a rod bearing only 23,800 miles of them was me driving it.......
the 350TBI aka LO-5 had 190K on it when it died of a spun bearing but i only put 27,070 miles on it.....
I had an 81 blazer with 350 2BBL threw #7 rod threw the side in 12,957 miles of me driving it..... the second 350 in it spun 3 rod bearing's....i only put 5,500 miles on that engine... so i junked the truck it had 97,9??miles on it..
Then My 66 chevy c-30 well let's just say they quit warrentying the engine's after 2 year's...
But it popped 4 block's in 2 year's....
now the 66 Chevy C-30 has had a 406 init for the last 5year's still running strong......
the 91 GTA will soon be rolling again with a nice EFIed 406sbc...
the 87 GTA's L-98 seem's to be hanging in there with 120,000 on it....... so i'm hoping it last's...
i wasn't going for a fast v-6 i was going for a durable more stout V-6.. then throwing a set of 3.73's behind it and let it be....
the 350TBI aka LO-5 had 190K on it when it died of a spun bearing but i only put 27,070 miles on it.....
I had an 81 blazer with 350 2BBL threw #7 rod threw the side in 12,957 miles of me driving it..... the second 350 in it spun 3 rod bearing's....i only put 5,500 miles on that engine... so i junked the truck it had 97,9??miles on it..
Then My 66 chevy c-30 well let's just say they quit warrentying the engine's after 2 year's...
But it popped 4 block's in 2 year's....
now the 66 Chevy C-30 has had a 406 init for the last 5year's still running strong......
the 91 GTA will soon be rolling again with a nice EFIed 406sbc...
the 87 GTA's L-98 seem's to be hanging in there with 120,000 on it....... so i'm hoping it last's...
i wasn't going for a fast v-6 i was going for a durable more stout V-6.. then throwing a set of 3.73's behind it and let it be....
The 4.3TBI i was looking at has the 4.3 turbo's cam in it.
fresh rebuild with only 24,000miles on it.
Dude only want's $1,500 for the engine.I think I can get it for $1,200Tho
But then again i might get it free 
The car i found was a 92 RS v-6 with a 5spd for $750.
so for $2,300 i'd have a nice daily beater that is ok power with decent mpg, and look's very awsome.
Just woundering how I could go wrong on the deal??
then down the road if i wanted to drop a 406 in it would just be a bolt in and go type deal....
But if you Don't think it's worth it I'll just pass on the Car and Engine and wait for somthing btter to come along Like a mint 67-69 that just need's a drive line
fresh rebuild with only 24,000miles on it.
Dude only want's $1,500 for the engine.I think I can get it for $1,200Tho
But then again i might get it free 
The car i found was a 92 RS v-6 with a 5spd for $750.
so for $2,300 i'd have a nice daily beater that is ok power with decent mpg, and look's very awsome.
Just woundering how I could go wrong on the deal??
then down the road if i wanted to drop a 406 in it would just be a bolt in and go type deal....
But if you Don't think it's worth it I'll just pass on the Car and Engine and wait for somthing btter to come along Like a mint 67-69 that just need's a drive line
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Tenino, Washington
Car: 89 f-bird and some others
Engine: 3.4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Kinda sounds like you should get the engine, but hold out on a car until you find one for cheap with a blown V8, then do the swap.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Originally posted by 91 GTA Ramair2
The car i found was a 92 RS v-6 with a 5spd for $750.
The car i found was a 92 RS v-6 with a 5spd for $750.
Well it is a runner and driver. it run's and soubnd's great i look's Like a Brand new Paint job or atleast it was well cared for.
Inside and out are like brand new i swear it was just Built .....
I was just thinking " Little V-6 Fairly heavy car "
So i was just thinking for cheap i could have a Nice car with a Decent sized V-6....
Inside and out are like brand new i swear it was just Built .....
I was just thinking " Little V-6 Fairly heavy car "
So i was just thinking for cheap i could have a Nice car with a Decent sized V-6....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
Apr 25, 2016 09:21 PM
C409
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Sep 1, 2015 03:42 PM




