V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

SRT 4 Turbo for a 3.4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 18, 2006 | 05:34 PM
  #1  
Pillsbry10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 3
From: Evansville, IN
Car: 1992 Camaro RS 25th Anniversary
Engine: 3.4L v6 with a t3/t4 Turbo
Transmission: T-5 Conversion
Axle/Gears: 3.23 SLP Limited Slip
SRT 4 Turbo for a 3.4?

well i wasnt really looking for a turbo yet for the 3.4 but one of my friends has a srt4 turbo outtve an 03 neon that hes gonna get rid of with an intercooler...i havent looked at it yet but what do you guys think about me using that on my engine?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2006 | 07:53 PM
  #2  
Six_Shooter's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 18
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Can you get the specs?

I believe it's a Mitsubishi turbo, and will most likely be too small for the 3.4.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2006 | 08:06 PM
  #3  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Unless the car is totalled or majorly trashed, he would be kinda stupid to sell just the turbo and intercooler.

Now if hes upgrading, thats another story.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2006 | 08:53 PM
  #4  
Pillsbry10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 3
From: Evansville, IN
Car: 1992 Camaro RS 25th Anniversary
Engine: 3.4L v6 with a t3/t4 Turbo
Transmission: T-5 Conversion
Axle/Gears: 3.23 SLP Limited Slip
im hoping someone will chim in with the specs i dont know them, probably will look for them lata on....im betting it will be to small as well but wanted to ask

he got it for his neon but isnt gonna use it anymore, it was a custom set up he was working on so he kinda got it off someone who was upgrading
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2006 | 08:54 PM
  #5  
Pillsbry10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 3
From: Evansville, IN
Car: 1992 Camaro RS 25th Anniversary
Engine: 3.4L v6 with a t3/t4 Turbo
Transmission: T-5 Conversion
Axle/Gears: 3.23 SLP Limited Slip
im hoping someone will chim in with the specs i dont know them, probably will look for them lata on....im betting it will be to small as well but wanted to ask

he got it for his neon but isnt gonna use it anymore, it was a custom set up he was working on so he kinda got it off someone who was upgrading
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2006 | 11:22 PM
  #6  
Mike-in-Orange's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Trabuco Canyon, CA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L
Transmission: Auto
I believe the turbo is actually integrated into the exhaust manifold on those cars. It is on the PT Cruiser turbo and those have the same engine except for the intake manifold. I'm about 93.2% sure about this.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 08:09 AM
  #7  
V6sucker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
From what I remember they are a proprietary exhaust flange, (NON standard style)
Factory they are equal to a medium T3 Garret.
Also they are from a 2.4L and only do low 200/230ish on it.
So you are adding 1L and pushing the operational range way low in the RPM band. Meaning you will build boost and overpower it (go way out of its' Eff. range) much faster.

A good choice? I would not reccomend it.

and ^mike, they are not intigrated, they are bolted on. But the flange style is non standard like I said above. Meaning it (the turbo exhaust mount) will need to be custom made.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 10:01 AM
  #8  
Six_Shooter's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 18
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
I just looked on evilBay and found this:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/SRT-4...56846223QQrdZ1

The turbine housing is integrated.


Last edited by Six_Shooter; Apr 19, 2006 at 10:04 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 10:09 AM
  #9  
V6sucker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
Originally Posted by Six_Shooter
well I stand corrected. The pics I had seen they were bolted in.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 10:51 AM
  #10  
Mike-in-Orange's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Trabuco Canyon, CA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L
Transmission: Auto
Originally Posted by V6sucker
From what I remember they are a proprietary exhaust flange, (NON standard style)
Factory they are equal to a medium T3 Garret.
Also they are from a 2.4L and only do low 200/230ish on it.
So you are adding 1L and pushing the operational range way low in the RPM band. Meaning you will build boost and overpower it (go way out of its' Eff. range) much faster.

A good choice? I would not reccomend it.

and ^mike, they are not intigrated, they are bolted on. But the flange style is non standard like I said above. Meaning it (the turbo exhaust mount) will need to be custom made.
Well, Six_Shooter has already confirmed that it is in fact integrated, but let me also correct you (sorry man, sorry!) that, although they only make 240HP from the factory the turbo is good for just over 300HP. The Mopar Stage kits keep the same turbo until you get to Stage 3, then the turbo/manifold is swapped out (along with some other bits). I have the same setup on my PT Cruiser with Stage 1 and I'm making about 260HP and 280lb-ft of torque and running 14.4 in the 1/4.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 02:17 PM
  #11  
Pillsbry10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 3
From: Evansville, IN
Car: 1992 Camaro RS 25th Anniversary
Engine: 3.4L v6 with a t3/t4 Turbo
Transmission: T-5 Conversion
Axle/Gears: 3.23 SLP Limited Slip
yeah i looked at it again and with the pictures it is integrated....just wondered if it would work seeing as i could get it easy...ill keep on the look out for a diffrent turbo
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 06:41 PM
  #12  
V6sucker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
Originally Posted by Mike-in-Orange
Well, Six_Shooter has already confirmed that it is in fact integrated, but let me also correct you (sorry man, sorry!) that, although they only make 240HP from the factory the turbo is good for just over 300HP. The Mopar Stage kits keep the same turbo until you get to Stage 3, then the turbo/manifold is swapped out (along with some other bits). I have the same setup on my PT Cruiser with Stage 1 and I'm making about 260HP and 280lb-ft of torque and running 14.4 in the 1/4.
no correcting needed. I listed factory numbers.
Sure you can put a different WG spring and get more boost.

But that does not change the fact that the turbo is undersized for a 3.4...
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2006 | 10:23 PM
  #13  
Mike-in-Orange's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Trabuco Canyon, CA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L
Transmission: Auto
Originally Posted by V6sucker
no correcting needed. I listed factory numbers.
Sure you can put a different WG spring and get more boost.

But that does not change the fact that the turbo is undersized for a 3.4...
How much boost can you safely run in a 3.4 without building the internals? I know I can hold 15psi with my very modest setup and will soon be holding closer to 18psi with a future mod. I know that on my car I'm getting plenty of fuel up to 20-21psi. Knowing all that are you sure this turbo couldn't feed a 3.4 enough boost to achieve what most people would be looking for? I know you don't boost this high with an engine not designed for it, so I'm just asking. I am more than willing to concede that you may well know a crapload more about this stuff than I do!
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 08:10 AM
  #14  
V6sucker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
Originally Posted by Mike-in-Orange
How much boost can you safely run in a 3.4 without building the internals? I know I can hold 15psi with my very modest setup and will soon be holding closer to 18psi with a future mod. I know that on my car I'm getting plenty of fuel up to 20-21psi. Knowing all that are you sure this turbo couldn't feed a 3.4 enough boost to achieve what most people would be looking for? I know you don't boost this high with an engine not designed for it, so I'm just asking. I am more than willing to concede that you may well know a crapload more about this stuff than I do!
It is not the amount of boost you can build, it is the amount you can do while still staying in the turbo's eff. range.
While yes you maybe able to get the wanted boost level from that turbo, but at what cost performance wise? I will say that most mitsu style factory turbos have a very narrow "good" range. Knowing this you may get that Boost, but only be in the 40% eff. range of the turbo. Meaning it is heating to air so much, that you would have to do some of the following...
Have an enormous intercooler, a VERY large wastegate(extrenal perferred), water injection, CO2 spray bar on intercooler, water spray bar on intercooler something to get the intake temps to something reasonable. And yes, guys have also even hooked the evaporator core from the A/C to their intercooler.

This is where researching flow maps and turbo sizing comes in.
The standard Garret T3 style has 4-5 different hot(exhaust side) sizes, and even more Cold (intake) sizes, due to the fact you can make a Hybrid and use T4 compressors on them. Which is what most small displacement guys do. As the smaller exhaust side means quick spool up, and the very large compressor means that the turbo will have a very large, very good and broad Eff. range.
The fact that they are probly making too much exhaust pressure, which would normally push the turbo out of the eff. range, the broadness and pure size of the compressor side keeps it "o.k.", though you decrease the turbo's lifespan by doing it.

Last edited by V6sucker; Apr 20, 2006 at 08:15 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 05:45 PM
  #15  
Pillsbry10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 3
From: Evansville, IN
Car: 1992 Camaro RS 25th Anniversary
Engine: 3.4L v6 with a t3/t4 Turbo
Transmission: T-5 Conversion
Axle/Gears: 3.23 SLP Limited Slip
anyone know what the size of the stock intercooler is on the srt4....could go ahead and maybe use that though
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 06:10 PM
  #16  
Six_Shooter's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,370
Likes: 18
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
I just happen to have one here, the Core measres 6" x 3" x 23"

The end tanks are a bitch to try and use though, I have cut them off and will be buidling new ones.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2006 | 06:11 PM
  #17  
Pillsbry10's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 3
From: Evansville, IN
Car: 1992 Camaro RS 25th Anniversary
Engine: 3.4L v6 with a t3/t4 Turbo
Transmission: T-5 Conversion
Axle/Gears: 3.23 SLP Limited Slip
hmm...what did you pay for yours?

also any pics of it?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 02:23 AM
  #18  
Stealthy-One's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC metro
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 700r4 auto
Axle/Gears: huh?? guessing stock.
If trying to Turbo the six, why not look into a 16G or 20G from Mitsu? I mention this as look what some of the Eclipse/Lancer guys are pushing with thier 2.0 I4's. 3-400? I know the Forced Performance Lancer was pushing over 800, but I cant remember if it was a 20G or not.....

That being said, how hard is it to add Forced Induction to these cars? I ask as I am selling my Dodge Stealth next weekend to ickup a 86 Camaro with a 2.8 v-6. at least that is what I was told is in it. Ill find out on Monday when I go drive the darn ting.

Mike S.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cheesehomer
Power Adders
91
Dec 31, 2015 08:48 AM
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM
beltran89
Theoretical and Street Racing
46
Oct 7, 2015 07:36 PM
bjpotter
History / Originality
17
Oct 4, 2015 07:48 PM
92projectcamaro
Engine Swap
4
Sep 29, 2015 07:07 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 AM.