V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Has anyone heard of the turbonator

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 12:29 AM
  #1  
gopeder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: waterford mi/ stationed in Baghdad Iraq
Car: 1985 camaro
Engine: 2.8l just rebuilt.
Transmission: auto rebuilt
Has anyone heard of the turbonator

The turbonator is kinda like a supercharger that is only 70 dollars and supposed to make a noticable gain. Has anyone heard of this or tried it on there 2.8l im realy interested in the results. Thank you.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 12:46 AM
  #2  
kretos's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
From: surrey b.c. canada
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
sounds like a bunch of bs to me

spend the 70 bucks on something else



its turbonator.com or some thing
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 01:15 AM
  #3  
duranged's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: ledyard,ct.
Car: '88 firebird/'98 durango
Engine: 2.8v6/5.2v8
Transmission: 700r4
yeah, i've see it on ebay it's junk spend ur money on a better cam
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 02:06 AM
  #4  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
http://www.turbonator.com/ --- Read this and get drawn into how unbelievably great the product really is.

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/autos/gasave.htm --- Then read what the Federal Trade Commission has to say about this kinda BS product and just how full of crap those guys really are.

And then search for them on TGO, because it's been explained in great technical detail just why they're up to their armpits in ****.

If it sounds too good to be true.......
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 04:00 AM
  #5  
oil pan 4's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 1
From: High plains of NM
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: L98
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Pure crap.
Thank you Federal Trade Commission :hail:
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 04:01 AM
  #6  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
The only place it could help is on a carbed car. where air n fuel mix pretty close.

not gonna help any FI car. the air wont swirl that long, soon as it hits throttle plates, n then the runners, its doin what it wants.



holley sells a smooth plastic lip for their carbs. $50 and it does help, but only cause the air n fuel mixes so close.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 09:23 AM
  #7  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
yeah, I could see possible marginal gains when the fuel's being introduced within 4-6" of the device. Anything to help atomization there wouldn't be a bad thing.. but by the time the air gets anywhere near fuel for the FI versions of these snake oil products, it's gone through so many turns in runners that it's not going to be affected at all...
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 10:34 AM
  #8  
gopeder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: waterford mi/ stationed in Baghdad Iraq
Car: 1985 camaro
Engine: 2.8l just rebuilt.
Transmission: auto rebuilt
thanks guys

it did sound like a load of bs
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 01:18 PM
  #9  
V8 Slayer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 909
Likes: 1
From: New York
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: TH-700-R4
It's the same BS as the "Tornado"
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 04:35 PM
  #10  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
people use to and still run velocity stacks on carbs or on motor cycles, as it helps. but same thing, air n fuel are mixing very close by. Only reason it works/helps.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2005 | 05:47 PM
  #11  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by Gumby
people use to and still run velocity stacks on carbs or on motor cycles, as it helps. but same thing, air n fuel are mixing very close by. Only reason it works/helps.
velocity stacks are a little different they are designed to smooth the air flow into the carb. if you noticed a lot of carbs the intake around them isn't the smoothest so the velocity stacks provide that round shape that is a lot smoother then the sharper edges. look at the demon carbs or even the old ITB designs notice how the edge is all round and smooth


this product is designed the swirl the air and doesn' work as they claim.... it's snake oil :-)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GeneralIesrussi
Carburetors
6
Jun 20, 2024 07:21 PM
db057
TBI
3
Jan 10, 2020 08:55 PM
HoosierinWA
Members Camaros
6
Sep 29, 2015 12:43 PM
mcbitchman
V6
8
Sep 29, 2015 12:32 AM
SS-EXPRESS
Electronics
2
Sep 28, 2015 09:14 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 PM.