Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Regrets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2004, 02:18 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
red85berlinetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regrets

hey guys just a quick question... when i rebuilt my motor i went with an edelbrock performer EPS intake manifold. how ever all i hear on here is that the performer is no better then stock, well i have a question and that is how much HP do you think i picked up over stock and also would i see any type of a good gain switching to a performer RPM with the parts that i have listed. thanks
Old 11-10-2004, 03:14 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
nsimmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Langley, BC, Canada
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
most magazines show a 10-15hp gain

Last edited by nsimmons; 11-10-2004 at 03:53 PM.
Old 11-10-2004, 03:34 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
ljnowell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
most magazines show a 10-15hp gain
You know how those magazines are though
IN all honesty, you probably arent losing much. Would it be worth it? Hard to tell. I have seen people lose HP going from a stock intake to a Performer RPM. As mild is your combo is, you probably are cool with it.
Old 11-10-2004, 03:54 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

 
nsimmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Langley, BC, Canada
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 350 is running the same cam, with ported heads, and a performer. I have no complaints, it runs pretty strong.
Old 11-11-2004, 12:08 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
Damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Look at my sig. That's using a Performer intake (not even the newer, better, EPS version) and it's on a VERY mild 350. I've taken the lower Performer intake into the 12s a few times.
Old 11-11-2004, 03:49 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
red85berlinetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[i] I've taken the lower Performer intake into the 12s a few times. [/B]
well damn why does everyone on here bash it and say it no better then stock... i mean can a stock manifold get you into the 12's?
Old 11-11-2004, 03:55 PM
  #7  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Originally posted by red85berlinetta
can a stock manifold get you into the 12's?
Probably, if the rest of the combination works. That's one of the reasons why the intake is one of the last things to change.
Old 11-13-2004, 01:30 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
88IROC350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Pitman, NJ
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
I ran a Performer back in the day and my motor ran pretty darn good ...I switched to a RPM and noticed NO difference in the butt-dyno. I'd say the RPM is a little bit better, but its definately not worth buying a new one over your Performer (in my opinion)...
Old 11-13-2004, 06:16 AM
  #9  
Member
 
contactpatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North Texas
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Engine: sbc 350
Is the stock intake really a choke point?
What are the dimensions of the runners?
What are the dimensions of the stock-head's intake ports?
Old 11-14-2004, 11:27 AM
  #10  
Supreme Member
 
Streetiron85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4
If you look at the Performer and the RPM side by side, you'll see that the RPM has a greater sectional area to the runners. That, and it's raised a bit to smooth out some of the corners.
The EPS intake has the cleaner flow path of the RPM with the smaller runners of the Performer.
I'm not sure where the Performer intake becomes the weak link. But I honestly believe that the Performer has some better flow than the stocker, in spite of being a stock replacement. And the EPS is an improvement over that.
There are some advantages to the smaller runner intakes but those benefits happen below 2500rpm.
The cam you're using is one that has some pretty nice low end by the looks of it and I'd think that the EPS would compliment that well.
I'll take that EPS off your hands, if you feel like you need to get rid of it though.
Old 11-14-2004, 05:04 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
88IROK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700r4
Originally posted by Damon
Look at my sig. That's using a Performer intake (not even the newer, better, EPS version) and it's on a VERY mild 350. I've taken the lower Performer intake into the 12s a few times.
You're not quite the last Damon, I learned from one of the best, Al Graeber himself!
Old 11-16-2004, 02:42 AM
  #12  
Member
 
Teal91rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hollywood Florida
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro *RIP* 1984 MonteCarloSS 1972 Nova
Engine: 355 cid 383 cid
Transmission: TH350 TH350
Ive got the eps on my 355 and its a great intake. Ive also got a 1 inch carb spacers which pushed the rpm band up a little and gives it great powerband and ill tell you man this things got a low and mid range pull. Id much rather have this than an rpm on a daily driver!

Last edited by Teal91rs; 11-16-2004 at 02:45 AM.
Old 11-16-2004, 10:29 AM
  #13  
Supreme Member
 
Streetiron85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4
Originally posted by Teal91rs
Ive got the eps on my 355 and its a great intake. Ive also got a 1 inch carb spacers which pushed the rpm band up a little and gives it great powerband and ill tell you man this things got a low and mid range pull. Id much rather have this than an rpm on a daily driver!
Would that be a 1" open spacer or 4 hole?

.... If you're still reading
Old 11-17-2004, 04:53 PM
  #14  
Member
 
Teal91rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hollywood Florida
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro *RIP* 1984 MonteCarloSS 1972 Nova
Engine: 355 cid 383 cid
Transmission: TH350 TH350
I bought this car the way it was unlike the nova i didnt build the motor so i would have no idea what it is. With the stuf the guy gave me with the car (bunch of carbs a few distirbs timeing gun power stearing pump starter ect) theres a 1' 4 hole that looks as if it came in pack with a open spacer. ive always worryed if i was looseing perfomance from a 4 hole is this true? MY pops not home so i have to burden you with the lame question
Old 11-17-2004, 05:26 PM
  #15  
Member
 
IROC_385Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: N.E. Ohio
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: SBC 385
Transmission: 700 w/ manual valvebody & 2400 TCI
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt B&W w/ 3.70s
Kinda off topic...

Whats up Chris...I thought that was your car up there!

Anyways, just wanted to let you know that I haven't forgotten about you wanting those headers...come March or April I will be rebuilding my tranny and getting some bigger headers so you can have them then, if you still want.

Let me know!

Oh, and don't worry about that EPS, untill you put a REAL motor in that car
Old 11-17-2004, 05:40 PM
  #16  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
http://www.nhra.com/2004/events/race...ults/stk.html?

Bottom of the page, winner Jody Lang, '81 Malibu wagon. Runs 12.38 @ 101 mph.

That's a M/SA Stock 305. It must run a factory manifold.

You can make them fast, the only question is how much money you're going to spend getting there.

Last edited by five7kid; 11-17-2004 at 06:03 PM.
Old 11-17-2004, 05:50 PM
  #17  
Member
 
IROC_385Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: N.E. Ohio
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: SBC 385
Transmission: 700 w/ manual valvebody & 2400 TCI
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt B&W w/ 3.70s
Yea, we all know that if you put enough $$ into any motor you can run 12s in it...but I know this dude and feel obligated to bust his chops!
Old 11-17-2004, 06:05 PM
  #18  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
And that Malibu is hardly streetable.

My point was the intake doesn't hold you back until you've done a lot of other things.
Old 11-17-2004, 06:34 PM
  #19  
Member
 
IROC_385Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: N.E. Ohio
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: SBC 385
Transmission: 700 w/ manual valvebody & 2400 TCI
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt B&W w/ 3.70s
Old 11-21-2004, 09:52 PM
  #20  
jmd
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
jmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Aridzona
Posts: 6,288
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Originally posted by red85berlinetta
well damn why does everyone on here bash it and say it no better then stock...
It is, but it's not a 30hp increase so it's looked down upon. On the 305 by the thread-starter, the Performer is exactly what I'd use. You'd just lose velocity with the RPM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BurlyChev
Electronics
0
08-22-2015 11:42 AM
v8nate92RS
TBI
1
07-06-2004 01:38 AM
Captain C
TPI
4
06-25-2004 06:12 PM
StylnCamaro
Engine Swap
8
11-10-2003 01:06 PM
Coop91RS
Tech / General Engine
3
08-01-2000 08:43 PM



Quick Reply: Regrets



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 AM.