V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 10:31 AM
  #1  
redneckcamaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: NC, Tobaccoville
Car: 1985 sport coupe
Engine: was 2.8 now 3.4
Transmission: 700r4 auto
2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

i have been doing some research on simple bolt on mods to open up the flow of the plentum some options i have seen are spacers between the top plentum and the bottom one but that seemed very contravercial as to just a increace of power on the bottom end and i really would like more responce but i dont wont to loose top end power, but i didnt find any thing on how high in the power band the power is effected due to lenthening the runners. i also was looking for the diference in the 2.8 plentum and a 3.1 plentum (being more open) if there is a diference besides the abcense of the 2.8 madlion. PS this is on a v6 that has had a 3.4 swap and still has all the 2.8 intake and fuel sys. Thanks

any advice/threads on this is apriciated
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 10:44 AM
  #2  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

2.8/3.1 intakes are the same internally
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 10:55 AM
  #3  
redneckcamaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: NC, Tobaccoville
Car: 1985 sport coupe
Engine: was 2.8 now 3.4
Transmission: 700r4 auto
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

okay thats what i thought, you know anything about the plentum spacers?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 01:19 PM
  #4  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

money better spent would be having the 3.4 intake modified to fit with the distributor, it takes 2 saw cuts and a tiny bit of welding to make it work. welding shop prolly charge u about 40-60 bucks to make the cuts and weld it up
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 08:04 PM
  #5  
redneckcamaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: NC, Tobaccoville
Car: 1985 sport coupe
Engine: was 2.8 now 3.4
Transmission: 700r4 auto
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

and keep the 2.8 plentum?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 09:34 PM
  #6  
Possumz's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 19
Likes: 1
From: Virginia
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

Any pictures of the modified 3.4 intake so i can use a distributor with my future swap.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 09:41 PM
  #7  
58mark's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 6
From: Mesquite, Texas
Car: 89 rs, 86 Trans Am
Engine: RS-V6... Trans Am-LG4
Transmission: RS-T5... Trans Am 700r4
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

the front side of the 3.1 plenum has to be modified to accept the 2.8 Throttle body

I can post a pic of the two side by side if you are interested. I have them both right here next to each other
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 09:46 PM
  #8  
58mark's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 6
From: Mesquite, Texas
Car: 89 rs, 86 Trans Am
Engine: RS-V6... Trans Am-LG4
Transmission: RS-T5... Trans Am 700r4
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

on both these pics, the 3.1 plenum is on the top.

it's the only differences I can find.


Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 10:19 PM
  #9  
Project 3.4 Camaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

I take it by this you know what I was about now, with clearancing for the TB? And as dave said, they are identical internally, spacers would help, but not hugely, a 3.4 intake takes more work to make work than it seems like it would at first glance, even figuring out how to run the throttle cable is a pita...
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2011 | 10:26 PM
  #10  
58mark's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 6
From: Mesquite, Texas
Car: 89 rs, 86 Trans Am
Engine: RS-V6... Trans Am-LG4
Transmission: RS-T5... Trans Am 700r4
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

Yep! I didn't know they used different tb's, but after looking at them, it's no big deal to alter it
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2011 | 09:48 AM
  #11  
redneckcamaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: NC, Tobaccoville
Car: 1985 sport coupe
Engine: was 2.8 now 3.4
Transmission: 700r4 auto
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

so to replace the intake not the plentum it just two cuts for the distuributor and the 2.8 plentum will bolt right back up?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2011 | 06:13 PM
  #12  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

send pilsbury a pm he has the 3.4 intake modified to fit on his car
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2011 | 07:07 PM
  #13  
58mark's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 6
From: Mesquite, Texas
Car: 89 rs, 86 Trans Am
Engine: RS-V6... Trans Am-LG4
Transmission: RS-T5... Trans Am 700r4
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

I have a full 3.4 intake over here that I got with my 3.4 engine... now i'm interested in the procedure to make it work
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2011 | 10:12 PM
  #14  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

Originally Posted by 58mark
I have a full 3.4 intake over here that I got with my 3.4 engine... now i'm interested in the procedure to make it work
u pretty much have to cut the crossover tube off the back of it and then weld up the holes. other then that i think u just need the throttle cable and bracket from a 3.4 car. along with the tb
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2011 | 10:14 PM
  #15  
58mark's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 6
From: Mesquite, Texas
Car: 89 rs, 86 Trans Am
Engine: RS-V6... Trans Am-LG4
Transmission: RS-T5... Trans Am 700r4
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

yeah, I read up on a lot of old threads that covered that, and even found some pics.

Not sure it actually DOES anything positive, but it's a cool idea. I guess I'll just polish up my 3.1 plenum when I swap to the 3.4
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2011 | 10:19 PM
  #16  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

Originally Posted by 58mark
yeah, I read up on a lot of old threads that covered that, and even found some pics.

Not sure it actually DOES anything positive, but it's a cool idea. I guess I'll just polish up my 3.1 plenum when I swap to the 3.4
its a much better intake, it has a larger plenum volume, shorter runners, and no nasty bend in it.

my only concern would be in a boosted application, on pilsburys car the middle cyl on the driverside was running hotter then the other 5( about 100* iirc), i dont know if this was an airflow issues or the injector was running a lil leaner in that cyl, i didnt have enough time to look into it while i was there doing the turbo stuff on his car

im pretty sure the one injector was just flowing less then the others and was causing the issue, cause to be honest if any of the cyls should have been lean it should have been the rear cyls since the air would stack up at the back of the intake making the rear cyls being fed more air
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2011 | 10:22 PM
  #17  
58mark's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 6
From: Mesquite, Texas
Car: 89 rs, 86 Trans Am
Engine: RS-V6... Trans Am-LG4
Transmission: RS-T5... Trans Am 700r4
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

even with the back rail of the plenum scooped out, it still practically hugs the distributor cap. I'm wondering what kind of effect that much heat would have on the electronics

now, if you go full bore and put the coil packs in there... it might be more attractive to me
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2011 | 10:34 PM
  #18  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

the heat wont hurt it,just make sure there is dielectric grease under the ignition module and u wont have any issues. i modified a gen 2 fwd top end to clear a dizzy and the guy never had an issue with it. that had 1/16th clearance from the dizzy to the back of the intake
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2011 | 10:36 PM
  #19  
58mark's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 6
From: Mesquite, Texas
Car: 89 rs, 86 Trans Am
Engine: RS-V6... Trans Am-LG4
Transmission: RS-T5... Trans Am 700r4
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

well, I've got the plenum, so i guess there's no hurry to decide what to do with it.

how do I get around the Throttle cable problem? couldn't find much info on that
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2011 | 10:39 PM
  #20  
58mark's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 6
From: Mesquite, Texas
Car: 89 rs, 86 Trans Am
Engine: RS-V6... Trans Am-LG4
Transmission: RS-T5... Trans Am 700r4
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

Originally Posted by project89
u pretty much have to cut the crossover tube off the back of it and then weld up the holes. other then that i think u just need the throttle cable and bracket from a 3.4 car. along with the tb
sorry., missed this post. So putting the cable and bracket from a 3.4 solves the problem?

which TB do I use?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2011 | 10:45 PM
  #21  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: 2.8 plentum vs. 3.1 plentum

+
i would assume the 3.4 bracket and tb would be the way to go,u would have to ask pilsbury for the definative answer as he is the only one i know of currently using a 3.4 intake on his motor
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
86maro_252
Tech / General Engine
6
Oct 10, 2015 06:52 PM
usafirebird
Engine Swap
3
Sep 29, 2015 11:58 PM
spartanreaper
Engine Swap
12
Sep 25, 2015 07:22 PM
RABMAN
Interior Parts Wanted
2
Sep 18, 2015 09:02 PM
89bird2.8
TBI
15
Sep 18, 2015 07:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 AM.