WOW..How many of these were produced???
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Car: 1989 trans am gta
Engine: tpi 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
WOW..How many of these were produced???
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...&category=6427 ???? If I only had the money???
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Car: 1985 Camaro, 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L carbed and 5.0L TPI
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 and 3.27 posi
Thats a nice GTA. Too nice in fact. I need something that can be driven. That car needs to be in a museum!
TGO Supporter

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
i love the perfect statement, nothing is perfect with 12,000 miles
:werd: my car has 14k org miles and it aint perfect either (not even close to be) still very clean and nice.. Also tat GTA kicks ***!:hail:
:werd: my car has 14k org miles and it aint perfect either (not even close to be) still very clean and nice.. Also tat GTA kicks ***!:hail:
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: United States
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Kandied91z
i love the perfect statement, nothing is perfect with 12,000 miles.
i love the perfect statement, nothing is perfect with 12,000 miles.
Case in point - our 1945 Indian bike has been restored and cared for so meticulously that it still looks, rides, and handles as it did when it was delivered to the U.S. military. I know, I'm comparing apples and oranges, but it's the best example I have at the moment.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 3
From: Marietta, GA
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt
yes but it was restored, key word there... this car hasnt anything that old with miles wont be absolutely perfect. Notice its a NY car and theres no undercarriage pics and only one pretty bad engine shot (shouldnt that say 5.7L?) I'd be willing to bet theres a bit of surface rust going on on the bottom (not stock exhaust either *cough*rusted off*cough*) Still looks pretty nice tho, ebay ads just irritate me when they state no flaws and just describe it as perfect.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
The guy is claiming it is rare because it has a 350 with t-tops
This is a 2 owner all original GTA with the very rare 5.7 liter/t-top combined option. It is an original 12,400 mile car that can be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt by carfax and with all the documentation that I have on the car. As you might recall you could only get the 5.0 liter engine with the t-tops
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
The thing that I think is hilarious is the bill of sale when he bought it for less that half of his buy it now, let alone that was almost 9 years ago.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Car: 1989 trans am gta
Engine: tpi 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
What caught my eye was the t top 5.7 combo.I have never seen one with this combo and was wondering how many of these were actually produced . I saw the horsepower # too It came stock with 240 add 15 for exhaust and maybe 10 for a k-n filter and that still falls short of 300 ..I'd say about 260 horses ..I will email the guy and tell him that I want to buy it for $10k due to the false statement in the add
Either way whoever buys this car is getting a nice clean thirdgen with a rare t top 5.7 option .But I would never pay 22k for it ..You could find a real nice tta for that kind of money.. I don't know if this holds true but on another board someone stated that this car is 1 of 11 in 1989 with this combo .. RARE .........
Either way whoever buys this car is getting a nice clean thirdgen with a rare t top 5.7 option .But I would never pay 22k for it ..You could find a real nice tta for that kind of money.. I don't know if this holds true but on another board someone stated that this car is 1 of 11 in 1989 with this combo .. RARE ......... Last edited by qiker; Nov 21, 2004 at 06:01 AM.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
Originally posted by qiker
What caught my eye was the t top 5.7 combo.I have never seen one with this combo and was wondering how many of these were actually produced . I saw the horsepower # too It came stock with 240 add 15 for exhaust and maybe 10 for a k-n filter and that still falls short of 300 ..I'd say about 260 horses ..I will email the guy and tell him that I want to buy it for $10k due to the false statement in the add
Either way whoever buys this car is getting a nice clean thirdgen with a rare t top 5.7 option .But I would never pay 22k for it ..You could find a real nice tta for that kind of money.. I don't know if this holds true but on another board someone stated that this car is 1 of 11 in 1989 with this combo .. RARE .........
What caught my eye was the t top 5.7 combo.I have never seen one with this combo and was wondering how many of these were actually produced . I saw the horsepower # too It came stock with 240 add 15 for exhaust and maybe 10 for a k-n filter and that still falls short of 300 ..I'd say about 260 horses ..I will email the guy and tell him that I want to buy it for $10k due to the false statement in the add
Either way whoever buys this car is getting a nice clean thirdgen with a rare t top 5.7 option .But I would never pay 22k for it ..You could find a real nice tta for that kind of money.. I don't know if this holds true but on another board someone stated that this car is 1 of 11 in 1989 with this combo .. RARE ......... And 10 HP for a K&N is a bit high
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
From: St. John's, NL, Canada
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
The t-top/350 combination is not rare....AT ALL!!! You could get a t-topped 350 from the factory up until 1990. Then in 1991 with the new banshee style Trans Am, GM came up with this "idea" that the 350's made too much torque for a t-topped car. So production of t-topped 350's stopped in 1991 and for 1992. Then when the fourth gens cam along you could get a t-topped LT1 car!
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 379
Likes: 4
From: New Mexico
Car: 87 Firebird,
Engine: lq4
Transmission: gto t56 (mn12)
Yea Speed88 is pretty much dead on. My 89 Formula has T-tops from the factory and a 350 TPI. At one time I had an engine in the car that was making 320 horsepower. I never had a problem with twisting or tweaking the body or whatever problem is associated with t-tops and torque. Does anyone know of actual problems with those later model years?
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by speed88
The t-top/350 combination is not rare....AT ALL!!! You could get a t-topped 350 from the factory up until 1990. Then in 1991 with the new banshee style Trans Am, GM came up with this "idea" that the 350's made too much torque for a t-topped car. So production of t-topped 350's stopped in 1991 and for 1992. Then when the fourth gens cam along you could get a t-topped LT1 car!
The t-top/350 combination is not rare....AT ALL!!! You could get a t-topped 350 from the factory up until 1990. Then in 1991 with the new banshee style Trans Am, GM came up with this "idea" that the 350's made too much torque for a t-topped car. So production of t-topped 350's stopped in 1991 and for 1992. Then when the fourth gens cam along you could get a t-topped LT1 car!
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
From: surrey b.c. canada
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
350 t tops isn't rare at all , finding a hardtop gta, nows that different.
and in 91-92 oyu could get a 350 t tops bird just not a camaro
and in 91-92 oyu could get a 350 t tops bird just not a camaro
Originally posted by Kandied91z
i love the perfect statement, nothing is perfect with 12,000 miles.
nice car though, always liked the gta.
i love the perfect statement, nothing is perfect with 12,000 miles.
nice car though, always liked the gta.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: United States
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by grngryoutmyway
yes but it was restored, key word there... this car hasnt anything that old with miles wont be absolutely perfect.
yes but it was restored, key word there... this car hasnt anything that old with miles wont be absolutely perfect.
To borrow a tired cliche - if I can do it anyone can.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
From: St. John's, NL, Canada
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by ES87iroc
Not really, there are factory 350/ttop 91/92 firebirds. Look up member mdformula350.
Not really, there are factory 350/ttop 91/92 firebirds. Look up member mdformula350.
Originally posted by speed88
You couldn;t get it in a GTA, just go on the GTAsourcepage.com and see for yourself. So why could you get it in a Formula. I'm pretty sure his car is not a t-top?
You couldn;t get it in a GTA, just go on the GTAsourcepage.com and see for yourself. So why could you get it in a Formula. I'm pretty sure his car is not a t-top?
its deffinatley a t-top...but maybe the drivetrain was swapped? i think this is too good to be true...and again i'll say...whats with the dash pad?? a "perfect car" shouldnt need a dash pad...but maybe its stock?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,010
Likes: 0
From: Lubbock, TX
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: Future: LSX Turbo
Transmission: built T-56
like everyone else is saying a 350 with t tops is NOT rare its called a GTA what is rare is finding an actual GTA without t tops and a 350 (i think ive seen a few) anyways i have a question
Why did gm not want so much torque on a t top car??? Whats the big deal?? will too much torque damage the t tops or something??? When i add a bigger engine to my 350 t top GTA i dont want to have problems.
Why did gm not want so much torque on a t top car??? Whats the big deal?? will too much torque damage the t tops or something??? When i add a bigger engine to my 350 t top GTA i dont want to have problems.
Originally posted by GodSpeedGTA
like everyone else is saying a 350 with t tops is NOT rare its called a GTA what is rare is finding an actual GTA without t tops and a 350 (i think ive seen a few) anyways i have a question
Why did gm not want so much torque on a t top car??? Whats the big deal?? will too much torque damage the t tops or something??? When i add a bigger engine to my 350 t top GTA i dont want to have problems.
like everyone else is saying a 350 with t tops is NOT rare its called a GTA what is rare is finding an actual GTA without t tops and a 350 (i think ive seen a few) anyways i have a question
Why did gm not want so much torque on a t top car??? Whats the big deal?? will too much torque damage the t tops or something??? When i add a bigger engine to my 350 t top GTA i dont want to have problems.
too much torque is supposed to twist the car so the t-tops dont seal right...thats what i heard...
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: IL
Car: 89 Formy
Engine: 305--->TPI 350
Transmission: auto :(
Doesn't anyone see the louvers?
Why are you guys talking about how rare the t-top 350 combo is. The first thing I noticed was that it has louvers with a warp around spoiler(that isn't cracked but it looks like the dashpad might be). I didn't think this combo was possible because the both the louvers and spoiler clip to the side of the hatch. I tried to put louvers on my formula that has the wrap around spoiler and it won't fit. If I put the louvers on first it might fit. All I'm saying it thats pretty rare. Unless any of you have pics of a wrap around with louvers.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
too much torque?? like 330lbft is alot.

twisting can be eliminate somewhat with subframe connectors and stiffer chassis/suspension components
or add a 4 or 6 point cage/roll bar and be done with it LOL

twisting can be eliminate somewhat with subframe connectors and stiffer chassis/suspension components
or add a 4 or 6 point cage/roll bar and be done with it LOL
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by speed88
You couldn;t get it in a GTA, just go on the GTAsourcepage.com and see for yourself. So why could you get it in a Formula. I'm pretty sure his car is not a t-top?
You couldn;t get it in a GTA, just go on the GTAsourcepage.com and see for yourself. So why could you get it in a Formula. I'm pretty sure his car is not a t-top?
Last edited by ES87iroc; Nov 22, 2004 at 05:00 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, Il
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: Lt1
Transmission: T56
I have a friend who has that exact car minus the louvers sitting in a garage now for more than 10 years. His has just under 50,000 on it and is definitely not anywhere near as clean. They are definitely twins though.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,372
Likes: 2
From: Toledo, OH
Car: 1982 Trans Am
Engine: SBC 400
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 2.77
I think all this talk about having T-Tops with a 350 will twist the frame is and ruin the T-Tops is BS. GM may have said it, but it's not going to do anything damaging. Look at the GN's. They had T-Tops and the torque suposedly twisted thier frames. Did it damage the T-Tops? I saw in GMHP Magazine this guy who has a T-Type running 10's with T-Tops! This goes along the same lines as the '86 Pontiac Grand Prix 2+2. Pontiac didn't put T-Tops on them because they said the wind coming in from the T-Tops would blow the rear window out. I don't believe it, look at the F-Body's. They have a similar rear hatch window and they don't blow out. I think even the Monte Carlo SS Aerocoupes could get T-Tops.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by 1982TA
I think all this talk about having T-Tops with a 350 will twist the frame is and ruin the T-Tops is BS. GM may have said it, but it's not going to do anything damaging. Look at the GN's. They had T-Tops and the torque suposedly twisted thier frames. Did it damage the T-Tops? I saw in GMHP Magazine this guy who has a T-Type running 10's with T-Tops! This goes along the same lines as the '86 Pontiac Grand Prix 2+2. Pontiac didn't put T-Tops on them because they said the wind coming in from the T-Tops would blow the rear window out. I don't believe it, look at the F-Body's. They have a similar rear hatch window and they don't blow out. I think even the Monte Carlo SS Aerocoupes could get T-Tops.
I think all this talk about having T-Tops with a 350 will twist the frame is and ruin the T-Tops is BS. GM may have said it, but it's not going to do anything damaging. Look at the GN's. They had T-Tops and the torque suposedly twisted thier frames. Did it damage the T-Tops? I saw in GMHP Magazine this guy who has a T-Type running 10's with T-Tops! This goes along the same lines as the '86 Pontiac Grand Prix 2+2. Pontiac didn't put T-Tops on them because they said the wind coming in from the T-Tops would blow the rear window out. I don't believe it, look at the F-Body's. They have a similar rear hatch window and they don't blow out. I think even the Monte Carlo SS Aerocoupes could get T-Tops.
For a 5.0 auto, can't believe how much $$ its getting.
Sure its in nice condition but I've got a near mint 89 GTA with the 5spd G92 3.45 rear 5.0 package which in my opinion is a hell of a better package...
Sure its in nice condition but I've got a near mint 89 GTA with the 5spd G92 3.45 rear 5.0 package which in my opinion is a hell of a better package...
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
From: So Cal (SD)
Car: 91 firebird now
Engine: 305
Transmission: 5 speed
Man that sure brings back memorys of when I bought my first thirdgen, a flame red 86 trans am with just about every option you could get from the factory in 86 with premo paint *crys* she looked so hot. Oh the silver bumper cover was after a little misshap but she still looked great after that
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
From: Allensville, PA
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI (Now HSR)
Transmission: 700R4 by Probuilt
Axle/Gears: 3:27 9 Bolt Posi W/ Discs
That is my cars twin minus the louvers and the T Tops. My car is an 88 though with alot more miles but hasnt been restored because it doesnt need it. So how rare is that interrior exactly? I was gonna change mine out but if its as rare as you say Im gonna keep it but I need to recover the front seats soon because the leather is drying out. I am starting to think my car is kinda rare seeing as it has some of the not so common options.
Last edited by meridius; Feb 8, 2005 at 02:39 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post









