Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-20-2001, 03:30 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 750
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to ColinOpseth Send a message via AIM to ColinOpseth Send a message via Yahoo to ColinOpseth
major knocking problems, engine just put in.. help!

hey, i need some serious help here... i don't know what the heck is up with this engine.. this is the deal, i broke a piston in my '86 IROC so i pulled the motor and put a shortblock from an '89 IROC into it, both motors are 305s..

anyways, i ended up getting the '86 non-centerbolt heads rebuilt and putting them on the '89 roller block so that i wouldn't need to change my intake and MEMCal..

i started it, and found that it runs absolutely HORRIBLE... it backfires out the exhaust and has NO power, not wanting to rev over 3000rpm and will not hold an idle...

i'm thinking tha ti adjusted the valvelash too tight, as I went 1.5 turns past 0 lash.. that is what my Chiltons said, was that too far?

i think the problem might be valve lash, as if they are tightened down too much the exhaust valve will be opening too early in the combustion stroke and some flametravel is going into the exhaust... am i right?

also, do roller lifters require LESS valve lash than flat tappet..

thanks, i appreciate your help!
Colin Opseth

------------------
Webmaster: www.IROC-Z.org
ColinOpseth is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2001, 03:31 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 750
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to ColinOpseth Send a message via AIM to ColinOpseth Send a message via Yahoo to ColinOpseth
also, the engine is throwing no codes except EST (which i had disconnected to set base timing)

thanks again,
Colin
ColinOpseth is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2001, 03:59 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Matt87GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The State of Hockey
Posts: 2,044
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 730 ECM
Transmission: TH700R4, 3000 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Matt87GTA Send a message via AIM to Matt87GTA
I'm not sure about the exact cause, but all GM hydraulic lifters should be set at 1/2 to 3/4 turn past zero lash. I would guess that 1 and 1/2 turns past zero lash is enough to keep the valves open too long and make it run like poop. Readjust the valves and go from there. (Where the hell did that book come from????? )

My $.02

hope that helps.........



------------------
Matt

1987 GTA L98 MD8 GW6

"Stop Lights timed for 35Mph are also timed for 70Mph"
Matt87GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2001, 04:03 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 750
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to ColinOpseth Send a message via AIM to ColinOpseth Send a message via Yahoo to ColinOpseth
taht was my fear all along..

i know, when i was setting them on the engine stand i remember thinking "holy s h i t, that's alot of lash... but that's what the book says..."

i yanked off the valve covers and backed them off 1/2 a turn all the way around, i hope that fixes the problem..

i woulda started ti but it was 12:30am and i'm sure my neighbours would appreciate that

------------------
Webmaster: www.IROC-Z.org
ColinOpseth is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2001, 03:21 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,264

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Bort62
Damn, Your Nicer than Me.

WE Pulled in here last night at 2:00 AM with a Vette On open Headers...



------------------
60 Ranchero - Project ( Money Hole )
85 Sport Coupe LG4 - Daily Driver
Reader's ride -> My Ride

Just another Hot Rod kid, or thats what they all tell me.
Livin' the Stereotype
Bort62 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2001, 03:37 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 750
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to ColinOpseth Send a message via AIM to ColinOpseth Send a message via Yahoo to ColinOpseth
question still isn't answered ... i think the valve lash is too tight, are roller lifters more sensitive to valve lash (ie. they should be set with less lash than a flat tappet)

thanks
ColinOpseth is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2001, 03:47 PM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Oklahoma City, USA
Posts: 223
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: Yes
Transmission: That, too.

Classifieds Rating: (0)
You may try looking at the pushrod length. I'm not certain, but there may have been a pushrod length change from the early non-roller blocks to the '87-up roller types. A pushrod too long or too short would definitely screw things up.

As for valve takeup, I always set mine at 1/2 to 3/4 turn, never as much as 1 full turn.

And a third thing to consider: are you certain the distributor timing is set correctly?
D_Amlee is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2001, 03:51 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 750
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to ColinOpseth Send a message via AIM to ColinOpseth Send a message via Yahoo to ColinOpseth
thanks for the reply

distributor is set at 0 BTDC for sure, no doubt about it and we double checked once the car was running...

i am using the '89 pushrods with the '89 rocker arms in the '86 heads...

the '89 rocker arms are self-aligning but the '86 rockers are not... from what i was told it wouldn't matter either way as both rocker arm styles are the same ratio..

i think the valves are just too tight, i'll try starting it in 5 minutes and see how it runs.. bbiaf

------------------
Webmaster: www.IROC-Z.org
ColinOpseth is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2001, 04:05 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 750
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to ColinOpseth Send a message via AIM to ColinOpseth Send a message via Yahoo to ColinOpseth
runs like a pile of dog s h i t...

i think the pushrods are binding in the heads, don't know why but that's my guess...

i'm so frustrated, both of my motor swaps in my IROCs have been like this, yet i can do a big block with no trouble.. obviously the way these cars are designed really SUCKS.

lame.

i'll put the roller heads on so i can use the correct rocker arms.. gotta look around for an '87 intake now, i guess...

thanks for the help guys...
Colin

------------------
Webmaster: www.IROC-Z.org
ColinOpseth is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2001, 04:16 PM   #10
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Oklahoma City, USA
Posts: 223
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: Yes
Transmission: That, too.

Classifieds Rating: (0)
One last suggestion, and try not to get offended if it sounds to simple...

did you make sure the plug wires are routed to the correct spark plugs?

I've done this myself, and it's an easy mistake to do if you're in a hurry.
D_Amlee is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2001, 04:19 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 750
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to ColinOpseth Send a message via AIM to ColinOpseth Send a message via Yahoo to ColinOpseth
yup, double checked..

thanks man..

now that i think about it i remember seeing some chaffing on the pushrods right where they go through the heads...

i knew this job would be too easy to be true

i can't wait until this IROC is running and sold so i can finish my big block!!!!

thanks man,
Colin

------------------
Webmaster: www.IROC-Z.org
ColinOpseth is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2001, 03:10 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Matt87GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The State of Hockey
Posts: 2,044
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 730 ECM
Transmission: TH700R4, 3000 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to Matt87GTA Send a message via AIM to Matt87GTA
Just some ideas here:

When you had the valve lash set waayyy too tight you could possibly have bent a push rod or two and now they are binding and/or throwing off your valvetrain geometry. Keep in mind that the push rods will naturally show some signs of wear where they pass through the heads. If you had the lash set at 1.5 turns past zero lash and only backed it off a half turn, than you are still too tight but you probably should have noticed some improvement in the running quality.

As far as parts interchangeability you may also want to check the rocker to valve retainer clearance. I had a friend that could not figure out why his engine was running like crap and finally noticed that the exhaust valve retainers had rotators on the tops of them and the rocker arms were hitting them causing valvetrain bind that ended up bending ALL of his exhaust push rods (hardened Crane ones! ). Boooo hissssss.

I can tell you that the factory push rod length for your roller cam motor is 7.200 inches. I'm not sure about a non-roller motor but my guess would be that they are a bit longer and the lifters themselves are a bit shorter on the non-roller setup.

And, don't take this the wrong way, but I'm sure you know that you should always check your valvetrain geometry prior to assembling an engine when you are straying from a 'stock' setup so I won't even mention it .

Anywayyyyyyssss, I hope you figure it all out .

Laterzzzzzzzzz

------------------
Matt

1987 GTA L98 MD8 GW6

"Stop Lights timed for 35Mph are also timed for 140Mph"
Matt87GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2001, 03:10 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
lash, problems, tight, valve
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details