747 users...try this ECU...
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: 600 yds out
Car: Bee-Bowdy
Engine: blowd tree-fity
Transmission: sebin hunnerd
Axle/Gears: fo-tins
747 users...try this ECU...
My edited WinBin ECU file for the 747 is on the DIY ftp site. It's called 747-mine.ecu. Give it a try and let me know of any errors please.
ftp://ftp.diy-efi.org/incoming/
ftp://ftp.diy-efi.org/incoming/
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Canada
Car: 89 Shortbox
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 700r4
V8 astro,
I might just be blind but I didn't see a max IAC limit in your .ecu. It might just be under a different name that I missed.
I might just be blind but I didn't see a max IAC limit in your .ecu. It might just be under a different name that I missed.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: 600 yds out
Car: Bee-Bowdy
Engine: blowd tree-fity
Transmission: sebin hunnerd
Axle/Gears: fo-tins
It's called Max retract IAC steps...in the values tab.
I'm glad it worked out for you.
I'm glad it worked out for you.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Canada
Car: 89 Shortbox
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 700r4
I noticed that in your .ecu under array, for TCC limits you have listed them in MPH, in tuner CAt theses values are % TPS.
No I just read it wrong again, your right!
No I just read it wrong again, your right!
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Canada
Car: 89 Shortbox
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 700r4
In your next release, It might not be a bad Idea to add the TCC forced lock-up in MPH @ 0x56E. Maybe even some other TCC params.
I say this because a few of us are finishing the 1/4 at over 100mph, which just happens to be the stock value, not really a good idea to have it locking at high rpms with a big stall.
I say this because a few of us are finishing the 1/4 at over 100mph, which just happens to be the stock value, not really a good idea to have it locking at high rpms with a big stall.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: 600 yds out
Car: Bee-Bowdy
Engine: blowd tree-fity
Transmission: sebin hunnerd
Axle/Gears: fo-tins
Here it is. I think that's all of the TCC stuff.
ftp://ftp.diy-efi.org/incoming/7747.ecu
or
ftp://ftp.diy-efi.org/incoming/ and just look for 7747.ecu
ftp://ftp.diy-efi.org/incoming/7747.ecu
or
ftp://ftp.diy-efi.org/incoming/ and just look for 7747.ecu
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Canada
Car: 89 Shortbox
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 700r4
Astro,
I have been having problems with max/min async PW values. It seems when I change the max value it effects the min value. Not sure maybe its just my computer, not sure. Let me know if they work fine for you.
Edit: It appears that when changing the min async bpw, to say a value of 002D, when you save the file , and re-open it the value magiclly becomes 2D2D.
I have been having problems with max/min async PW values. It seems when I change the max value it effects the min value. Not sure maybe its just my computer, not sure. Let me know if they work fine for you.
Edit: It appears that when changing the min async bpw, to say a value of 002D, when you save the file , and re-open it the value magiclly becomes 2D2D.
Last edited by Low C1500; Oct 2, 2002 at 05:39 PM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: 600 yds out
Car: Bee-Bowdy
Engine: blowd tree-fity
Transmission: sebin hunnerd
Axle/Gears: fo-tins
I see you figured that one out too. I have the same problem. I have no been able to get WinBin to do double byte values. I may try another sceme. Such as doing the double byte values as an array with two columns.
I'll post back when I make the change.
Ok I tried putting the double byte values as an array. Looks like you can edit the bytes one at a time, but anything that is a DB the conversion doesn't work. This is because the first and second byte are treated as two different numbers so the WinBin converts them independantly.
If there is a DB value of $0318, it is not converted to #792. It looks at it as $03 and $18. So you get #3 and #24($18) converted separatly.
If you still want the new ECU lemme know...
I'll post back when I make the change.
Ok I tried putting the double byte values as an array. Looks like you can edit the bytes one at a time, but anything that is a DB the conversion doesn't work. This is because the first and second byte are treated as two different numbers so the WinBin converts them independantly.
If there is a DB value of $0318, it is not converted to #792. It looks at it as $03 and $18. So you get #3 and #24($18) converted separatly.
If you still want the new ECU lemme know...
Last edited by V8Astro Captain; Oct 2, 2002 at 06:42 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Canada
Car: 89 Shortbox
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 700r4
If you could email my the ecu @ ryanhart@shaw.ca that would be great.
Another topic: My TCC doesn't lock up. All my boundrys seem in check, I do get a "NO high gear" flag in winaldl. Just wondering if any of the "flags" in winbin have any thing to do with the TCC. There is one or two that have TCC in there name but I don't know what there for. Just wondering if you have any knowlodge on this.
Another topic: My TCC doesn't lock up. All my boundrys seem in check, I do get a "NO high gear" flag in winaldl. Just wondering if any of the "flags" in winbin have any thing to do with the TCC. There is one or two that have TCC in there name but I don't know what there for. Just wondering if you have any knowlodge on this.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Canada
Car: 89 Shortbox
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 700r4
In your ecu the value "min temp for closed loop" yeilds a different value than that of tunercat. Changing one does move the value in the other program, so It s the same constant, just difffernt values.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
From: 600 yds out
Car: Bee-Bowdy
Engine: blowd tree-fity
Transmission: sebin hunnerd
Axle/Gears: fo-tins
I've found that some of TunerCats conversions are not the same. I will not say they are wrong...but I get my conversions right from the ASDZ 747 hack.
So if you divide 35 (*c coolant) by 64....you get .546875. This is what is used for my conversion. I've used the same method for the other 100 entries I added to the ecu file so far.
What does TunerCat use?
Code:
LD299 FCB 64 ; 35c COOL, Min for CLS LP Enable
What does TunerCat use?
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by V8Astro Captain
I've found that some of TunerCats conversions are not the same. I will not say they are wrong...but I get my conversions right from the ASDZ 747 hack.
So if you divide 35 (*c coolant) by 64....you get .546875. This is what is used for my conversion. I've used the same method for the other 100 entries I added to the ecu file so far.
What does TunerCat use?
I've found that some of TunerCats conversions are not the same. I will not say they are wrong...but I get my conversions right from the ASDZ 747 hack.
Code:
LD299 FCB 64 ; 35c COOL, Min for CLS LP Enable
What does TunerCat use?
C = (N * 0.625) - 5
C is temperature
N is the bin value
This holds true for the coolant value in L0021. The '747 also uses ADC counts, can drive 'ya crazy.
RBob.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




