3.1 Headers?
3.1 Headers?
Ok from what I've read it looks like the Pacesetter headers for the 2.8 will fit in my 1991 firebird with the 3.1. Is this true? Has any one here done this? If so, what are some good tips on installing them, is it easy to do myself or have a shop do it, any problems you ran into with them, and what would be some of the best cats and cat back sytems to bolt up to it.
thanks
thanks
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Car: 89 V6 Camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open diff
Re: 3.1 Headers?
Soak the old bolts in PB Blaster overnight so that you don't break them. You will have to loose your AIR pump, you may need a shorter belt. slip the headers on with Felpro gaskets, not the cheap ones they send with them and get a Dynomax cat-back, it has all new piping ar 2.5" and it doesn't sound too bad. Also I would get a highflow cat off of ebay for pretty cheap and call it a day.
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Inglewood, CA
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: stock, dynomax turbo exhaust
Re: 3.1 Headers?
I called pacesetter and asked them the same thing, they said it would not work on my 3.1, but some people have told me that it can, I havn't bought them for the simple fact that I'm not sure which is the correct answer.
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 262
Likes: 8
From: Toronto, Ontario Canada
Car: '88 Camaro / '91 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L MPFI V6 / 3.1 MPFI V6
Transmission: 700R4 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: ??? / 3.23's
Re: 3.1 Headers?
They will bolt up to a 3.1 but you have to remove the smog pump...
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Re: 3.1 Headers?
Pace is saying that to cover there ***. I installed the very first set on a 3.4 in a 1991 model.
A few weeks ago, I posted my typed up directions on how to bolt them that use to be on my website that I closed.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/v6/4...t=#post3540528
A few weeks ago, I posted my typed up directions on how to bolt them that use to be on my website that I closed.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/v6/4...t=#post3540528
Last edited by Dale; Dec 5, 2007 at 11:45 AM.
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles,California
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: V6 MFI 3.1
Transmission: 700R
Axle/Gears: Stock 3.23
Re: 3.1 Headers?
Problem is if you live in a state where you need emissions testing you won't be able to pass it w/o the AIR pump
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: Automatic
Re: 3.1 Headers?
You will not loose your smog pump. You have to take it off to get the header in there and then you put it back on. You do have to remove the tubes on the back of the smog pump. There is no other way to route the belt. Ive seen me do it, and the car is in the garage.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Western PA
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1/3100 in progress...Turbo Soon
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 3.1 Headers?
I thought the smog tube routing was different for the 2.8 and 3.1. I thought that the 2.8 had one tube for every exhaust port and the 3.1 had one tube.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Car: 89 V6 Camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open diff
Re: 3.1 Headers?
The 2.8 doesn't have any kind of tubes comming from the exhaust. There is the EGR valve that has one big tube from the valve to the intake. Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Western PA
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1/3100 in progress...Turbo Soon
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 3.1 Headers?
The tubes that inject the air, from the smog pump, into the manifolds. Mabye Im thinking of the V8s.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Car: 89 V6 Camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open diff
Re: 3.1 Headers?
You are thinking of the V8s. They have those seperate small tubing for the AIR injection.
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Car: 89 V6 Camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open diff
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 firebird/1990 firebird
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
Re: 3.1 Headers?
Ok from what I've read it looks like the Pacesetter headers for the 2.8 will fit in my 1991 firebird with the 3.1. Is this true? Has any one here done this? If so, what are some good tips on installing them, is it easy to do myself or have a shop do it, any problems you ran into with them, and what would be some of the best cats and cat back sytems to bolt up to it.
thanks
thanks
They will fit with some minor alterations. I installed a set on to my '91 firebird last year without too many problems. You should be able to do them yourself with some sockets and short wrenches. Both sides will go in from the top. The driver's side, you will have to take off the power steering pump and if I remember right one of the 2 back bolts either doesn't go in or doesn't tighten all the way when reinstalling the pump. On the passenger's side, you will have to pull the smog pump and slide it in from the front. The back half of the smog pump will be in the way, so just unbolt it and take it off. You need to have the pulley there because of the serpentine belt routing so that much will have to stay. The back bracket of the alternator will have to go as well. I can get pics later if you need them.
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Re: 3.1 Headers?
fictmich, sounds like you did alot of extra work. Only thing I removed was an alternator.
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 firebird/1990 firebird
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
Re: 3.1 Headers?
Maybe your setup was different? The power steering pump was mounted to the exhaust manifold so that had to move out of the way, along with the alternator bracket. Then the back of the smog pump was in the way of the primary for #1, didn't have a plug in for it anyway in the headers.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
Car: 89 V6 Camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open diff
Re: 3.1 Headers?
I had to pull the power steering pump too. It has a bracket on the back that attaches to where one of the header bolts is.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Car: 1985 Camaro, 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L carbed and 5.0L TPI
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 and 3.27 posi
Re: 3.1 Headers?
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
Re: 3.1 Headers?
pretty much a direct bolt in, just use the 2.8L accessories (bracketry, manifolds, etc.)
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: 3.1 Headers?
For a simple answer, yes, the 2.8l and 3.1l engines are identical for all intents and purposes, the 3.1l is merely a stroked 2.8. From what I read skimming through the posts, how easy or complicated it will be is going to depend on year, and transmission.
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 3.1 Headers?
Resurrecting an old thread here. I just ordered a set of Pacesetter Headers. P/N 70-1206. These supposedly bolt-on to the 2.8L V6 Engine, I have a 3.1 V6, and as was already stated the engines are identical to a large degree. With that being said, will these headers bolt on with little to no altercations, or was the purchase more trouble than what its worth.
Also for a backstory, I am, or at least starting a budget rebuild of my 3.1 V6. While so many people just buy these cars and throw a 350/383 in them, I am choosing to keep my RS as original as possible, while squeezing out all performance that I can. I estimate to increase the est. 140 hp to at least 235 once completed.
Also for a backstory, I am, or at least starting a budget rebuild of my 3.1 V6. While so many people just buy these cars and throw a 350/383 in them, I am choosing to keep my RS as original as possible, while squeezing out all performance that I can. I estimate to increase the est. 140 hp to at least 235 once completed.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: 3.1 Headers?
As long as they are for a 3rd gen v6 they should bolt up just fine.
Also just fyi, hitting 235 is not likely without going hybrid or boost. Or a pretty radical NA build that wouldn't be very street friendly or cost effective.
Also just fyi, hitting 235 is not likely without going hybrid or boost. Or a pretty radical NA build that wouldn't be very street friendly or cost effective.
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,287
Likes: 41
From: Northwest Ohio
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: Lq4 6.0 SBE s485 turbo E85
Transmission: Fsi th400 stage 4. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
Re: 3.1 Headers?
I dont know a ton about modding these engine to the extreme, But i do know that i massivly ported the heads, cam, and stuff like that and im sure i didnt end up with more then 155-160hp crank total, if i was really lucky. Am91Camaro_rs did a good job at making a fast N/A car that ran low 15's and even 14's in the quarter mile, but that was with some high comp ratio....10.?:1 i think, large stall conv. So its possible to make 200hp im sure but 235 is a stretch! Exspecially if your on any sort of budget!! Im hoping for those numbers(235Hp) with a turbo
Last edited by fasteddi; Jan 22, 2012 at 11:59 AM.
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 3.1 Headers?
Alright sweet thanks. I had done some research before hand, and taken some measurements. But I wasn't too sure, and figured I'd ask.
I suppose 235 is pretty optimistic. I was planning on tearing the engine out and sending it out to a local machine shop to have it torn down and checked out. I was looking at doing a 3x00 top end swap, and switching out the plenums, along with the headers and a magnaflow exhaust.
I suppose 235 is pretty optimistic. I was planning on tearing the engine out and sending it out to a local machine shop to have it torn down and checked out. I was looking at doing a 3x00 top end swap, and switching out the plenums, along with the headers and a magnaflow exhaust.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: 3.1 Headers?
Just fyi, if you go hybrid, the headers won't work, not unless you can modify them to anyway, 3x00 heads use D shaped exhaust ports, I think its a different size as well.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,240
Likes: 6
From: LeRoy, NY
Car: 2003 Hyundai Tiburon GT
Engine: 2.7L V6
Transmission: 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.41
Re: 3.1 Headers?
2. 3x00 pretty much requires use of headers with 1 5/8" primaries (measured the ports). Pacesetters have 1 1/2" primaries.
The ONLY headers I can see working on a 3x00 would be RKSport 3.4 1993-95 headers (1 5/8 primaries and $200 more), but I can't get anyone to confirm if they need to be modified to work in a thirdgen chassis. As soon as I can get an answer, I'm going with one or the other (3100 hybrid in the garage only needing pushrods and rockers, which will be bought within the next couple weeks, waiting for the body to be finished).
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: 3.1 Headers?
the bolt spacing is a little larger vertically however you can just oval the holes and they'll bolt up fine.
The issue is that headers for gen 1 heads are usually 1.5" primaries, there will be a little overlap of the corners when used on gen 3 heads. This shouldn't stop you though, I've used the very same combo on a set of longtubes (gen 1 flanges with 1.5" primaries) that went onto a cammed, P&P'd 3400 and it's been daily driven like that for several years with no issues.
It put down about 245 WHP with a 5 speed.
The issue is that headers for gen 1 heads are usually 1.5" primaries, there will be a little overlap of the corners when used on gen 3 heads. This shouldn't stop you though, I've used the very same combo on a set of longtubes (gen 1 flanges with 1.5" primaries) that went onto a cammed, P&P'd 3400 and it's been daily driven like that for several years with no issues.
It put down about 245 WHP with a 5 speed.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,240
Likes: 6
From: LeRoy, NY
Car: 2003 Hyundai Tiburon GT
Engine: 2.7L V6
Transmission: 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.41
Re: 3.1 Headers?
the bolt spacing is a little larger vertically however you can just oval the holes and they'll bolt up fine.
The issue is that headers for gen 1 heads are usually 1.5" primaries, there will be a little overlap of the corners when used on gen 3 heads. This shouldn't stop you though, I've used the very same combo on a set of longtubes (gen 1 flanges with 1.5" primaries) that went onto a cammed, P&P'd 3400 and it's been daily driven like that for several years with no issues.
It put down about 245 WHP with a 5 speed.
The issue is that headers for gen 1 heads are usually 1.5" primaries, there will be a little overlap of the corners when used on gen 3 heads. This shouldn't stop you though, I've used the very same combo on a set of longtubes (gen 1 flanges with 1.5" primaries) that went onto a cammed, P&P'd 3400 and it's been daily driven like that for several years with no issues.
It put down about 245 WHP with a 5 speed.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: 3.1 Headers?
Personally if it were me, I would probably get the header flange piece from wot tech, cut the flanges off the pacesetters and graft the wot tech flange on, probably the easiest way to go about it, obviously would take a little more work than that getting the pipes to fit the flange right, but easier than starting from scratch and figuring out the routing and all that crap at least.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: 3.1 Headers?
The wot-tech D shaping tool is for 1 5/8" primaries (Mars still has mine.. lol)
If you wanted it to be better then i'd cut a little over an inch back past the old flange, D shape the ends of 6, 2" pieces of 1 5/8" tubing, slide them in the new flanges and then slide the pacesetters into the bigger pipes. Weld it all up solid and have them re-coated. Not truly a stepped tube header but the transition would be smoother.
Here are the longtubes that i built for a friends car..

and on the car (94 Cavalier Z24)

Never any leaks, we used standard GM MLS exhaust gaskets for the 3x00. He's probably put 30K+ miles on the car since we installed them. The coating isn't that shiny anymore though.. haha
If you wanted it to be better then i'd cut a little over an inch back past the old flange, D shape the ends of 6, 2" pieces of 1 5/8" tubing, slide them in the new flanges and then slide the pacesetters into the bigger pipes. Weld it all up solid and have them re-coated. Not truly a stepped tube header but the transition would be smoother.
Here are the longtubes that i built for a friends car..

and on the car (94 Cavalier Z24)

Never any leaks, we used standard GM MLS exhaust gaskets for the 3x00. He's probably put 30K+ miles on the car since we installed them. The coating isn't that shiny anymore though.. haha
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: 3.1 Headers?
The wot-tech D shaping tool is for 1 5/8" primaries (Mars still has mine.. lol)
If you wanted it to be better then i'd cut a little over an inch back past the old flange, D shape the ends of 6, 2" pieces of 1 5/8" tubing, slide them in the new flanges and then slide the pacesetters into the bigger pipes. Weld it all up solid and have them re-coated. Not truly a stepped tube header but the transition would be smoother.
If you wanted it to be better then i'd cut a little over an inch back past the old flange, D shape the ends of 6, 2" pieces of 1 5/8" tubing, slide them in the new flanges and then slide the pacesetters into the bigger pipes. Weld it all up solid and have them re-coated. Not truly a stepped tube header but the transition would be smoother.
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,287
Likes: 41
From: Northwest Ohio
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: Lq4 6.0 SBE s485 turbo E85
Transmission: Fsi th400 stage 4. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
Re: 3.1 Headers?
The wot-tech D shaping tool is for 1 5/8" primaries (Mars still has mine.. lol)
If you wanted it to be better then i'd cut a little over an inch back past the old flange, D shape the ends of 6, 2" pieces of 1 5/8" tubing, slide them in the new flanges and then slide the pacesetters into the bigger pipes. Weld it all up solid and have them re-coated. Not truly a stepped tube header but the transition would be smoother.
Here are the longtubes that i built for a friends car..

and on the car (94 Cavalier Z24)

Never any leaks, we used standard GM MLS exhaust gaskets for the 3x00. He's probably put 30K+ miles on the car since we installed them. The coating isn't that shiny anymore though.. haha
If you wanted it to be better then i'd cut a little over an inch back past the old flange, D shape the ends of 6, 2" pieces of 1 5/8" tubing, slide them in the new flanges and then slide the pacesetters into the bigger pipes. Weld it all up solid and have them re-coated. Not truly a stepped tube header but the transition would be smoother.
Here are the longtubes that i built for a friends car..

and on the car (94 Cavalier Z24)

Never any leaks, we used standard GM MLS exhaust gaskets for the 3x00. He's probably put 30K+ miles on the car since we installed them. The coating isn't that shiny anymore though.. haha
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Elephantismo
Electronics
14
Feb 13, 2019 12:51 AM
redformula88
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Oct 14, 2015 06:08 PM







