V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Burnt valve, or head gasket?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 20, 2001 | 11:13 PM
  #1  
CSUS_Dude's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Burnt valve, or head gasket?

In case you don't remember my story, here's a quick recap. I have an '89 2.8 that wouldn't pass the CA emissions testing. It has a miss from idle to about 3k rpm. I replaced cap/rotor/plugs/wires and that didn't quite get the job done. I went to a mechanic who charged me $40 to look at the car for 10 minutes and tell me that I needed new injectors.

I pulled the injectors and had them cleaned and blueprinted by Rich at Cruzin Performance (I highly recommend him, excellent customer service) and I just finished installing them tonight. Well, the car runs about the same and I think I've got the problem narrowed down somewhat. When I pull the #3 plug wire while the car is idling, it makes absolutely no difference in the way the car idles. The car is also running very rich. I haven't done a compression check yet, but I'm thinking that I either have a leaking valve or a blown head gasket causing low compression and its not burning the fuel, which would explain why its running rich. Does this sound reasonable? Its not burning oil, so I'm pretty sure its not rings. The engine has 106k miles BTW. Also, how can I tell if its a valve or if its a head gasket? I haven't noticed oil in the water, or vice versa, but there have been a couple times when I've had my water reserve tank bubble over when the car was nowhere close to overheating. I suppose that could be from engine compression getting into the water system. Any thoughts? Sorry for the long post.

Thanks,
Brandon
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2001 | 11:41 PM
  #2  
87RS402's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
From: Klamath Falls, Oregon
An '89 running rich? The computer should lean the crap out of the engine if the O2 sniffs raw fuel. Anyway the comp check will help out on the diagnosis. I don't want to venture a guess without a few more facts.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2001 | 11:54 PM
  #3  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
Compression test that one cylinder first, the same location, opposite side, then the rest same opposite side.
You may know, quickest, that way.

------------------
Chat Soon,
KED85
Karl
1985 Firebird 2.8 to 3.4 swap project for Smog Happy LA, CA
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2001 | 01:00 PM
  #4  
Kevin S's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Pt. Pleasant, WV (Home of the Mothman!)
I have a 89 Bonneville doing the same thing.I replaced the wires,plugs,coil pack and injector.Didn't help a damn thing!
I still need to check the compression,which I have had the guage for about 2 months now and still haven't done it
I,like you,figure it is a gasket or a burnt valve.If you find anything out PLEASE let me know!

------------------


[This message has been edited by Kevin S (edited March 21, 2001).]
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2001 | 01:41 PM
  #5  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
I always meant to ask this- What's a burnt valve? Is that like a burnt piston- it's melted (or blown) away in the center?


------------------
-Tom P (Hot rodded 1986 Firebird 2.8l) from http://www.f-body.net/mailbag/3rd/3rd_mailbag.html message boards
---Think your car could be pic of the week? Visit http://www.f-body.net for details!
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2001 | 07:44 PM
  #6  
CSUS_Dude's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
I'll try to borrow a friend's compression guage this weekend and I'll let you all know what comes up.

As far as what a burnt valve is, honestly, I'm not totally sure. I just know that a burnt valve doesn't seal well against the seat and you lose compression. I'd like to hear a more elaborate answer too, if anyone knows.

Brandon
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2001 | 10:50 PM
  #7  
Engineboy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 1
From: Reno, NV
Car: yep
Engine: uhuh
Transmission: sure does
A burnt valve will usually have a small area that is burned away on the seating surface of the valve. It will make the seat surface no longer round, so it won't fit into the seat to form a good seal.

The bigger the burned area, the worse they run.

Do a compression check.

For what its worth, usually when a head gasket is blown between 2 cylinders, it has 2 low firing holes.

It really doesn't matter if its a head gasket or a burnt valve, if the compression isn't there, the heads got to come off anyway and then it gets gaskets and a valve job.

------------------
ASE Mechanic/Machinist/Smog Tech

1999 NBM Trans Am
1986 Chevy 3/4 ton pick up
1981 corvette
1995 Kawi ZX6R

R.I.P. #3
My favorite quote about D.E. "He can see air"
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2001 | 03:32 PM
  #8  
Horst's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Schotten, Germany
Car: Firebird
Engine: 3.1 L
Transmission: auto
how does plug #3 look like? maybe there is the answer, wet? black?

------------------
www.marion-becker-nidda.de
91 Firebird 3.1
Modsynomax ultra flow stainless steel
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2001 | 07:06 PM
  #9  
Luke's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: phoenix
Car: '86 Camaro
Engine: 2.8 MPFI
Transmission: T-5
What is the compression supposed to be at?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2001 | 09:55 AM
  #10  
Kevin S's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Pt. Pleasant, WV (Home of the Mothman!)
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Horst:
how does plug #3 look like?</font>
On my Pontiac it's the #1 cylider that has the miss and the plug looks like the rest.The plug is firing.My guess is the compression is so low,what fuel is igniting just isn't burning fast enough to go BOOM

------------------


[This message has been edited by Kevin S (edited March 23, 2001).]
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2001 | 10:18 AM
  #11  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Thanks for the clarification, Engineboy!

Luke, last I checked compression on my 2.8, I had 5 cylinders between 160-180 PSI, with one "dog" cylinder at either 145 or 150.


------------------
-Tom P (Hot rodded 1986 Firebird 2.8l) from http://www.f-body.net/mailbag/3rd/3rd_mailbag.html message boards
---Think your car could be pic of the week? Visit http://www.f-body.net for details!
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2001 | 01:26 PM
  #12  
Mike Harvey's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: CA
Hey Tom that isn't good to have more than a 10% variance in any one cylinder when you do a compression check. Your numbers make mine look weak. I had 140-145 psi in all 6 of my cylinders.

------------------
- Mike Harvey -
1986 Firebird S/E
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2001 | 11:34 AM
  #13  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
I have a feeling my numbers (being out of that 10%) are because of mileage. The one cylinder that's a dog is because of the over-advanced timing I had- the spark plug's center electrode blew into little pieces, and must've screwed up my rings somehow. You should've seen my face when I pulled that plug out! My distributor hold-down bolt had loosened up, and my timing was so advanced it was off the scale!


------------------
-Tom P (Hot rodded 1986 Firebird 2.8l) from http://www.f-body.net/mailbag/3rd/3rd_mailbag.html message boards
---Think your car could be pic of the week? Visit http://www.f-body.net for details!
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2001 | 11:02 PM
  #14  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
On my 3.4 engine swap, I had to compression check to adjust the valves.
I had 175 to 200 compression in my block.
That's a 40K mile block.

------------------
Chat Soon,
KED85
Karl
1985 Firebird 2.8 to 3.4 swap project for Smog Happy LA, CA
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2001 | 01:22 AM
  #15  
87RS402's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
From: Klamath Falls, Oregon
That's pretty good KED. My 1500 mile 4.3 was 150 on 5 and 145 on the other.

The actual PSI you'll get will vary depending on CR and miles on the shortblock. It's not really fair to compare the #'s of different engines.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
355tpipickup
Tech / General Engine
49
Aug 27, 2015 08:13 AM
NinjaNife
Tech / General Engine
27
Aug 23, 2015 11:49 AM
lakeffect2
Cooling
11
Aug 23, 2015 08:44 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM.