Opinions on this look
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Opinions on this look
I ran into some clearance problems putting the torq thrusts back on the Camaro after installing the Vette brakes so I'm trying them out on the Pontiac. Thinking about keeping them on this car and getting another wheel for the Camaro.
Stock

American Racing Torq Thrust II's


Here's how they look on the other car
Stock

American Racing Torq Thrust II's

Here's how they look on the other car
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Opinions on this look
I used to love 'em. Now I think that they're played out.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Opinions on this look
Haha well I'm not getting rid of the rims cuz I still love them, just trying to decide which car to keep them on.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 402
Likes: 13
From: Evansville, IN
Car: 1984 Trans Am WS6
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 LSD
Re: Opinions on this look
The Camaro's stance looks good with those wheels but chrome TTII's look awesome with a black car. If you plan on lowering the Formula an inch or two it would look killer; otherwise I'd run them on the Camaro, they make the Formula look like it sits kinda high whereas the stock wheels don't quite so much.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 574
Likes: 8
From: Georgia
Car: 91' Z28. 70' Dune Buggy
Engine: LSX Cam/Full Bolt ons
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: Opinions on this look
I like them better on the pontiac!
But they look good on both cars.
But they look good on both cars.
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: Culpeper, Va
Car: 1989 5.7 IROC Dark Red/Blk 92Z28
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R
Re: Opinions on this look
The Camaro's stance looks good with those wheels but chrome TTII's look awesome with a black car. If you plan on lowering the Formula an inch or two it would look killer; otherwise I'd run them on the Camaro, they make the Formula look like it sits kinda high whereas the stock wheels don't quite so much.
Trending Topics
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
Re: Opinions on this look
The stock wheels look better on the Formula and the TT2s look better on the Camaro. They're pretty good on both really. As said though, the Formula needs a drop to pull them off. They look perfect on the Camaro.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Opinions on this look
I want to lower the car. What kind of effect will that have on how it handles though?
Supreme Member




Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 33
From: Washington State
Car: 1983 BB 1995 Z28 Camaro's
Engine: 454-350
Transmission: TH350-4l60e
Axle/Gears: 373 posi-Stock
Re: Opinions on this look
Stock wheels on the formula look like they just need to be left on it.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
From: Round Rock, TX
Car: 1988 Firbird formula 350
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Nine Bolt
Re: Opinions on this look
I like the stock Formula wheels better. But ether way, it's a good looking Firebird!
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 328
Likes: 7
From: Gresham Oregon
Car: 1985 Z28 & 1997 Z28 SS SLP
Engine: Sbc 305 TPI & LT1
Transmission: 700r4 and A4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt Posi 323 & Posi 323
Re: Opinions on this look
Look better on the camaro, what size TT11s U have, my 15 X 8s were rubbing on bumps on my 84 Z28 so I put them back on my 78 TA, I think my tires were too tall as I had real meaty tires, but my 16 X 8 IROCs fit perfect, thanks
COTM Editor
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 13
From: WINDSOR, CO
Car: 91 Z28, 87 SC, 90 IROC, 92 RS
Engine: LS1, 305 TPI, L98, NADA
Transmission: T56, 700r4's, and NADA
Axle/Gears: 3.89, 3.42, 3.23, NADA
Re: Opinions on this look
I agree 100%!
I think that when toned down and made to look more like Vintage Wheel Works V40, or V45 they can have a cool old school road racer look. I would sand/bead blast the centers and brush the lips then clear coat in matte clear with flat caps. That would totally set them apart from every other old man rocking TT2's, and make the subtle enough to run on either car.
I would lower the Formula anyway, no matter where the wheels go. Nice cars man.
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 790
Likes: 4
From: Downriver, MI
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 4:10
Re: Opinions on this look
TT2's are nice wheels.. a bit overdone IMO, but they're a classic! Just get the stance right and they'll look great.
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 809
Likes: 1
From: Siloam Springs AR.
Car: 1998 Trans/Am, 1989 RS Camaro
Engine: LS1, LQ9 6.0
Transmission: 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 2.73
Re: Opinions on this look
+1 Stock , Those wheels are way played out.
COTM Editor (Retired)
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 83
From: Washington
Car: 89 Formula 350, TTA
Re: Opinions on this look
Youre going to be hard pressed to find another wheel that looks "more right" on a Formula than the factory wheels. The TTs look wrong on the Formula. sits too high too - as in looks like somebody changed the wheels simply for the sake of changing the wheels, with no thought or sense regarding the overall look of the car.
I think those TTs look pretty good on the Camaro, but terrible on the Formula. also, i go in for chrome on white before chrome on black.
TTs are a bit played out, but who cares? with a Third gen, your sort of limited anyway - especially on a Firebird.
again, imho, NOTHING looks better on a formula than the stock wheels. i just wish someone would make a one-off in 17".
I think those TTs look pretty good on the Camaro, but terrible on the Formula. also, i go in for chrome on white before chrome on black.
TTs are a bit played out, but who cares? with a Third gen, your sort of limited anyway - especially on a Firebird.
again, imho, NOTHING looks better on a formula than the stock wheels. i just wish someone would make a one-off in 17".
Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Car: 4/89 IROC Z28 G92 -
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Opinions on this look
I grew up with Torque thrusts ... Cragars..... so i'm partial.
I like how you can see the rotors and the spokes have nice depth.
I like how you can see the rotors and the spokes have nice depth.
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 241
Likes: 3
From: Piscataway, N.J.
Car: 1991 Formula 350, 2002 Grand Prix G
Engine: 350 with SLP & Edlebrock mods
Transmission: 4-speed automatic-700 R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt with 3:73
Re: Opinions on this look
You will also need an adjustable Panhard bar to compensate for the lowered rear end. The biggest problem you will run into is the clearance distance between the cat convertor and the ground which is about 3 1/2". If you drop it down (for looks) you will only have less than 2 1/2" which makes EVERY SPEED BUMP a scrap+plus dips in the road+driveways and so forth. Put on a good set of Alston Sub Frame Connectors and smile for the next week because of the awesome way the car feels (no more squeaks or rattles) and it rides like Cadillac sedan over bumps in the road.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1991 Camaro RS/1989 Formula
Engine: 5.0 L03 V8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Opinions on this look
You will also need an adjustable Panhard bar to compensate for the lowered rear end. The biggest problem you will run into is the clearance distance between the cat convertor and the ground which is about 3 1/2". If you drop it down (for looks) you will only have less than 2 1/2" which makes EVERY SPEED BUMP a scrap+plus dips in the road+driveways and so forth. Put on a good set of Alston Sub Frame Connectors and smile for the next week because of the awesome way the car feels (no more squeaks or rattles) and it rides like Cadillac sedan over bumps in the road.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
May 17, 2020 10:44 AM
LiquidBlue
Wheels and Tires
32
Dec 10, 2019 04:06 PM
skinny z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Oct 5, 2015 06:23 PM








