Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2017, 10:24 AM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
z28cmr83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 83 Z28, 84 Z28
Engine: 5.0 Cross Fire, 5.0 H.O.
Transmission: 4 Speed Auto, 5 Speed Manual
Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

Hey everyone, its been a while since I have visited ThirdGen, but I am finally getting everything together to restore my 84 Z28 that I have held on to for 15 years. I have a bran new LS3 in the driveway and I am trying to figure out which transmission to hook it up to. What is the difference between drivability/performance on these 2 transmissions with their respective gear ratios of:

TUET11009
2.66 / 1.78 / 1.30 / 1.00 /.80 / .63

TUET11012
2.97 / 2.10 / 1.46 / 1.00 / .74 / .50

I am coming from the stock T-5. I am assuming I will be running a 3.73 rear, but I'm open to suggestions if anyone can provide some info on what I can expect from these combinations. My goal for this car is modern drivability, I will never be at the track, but I want to retain the Camaro spirit.
Old 07-20-2017, 10:59 AM
  #2  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
rgauder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Windsor, Ontario
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Re: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

The closer ratios would be more fun for a protouring type build.
Old 07-21-2017, 07:53 AM
  #3  
 
Jeremy85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Preston, ID
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Re: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

I agree, somewhat. But the wider ratio spread is closer to what GM used behind the LS3, and if you choose the wide, you're copying the drivetrain and gearing HotRod used on their orange 2nd-gen Camaro build about 2 years ago. They went with the ERod LS3, the wide-ratio T56 Magnum, and a 3.70:1 rear. You can Google their follow-up article for how it worked out. The deeper first is better in parking lots, and will launch better on drag radials. You have enough axle gear to pull that sixth without lugging.
Old 07-21-2017, 11:18 AM
  #4  
jmd
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
jmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Aridzona
Posts: 6,293
Received 44 Likes on 43 Posts
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

Go test drive an LS3 Camaro. If you like the 1-4, go 2.97.

Then test drive something with the 2.66.

Neither is a bad set of ratios. If you were going to the drag strip then I would say 2.66. A casual cruiser is great with 2.97.

All that interrelated to the rear gear.

And, don't get too tied up in 6th gear ratio. In the TR 6060 line, including T56 magnum, each can be changed.
Old 07-21-2017, 06:04 PM
  #5  
 
Jeremy85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Preston, ID
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '85 Camaro
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Re: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

Depending on your driving circumstances, better to be turning an extra hundred RPM all the time with the 0.63 sixth than always downshifting out of the 0.50 sixth. Fifth is just as easy to change.
Old 06-27-2020, 09:13 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
malc1080's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1987 z28 T Tops
Re: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

which transmission did you end up going with? im looking at them both on summit racing the TUET-11009 being cheaper $3,195.00 vs the TUET-11012 for $3,379.99.

Will this transmission fit easily in our 3rd gen camaros? I heard you just had to cut the floor shifter 2in back is that correct?
Old 06-27-2020, 09:26 PM
  #7  
Member

iTrader: (8)
 
daferris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lansing, Mi
Posts: 403
Received 33 Likes on 28 Posts
Car: One owner '88 IROC 50k
Engine: L98 with bolt ons.
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3:42 again
Re: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

Originally Posted by malc1080
which transmission did you end up going with? im looking at them both on summit racing the TUET-11009 being cheaper $3,195.00 vs the TUET-11012 for $3,379.99.

Will this transmission fit easily in our 3rd gen camaros? I heard you just had to cut the floor shifter 2in back is that correct?
Tremec now has a Magnum F that does not require you to cut the floor. Think it's available in both ratios
Old 06-27-2020, 10:14 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
malc1080's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1987 z28 T Tops
Re: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

Originally Posted by daferris
Tremec now has a Magnum F that does not require you to cut the floor. Think it's available in both ratios

oh wow your absolutely right! Thank you for that info. It’s on summit racing it’s the “magnum-f manual transmissions TUET16362” for $3,395.00.
Old 06-28-2020, 11:10 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
GeneralDisorder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,255
Received 422 Likes on 323 Posts
Car: 86 Imponte Ruiner 450GT, 91 Formula
Engine: 350 Vortec, FIRST TPI, 325 RWHP
Transmission: 700R4 3000 stall.
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt Torsen 3.70
Re: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

Interesting - can the Magnum F accept a normal gen 1 sbc bell housing? This would make a T5 replacement a lot easier......

GD
Old 06-28-2020, 12:04 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,175
Received 1,703 Likes on 1,296 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

The closer ratio and a higher-number rear gear is where the "fun factor" is at.

Factory choices for things like that (*cough*LS3*cough*) AREN'T designed to maximize "fun" in all cases. They are intended to minimize emissions, minimize warranty expense, minimize emissions, appeal to the widest possible audience, minimize emissions, give the best available fuel mileage, minimize emissions, ... oh did I forget to mention, EMISSIONS?? Quoting "that's what the factory used" isn't really altogether applicable to a hot-rodder build.

Having had a 83 L69 Z28 with the lame stock 3.73 ratio and a LT1 T-56 with 1st - 3rd ratios similar to the closer ones up there, I'd say, 3.73 isn't enough gear. It's pretty much about the bare minimum. It felt almost like the OE T-5 taking off in 2nd instead of 1st. 4.10s would be much better.
Old 06-28-2020, 12:16 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
malc1080's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1987 z28 T Tops
Re: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

Originally Posted by GeneralDisorder
Interesting - can the Magnum F accept a normal gen 1 sbc bell housing? This would make a T5 replacement a lot easier......

GD
gen 1? You’re not pairing it to an ls1?
Old 06-28-2020, 12:33 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
GeneralDisorder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,255
Received 422 Likes on 323 Posts
Car: 86 Imponte Ruiner 450GT, 91 Formula
Engine: 350 Vortec, FIRST TPI, 325 RWHP
Transmission: 700R4 3000 stall.
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt Torsen 3.70
Re: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

Originally Posted by malc1080
gen 1? You’re not pairing it to an ls1?
The OP is using an LS3....... I wouldn't be. I rather like the old school myself. My $200 Vortec puts out 400 HP and revs to 6500 so I don't really see the need on my daily.

I'm just curious if you could mate this to a gen 1 with the right bell housing and clutch components.... it says it won't work with an external slave which is a bummer but I'm sure I could work around that.

GD
Old 06-28-2020, 04:50 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland Suburbs
Posts: 5,850
Received 215 Likes on 162 Posts
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

What axle ratio do you have right now in the car? Are you planning on changing it to a shorter gear?

Personally, I'd go the close ratio, and STILL choose a shorter gear. I tried to post this nicely, but TGO doesn't support the BBCode for Tables, or straight up code correctly. Code works, but the formatting is junk.

Go to this Google Doc, make a copy of it for your use. Then you can edit the drop down for Gearset, Final Drive, and Tire/Rim combo. It'll calculate your MPH ever 100rpm. I've already set it to the Magnum TUET11009, 3.42s, and a 245/50/16 tire.

Bill's Transmission Gears vs MPH Calculator
Old 06-28-2020, 07:00 PM
  #14  
Member

iTrader: (8)
 
daferris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lansing, Mi
Posts: 403
Received 33 Likes on 28 Posts
Car: One owner '88 IROC 50k
Engine: L98 with bolt ons.
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3:42 again
Re: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

Originally Posted by GeneralDisorder
Interesting - can the Magnum F accept a normal gen 1 sbc bell housing? This would make a T5 replacement a lot easier......

GD
You have to use the QuickTime bellhousing and a LS style push clutch.
Old 06-29-2020, 12:01 AM
  #15  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
GeneralDisorder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,255
Received 422 Likes on 323 Posts
Car: 86 Imponte Ruiner 450GT, 91 Formula
Engine: 350 Vortec, FIRST TPI, 325 RWHP
Transmission: 700R4 3000 stall.
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt Torsen 3.70
Re: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

Originally Posted by daferris
You have to use the QuickTime bellhousing and a LS style push clutch.
I assume flywheel's for that clutch mated to a gen 1 are readily available? Sounds like it will work then! I may go this route on my 91 Formula.

GD
Old 06-29-2020, 07:50 PM
  #16  
jmd
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
jmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Aridzona
Posts: 6,293
Received 44 Likes on 43 Posts
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012

Originally Posted by GeneralDisorder
The OP is using an LS3....... I wouldn't be. I rather like the old school myself. My $200 Vortec puts out 400 HP and revs to 6500 so I don't really see the need on my daily.

I'm just curious if you could mate this to a gen 1 with the right bell housing and clutch components.... it says it won't work with an external slave which is a bummer but I'm sure I could work around that.

GD
Mating an LS1 F-body T56 or T56 Magnum to a Gen I or II SBC is the same deal since their maindrive (input) is the same and the 8 bolt pattern is the same.

LS1 F-body T56 bellhousing + the Centerforce spacer is one way.
QuickTime specific scattershield for this swap is another way.
The 4 bolt to 8-bolt adapter plate (used with the late 90s "aftermarket T56") and third gen or other Muncie pattern bell is another way.

You gotta get the pilot bearing right. etc. etc. etc.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mdricken
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
04-14-2007 07:29 AM
OutLaw305
Transmissions and Drivetrain
6
02-12-2004 01:26 AM
Ringmaster72
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
04-23-2003 12:10 AM
dhirocz
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
03-23-2002 11:01 AM



Quick Reply: Tremec TUET11009 vs TUET11012



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 PM.