CAM in a 3.1L V6
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Garland, TX, USA
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS & 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 L v6 & 305 (5.0L) v8
Transmission: 4L60 Auto
CAM in a 3.1L V6
how much would I gain in HP if I put a tame CAM in my Camaro and what would I lose in MPG, and same question if I put in roller rocker arms.
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ****SoCal, USA****
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Roller tip rockers would work great.
They would easily fit under the valve covers. 1.52 would be very advantageous
NOW go get the factory 3.4 cam.
Designed by Crane Cam, new springs (to match the potential for 6500RPMs)
You can get that cam from the FWD east west 3.4's!
Our cars use a north south engine.
------------------
Chat Soon,
KED85
Karl
1985 Firebird 2.8 to 3.4 swap project for Smog Happy LA, CA
They would easily fit under the valve covers. 1.52 would be very advantageous
NOW go get the factory 3.4 cam.
Designed by Crane Cam, new springs (to match the potential for 6500RPMs)
You can get that cam from the FWD east west 3.4's!
Our cars use a north south engine.
------------------
Chat Soon,
KED85
Karl
1985 Firebird 2.8 to 3.4 swap project for Smog Happy LA, CA
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post