cheaper alternative to LPE 219
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 82
Likes: 3
From: Michigan
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Torsen
cheaper alternative to LPE 219
Edelbrock just released a new hydraulic roller
PN 2108
218/218 @ .050
.525/.525 lift with 1.5 rockers
112 lobe sep
112 intake centerline
Valve events:
IO 3 ATDC
IC 41 ABDC
EO 41 BBDC
EC 3 BTDC
Anyone have actual valve events for the LPE 219 for comparison?
With E-Tec 170 heads and a Performer RPM intake on a ZZ4 shortblock this cam makes 435 hp/435 ft-lbs....but it seems like it would work well with TPI motors as well. The Edelbrock cam is $249 from Summit, vs $339 for the LPE 219.
PN 2108
218/218 @ .050
.525/.525 lift with 1.5 rockers
112 lobe sep
112 intake centerline
Valve events:
IO 3 ATDC
IC 41 ABDC
EO 41 BBDC
EC 3 BTDC
Anyone have actual valve events for the LPE 219 for comparison?
With E-Tec 170 heads and a Performer RPM intake on a ZZ4 shortblock this cam makes 435 hp/435 ft-lbs....but it seems like it would work well with TPI motors as well. The Edelbrock cam is $249 from Summit, vs $339 for the LPE 219.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 1
From: Macedonia ,OH
Car: Formula
Engine: 6.0 LSX
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3:27
Lingenfelter was selling their cam for 250 for the last few months. Thats where many + myself got ours. I cant answer on the differance though, but check this out.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...spagename=WDVW
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...spagename=WDVW
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 1
From: Macedonia ,OH
Car: Formula
Engine: 6.0 LSX
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3:27
Originally posted by Mkos1980
Lingenfelter was selling their cam for 250 for the last few months. Thats where many + myself got ours. I cant answer on the differance though, but check this out.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...spagename=WDVW
Lingenfelter was selling their cam for 250 for the last few months. Thats where many + myself got ours. I cant answer on the differance though, but check this out.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...spagename=WDVW
For TPI I would go with the ZZ9 or Lingenfelters 211 cam.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Laval, Canada
Car: 2004 BMW 330Cic
Engine: 3.0
Transmission: 6 speed
what's weird is that the 2 cam cards show different timing events. When did they change and from what to what?
I punched in the cams in DD2000 and the one on Ebay made more power to 5000 rpm and then dropped off compared to this one.
Seems to me the other timing events work better for street cars.
I punched in the cams in DD2000 and the one on Ebay made more power to 5000 rpm and then dropped off compared to this one.
Seems to me the other timing events work better for street cars.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 1
From: Macedonia ,OH
Car: Formula
Engine: 6.0 LSX
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3:27
Something is up with the cam on ebay. If you look at hte cam card on ebay it says 218!! @.050 Something is weird.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 689
Likes: 1
From: Irmo, SC
Car: 1992 Pontiac GTA
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt, 2.73
The $250 Ebay cam has Parkerized roller lobes, not billet. Also the nose pin is the short variety. LPE starting selling them about a year ago.
I purchased and then returned the cheaper cam to LPE because of the difference in stats. I wanted the real-deal 219.
I purchased and then returned the cheaper cam to LPE because of the difference in stats. I wanted the real-deal 219.
Rick Neuenschwander <rneuenschwander@lingenfelter.com> wrote: Hello Robert
I recieved the fax and the lobe lift on ebay is a typing error on my part. The difference on the duration is just that I rounded the cam machine spec from 218.5 to 219 instead of 218.5 to 218. The actual lobe lift is .350 that is .525 with 1.5 and .560 with 1.6 rocker arms. I have attached a copy of what I send with my camshaft. Hope that this helps.
This is what Rick from LPE emailed me when I asked about the Duration difference.
I recieved the fax and the lobe lift on ebay is a typing error on my part. The difference on the duration is just that I rounded the cam machine spec from 218.5 to 219 instead of 218.5 to 218. The actual lobe lift is .350 that is .525 with 1.5 and .560 with 1.6 rocker arms. I have attached a copy of what I send with my camshaft. Hope that this helps.
This is what Rick from LPE emailed me when I asked about the Duration difference.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: San Pedro, Ca
Car: White KSwisses
Engine: 5.3L Gen III
Originally posted by OMINOUS_87
HEY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dont be so fast to forget about the CC XR276HR-12.
224/230 .510/.520
HEY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dont be so fast to forget about the CC XR276HR-12.
224/230 .510/.520
Hey Ominous, i gotta question for you off topic, can you check your PM,
Last edited by cali92RS; Aug 15, 2004 at 09:15 PM.
Originally posted by cali92RS
Doesnt that cam have .503/.510 lift w/1.5 lifters?
Hey Ominous, i gotta question for you off topic, can you check your PM,
Doesnt that cam have .503/.510 lift w/1.5 lifters?
Hey Ominous, i gotta question for you off topic, can you check your PM,
Been some time since I checked, I run 1.6 which bumps it up a bit anyway.
PMed You..................
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
raymondandretti
Electronics
1
Sep 27, 2015 06:43 PM





