V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

This is how NOT to swap in a 3.4L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 07:10 PM
  #1  
67 Camaro 88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 718
Likes: 1
From: Hliðskjálf / Pensacola, FL
Car: Camaro
Engine: 3800
Transmission: T5
This is how NOT to swap in a 3.4L

I was at the junkyard today and before snagging some cheap, needed parts I was amazed to find this. First time i've seen someone else's car with a 3.4 in it. But, seriously... I hope none of you guys are doing anything like this if you're swapping wires (pardon the subpar quality... I don't bring my camera to junkyards, just my phone... ):




there's a stick plugging a pipe... looked to be a/c, but I dunno? Why would it be plugged with a stick?

Last edited by 67 Camaro 88; Jan 8, 2007 at 07:50 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 07:29 PM
  #2  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Holy crap. So they attempted a full SFI swap it looks like.

Thats not what my SFI swap looked like in my s10. I was told it looked factory accept for the intake tube.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 07:37 PM
  #3  
Mdenz3's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: Northwest SC
Car: 91 RS
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
i love the coilpacks mounted on the fire wall
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 09:15 PM
  #4  
Kevman's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 3
From: Windsor Ontario
Car: 1987 Firebird Formula
Engine: 2004 LQ4
Transmission: T-5 WC
Axle/Gears: 3.42
What a mess, my cousin will love these pics, he wants to put a 3.4 into his Cavalier..
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 10:10 PM
  #5  
drdave88's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 6
From: Waterford, MI
Car: 1998 Camaro Z28
Engine: 6.0L
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
is it just me or do the pics not work anymore?
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 10:57 PM
  #6  
coolrimsatleast's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Tenino, Washington
Car: 89 f-bird and some others
Engine: 3.4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I can see the pictures. I wonder if it ran better than my 3.4 though.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 11:00 PM
  #7  
Leo_padakin's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: somewheres is houston
Car: 1985 reliant saloon
Engine: 2.2 pile of metal
Transmission: 3 on the tree
Axle/Gears: so tall theres no point
lmao, thats good ole "back wood" engineering at its best
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 11:09 PM
  #8  
Project: 85 2.8 bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
he copied my idea of putting the coil paks there when I had teh 3800 in, the bastage.

Other than that....... I'm speechless....... none of my swaps never looked that piece of shitaki mushroom
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 12:09 AM
  #9  
Six_Shooter's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,367
Likes: 15
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Originally Posted by Kevman
What a mess, my cousin will love these pics, he wants to put a 3.4 into his Cavalier..

That would be a 3400, not a 3.4, there is a large difference. Besides the 3400 swaps end up lookig pretty much stock and run off the original 2.8 or 3.1 ECM.

www.domesticcrew.com Site dedicated to that very swap.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 12:53 AM
  #10  
Bluejae's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Topeka, Kansas
Car: 1988 Formula 350
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Until proven wrong, I'm going to beg to differ on it being a 3400. For starters I have a '94 with a 3.4. My motor is completely stock and looks identical to that. Secondly if that was a true 3400, then why in the hell would they put the lousy 3.4 heads and intake on the 3400 block. The typical swap for the 3.4 f-body, if your staying six cylinder, is to get the 3400 top end and put that on the 3.4 block. Of course you have to run different pistons and all that junk, but the 3400 fwd motors where a better designed motor in terms of flow in the heads and intake. Lastly if it were a 3400 motor that was completely stock and just dropped in there, the intake would be entirely different and would actually say 3400 on it instead of 3.4, but I might be wrong seeings how I don't know this car at all. I'm just judging from the pictures.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 05:21 AM
  #11  
drdave88's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 6
From: Waterford, MI
Car: 1998 Camaro Z28
Engine: 6.0L
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
i think he was referring to the person who was talking about putting a 3.4 in the cavalier. he meant that a 3400 goes into the cavy, not a 3.4. that is a 3.4 in the pics.


Originally Posted by Bluejae
Until proven wrong, I'm going to beg to differ on it being a 3400. For starters I have a '94 with a 3.4. My motor is completely stock and looks identical to that. Secondly if that was a true 3400, then why in the hell would they put the lousy 3.4 heads and intake on the 3400 block. The typical swap for the 3.4 f-body, if your staying six cylinder, is to get the 3400 top end and put that on the 3.4 block. Of course you have to run different pistons and all that junk, but the 3400 fwd motors where a better designed motor in terms of flow in the heads and intake. Lastly if it were a 3400 motor that was completely stock and just dropped in there, the intake would be entirely different and would actually say 3400 on it instead of 3.4, but I might be wrong seeings how I don't know this car at all. I'm just judging from the pictures.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 11:21 AM
  #12  
Blue1989RS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA
Car: 1989 RS
Engine: 3.1L + .060" overbore
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.11, Auburn LSD
Wow, thats wack. My LT1 swap was kinda hack, but looks way better than that!
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 12:50 PM
  #13  
rover420's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: amherstburg (windsor) Ontario Canada
Car: 88 camaro
Engine: 3.4
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: limited slip posi 3.42
wow that red electical tap really looks good on it to
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 06:54 PM
  #14  
xplane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Car: 85 camaro sport coupe
Engine: 2.8 MFI
Transmission: v6 700R4 wish it was a 5spd Stick
Axle/Gears: Stock non posi 3.42s
Id like to swap over the whole SFI system as well as the 3.4 but im not goin that far unless i switch to the FWD heads.

I bet all swaps look like that at some point during the process looks like they just got burned out on the whole thing. the wood thing is kinda funny tho.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 12:00 AM
  #15  
Six_Shooter's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,367
Likes: 15
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Originally Posted by drdave88
i think he was referring to the person who was talking about putting a 3.4 in the cavalier. he meant that a 3400 goes into the cavy, not a 3.4. that is a 3.4 in the pics.

Yes, I was refering to the specific poster, not the pictures that started this thread.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 12:34 AM
  #16  
Bluejae's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Topeka, Kansas
Car: 1988 Formula 350
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
That's cool, just at the time seemed like you were talking about the pictures.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 12:40 AM
  #17  
2_point8_boy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
Originally Posted by rover420
wow that red electical tap really looks good on it to
They should have used light blue tape and wrote Type-S on it...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
E Rod
LTX and LSX
5
Aug 28, 2015 05:17 AM
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
2
Aug 22, 2015 06:52 PM
Hello, Michael
Engine Swap
8
Aug 20, 2015 03:19 PM
jharrison5
Engine Swap
5
Aug 19, 2015 05:53 PM
355sbcTPI
Electronics
2
Aug 19, 2015 04:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 AM.