Ran a 16.6
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Rochester
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock 3.23 open diff
Ran a 16.6
I just ran a 16.6@84mph. I keep reading things saying how these car are 17 sec cars and but my first time racing I got a 16.6. I only have a gutted airbox and a catback system and a 700R4 trans. I think thats pretty good for being relatively stock
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
From: southern maryland
Car: 2012 Ram express
Engine: 5.7 hemi
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 3.55
Yea i got a 91 firebird 3.1 auto and i hear with the mods i got (same as yours) that ill only run a 17. Do u have t-tops??
Banned
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville, fla
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
just out of curiosity what was your 60ft time?
i ran a 10.8 last weekend with serious traction issues and running really lean on the 1/8th. i haven't gotten down to a 1/4 mile track to run but i should be running about the same if not a little faster. my 1/8th speed was like 65mph. i got the slips at home, but just don't have a digital camera to post them. maybe next paycheck after insurance is due!
i ran a 10.8 last weekend with serious traction issues and running really lean on the 1/8th. i haven't gotten down to a 1/4 mile track to run but i should be running about the same if not a little faster. my 1/8th speed was like 65mph. i got the slips at home, but just don't have a digital camera to post them. maybe next paycheck after insurance is due!
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
It's a decent 60, but you've got room to improve!
At those speeds .1 off your 60 should equate to around .2 off of your 1/4 ET. Do some suspension and maybe another power mod and you can get a quicker short time than a 2.2!
At those speeds .1 off your 60 should equate to around .2 off of your 1/4 ET. Do some suspension and maybe another power mod and you can get a quicker short time than a 2.2!
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by urbanhunter44
It's a decent 60, but you've got room to improve!
At those speeds .1 off your 60 should equate to around .2 off of your 1/4 ET. Do some suspension and maybe another power mod and you can get a quicker short time than a 2.2!
It's a decent 60, but you've got room to improve!
At those speeds .1 off your 60 should equate to around .2 off of your 1/4 ET. Do some suspension and maybe another power mod and you can get a quicker short time than a 2.2!
Banned
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville, fla
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
i got a 2.8 and i am still running about the same times as the 3.1's. if you are running 18's there is something wrong there, the engine isn't running on all 6 or something. that is almost 1.2 seconds off of the normal time of the 6 cyl f bodies!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
From: Long Neck, De
Car: 2002 SS
Engine: Ls1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3:42 posi
at wot it doesnt shift into 3rd So i ran the 1/4 in 1st and 2nd. But still. The car in 1st and 2nd is like a dog.. When i get high in first then it shifts into second it feels like someone just hooked 1000 lbs to my rear
Banned
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville, fla
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
i know alan, he got a serious tranny issue, and the tranny isslipping, the bands are seriously worn out and slipping along with prolly his stall convertor
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
From: Long Neck, De
Car: 2002 SS
Engine: Ls1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3:42 posi
yeah and when say i'm going the mph where its in between 3rd and o.d it doesnt know what to do sometimes. goes back and forth and woes. Also sometimes in 2nd-3rd. I dont want to ruin ur thread cause this is alittle off topic. Here's the slip
r/t-.254
60-2.585-street tires spun bad non-posi rear dont help
330-7.432
1/8-11.480
mph-61.37
1000-15.011
1/4-18.286 @ 64.66
r/t-.254
60-2.585-street tires spun bad non-posi rear dont help
330-7.432
1/8-11.480
mph-61.37
1000-15.011
1/4-18.286 @ 64.66
Banned
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville, fla
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
personally i see where i would be pulling so bad on you, your 60ft time is about what i been running, and yes i been having traction issues too, i would pull almost .5 seconds on you by the 330 ft mark and pull another almost second on you to the 1/8th mile mark, after that i don't know cause i only been able to run 1/8th miles as of yet.
i do the 1/8th at 64.65,
i do the 1/8th at 64.65,
Banned
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville, fla
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
try a tranny flush and change the filter. (i am assuming the 700r4 has one) make sure that you don't got any metal shavings in there!
Banned
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville, fla
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
yea, poor little 6, the mustang runs 120+ on the 1/8th(wiat that is a race prepped, blown, bottle fed, wheel standing beast!)
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally posted by AM91Camaro_RS
lol. its just a v6. its not going to pull 1.9Xs on a stock motor! it'll probably never pull 2.1Xs on a stock motor.
lol. its just a v6. its not going to pull 1.9Xs on a stock motor! it'll probably never pull 2.1Xs on a stock motor.
The 60 foot is the most important part of a race, as well as the hardest and easiest (in some aspects). Most every car with some suspension work a few power mods can pull a 2.1.
Banned
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville, fla
Car: 1987 camaro & 70 mustang
Engine: 2.8l & built 351C
Transmission: borg warner T-5
i don't think so man, am91camaro_rs is the fastest of all of us N/A 6's and the best he can do is a 2.05 even with all the mods i am doing, i doubt that i am gonna be able to get down lower than about 1.85 and that is really pushing it th even thing that i may be able to get down that low!
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
yeah, anywhere even into the 2.1Xs is kind of tough to do with one of these cars! weight transfer is all that you could ask for on my car. so, spinning isn't any issue. the tranny does have some issues but hopefully i can get that fixed before too much longer. i'm not sure if its having any problems when i launch or not though...doesn't really act like it. the car does need tuned, bad! well, computer, not motor. but, like 87blue said....i've only gotten a 2.05 60'.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Rochester
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock 3.23 open diff
Originally posted by V6camaroman
did you run the car at leister dustyjl? i live in dansville and go to leister quite often in the summer.
did you run the car at leister dustyjl? i live in dansville and go to leister quite often in the summer.
I ran at New York International. I think its in Dansville. I live up in Fairport so its about an hour drive for me
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
May 28, 2019 01:47 PM
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
Oct 11, 2015 11:51 PM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
12
Oct 1, 2015 09:50 PM




