Replaced Action+ with RPM Air Gap
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Replaced Action+ with RPM Air Gap
On the 396. Thought you might be interested in the results.
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=320131
The Action+ was gasket matched. The RPM is slightly smaller, about an eighth of an inch wall left all the way around each port. Didn't seem to hold it back much, though.
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=320131
The Action+ was gasket matched. The RPM is slightly smaller, about an eighth of an inch wall left all the way around each port. Didn't seem to hold it back much, though.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
From: Severn, MD.
Car: '88 T/A and '90 T/A
Engine: LB9/383
Transmission: T5/700R4
I've been saying for a while now that the air gap is the best intake for street small blocks. Seen lots of power gains with them over even the Perf. RPM. Glad to hear you had good luck with it.
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I was also considering the Stealth. It would have been cheaper, but I liked the idea of the Air Gap for bracket racing. I was hearing less than complimentary things about Edelbrock quality control a couple of years ago, but hadn't lately, so that helped with the decision. I did have to file down the upper bolt bosses in order to clear the cover rails and covers themselves (cast aluminum), but that was minor. Also had to modify the upper alternator bracket (elongate a bolt hole), also minor. The carb mount was slightly higher, so I had to go to thin carb gaskets on each side of the Holley carb shield.
The really good news is the coolant bypass hose fit better...
The really good news is the coolant bypass hose fit better...
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
From: Orange County,NY
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt
I just did a similar swap on my 355.Well it was the Stealth to the RPM air gap.The main swap was cake, no major issues there.I cannot beleive the difference in the car after the swap.I had the car well tuned with the Stealth..but driveability was always "lacking".I could never really get the car to come off idle well.And when I finally got it "ok" it was pig rich on the initial launch.Lean it out and it got worse.The looks are a bit better to me as far as when the hood is open.Driveability though has improved what feels like 100% on my mild street motor.I set the carb back to factory settings aside from a blue primary pump cam and going down to a 28 primary squirter when I put the air gap on.This car drives like it never has.It runs so much better down low...excellent in traffic manners when I am stuck in town.It used to get grumpy with the Stealth.It doesn't seem to pull as hard in the mid range but it seems to get up in MPH quicker.Flatter torque curve maybe.Results cannot be verified till I get back to the track so we'll see.But from what it gained from the swap in improved street manners alone was more than worth it.Excellent choice!
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
From: Severn, MD.
Car: '88 T/A and '90 T/A
Engine: LB9/383
Transmission: T5/700R4
yeah the Stealth is too much for a small displacement street motor. Throttle response and driveability will suffer. I've noticed in the past week or so that once the Air Gap is warmed up after the motors been running for a few minutes, the power gains between it and the RPM are almost non-existent. I figured keeping the plenum up and away from the hot lifter valley would keep it cool, but it's not enough to see much power.
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
From: Orange County,NY
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt
Originally posted by NastyL98_T/A
I've noticed in the past week or so that once the Air Gap is warmed up after the motors been running for a few minutes, the power gains between it and the RPM are almost non-existent. I figured keeping the plenum up and away from the hot lifter valley would keep it cool, but it's not enough to see much power.
I've noticed in the past week or so that once the Air Gap is warmed up after the motors been running for a few minutes, the power gains between it and the RPM are almost non-existent. I figured keeping the plenum up and away from the hot lifter valley would keep it cool, but it's not enough to see much power.
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
In my case, the real world doesn't count - I drag race this car.
Trending Topics
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Boone NC
Car: 2005 colorado 2wd, 1986 fiero GT, 1989 Firebird
Engine: None yet
Transmission: auto
anyone tried some how cooling the gap? Like some put ice packs or something on intakes, some tubo guys put them on the intake pipes and what not. You could probly see some real gains then. What concerns me about them is all the junk that collects in the motor will go under there and hide and make a nasty mess over time with out care to attention when cleaning under the hood.
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
The intake needs a little heat in it to work properly. Otherwise, fuel will puddle, or won't vaporize properly on its way to the intake valve.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mdtoren
Tech / General Engine
0
Aug 16, 2015 05:45 PM





