Aftermarket Product Review Provide questions and answers about aftermarket parts for the Third Generation F-Body.

Opinions for Engine Mounts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2003, 07:15 PM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Frains90RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3: 305 TBI
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 1997 Trans Am rear w/ posi -3.23
Opinions for Engine Mounts

Right board?--->I'm going to replace my motor mounts, among other parts, but I was wondering what is out there and what would be best. Got the 305 TBI in there now, but might swap to TPI or 350 w/ TPI in the future. Either displacement would be a small block, would that matter in mount selection? Prolly won't ever get above 300 hp... feel free to drop in your $0.02. Thanks-Efrain.
Old 11-02-2003, 11:05 PM
  #2  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Frains90RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3: 305 TBI
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 1997 Trans Am rear w/ posi -3.23
^^^^^^

Any one? Anything.
Old 11-02-2003, 11:37 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
86IROCNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 2,119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 Iroc-Z28
Engine: FB385
Transmission: 700r4
You could go with stock style from NAPA, "clamshell" or a lot of people go with poly mounts from here for example: http://www.spohn.net/product.cfm?productid=1363 good luck
Old 11-03-2003, 10:01 PM
  #4  
Member
 
sinner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: umatilla county, or.
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28
Engine: 1995 Camaro LT1
Transmission: 700R4
i bought energy suspension motor mounts. u have to drill out the rivits in the clam shell to put em in. i think they look cool. they are polyurethan so they will last. the motor has very little movement now, i am happy with them.
Old 11-04-2003, 12:57 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Just set the motor donw in there and then wrap some tow chain around the block 2-3 times and weld it down. Just pray for no valve cover leaks.

Matt
Old 11-04-2003, 02:56 AM
  #6  
TGO Supporter

 
MdFormula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Maryland; USA
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
sounds like homemade solid engine mounts works for me
Old 11-04-2003, 10:26 AM
  #7  
zed
Junior Member

 
zed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Concord, CA, USA
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28, 1984 Z28, 1990 Toyota 4x4
Engine: L98, L69, 22RE
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4, 5Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.23 Posi, 4.10
do the prothane engine mounts work the same way as the ES? where you have to use your old clamshells?

thanx

zed
Old 11-04-2003, 09:22 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member
 
25THRSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glen Allen, VA
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by zed
do the prothane engine mounts work the same way as the ES? where you have to use your old clamshells?

thanx

zed
yes, IMP, prothane is better quality also.
Old 11-05-2003, 12:56 PM
  #9  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Frains90RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3: 305 TBI
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 1997 Trans Am rear w/ posi -3.23
Elaborate please.

Originally posted by 25THRSS
yes, IMP, prothane is better quality also.
Still catching up to the board lingo. IMP=? What makes the prothane better? Thanks, Efrain.
Old 11-05-2003, 01:45 PM
  #10  
Member
 
wingnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '91 Firebird
Engine: 408 SBC
Transmission: T5
I would stick with the factory mounts. The only reason being they work just fine for the least amount of money. I reused the mounts from my LG4 when I swapped it out for a 408 SBC. With 110K miles on them, they were/are still in fine working order. Also, I've seen claims that some aftermarket mounts change the height of the engine, sometimes causing clearance problems when you go to install long tube headers.
Old 11-05-2003, 03:44 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
xpndbl3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 13,622
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
i used energy suspension mounts and they raised my motor.....


oh yea long tube headers were an 8 hour session of grinding on the crossmember to get them to fit. Now i have to weld in plates on the crossmember to plate it up for strength.

but the motor doesn't move much now.

Last edited by xpndbl3; 11-05-2003 at 11:57 PM.
Old 11-05-2003, 07:14 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member
 
25THRSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glen Allen, VA
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: Elaborate please.

Originally posted by Frains90RS
Still catching up to the board lingo. IMP=? What makes the prothane better? Thanks, Efrain.
oops, meant to put IMO, or in my opinion. They fit better than energy suspension from what I can tell others have said. Energy suspension seems to cause some added vibrations with their tranny mount and their motor mounts seem to raise the engine way too much over stock. Also, with suspension parts, the prothane won't squeek as much.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
01-10-2020 05:33 PM
MoJoe
Fabrication
14
08-19-2017 07:12 PM
E Rod
LTX and LSX
5
08-28-2015 05:17 AM
bradleydeanuhl
DFI and ECM
4
08-12-2015 11:48 AM
Elliswon
LTX and LSX
4
08-10-2015 12:33 PM



Quick Reply: Opinions for Engine Mounts



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 AM.