Flywheel/flex plate differences...
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Car: 87 Firebird (Hasselhoff special)
Engine: 2.8L of PURE STOCK POWER
Flywheel/flex plate differences...
Is there a difference between the flywheel on an firebird 87 2.8 automatic and an 89 camaro 2.8 5 speed. After swapping motors I get a very noticeable vibration at the tranny. I used my 87 flywheel on the 89 motor. Anyone?
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: The Nest
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
There is a huge difference between a flexplate and a flywheel.
But in regards to your underlying question, there is no difference in balacing between the "87 and '89 cranks, at least there's not supposed to be. The '87 MY was teh first year of the internally balanced 660.
But in regards to your underlying question, there is no difference in balacing between the "87 and '89 cranks, at least there's not supposed to be. The '87 MY was teh first year of the internally balanced 660.
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
89 as far as I have read, is the cut off year. Part year was internal, part year was external.
Even if both are internal. That 87 plate/wheel was balanced per the 87 crank, not the 89.
Even if both are internal. That 87 plate/wheel was balanced per the 87 crank, not the 89.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: The Nest
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Originally posted by Dale
89 as far as I have read, is the cut off year. Part year was internal, part year was external.
Even if both are internal. That 87 plate/wheel was balanced per the 87 crank, not the 89.
89 as far as I have read, is the cut off year. Part year was internal, part year was external.
Even if both are internal. That 87 plate/wheel was balanced per the 87 crank, not the 89.
Besides, with both being internal, the flywheel/flex plate won't care what year crank it's on. The flywheel/flexplate will be nuetrally balanced, in both cases.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
IIRC 1988 was the year of the switch to the internally balanced crankshaft. The symptoms describe also fit a misbalanced flywheel/flexplate perfectly. Unfortunately this mistake will have already dealt its damage to the new engine; expect a reduced main bearing service life. Replace the flywheel/flexplate with a neutrally balanced unit before starting your car again.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Originally posted by Dale
Even if both are internal. That 87 plate/wheel was balanced per the 87 crank, not the 89.
Even if both are internal. That 87 plate/wheel was balanced per the 87 crank, not the 89.
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
ops, I meant external on that post.
As well, if he put it back on the same engine, but wrong clock angle, same problem.
As well, if he put it back on the same engine, but wrong clock angle, same problem. Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: The Nest
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Originally posted by Dale
ops, I meant external on that post.
As well, if he put it back on the same engine, but wrong clock angle, same problem.
ops, I meant external on that post.
As well, if he put it back on the same engine, but wrong clock angle, same problem. Also, it's my understanding that the entire 660 line up changed to the internally balanced design, with the introduction of the genII which was in 1987.
The symptoms do indictae a similar problem, but I have seen this happen even with the proper flywheel/flexplate. IIRC it turned out to be an ignition module or something screwy like that.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
Originally posted by Dale
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: The Nest
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Originally posted by Project: 85 2.8 bird
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...61#post2643261
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...61#post2643261
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
monte87cortez
Transmissions and Drivetrain
2
Sep 26, 2015 08:10 PM





