Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Regrets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 02:18 PM
  #1  
red85berlinetta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Regrets

hey guys just a quick question... when i rebuilt my motor i went with an edelbrock performer EPS intake manifold. how ever all i hear on here is that the performer is no better then stock, well i have a question and that is how much HP do you think i picked up over stock and also would i see any type of a good gain switching to a performer RPM with the parts that i have listed. thanks
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 03:14 PM
  #2  
nsimmons's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: Langley, BC, Canada
most magazines show a 10-15hp gain

Last edited by nsimmons; Nov 10, 2004 at 03:53 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 03:34 PM
  #3  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
most magazines show a 10-15hp gain
You know how those magazines are though
IN all honesty, you probably arent losing much. Would it be worth it? Hard to tell. I have seen people lose HP going from a stock intake to a Performer RPM. As mild is your combo is, you probably are cool with it.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 03:54 PM
  #4  
nsimmons's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: Langley, BC, Canada
My 350 is running the same cam, with ported heads, and a performer. I have no complaints, it runs pretty strong.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 12:08 PM
  #5  
Damon's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 13
From: Philly, PA
Look at my sig. That's using a Performer intake (not even the newer, better, EPS version) and it's on a VERY mild 350. I've taken the lower Performer intake into the 12s a few times.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 03:49 PM
  #6  
red85berlinetta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
[i] I've taken the lower Performer intake into the 12s a few times. [/B]
well damn why does everyone on here bash it and say it no better then stock... i mean can a stock manifold get you into the 12's?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 03:55 PM
  #7  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Originally posted by red85berlinetta
can a stock manifold get you into the 12's?
Probably, if the rest of the combination works. That's one of the reasons why the intake is one of the last things to change.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2004 | 01:30 AM
  #8  
88IROC350TPI's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 5
From: Pitman, NJ
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
I ran a Performer back in the day and my motor ran pretty darn good ...I switched to a RPM and noticed NO difference in the butt-dyno. I'd say the RPM is a little bit better, but its definately not worth buying a new one over your Performer (in my opinion)...
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2004 | 06:16 AM
  #9  
contactpatch's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 236
Likes: 1
From: North Texas
Engine: sbc 350
Is the stock intake really a choke point?
What are the dimensions of the runners?
What are the dimensions of the stock-head's intake ports?
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2004 | 11:27 AM
  #10  
Streetiron85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 1
From: Pacific Northwest
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4
If you look at the Performer and the RPM side by side, you'll see that the RPM has a greater sectional area to the runners. That, and it's raised a bit to smooth out some of the corners.
The EPS intake has the cleaner flow path of the RPM with the smaller runners of the Performer.
I'm not sure where the Performer intake becomes the weak link. But I honestly believe that the Performer has some better flow than the stocker, in spite of being a stock replacement. And the EPS is an improvement over that.
There are some advantages to the smaller runner intakes but those benefits happen below 2500rpm.
The cam you're using is one that has some pretty nice low end by the looks of it and I'd think that the EPS would compliment that well.
I'll take that EPS off your hands, if you feel like you need to get rid of it though.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2004 | 05:04 PM
  #11  
88IROK's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: PA
Car: 1988 IROC
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700r4
Originally posted by Damon
Look at my sig. That's using a Performer intake (not even the newer, better, EPS version) and it's on a VERY mild 350. I've taken the lower Performer intake into the 12s a few times.
You're not quite the last Damon, I learned from one of the best, Al Graeber himself!
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 02:42 AM
  #12  
Teal91rs's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood Florida
Car: 1991 Camaro *RIP* 1984 MonteCarloSS 1972 Nova
Engine: 355 cid 383 cid
Transmission: TH350 TH350
Ive got the eps on my 355 and its a great intake. Ive also got a 1 inch carb spacers which pushed the rpm band up a little and gives it great powerband and ill tell you man this things got a low and mid range pull. Id much rather have this than an rpm on a daily driver!

Last edited by Teal91rs; Nov 16, 2004 at 02:45 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2004 | 10:29 AM
  #13  
Streetiron85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 1
From: Pacific Northwest
Car: '85 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700 R4
Originally posted by Teal91rs
Ive got the eps on my 355 and its a great intake. Ive also got a 1 inch carb spacers which pushed the rpm band up a little and gives it great powerband and ill tell you man this things got a low and mid range pull. Id much rather have this than an rpm on a daily driver!
Would that be a 1" open spacer or 4 hole?

.... If you're still reading
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 04:53 PM
  #14  
Teal91rs's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood Florida
Car: 1991 Camaro *RIP* 1984 MonteCarloSS 1972 Nova
Engine: 355 cid 383 cid
Transmission: TH350 TH350
I bought this car the way it was unlike the nova i didnt build the motor so i would have no idea what it is. With the stuf the guy gave me with the car (bunch of carbs a few distirbs timeing gun power stearing pump starter ect) theres a 1' 4 hole that looks as if it came in pack with a open spacer. ive always worryed if i was looseing perfomance from a 4 hole is this true? MY pops not home so i have to burden you with the lame question
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 05:26 PM
  #15  
IROC_385Z's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: N.E. Ohio
Car: 88 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: SBC 385
Transmission: 700 w/ manual valvebody & 2400 TCI
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt B&W w/ 3.70s
Kinda off topic...

Whats up Chris...I thought that was your car up there!

Anyways, just wanted to let you know that I haven't forgotten about you wanting those headers...come March or April I will be rebuilding my tranny and getting some bigger headers so you can have them then, if you still want.

Let me know!

Oh, and don't worry about that EPS, untill you put a REAL motor in that car
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 05:40 PM
  #16  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
http://www.nhra.com/2004/events/race...ults/stk.html?

Bottom of the page, winner Jody Lang, '81 Malibu wagon. Runs 12.38 @ 101 mph.

That's a M/SA Stock 305. It must run a factory manifold.

You can make them fast, the only question is how much money you're going to spend getting there.

Last edited by five7kid; Nov 17, 2004 at 06:03 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 05:50 PM
  #17  
IROC_385Z's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: N.E. Ohio
Car: 88 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: SBC 385
Transmission: 700 w/ manual valvebody & 2400 TCI
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt B&W w/ 3.70s
Yea, we all know that if you put enough $$ into any motor you can run 12s in it...but I know this dude and feel obligated to bust his chops!
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 06:05 PM
  #18  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 45
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
And that Malibu is hardly streetable.

My point was the intake doesn't hold you back until you've done a lot of other things.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 06:34 PM
  #19  
IROC_385Z's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: N.E. Ohio
Car: 88 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: SBC 385
Transmission: 700 w/ manual valvebody & 2400 TCI
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt B&W w/ 3.70s
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2004 | 09:52 PM
  #20  
jmd's Avatar
jmd
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,526
Likes: 93
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Originally posted by red85berlinetta
well damn why does everyone on here bash it and say it no better then stock...
It is, but it's not a 30hp increase so it's looked down upon. On the 305 by the thread-starter, the Performer is exactly what I'd use. You'd just lose velocity with the RPM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BurlyChev
Electronics
0
Aug 22, 2015 11:42 AM
v8nate92RS
TBI
1
Jul 6, 2004 01:38 AM
Captain C
TPI
4
Jun 25, 2004 06:12 PM
StylnCamaro
Engine Swap
8
Nov 10, 2003 01:06 PM
Coop91RS
Tech / General Engine
3
Aug 1, 2000 08:43 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:41 AM.