V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

why not a 4.3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 05:47 PM
  #1  
bahsarie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: chicago, il
Car: 89 IROC-Z T-top C&C
Engine: 350
why not a 4.3?

why not swap a 4.3L? why stop at 3.4?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 07:15 PM
  #2  
KrisW's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 7
From: Casselberry, FLA
Car: 88 V6 'bird/89TBI bird/85 T/A
Engine: 2.8/TBI/TPI
Transmission: V8 T-5/700R4 x2
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open/2.73 open/ 3.27 9 bolt
I honestly haven't heard of anyone taking the time. You need a V8 transmission because of the bellhousing bolt pattern and V8 motor mounts that are slid back just a tad...

If you were swapping a carb'd 2.8 it'd be pretty straight forward; I don't know of a factory MPFI manifold for a 90* Chevy V6 so you'd probably have to use a TBI system on a budget or have a factory aluminum TBI intake modified for the injectors. Then you need to tune the ECM...

I think most people just go V8 for that much effort.

Prove them wrong and do it!!

Last edited by KrisW; Feb 25, 2007 at 08:09 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 07:30 PM
  #3  
bahsarie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: chicago, il
Car: 89 IROC-Z T-top C&C
Engine: 350
well the tbi setup could be from a blazer i know my bravada has a 4.3 with tbi, there is also the vortec version which stock puts out about 200, and there are tools out there to modify them becuase if you look at the typhoon, and cyclone are producing some good power i think 275. for a trans couldnt you use one from a blazer/jimmy that is only 2wd? I'm just wondering becuase i do not know much.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 08:08 PM
  #4  
KrisW's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 7
From: Casselberry, FLA
Car: 88 V6 'bird/89TBI bird/85 T/A
Engine: 2.8/TBI/TPI
Transmission: V8 T-5/700R4 x2
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open/2.73 open/ 3.27 9 bolt
You could use an s-truck automatic if you swap your f-car tailshaft housing on so that you have your torque arm mount.

I know TBI setups are plentiful... I have 3 or 4 in my garage now from s-truck 4.3s... it's just that you have to change ECM tuning to run it right...
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 09:56 PM
  #5  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
4.3 parts are expensive. with the exception of highly modified ones, they aren't that powerful. cyclones and typhoons are turbo charged, stock. and a v8 tranny from a f-body will work... doesn't have to be from an s-series.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 10:00 PM
  #6  
firstfirebird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,413
Likes: 2
From: South FL
Not to mention, to swap from a 2.8/3.x to a 4.3 would require a 90 degree transmission (ie from a V8).
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 10:11 PM
  #7  
bahsarie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: chicago, il
Car: 89 IROC-Z T-top C&C
Engine: 350
Originally Posted by AM91Camaro_RS
4.3 parts are expensive. with the exception of highly modified ones, they aren't that powerful. cyclones and typhoons are turbo charged, stock. and a v8 tranny from a f-body will work... doesn't have to be from an s-series.
how much are we talking as expensive? for vortecs are not that hard to come by and neither are s-series or blazer-jimmy trans to hard either my local junkyard has a couple.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 10:35 PM
  #8  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
i don't know exactly on prices. but, i do know that cams are a little more expensive than even cams for the 60* v6s. you won't be able to buy headers for a 4.3 in a camaro/bird...that I know of. They'd have to be custom made most likely. I mean, it'd be cool to see it done but I know I couldn't justify the time or money to do a v8 swap plus more work to still have a v6 in the car.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2007 | 11:02 PM
  #9  
Six_Shooter's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,367
Likes: 15
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Because 4.3s are junk.

Every 4.3 I've raced, including ones with forced induction are slower than my cheaply built, junk yard parts sourced 3.2L.

This is also shown by the numerous people that try and make thier S-series "fast", with a supercharger , or nitrous, and even some turbo set-ups, that run a measly low 15 to high 14. I'm into the 13s with an S-series SUV, so that makes 660 > 4.3.

If I were to go through the trouble of swapping over to the parts need for a 4.3, I'd go SBC, but I'd probably actualy go for an LSx, due to teh lighter over all and more efficient package.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CODY BEHNKE
Tech / General Engine
6
Nov 6, 2001 09:19 PM
GreenMachine92rs
V6
8
Aug 2, 2001 09:48 PM
gemmefire
V6
19
Mar 16, 2001 06:32 PM
gemmefire
Engine Swap
2
Mar 13, 2001 08:22 PM
PONTIMANIAC 90
V6
3
Dec 20, 2000 07:56 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.