lt vs LS1 rear brakes
lt vs LS1 rear brakes
what's the main differences between these two? i'm trying to figure out some new options since my new rear won't be able to accept my 91 rear disc brakes.
I came across 98 rear disc, the only the that was missing where the calipers, the brakes that hold the calipers, and pads. I guessing that i would need 98 parts to complete the upgrade to my 87 camaro. would U happen to know if the 98 gears would fit the 87 rear end?
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
Originally posted by steele
LS1's have aluminum calipers, while I believe the LT1's and older have steel ones. One advantage to aluminum is you can polish them up real nice like I did on my LS1.
LS1's have aluminum calipers, while I believe the LT1's and older have steel ones. One advantage to aluminum is you can polish them up real nice like I did on my LS1.
Ok, maybe I'm wrong about the aluminum part. But anyway, the LS1 rear brakes are definitely bigger. I know the front brakes are a lot better than the LT1 (dual piston vs. single piston, etc.) but I never paid much attention to the rear brakes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sailtexas186548
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
8
Jan 19, 2016 12:21 PM






