Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-07-2001, 04:31 PM   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 203

Classifieds Rating: (0)
What would be the ideal cam ?

For a 383 with TF23 heads and a pretty much stock TPI except SLP runners and an Accel base ?

------------------
92 Z28 5.7
------------------
Trick Flow 23° heads, Comp Cams XR270HR-10 cam, Accel intake base + ported TPI,
TES headers, Flowmaster catback, MSD ignition, #24 SVO injectors, 1LE aluminum driveshaft.

Click here to see pics of my car !
Synergy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2001, 04:31 AM   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 203

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Nobody ?!?
Synergy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2001, 07:40 AM   #3
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: College Station, Tex USA
Posts: 1,443
Car: 89rs
Engine: 400Sb
Transmission: Tremec 3550

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The XR270 is pretty close. Maybe a 276hr I would use 1.6 rockers at least on the intake. If you want the absolute best call cammotion and give them your combination. Gearing also.
jcb999 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2001, 05:30 PM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 203

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I think this cam is too small right now with my 350. I think I need a little more duration and definetly a wider LSA then the current 110. Does anyone else have any opinions ?
Synergy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2001, 06:58 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Annandale,NJ
Posts: 2,463

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to camaro6spd
well the ideal cam is the one my father came up with when he was 14. instead of a cam it used electromagnets and a computer to control when the valves open, how far and how long. With the computer the lift and dur would be infinity varable depending on the load and RPMS. wow could you imagin that a VTEC that works all the time from 0 to 10000000000 RPMS. We still have his drawings that he drafted in collage for his professor. Damn if only he patended the the thing or sold it to one the car companies for much dinero, damn I could have 1 of every model F-body made. hummmm anyway that it the ideal cam....for any engine.
camaro6spd is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2001, 01:29 AM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Selkirk,Manitoba,Canada
Posts: 116
Car: chevy s10,1986camaro
Engine: 406sbc
Transmission: 350turbo

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Actualy I've heard of plans for such an engine however a standard 12 volt system isn't enough to operate the system, apparently they are waiting till they switch to a 48 volt system which isn't going to happen any time soon. Heard bout it from my collage instructor who used to be a service manager at a gm dealership. He likes digging up info on all the new fancy gadets coming out for cars.
sb406camaro86 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2001, 01:31 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 1,196

Classifieds Rating: (0)
For that set-up, you could consider the cam I am running, the LT4 HOT Cam from GMPP. The cam is more made for shorter runner engines, but it should still work well. The specs are 218*/228* @ .050 with .492/.492 lift with 1.5 rockers.

------------------
1987 Chevy Camaro IROC-Z
L98 TPI 350 (5.7L)
TH 700R-4 Transmission
Borg Warner 7.75" 9 Bolt Rear End with 2.77:1 Gears.

Current Mods: LT4 HOT Cam, Comp Cams 1.52:1 Roller Rocker Arms, Accel High Flow TPI Baseplate, Edelbrock TES 1 5/8" Headers, Catco 3" High-Flow Catalytic Converter, Hooker 3" Aerochamber Cat-Back System, Transgo Shift Kit, Performance Resource Chip, Accel Ignition, K&N Filters, Jet TPI Air Foil, All Free Mods, Falken ZIEX Z-Rated Tires.

Best ET: 14.32 @ 97.7mph
(corrected for elevation)
Dan87IROC-Z is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2001, 11:47 AM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 203

Classifieds Rating: (0)
That's a smaller cam then what I have right now. Surely that wont work in a bigger engine like a 383.
Synergy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2001, 08:37 PM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 8

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via ICQ to sparky
hot about these cams

12370845 214/224 dur@ .50 488/509 112

12370846 222/230 dur@ .50 509/528 112

12370846 232/240 dur@ .50 539/558 112

hydraulic roller. avaible from gm
sparky is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2001, 09:04 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Chander, Arizona USA
Posts: 1,338
Car: 2006 Silverado 1500
Engine: 5.3L
Transmission: 4L60E

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to zippy
i would have to agree, the xr276hr would be all the bigger you'd want to go aside from the listed gm cams. unported the trick flow heads are going to feed well at that lift. the main problem is your intake set up. your feeding much more cubic inch now and going with a bigger cam is just going to worsen the intake problem. even with the upgrades to the tuned port, it is only going to flow just so much. i'd recomend keeping the cam lift below .525 and duratin under 235@50. you won't need to rev it as high to make power, it's got cubic inches to make the power. if your looking to rev it and go with the bigger cam, your going to need a mini ram, super ram, or t-ram.
zippy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2001, 09:27 AM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 203

Classifieds Rating: (0)
One of my good friends has a hydraulic roller comp cams that has 530/530 lift and 230/230 duration on a 110 lobe. I think that would be a middle ground in between all the cam recommendations so far, wouldn't you think ? I'm going to keep the TPI and I don't plan on revving it past 5500-6000.

------------------
92 Z28 5.7
------------------
Trick Flow 23° heads, Comp Cams XR270HR-10 cam, Accel intake base + ported TPI,
TES headers, Flowmaster catback, MSD ignition, #24 SVO injectors, 1LE aluminum driveshaft.

Click here to see pics of my car !
Synergy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2001, 03:31 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 1,978
Car: 88 Firebird WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to JoelOl75
I was recommended 234/234 .488/.488 for my 388. I went with the flat-tops (11:1 CR) and running a flat cam. I got mine from Summit ($79) it's on a 114LSA for a 'smooth' idle, but it still will be choppy somewhat and was told this cam will pull 10.5 to 11" Hg at 750rpm idle.

JoelOl75 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2001, 03:31 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
12370846, 232, 234, 234234, 488, 488488, cam, cams, comp, duration, idle, lift, summit, xr270, xr270hr
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details