vert 350?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Erlanger, KY
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1989 Iroc-z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: Auto 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt - 2.77
Re: vert 350?
Would this car be a real 350 convert? I see cc1 on the rpo he listed. Were converts t-top cars before they were sent to asc to have the conversion done? Was there a rpo for a vert?
#6
Moderator
iTrader: (6)
Re: vert 350?
It's as real as it gets for a pre-91 Firebird convertible.
Vin 3 would indicate that it's a full GM convertible. IIRC, they still have the CC1 RPO code, but I could be wrong on that. Basically instead of the 6th digit of the VIN being a 2 to denote hatchback, it would be a 3 to denote convertible. These are dealer ordered convertibles, but GM warrantied them as normal to my understanding.
All of them left the factory as t-top cars until ASC cut the roofs off.
Vin 3 would indicate that it's a full GM convertible. IIRC, they still have the CC1 RPO code, but I could be wrong on that. Basically instead of the 6th digit of the VIN being a 2 to denote hatchback, it would be a 3 to denote convertible. These are dealer ordered convertibles, but GM warrantied them as normal to my understanding.
All of them left the factory as t-top cars until ASC cut the roofs off.
#7
Member
Re: vert 350?
Yes, some of them had the 350 until '91 when all of them came with the 305. The reason was because GM restricted the B2L/CC1 option combination after the '89MY. After '90, the 350 was no longer available with T-tops from GM. Since ASC convertibles were converted from T-top optioned cars, no 350 'verts were made after '90.
The T-top optioned cars had additional factory bracing that the hardtops lacked so they were the logical choice for GM to be converted by ASC from '87-'92.
There is evidence that a small number of very early '91 cars did sneak out of the GM factory with the 350/T-top option. A member on here actually owns/owned one. However, I don't if any of those cars (which were very rare) were converted by ASC into convertibles. If there were, the number has to be extremely low like in the low single digits or something.
The T-top optioned cars had additional factory bracing that the hardtops lacked so they were the logical choice for GM to be converted by ASC from '87-'92.
There is evidence that a small number of very early '91 cars did sneak out of the GM factory with the 350/T-top option. A member on here actually owns/owned one. However, I don't if any of those cars (which were very rare) were converted by ASC into convertibles. If there were, the number has to be extremely low like in the low single digits or something.
Trending Topics
#8
Moderator
iTrader: (6)
Re: vert 350?
Yes, some of them had the 350 until '91 when all of them came with the 305. The reason was because GM restricted the B2L/CC1 option combination after the '89MY. After '90, the 350 was no longer available with T-tops from GM. Since ASC convertibles were converted from T-top optioned cars, no 350 'verts were made after '90.
The T-top optioned cars had additional factory bracing that the hardtops lacked so they were the logical choice for GM to be converted by ASC from '87-'92.
There is evidence that a small number of very early '91 cars did sneak out of the GM factory with the 350/T-top option. A member on here actually owns/owned one. However, I don't if any of those cars (which were very rare) were converted by ASC into convertibles. If there were, the number has to be extremely low like in the low single digits or something.
The T-top optioned cars had additional factory bracing that the hardtops lacked so they were the logical choice for GM to be converted by ASC from '87-'92.
There is evidence that a small number of very early '91 cars did sneak out of the GM factory with the 350/T-top option. A member on here actually owns/owned one. However, I don't if any of those cars (which were very rare) were converted by ASC into convertibles. If there were, the number has to be extremely low like in the low single digits or something.
#9
Member
Re: vert 350?
It wasn't early 91 that the 350 t-top option was available and they didn't "sneak out". If you bought a late 91/92 Formula with the PW7 crosslace wheels, you could get a 350. However, no Formulas or GTAs were convertibles, so no 350 convertibles were made past 89. I have never seen any evidence of a 1990 ASC convertible Firebird.
I remember there was a lot of conflict during that thread and threads made after that about the existence of '91 Firebird 350 GTA's with T-tops. The existence of a few more popped up later, I believe, so the conclusion was they were, indeed, a few made very early in the '91 MY. As we all know, the '91's debuted in Feb '90 which was a lot earlier than the normal model year production cycle of past years. Of course, this would exclude PW7 equipped '91-'92 Formulas since those were pretty much readly available and advertised in the brochure for most of the '91 and '92 model year.
It would be interesting to confirm if there were any Firebird 'verts made for '90 by ASC though.
Last edited by Mikos_89; 07-16-2012 at 10:18 PM.
#11
Member
Re: vert 350?
Yes, I think that's the member IIRC. He sounded pretty legit and very convincing about his claims, but I don't know what the real deal actually was.
Last edited by Mikos_89; 07-16-2012 at 11:11 PM.
#12
Moderator
iTrader: (6)
Re: vert 350?
That was the one I was thinking of... however, checking his current sig:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/member.php?u=4606
"'91 GTA w/C&C T-tops, E..."
I don't think his car was a factory t-top car.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/member.php?u=4606
"'91 GTA w/C&C T-tops, E..."
I don't think his car was a factory t-top car.
#13
Member
Re: vert 350?
That was the one I was thinking of... however, checking his current sig:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/member.php?u=4606
"'91 GTA w/C&C T-tops, E..."
I don't think his car was a factory t-top car.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/member.php?u=4606
"'91 GTA w/C&C T-tops, E..."
I don't think his car was a factory t-top car.
I don't remember him saying the tops were C&C T-tops back then. Maybe he didn't know the difference and just assumed they were factory T-tops or something. lol!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post