V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 06:55 PM
  #1  
vargasjc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Please help me out, I have been told a lot of bad stuff about this headers.
If someone has ever installed some on their v6...

I was just wondering...are they a good fit?
I read somewhere in the internet that they really dont fit and look like they werent even made for the 2.8 engine...please help me out

Also...did you notice anything different than with the stock headers?

Reply
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 07:30 PM
  #2  
GTA50's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: Chilliwack, B.C., Canada
Car: '88 GTA, '89, '94 Firebird, '84 T/A
Engine: 5.0L TPI (GTA); '89 -2.8; '94 -3.4
Transmission: 5 speed (for all 3),auto for T/A
Axle/Gears: 3.45 (GTA only)
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Something tells you that you may get whacked for posting in multiple threads. However, be that as it may, many people on this site have installed these headers with no problems. The following thread contains much information about fitting these headers - especially for those with AIR pumps and manual transmissions.

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/v6/4...r-headers.html

I've had them on for about two months now and no problems any different that with any other manufacturer's headers. Keep in mind that, in my opinion, there seems to be a slight difference in factory specs versus aftermarket specs. So, you may end up using two gaskets versus one for example to get good sealing. Let's see what others say.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 07:54 PM
  #3  
bmxerboi221's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Cumming, GA
Car: 1988 Firebird
Engine: soon to be 3.4/3400
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Only problem i had was blowing out header gaskets every couple months but i fixed that with the old VW bug header gaskets. (do a search and you will find what im talking about) Oh and my EGR bolt holes did not line up but 5 min with a drill fixed that
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 08:15 PM
  #4  
vargasjc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Originally Posted by bmxerboi221
Only problem i had was blowing out header gaskets every couple months but i fixed that with the old VW bug header gaskets. (do a search and you will find what im talking about) Oh and my EGR bolt holes did not line up but 5 min with a drill fixed that
did you notice any performance...mpg increase at all??
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 08:16 PM
  #5  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

I got the very first set ever made. I posted pics and the issues I had.


But considering they are the only production headers made for these cars, what are your other choices?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2009 | 08:29 PM
  #6  
vargasjc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Originally Posted by Dale
I got the very first set ever made. I posted pics and the issues I had.


But considering they are the only production headers made for these cars, what are your other choices?
Do you have a link to your post or is there a way you could post the pics here and describe the issues? did you notice any performance increase or anything...well my other option would be to just keep the stock ones
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 06:06 AM
  #7  
drdave88's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 6
From: Waterford, MI
Car: 1998 Camaro Z28
Engine: 6.0L
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Ive had mine for over 3 years and once i replaced the gaskets that it came with (they blew out in a few weeks) with felpro ones and got locking header bolts, everything has been fine.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 07:15 AM
  #8  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/v6/2...tml?highlight=

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/v6/2...tml?highlight=

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/v6/2...tml?highlight=

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/v6/2...tml?highlight=
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 04:04 PM
  #9  
bmxerboi221's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Cumming, GA
Car: 1988 Firebird
Engine: soon to be 3.4/3400
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Not really the car runs a little richer but thats to be expected, i probably gained 5-10 horses if that lol, but it does sound a little better
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 10:49 PM
  #10  
GTA50's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: Chilliwack, B.C., Canada
Car: '88 GTA, '89, '94 Firebird, '84 T/A
Engine: 5.0L TPI (GTA); '89 -2.8; '94 -3.4
Transmission: 5 speed (for all 3),auto for T/A
Axle/Gears: 3.45 (GTA only)
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Can't really say that I got a great increase in performance as I did a pretty radical build on the engine (went stroker, cam, port and polish, CAI, etc and also opening up the exhaust). So, it's in there somewhere with the other mods.

On the other hand, it sounds great. I went with the ceramic coating and it seems to have held up pretty good so far. Installation was pretty straightforward - although the instructions are poor.

They do run a little rich, as mentioned above. I set my timing to 12 degrees and also put in a heated oxygen sensor and I now idle about 700 rpm as I did prior.

Gary.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 11:01 PM
  #11  
vargasjc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Originally Posted by GTA50
Can't really say that I got a great increase in performance as I did a pretty radical build on the engine (went stroker, cam, port and polish, CAI, etc and also opening up the exhaust). So, it's in there somewhere with the other mods.

On the other hand, it sounds great. I went with the ceramic coating and it seems to have held up pretty good so far. Installation was pretty straightforward - although the instructions are poor.

They do run a little rich, as mentioned above. I set my timing to 12 degrees and also put in a heated oxygen sensor and I now idle about 700 rpm as I did prior.

Gary.
How did you manage to set/change the timing?
also..what gaskets do you recommend?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 07:54 AM
  #12  
GTA50's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: Chilliwack, B.C., Canada
Car: '88 GTA, '89, '94 Firebird, '84 T/A
Engine: 5.0L TPI (GTA); '89 -2.8; '94 -3.4
Transmission: 5 speed (for all 3),auto for T/A
Axle/Gears: 3.45 (GTA only)
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

I went with the Fel-pro gaskets.

To set timing, there is a connector by the firewall on the passenger side with two brown wires going into it if I recall correctly.

To set the timing (of course have the engine at operating temperature):

Paint the notch on the crank pulley with some white paint or use white chalk.
Connect your timing light to #1 plug wire (front of engine, passenger side), disconnect the two brown wires, loosen the distributor retaining bolt and adjust timing by rotating the distributor as for any other car. Look for the white mark to line up with the timing marks to set what you want for timing (stock is 10 degrees). When done, tighten the distributor bolt and connect the brown wires.

Typing kind of quick here, but I think that covers it.

Hope that helps.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 10:01 AM
  #13  
bmxerboi221's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Cumming, GA
Car: 1988 Firebird
Engine: soon to be 3.4/3400
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Originally Posted by vargasjc
How did you manage to set/change the timing?
also..what gaskets do you recommend?
Use 1971 vw beetle gaskets
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/v6/4...kets+vw+header
http://www.fullthrottlev6.com/forums...2&postcount=15
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 11:04 PM
  #14  
bl85c's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
From: right behind you
Car: '85 maro
Engine: In the works...
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

If you care to do a little bending s-10 headers from hedmann will fit. That's what I did on mine. You'll need a custom y-pipe though, obviously won't line up with the stock exhaust.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 01:34 PM
  #15  
coolrimsatleast's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Tenino, Washington
Car: 89 f-bird and some others
Engine: 3.4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

The crossover section under the engine was about 2" too long. Had it shortened, problem solved.

You'll probably also need a heated o2. I did, and some others did too.

I can't tell about any performance gains. I installed them with a new 3.4, and I'm still having issues with the computer, and keep procrastinating on ordering the stuff for the 165 swap. That and I hit an elk so now I have a bunch of body damage to fix.

it's louder too. I already had a 2.5 I-pipe with a 2.5 dynomax muffler. When I added the headers it became a bit too loud for my tastes.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 12:22 AM
  #16  
IROCtheThird's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
From: Northeast CT
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: LSx
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

I installed these headers because my manifolds and y-pipe were bad. Installation wasnt bad, its just that I had alot of rusted hardware. Didnt notice any more performance since its an otherwise stock motor. Also had the problem of running rich, never put a heated o2 in since its now off the road the motor is getting swapped anyway.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 02:45 PM
  #17  
coolrimsatleast's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Tenino, Washington
Car: 89 f-bird and some others
Engine: 3.4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

My rich running problem after the headers was turning the o2 sensor black, and setting off code 32, 33, 34 or whichever one it is that relates to it.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2009 | 02:45 PM
  #18  
rsrsrs's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: LI, NY
Car: 90 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L v6
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

If you buy them, buy coated or else you'll probably run into the same problem I have -> https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/v6/5...-question.html
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2009 | 03:05 PM
  #19  
rsrsrs's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: LI, NY
Car: 90 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L v6
Transmission: 700
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Originally Posted by drdave88
Ive had mine for over 3 years and once i replaced the gaskets that it came with (they blew out in a few weeks) with felpro ones and got locking header bolts, everything has been fine.
Got a link to those locking header bolts?

I'm looking on Summit but have no idea what options to choose (Thread Size, Underhead length, Head style)
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2009 | 09:03 PM
  #20  
vargasjc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

whats a fair pice for this pacessetters ...the black painted ones?
if some1 is trying to get rid of them and they ask you to shoot them an offer?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 06:39 AM
  #21  
drdave88's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 6
From: Waterford, MI
Car: 1998 Camaro Z28
Engine: 6.0L
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...0&autoview=sku

These are the ones i believe i ordered. Its been a few years now, and if i remember right, you have to reuse one or two of your old bolts b/c of the head size.

As far as how much to ask for them, are they used or new? They run $270 new on summits site (up $50 from what i paid). If theyre used, do they come with all the gaskets, clamps, bolts, etc? need more info.

Last edited by drdave88; Jan 29, 2009 at 06:43 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2009 | 07:46 AM
  #22  
vargasjc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Originally Posted by drdave88
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...0&autoview=sku

These are the ones i believe i ordered. Its been a few years now, and if i remember right, you have to reuse one or two of your old bolts b/c of the head size.

As far as how much to ask for them, are they used or new? They run $270 new on summits site (up $50 from what i paid). If theyre used, do they come with all the gaskets, clamps, bolts, etc? need more info.
Yea he said he paid almost $300 for them and they are in brand new condition...never been mounted...he did mention a couple of scratches from laying around though...they come with the gaskets and stuff (but i heard the ones that come with it suck big time)
this is a stock pic of them: they are black just like the ones in the pic

Reply
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 09:36 PM
  #23  
GTA50's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: Chilliwack, B.C., Canada
Car: '88 GTA, '89, '94 Firebird, '84 T/A
Engine: 5.0L TPI (GTA); '89 -2.8; '94 -3.4
Transmission: 5 speed (for all 3),auto for T/A
Axle/Gears: 3.45 (GTA only)
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Too much too spend!! I got my ceramic coated headers through the local speed shop and with all the shipping, etc. came in at about $360. The price for the "painted" was about $250. Check with Pacesetter and Summit to see what their price is and bargain from there.

With all due respect, why were they never installed but yet ordered?

Be an agressive consumer!!! It is currently in your favor.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #24  
vargasjc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Originally Posted by GTA50
Too much too spend!! I got my ceramic coated headers through the local speed shop and with all the shipping, etc. came in at about $360. The price for the "painted" was about $250. Check with Pacesetter and Summit to see what their price is and bargain from there.

With all due respect, why were they never installed but yet ordered?

Be an agressive consumer!!! It is currently in your favor.
He said he decided to sell the car before they got installed...I didmt say i offered $300 thats how much he paid...whats a good/fair deal to offer?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 12:06 PM
  #25  
GTA50's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: Chilliwack, B.C., Canada
Car: '88 GTA, '89, '94 Firebird, '84 T/A
Engine: 5.0L TPI (GTA); '89 -2.8; '94 -3.4
Transmission: 5 speed (for all 3),auto for T/A
Axle/Gears: 3.45 (GTA only)
Re: pacesetter headers review for the 2.8l

Well, I've seen prices for the painted headers in the $270 range. The ceramic coated are about $75-100 more. So, idk, offer somewhere around $200 and see what happens.

If it doesn't work out and you are looking to buy a new set, I would definitely think ceramic coated over painted - if that works in your budget. There are advantages to the ceramic coating over the painted headers - longevity for one.

Hth.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
92projectcamaro
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
11
Jan 18, 2016 08:00 AM
redformula88
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Oct 14, 2015 06:08 PM
Chad Speier
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Sep 24, 2015 12:32 PM
hdis2002
Exhaust
2
Sep 8, 2015 02:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 PM.