V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Flywheel/flex plate differences...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 04:39 PM
  #1  
sixbanger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Car: 87 Firebird (Hasselhoff special)
Engine: 2.8L of PURE STOCK POWER
Flywheel/flex plate differences...

Is there a difference between the flywheel on an firebird 87 2.8 automatic and an 89 camaro 2.8 5 speed. After swapping motors I get a very noticeable vibration at the tranny. I used my 87 flywheel on the 89 motor. Anyone?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 06:19 PM
  #2  
The_Raven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: The Nest
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
There is a huge difference between a flexplate and a flywheel.

But in regards to your underlying question, there is no difference in balacing between the "87 and '89 cranks, at least there's not supposed to be. The '87 MY was teh first year of the internally balanced 660.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 07:51 PM
  #3  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
89 as far as I have read, is the cut off year. Part year was internal, part year was external.

Even if both are internal. That 87 plate/wheel was balanced per the 87 crank, not the 89.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 12:16 AM
  #4  
The_Raven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: The Nest
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Originally posted by Dale
89 as far as I have read, is the cut off year. Part year was internal, part year was external.

Even if both are internal. That 87 plate/wheel was balanced per the 87 crank, not the 89.
Change from small journal to large journal was a mid year change, internal/external balancing was at the beginning of the MY.

Besides, with both being internal, the flywheel/flex plate won't care what year crank it's on. The flywheel/flexplate will be nuetrally balanced, in both cases.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 01:46 AM
  #5  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
IIRC 1988 was the year of the switch to the internally balanced crankshaft. The symptoms describe also fit a misbalanced flywheel/flexplate perfectly. Unfortunately this mistake will have already dealt its damage to the new engine; expect a reduced main bearing service life. Replace the flywheel/flexplate with a neutrally balanced unit before starting your car again.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 01:48 AM
  #6  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Originally posted by Dale
Even if both are internal. That 87 plate/wheel was balanced per the 87 crank, not the 89.
This would make no difference. Internally balanced engines use neutral balanced flywheels/flexplates. The definition of neutral, fortunately, is not particularly capable of changing from year to year
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 06:35 AM
  #7  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
ops, I meant external on that post. As well, if he put it back on the same engine, but wrong clock angle, same problem.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 03:42 PM
  #8  
The_Raven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: The Nest
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Originally posted by Dale
ops, I meant external on that post. As well, if he put it back on the same engine, but wrong clock angle, same problem.
Yes, but then you'd have to drill out a few holes so that you could get the bolts to line up. The bolt pattern in the (even neutrally balanced) crankshaft is not a perfectly spaced cicurlar bolt pattern.

Also, it's my understanding that the entire 660 line up changed to the internally balanced design, with the introduction of the genII which was in 1987.

The symptoms do indictae a similar problem, but I have seen this happen even with the proper flywheel/flexplate. IIRC it turned out to be an ignition module or something screwy like that.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 10:40 PM
  #9  
sixbanger's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Car: 87 Firebird (Hasselhoff special)
Engine: 2.8L of PURE STOCK POWER
Whats the easiest way to get the plate off the back of the motor (without taking the motor out of car)?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 06:33 AM
  #10  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
pull the trans.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2005 | 04:57 PM
  #11  
The_Raven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: The Nest
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Originally posted by Dale
pull the trans.
QFT!
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 06:36 AM
  #12  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Originally posted by The_Raven
QFT!
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 06:45 AM
  #13  
Project: 85 2.8 bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
Originally posted by Dale
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...61#post2643261
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 10:05 AM
  #14  
The_Raven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: The Nest
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Originally posted by Project: 85 2.8 bird
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...61#post2643261
I guess that works, but it's actually Quoted For Truth.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #15  
Nocturnall's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, NH
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 191ci 6cyl
Transmission: 700r4
That's what that post says at the very bottom.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
manualbrakes.com
Brakes
63
Apr 9, 2024 11:55 AM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
Oct 5, 2015 10:05 PM
ndndndnd
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
Sep 28, 2015 08:00 AM
mfp189
Transmissions and Drivetrain
1
Sep 27, 2015 09:25 AM
monte87cortez
Transmissions and Drivetrain
2
Sep 26, 2015 08:10 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 AM.