TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stock Runners? Modified 355

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2012, 10:24 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
irockid43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Spirit Lake, ID
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 IROC-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Stock Runners? Modified 355

Im in the process of putting a tpi back on my 86 iroc. The original engine was removed(305 tpi), and I put 355 with high flowing heads and a moderate hyd roller cam in its place. I am trying to figure out if I need to go with better flowing runners.(slp?) I have upgraded the injectors (22lb) and am programming a chip to match. I have a holley 670 carb that seems to be well matched to the engine, but am excited to get the tpi back on.
Sorry if youve had to answer the same kind of question a bunch of times, but any advice would be much appreciated!
Old 02-13-2012, 10:37 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
vetteoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Not in Kansas anymore
Posts: 7,732
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

Originally Posted by irockid43
moderate hyd roller cam in its place. d!
What specs on cam?
Stock TPI intake is known restriction to top end performance so anything you can do to improve flow will add power potential
Old 02-14-2012, 12:07 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
irockid43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Spirit Lake, ID
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 IROC-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

Yeah, ive heard that the runners were the most restricted part of the top end. The cam Im running has 206-212 duration and 480-487 lift. With the carb Im getting power up past 6000rpm, Im hoping to get good flow from the tpi and not lose the top end power.
Old 02-14-2012, 12:25 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
BlackenedBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Aussie 9-bolt/3.27 posi
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

The stock top end can support 400hp/500ft lbs, You think you'll exceed that with the 355?
Old 02-14-2012, 01:02 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
vetteoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Not in Kansas anymore
Posts: 7,732
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

Originally Posted by BlackenedBird
The stock top end can support 400hp/500ft lbs,
But flatlines at 4500
Aftermarket intakes will run past 6K
Old 02-14-2012, 08:12 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
BlackenedBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,893
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Aussie 9-bolt/3.27 posi
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

Originally Posted by vetteoz
But flatlines at 4500
Aftermarket intakes will run past 6K
More like 4750/5000, but it comes down to the Owners desired usage of the vehicle. On the street, 4500 is plenty. For drag racing higher rpms might be. But a higher rpm range also costs you bottom end torque.

For a primarily street car, I'd gladly sacrifice the above 4500rpm horsepower to gain bottom end torque. For the drag strip I'd go for rpms too.

I constantly see people quick to dismiss TPIs rpm range when no consideration is given to the intended usage.
Old 02-14-2012, 08:38 AM
  #7  
Senior Member

 
camaro1185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Iroc
Engine: 5.7L
Transmission: '96 T56, Hurst Shifter, Mech VSS
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

I think a FAST TPI intake would work well with your combo. It will allow you to keep that low end torque, but let you breath uptop and not waste your cam. Your set up with that intake and a spot on tune will make a really fun street car that should be easily into the 12's.
Old 02-14-2012, 10:17 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
irockid43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Spirit Lake, ID
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 IROC-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

Thanks for the info guys. I forgot to mention that my heads have been ported and polished too. Ive been trying to find cfm specs on the stock runners compared to slps. Im wondering how much of a difference bigger runners can make? What is a Fast TPI intake?
Old 02-14-2012, 10:26 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ninetyone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91' Firebird SOLD
Engine: 350 TPI +bolt-ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

Originally Posted by irockid43
Thanks for the info guys. I forgot to mention that my heads have been ported and polished too. Ive been trying to find cfm specs on the stock runners compared to slps. Im wondering how much of a difference bigger runners can make? What is a Fast TPI intake?
are u keeping the 273's? then if you are you better go for a low end torque street car. How are u using the vehicle? track only? street?
Old 02-14-2012, 11:41 AM
  #10  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
irockid43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Spirit Lake, ID
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 IROC-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

I would love to change the rear end gears to 3.73s, or 3.42s. Its just a street car, but not a daily driver. I feel like the gears are way too high right now. Do you guys think that upgrading the runners sacrifices low end torque?? I am just kind of wondering the difference in performance between stock and aftermarket runners, and I guess trying to confirm that they are the most restrictive part of the intake? Maybe someone has done this upgrade and was happy or unhappy with the results?
Old 02-14-2012, 12:28 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
TTOP350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,723
Received 773 Likes on 520 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

Originally Posted by irockid43
Thanks for the info guys. I forgot to mention that my heads have been ported and polished too. Ive been trying to find cfm specs on the stock runners compared to slps. Im wondering how much of a difference bigger runners can make? What is a Fast TPI intake?
Unported the SLPs will show very little gain. You have to port the !!!! out of them to be worth it. then you need a bigger or ported base.
Old 02-14-2012, 12:58 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
tenpin842's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Richmond 3.73
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

The heads are your biggest bottle neck with the TPI motors. You have updated heads so I think you will see nice gains. I have the Edelbrock intake set up on mine. And I'm pretty happy.
Old 02-14-2012, 02:12 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ninetyone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91' Firebird SOLD
Engine: 350 TPI +bolt-ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

Originally Posted by irockid43
I would love to change the rear end gears to 3.73s, or 3.42s. Its just a street car, but not a daily driver. I feel like the gears are way too high right now. Do you guys think that upgrading the runners sacrifices low end torque?? I am just kind of wondering the difference in performance between stock and aftermarket runners, and I guess trying to confirm that they are the most restrictive part of the intake? Maybe someone has done this upgrade and was happy or unhappy with the results?
you will lose a little low end,it will mainly shift your powerband up a little. the same torque you had at like 3k rpm will now be seen at 3500 but you may see like an extra 10 ft/lbs. That is basically how it works. Just so you know, if you are running a 700r4 transmission,then 342's would be the max gear i would use. I have 342 and almost have no 1st gear now and feels like i need to shift again after 65. So that gives u an idea. I say stick with the stock runners UNTIL your requires bigger runners.
Old 02-14-2012, 02:14 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ninetyone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91' Firebird SOLD
Engine: 350 TPI +bolt-ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

i think your looking at like 10hp on a stock motor and they cost $300+.
Old 02-14-2012, 02:35 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
tenpin842's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Richmond 3.73
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

Before you look into a gear in the rear end, think about the cost. You probably have a series 2 carrier. Series 2...you can only go to a 3.08 gear....its not worth the $$ in my opinion.
Anything more then that your going to have to jump to a series 3 carrier. And if your going to be spending the $$ I would go with 3.73....I have had them in my car for 6 years...wouldn't change a thing! People who think 3.42's are the best....haven't driven a car with 3.73's LOL!!
Old 02-14-2012, 02:43 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ninetyone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91' Firebird SOLD
Engine: 350 TPI +bolt-ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

you can pick up a used rear for $150 from a junkyard. Sometimes with 342 or 323's in them. I remembering reading an article on a 91' TPI car that went from 342 to 373 and gained nothing. Maybe a better 60ft time.
Old 02-14-2012, 02:46 PM
  #17  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ninetyone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91' Firebird SOLD
Engine: 350 TPI +bolt-ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

Originally Posted by tenpin842
Before you look into a gear in the rear end, think about the cost. You probably have a series 2 carrier. Series 2...you can only go to a 3.08 gear....its not worth the $$ in my opinion.
Anything more then that your going to have to jump to a series 3 carrier. And if your going to be spending the $$ I would go with 3.73....I have had them in my car for 6 years...wouldn't change a thing! People who think 3.42's are the best....haven't driven a car with 3.73's LOL!!
Remember he only has 273's. I gained like 3 tenths from my 342 swap! Feels like 100 ft lbs of torque. Even my wife said the car felt like it had a supercharger or something on it
Old 02-14-2012, 06:39 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
irockid43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Spirit Lake, ID
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 IROC-Z
Engine: 355
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

Originally Posted by tenpin842
Before you look into a gear in the rear end, think about the cost. You probably have a series 2 carrier. Series 2...you can only go to a 3.08 gear....its not worth the $$ in my opinion.
Anything more then that your going to have to jump to a series 3 carrier. And if your going to be spending the $$ I would go with 3.73....I have had them in my car for 6 years...wouldn't change a thing! People who think 3.42's are the best....haven't driven a car with 3.73's LOL!!
Yeah, I would like to use the 3.73s.. I think. What kind of rpm are you running at 60mph?
Old 02-14-2012, 07:04 PM
  #19  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ninetyone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91' Firebird SOLD
Engine: 350 TPI +bolt-ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

Originally Posted by irockid43
Yeah, I would like to use the 3.73s.. I think. What kind of rpm are you running at 60mph?
suit yourself
Old 02-15-2012, 07:15 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
tenpin842's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Richmond 3.73
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

Originally Posted by ninetyone
Remember he only has 273's. I gained like 3 tenths from my 342 swap! Feels like 100 ft lbs of torque. Even my wife said the car felt like it had a supercharger or something on it
and imagine what she would have said if you installed a 3.73

It's not like hes going to the track racing every week. Hes an in town driver who like the streetlight to street light race. Or likes the feel of goosing the gas pedal off the start.

You want to get even better throw a little stall in it. Do some research, a stall out of a S10 truck / blazer bumps up the stall a little, that's cheap too. And that's just a stock GM converter. I think our cars stall around 1200 this bumps it up to 1700.
Old 02-15-2012, 07:39 AM
  #21  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
vetteoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Not in Kansas anymore
Posts: 7,732
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

Originally Posted by BlackenedBird
For a primarily street car, I'd gladly sacrifice the above 4500rpm horsepower to gain bottom end torque.
Remember the 3.07 1st gear of the auto gives plenty of torque multiplication
In 1st gear ,2.73 rear w/ T700 is equal to old skool 3spd auto with 3.4's
3.42 is equal to old skool auto w/ 5.10's

Originally Posted by ninetyone
I remembering reading an article on a 91' TPI car that went from 342 to 373 and gained nothing. Maybe a better 60ft time.
Probably running out of top end w/TPI

Last edited by vetteoz; 02-15-2012 at 07:44 AM.
Old 02-15-2012, 07:51 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
tenpin842's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Richmond 3.73
Re: Stock Runners? Modified 355

Originally Posted by irockid43
Yeah, I would like to use the 3.73s.. I think. What kind of rpm are you running at 60mph?

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tran...4-11-whos.html

here is a link to the mph / rpm's it shows 3.73's also

Last edited by tenpin842; 02-15-2012 at 07:56 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
08-20-2017 12:16 AM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
40
08-21-2015 02:12 PM
theurge
TPI
7
08-21-2015 12:46 PM
marcusaw
DFI and ECM
4
08-10-2015 08:13 AM



Quick Reply: Stock Runners? Modified 355



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM.