Body General body information and techniques for restoration, repairs, and modifications.

camaro & trans am concept

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 10:07 PM
  #1  
Alexcoqui's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 5
From: Manati, PR
Car: Trans Am "GTA"
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Auto
camaro & trans am concept

Hi, dont know if this is the right post for this, but somebody posted the camaro pic some time ago & I wanted to see how a trans am would look. So this is what I came with.. I would buy it!
Attached Thumbnails camaro & trans am concept-trans-am.jpg  
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 10:14 PM
  #2  
CorVM's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Clinton, MS
Car: '92 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: LO3 305ci.
Transmission: 700R4
That is definately a nice looking car, but I am biased towards 3rd and 4th generation 'birds Especially 3rd generation. But I do like the retro flair you gave it. You never know what might happen...

Corey
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 10:16 PM
  #3  
FruityOne's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 0
From: Elk Grove Village, IL
Car: 1989 TransAm GTA
Engine: One sweet modified 355 TPI.
Transmission: The kind that shifts....
Don't like it.

The front end it too bulbous, and the rear looks like fed it twinkies for a year.
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 10:20 PM
  #4  
5SIZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: Tucson
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Looks like a mercedes did the hippidy dippidy with a 69 maro & thats what popped out


also reminds me of the brand new mustangs.

not my cup of tea.
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 10:21 PM
  #5  
Alexcoqui's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 5
From: Manati, PR
Car: Trans Am "GTA"
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Auto
The body came out of this camaro, who I belive is some kind of concept.
if anybody has any info ill apreciated.
Attached Thumbnails camaro & trans am concept-camaro2.jpg  
Old Feb 12, 2004 | 10:41 PM
  #6  
FbodTrek's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
If they build that...

the F-body will die all over again (when ours shoot themselves for being related)
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 12:05 AM
  #7  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
the orange one i like, the bird no way.....that kids got alot of talent. the rendition they are actually working with is alot better though.
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 12:06 AM
  #8  
posbird87's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: wyandotte MI
Car: 87 formie
Engine: none
Transmission: none
just too curvy, and the trans am looks fat
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 01:03 AM
  #9  
Mathius's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
From: Northern Ohio
Originally posted by Alexcoqui
The body came out of this camaro, who I belive is some kind of concept.
if anybody has any info ill apreciated.

Ok, I can't seem to find the article, but that car was designed by Kris Horton. I've seen two blurbs on this, one was a small article that I can't seem to find. That article stated that the concept car was presented in its full portfolio to the top GM brass. It was presented through one of the popular Chevy Magazines, and I can't remember if it was Chevy High Performers, or Super Chevy, or what, but they took a photo of their editor presenting it to the GM representative whos name I can't remember right now.

The second blurb was a fan letter to Popular HotRodding, requesting contact info for Kris. The reply stated that Kris has done some other great works that will be showing up in PHR, and that while they couldn't give out his e-mail address or anything like that, they knew he frequented www.camaroz28.com

Hope that helps some. I'll try to keep looking for that article.

Mathius
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 01:16 AM
  #10  
Mathius's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
From: Northern Ohio
I just went through my magazines again and couldn't find the damn article. It'll turn up when I quit looking for it.

Anyways, I did find this in another thread....


http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...09phr_5camaro/

Mathius
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 01:23 AM
  #11  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
That car looks retarded and doesn't resemble a f-body.
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 01:58 AM
  #12  
ksrammstein's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
From: North Olmsted, OH
Car: 1984 Pontiac Trans Am WS6
Engine: H.O. 305 5.0L;L69
Transmission: T-5; Axle Ratio 3.73
I think it looks cool...just not for an F-body....for some reason it kinda looks like a stang...U know the new ones
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 02:33 AM
  #13  
JeremyNYR's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 2
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 4.10 gears
I read the article you're talking about and it was linked from another thread on the board. It wasn't presented to "GM brass" though. It was stated in the article that GM doesn't accept any renditions from outside the company due to legal reasons. The author or the article had a former GM employee that had worked in design critique the computer generated pic you see above. He said mostly positive things about Kris' skill level and that he was impressed with the 19 year old's work.
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 07:12 AM
  #14  
AFTERMIDNIGHT's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Buckeye Lake, OH
Car: 1989 Camaro, 2008 600RR
Engine: 311
Transmission: T-10
Axle/Gears: 02 SS Rear with 3.23 Gears
i like it. it something different, new, but with the old-school attitude lurking out it's head. something that looks like that with the new ls2 or the concept 427 small block cranking 650hp with i think like 590ftlbs. mate it to a t56 or even do something like a new school muncie 4-spd for more of the old school taste. just my .02.
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 08:53 AM
  #15  
FyreLance's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 1
From: Huber Heights, OH
Car: 00 TA, 91 Formula, 89 RS
Engine: LS1 / 305 / 2.8, respectively
Transmission: T-56 / auto / auto
Looks like a retard with a bad attitude. No offense.
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 10:28 AM
  #16  
3.1EyeCandy's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 59
From: Conroe, TX
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60e
I LOVE it! Nice modification!
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 10:42 AM
  #17  
TransAmman87's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 90 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T-5
In this day and age where car companies are trying to recapture the muscle car market by creating "retro" cars, they really are doing an injustice to what these cars once were. Take the new "GTO" for example, it doesn't remind anyone of the mid 60's to early 70's goats which is a damn shame. I have seen concept versions of possible new camaros and firebird/trans-am's just like the one posted, and my *** they are either ugly or just a totally different car. If anyone really wants to create a retro car, they should really come up with something that is unique, not just create a car and slap a badge on it (aka. GTO/Monero). May the Gods of cars please look after these storied names and give designers some much needed devine intervention!
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 12:15 PM
  #18  
pasky's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 1
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Glad im not the only one who thinks all these new concept cars are hideous.
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 01:09 PM
  #19  
nolanr0413's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 1
From: New York
Car: Trans am
were do i sign , ill buy it. it looks sweet .
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 02:49 PM
  #20  
X86TRANSAMWS6X's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Palmer, MA
Car: 87 Conquest TSI, 86 Fiero GT
the only thing i would change is the grill and headlights. looks sweet btw!
Old Feb 13, 2004 | 03:03 PM
  #21  
Bandit5's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
It is just a concept... if they do produce a real on, the production model will be much more tame.
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 03:48 AM
  #22  
AmorgetRS's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,646
Likes: 1
From: Near Seattle, WA
Retro is a fad, that is why the GTO doesn't look anything like the 70s GTO. GM will not make a Retro Camaro or Firebird, as they shouldn't. We progressed from 67-02, why the heck do we go back to 67 styling for only a few production years, then have it all die again as everyone realises that it isn't that cool.
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 08:30 PM
  #23  
SinthetikIroc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Haverhill, Ma
Car: Corvette
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
i think those 2 look tough. and if i had the cash would def buy them
Old Feb 14, 2004 | 08:43 PM
  #24  
Kevs87Z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, Ohio Area
Car: Yellow/Black 1987 Z28
Engine: 355 Carb
Transmission: 700R4
how could you rape the kids idea like that? i mean all you did was change the grill, add another headlight, a spoiler, and changed the color. the design is exactly the same as his. thats plagiarism or something you just can do things like this and claim it as your idea.
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 06:09 PM
  #25  
kretos's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
From: surrey b.c. canada
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
i dunno i wanna see a 5th gen come out but personally i don't like em look sorta riceish to me
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 06:17 PM
  #26  
TransAmman87's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 90 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T-5
You know what, I almost guarentee that if GM comes out with a fifth gen. Camaro/Firebird, it most likely will not be something affordable for the common man. I'm only 21, and still have a lot to learn, but I would like to see GM create a car that represents the car name and the groups like us. Our imput is more important that some designer trying to make a statement and give their interpretation of what these new age muscle cars should be. Its my hope that if they bring back the nameplates of these historic cars, that they find it possible to keep them from hitting the 30 thousand dollar mark, muscle cars should be affordable, because hell, we are going to do things to improve them anyway.
Old Feb 15, 2004 | 07:03 PM
  #27  
GTA4ME's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 2
From: Hill AFB, Utah
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA Notchback
Engine: 305ci, 5.0L, TPI, HO
Transmission: Borg Warner T5 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt Positraction Rear w/3.45 Grs
Sorry, but this is a 3rd Gen site, not 5th Gen. Thanks.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
camaro11j
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
Sep 19, 2018 08:49 AM
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 20, 2017 12:16 AM
TheJoeY88
Electronics
19
Dec 31, 2016 07:30 PM
The_Phoenix
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Sep 3, 2015 10:56 PM
84z96L31vortec
North East Region
1
Aug 10, 2015 08:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 PM.