3.1 V6 "high output"
3.1 V6 "high output"
.....does anything like this exist? My uncle says that the '90 firebird i'm lookibg at getting from his son is an HO and he says if you tromp down on it it will sit and spin out. My cousin, his son, says it was a 350 then somone blew that and put this 3.1 in. It would be great to have an answer, thank you. I plan to modify it heavily to learn how and if i start with more horses it wiuld be great
thanks
thanks Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 15
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
No such thing.
There was, however, back in the early '80s a 2.8L "H.O.", but not a "3.1L H.O."
There was, however, back in the early '80s a 2.8L "H.O.", but not a "3.1L H.O."
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
Didn't think so. So i don't know what the heck they're talking about then. It is a 3.1 and its MTPF. In '90 i believe they increased the stroke slightly though. Maybe thats what he's talking about?
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 15
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
MPFI...
Yes, 1990 was the first year for the 3.1, which has a longer stroke than the 2.8L
Yes, 1990 was the first year for the 3.1, which has a longer stroke than the 2.8L
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 1
From: Georgetown TX
Car: Base 91 'bird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27 & PBR
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
Don't think HO as "high output" was used on 3rd gens but it was in the past. It was an option back in the 70's at least. Maybe before and some time after.
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
Right but i doubt they used an engine that old haha. I think hes calling it high output because he actually built part of it. He thinks it might have domed pistons in it or something. If it won't affect my insurance cost i want to turbo it. I would only be around $3,500 into it then after head porting, reground delta 260 grind cam, and some lifters from them, headers, exhaust system, and a col air intake. What else could i do to it? I have $7,600 i have earned and i am 15 years old. This will be the first car that is "mine" specifically. I won't be driving it until i'm used to dads 3.0 6 Camry on the highway and road first
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
Don't get hung up on terms like "High Output", It's what's inside that counts.
If it's a good running car then get it and enjoy it for a while, then decide on what to do. Don't blow your money all at once.
If it's a good running car then get it and enjoy it for a while, then decide on what to do. Don't blow your money all at once.
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
I know haha
$7,600 into this car.....theres no way lol. If i'm upgrading only whats inside, and leave the outside (semi) stock, as in right now he had big ugly blue tribal decals and tinted windows (ala drug dealer), would it be more confusing at the track?
$7,600 into this car.....theres no way lol. If i'm upgrading only whats inside, and leave the outside (semi) stock, as in right now he had big ugly blue tribal decals and tinted windows (ala drug dealer), would it be more confusing at the track?
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,521
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
Originally Posted by jamesbond2285
Should i carb the 3.1 maybe?
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
I wasn't sure, i started a thread asking that ause nobody answered that originally. My uncle and somone else was talking about how they use carbs on dirt track engines and stuff, so i wasn't sure. I know carbureaters though, where fuel injection confuses me
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
I am the same way. I will ask a ton of questions in my own thread because I don't want to use the search option. (For all you guys that say "use the search" and for those of you who run this sight, that search option isn't worth ****.) But honestly you will learn more on what to do if you search it on here and read the information/useful section at the top of the sub forum pages.
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,521
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
Originally Posted by jamesbond2285
I wasn't sure, i started a thread asking that ause nobody answered that originally. My uncle and somone else was talking about how they use carbs on dirt track engines and stuff, so i wasn't sure. I know carbureaters though, where fuel injection confuses me...
You would buy yourself an autoprom...
Then use TunerPro RT as your software...
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,521
Likes: 204
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
Originally Posted by jamesbond2285
I dont wanna mess with computer tuning. I'm gonna have my hands full enough with putting parts in and changing stuff...
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,287
Likes: 41
From: Northwest Ohio
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: Lq4 6.0 SBE s485 turbo E85
Transmission: Fsi th400 stage 4. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
When the time comes there are many people on here that will help you and guide you through tuning the car just like streetlethel said. Because to be honest, tuning is where its at when you start adding mods.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: Alamogordo, NM
Car: '86 Grand National
Engine: LZ9????
Transmission: 2004R
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
Well i'm wanting to get maximum efficiency and power out of this engine beause i believe the one i have is nearly new so turbo should not be a problem. All together the car will cost me around $3,000 with a turbo, cold air intake, porting the heads, new injectors, headers, catback exhaust system, and a little more for tuning the computer. Wiuld this be a waste of money do you think? I want to learn as much as i can about engines out of this and i have more than enough to buy everything and as i believe i said i'm 15 so i have plenty of time because i wont be driving for perhaps another year or two
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L
Transmission: Manual T5
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
Well i'm wanting to get maximum efficiency and power out of this engine beause i believe the one i have is nearly new so turbo should not be a problem. All together the car will cost me around $3,000 with a turbo, cold air intake, porting the heads, new injectors, headers, catback exhaust system, and a little more for tuning the computer. Wiuld this be a waste of money do you think? I want to learn as much as i can about engines out of this and i have more than enough to buy everything and as i believe i said i'm 15 so i have plenty of time because i wont be driving for perhaps another year or two
Also, here is a link on increasing the power of a V6. I've done a tune up, removed the air filter snorkel and installed a high flow catalytic converter. Drilling off the snorkel and giving the engine more air made a big difference in power.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/v6/5...ost-power.html
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
I suggest you save some of your money to beef up your suspension: good quality struts and shocks, a wonder bar, and bigger front and rear sway bars and end links. A good handling car will be much more fun to drive, especially if you increase the engine output.
Also, here is a link on increasing the power of a V6. I've done a tune up, removed the air filter snorkel and installed a high flow catalytic converter. Drilling off the snorkel and giving the engine more air made a big difference in power.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/v6/5...ost-power.html
Also, here is a link on increasing the power of a V6. I've done a tune up, removed the air filter snorkel and installed a high flow catalytic converter. Drilling off the snorkel and giving the engine more air made a big difference in power.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/v6/5...ost-power.html
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
The autoprom is neat but you can save some cash by just buying the Ostrich emulator and a G1 adapter along with either the moates ALDL cable.
I've had my Ostrich since 2007, never had a problem. I had a slight idle issue today, just pulled over, plugged in the laptop fixed it in about 30 seconds and then went on my way.
Tuning is something that is best to start on a stock engine, you can play around with different things and get a feel for how they work. Then when you start making larger changes like headers, cams and better heads you have an idea of what to do.
With some basic changes to the stock file you can gain some power, don't expect a miracle but 5, maybe 10 at the very most HP.
I've had my Ostrich since 2007, never had a problem. I had a slight idle issue today, just pulled over, plugged in the laptop fixed it in about 30 seconds and then went on my way.
Tuning is something that is best to start on a stock engine, you can play around with different things and get a feel for how they work. Then when you start making larger changes like headers, cams and better heads you have an idea of what to do.
With some basic changes to the stock file you can gain some power, don't expect a miracle but 5, maybe 10 at the very most HP.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 15
Car: 1973 Datsun 240Z/ 1985 S-15 Jimmy
Engine: Turbo LX9/To be decided
Transmission: 5-speed/T-5
Axle/Gears: R200 3.90/7.5" 3.73
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
Honestly, if you're only 15, what you should do, is not worry about increasing power, or performance yet, but learn how to maintain the car, once you do start driving it. Then after a while of driving it, start modifying it in a way that will benefit the way you drive.
I know I sound like a parent in saying this, but that's not where I'm coming from (and I'm not a parent), you'll be surprised just what it takes to keep a vehicle on the road, in both money and time.
I know I sound like a parent in saying this, but that's not where I'm coming from (and I'm not a parent), you'll be surprised just what it takes to keep a vehicle on the road, in both money and time.
Re: 3.1 V6 "high output"
Honestly, if you're only 15, what you should do, is not worry about increasing power, or performance yet, but learn how to maintain the car, once you do start driving it. Then after a while of driving it, start modifying it in a way that will benefit the way you drive.
I know I sound like a parent in saying this, but that's not where I'm coming from (and I'm not a parent), you'll be surprised just what it takes to keep a vehicle on the road, in both money and time.
I know I sound like a parent in saying this, but that's not where I'm coming from (and I'm not a parent), you'll be surprised just what it takes to keep a vehicle on the road, in both money and time.
Last edited by jamesbond2285; Aug 14, 2012 at 11:24 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Elephantismo
Electronics
14
Feb 13, 2019 12:51 AM









3.1 HO 

