DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

idle down faster?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 06:33 PM
  #1  
rsc350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Saint Cloud, FL
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Truetrac
idle down faster?

I did a search on this and could not find anything, maybe wrong terminology...

I want my engine to idle down faster than it does.

For example you have the car in neutral and rev the engine, I want the engine to cut rpm's faster on the way down, it seems like they linger longer and take forever to de-rev.

Anything I can play with to change that?
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 08:40 PM
  #2  
Slow89Iroc-Z's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
From: Oswego, IL
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350ci SBC
Transmission: 700R4
do a search on throttle follower or IAC steps. etc.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 10:32 PM
  #3  
Kevin91Z's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
I know how to change the idle follower in the constants in a speed density TPI, but not in a TBI, sorry.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 11:43 PM
  #4  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
It would help if you would post the ecm you're using. I'm no psychic so I'm just guessing but is your ecm an 8746? If so, check out these locations in the chip;
Code:
LD538:	FCB	 96	; max TF steps

LD539:	FCB	 32	; TF decay filt coef, < low mph
LD53A:	FCB	 16	; TF decay filt coef, > low mph & < high mph
LD53B:	FCB	 25	; TF decay filt coef, > high mph

LD53C:	FCB	 64	; filt coef
LD53D:	FCB	 15	; filt coef

LD53E:	FCB	  5	; TF decay low mph thres, between filt coef @ D539 & D53A
LD53F:	FCB	 20	; TF decay high mph thres, between filt coef @ D53A & D53B

LD540:	FCB	 10	; min TF steps if mph > 5
LD541:	FCB	  6	; 2.3%, TF tps% bias
LD542:	FCB	 32	; TF factor in prk/neut
LD543:	FCB	 64	; TF factor not in prk/neut
There's a lot to play with right there. There are factors for when in park/neutral, when not, below a mph, imbetween, and above. There is also a max TF steps! Have fun, I know I did when I was playing with these values.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 12:35 AM
  #5  
Rick King's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Car: 1987 TA
Engine: 350 stock/twecked
Transmission: 700r4
a fast drop in rpms on a push rod motor can cause other unwanted issues--ex bent push rods


later and

GB
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 01:05 AM
  #6  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by Rick King
a fast drop in rpms on a push rod motor can cause other unwanted issues--ex bent push rods


later and

GB
Could you explain how the deceleration would bend push rods. I can't seem to figure it out. I do know that rappid deceleration and engine braking is really bad for your rotating assembly but I had never heard of it effecting the valvetrain. If you could tell me your sources I'd really appreciate it.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 07:10 AM
  #7  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by JPrevost
Could you explain how the deceleration would bend push rods. I can't seem to figure it out. I do know that rappid deceleration and engine braking is really bad for your rotating assembly but I had never heard of it effecting the valvetrain. If you could tell me your sources I'd really appreciate it.
Actually, it's the first instant the throttles snap shut. The sudden increase in manifold vac., can literary tear a rod apart, in tension.

Rods fail either in Tension, or Compression (loads). Compression rod failures *generally* wind up with a bend in the mid section of the beam area. A *tension* rod failure, is a *clean* break without much bending. If you get to see enough rods that break at the top end of the track, vs most any other time, you'll quickly get to see/understand the difference.

It can be more complex, and involve other issues, but in a nutshell, this should help explain what's happening.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 07:23 AM
  #8  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by Grumpy
Actually, it's the first instant the throttles snap shut. The sudden increase in manifold vac., can literary tear a rod apart, in tension.

Rods fail either in Tension, or Compression (loads). Compression rod failures *generally* wind up with a bend in the mid section of the beam area. A *tension* rod failure, is a *clean* break without much bending. If you get to see enough rods that break at the top end of the track, vs most any other time, you'll quickly get to see/understand the difference.

It can be more complex, and involve other issues, but in a nutshell, this should help explain what's happening.
I knew that, that's why I stated rotating assembly. What I don't understand is how it effects the pushrods like he said it does.
BTW; I've broken a couple rods at about 8000rpm but it was a clean break at the top neck of the rod and it was under steady high load . None of the ME's at the C.A.R. could figure out why it failed but it did and completely ruined our chances that year of coming in 1st place. Came in 10th which was pretty good considering we couldn't do jack squat in the acceleration department with a 3 year old engine down 20% of our intended hp.

Last edited by JPrevost; Aug 24, 2005 at 07:28 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 12:22 PM
  #9  
Rick King's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Car: 1987 TA
Engine: 350 stock/twecked
Transmission: 700r4
my tpi motor, experince frist hand. had it at wot doinging about 110 let off the gas completly to catch my exit and well the rest is history 3 bent pushrods and 2 bent valves

later and

GB

rk
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 12:46 PM
  #10  
rsc350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Saint Cloud, FL
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Truetrac
Wow... lots of good information

Where would you consider TF too low and be risking engine damage?
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 04:46 PM
  #11  
DM91RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by JPrevost
I'm just guessing but is your ecm an 8746? If so, check out these locations in the chip;
Code:
LD538:	FCB	 96	; max TF steps

LD539:	FCB	 32	; TF decay filt coef, < low mph
LD53A:	FCB	 16	; TF decay filt coef, > low mph & < high mph
LD53B:	FCB	 25	; TF decay filt coef, > high mph

LD53C:	FCB	 64	; filt coef
LD53D:	FCB	 15	; filt coef

LD53E:	FCB	  5	; TF decay low mph thres, between filt coef @ D539 & D53A
LD53F:	FCB	 20	; TF decay high mph thres, between filt coef @ D53A & D53B

LD540:	FCB	 10	; min TF steps if mph > 5
LD541:	FCB	  6	; 2.3%, TF tps% bias
LD542:	FCB	 32	; TF factor in prk/neut
LD543:	FCB	 64	; TF factor not in prk/neut
There's a lot to play with right there. There are factors for when in park/neutral, when not, below a mph, imbetween, and above. There is also a max TF steps! Have fun, I know I did when I was playing with these values. [/B]

Are these values accessable in Tunerpro or Tunercat? I ASSume that they have to be in the xdf/ecu or tdf.

Thanks DM
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 09:21 PM
  #12  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by Rick King
my tpi motor, experince frist hand. had it at wot doinging about 110 let off the gas completly to catch my exit and well the rest is history 3 bent pushrods and 2 bent valves
That doesn't tell me why they bent. If anything I would have assumed the high revs (lifter and rocker inertial compressing the pushrod) where to blame! I've never noticed a bent pushrod because of the acceleration or decel of an engine's RPM and I've beat'n on a bunch of built Lt1's (7200rpm with blower) and Ls1's (7500rpm nitrous). Neither of them bent a pushrod and they weren't using exotic pushrods . You're actually the first person that I've heard of that's said deceleration has bent their pushrods. Having more than zero lash on most hydralic lifters now-a-day's can also bend pushrods when the oil pressure gets really high (again, dictated by rpm, not acceleration). Don't think I don't believe you that you broke those parts but I'm having a hard time believe it's for the reasons you stated.
Does anybody know WHY (or if) the pushrods are more acceptable to bending failure during decel because I'm seriously stumped. Please don't sight experiences, I want a reason.
Originally posted by DM91RS
Are these values accessable in Tunerpro or Tunercat? I ASSume that they have to be in the xdf/ecu or tdf.

Thanks DM
They don't have to be but it could be added easily enough. Or just use a hex editor like the one built into TunerPro and edit those locations.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 09:33 AM
  #13  
dimented24x7's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by rsc350
Wow... lots of good information

Where would you consider TF too low and be risking engine damage?

Even with the IAC all the way open it isnt going to break the vac too much at high rpms where youll be risking damage to the rod bolts. Best thing to do is try and remind yourself to slowly roll back on the throttle. Im trying to break the habit of snapping it shut myself when at high rpms.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 10:22 AM
  #14  
RBob's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by JPrevost
Does anybody know WHY (or if) the pushrods are more acceptable to bending failure during decel because I'm seriously stumped. Please don't sight experiences, I want a reason.
Possibly due to minimal valve to piston clearance. With the high manifold vacuum trying to rip the piston off the top of the rod, the valve to piston clearance closes up and they make contact.

At high RPM with high vacuum the rod/piston assembly is going to stretch.

RBob.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 04:52 PM
  #15  
Rick King's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Car: 1987 TA
Engine: 350 stock/twecked
Transmission: 700r4
I don't know why it happened just that it did. the piston tops where unmarked, so there was no hitting, I do know that shutting down a push rod engine (sharp drop in rpms very fast) can be detritmantel to the health of the motor. you have mechanical parts that are moving very fast and the ask them to almost stop--the energy has to go some where and that would be what ever part is the weakest link for what ever reason mine was the pushrods and vales

later and

GB

rick
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GeneralIesrussi
Carburetors
6
Jun 20, 2024 07:21 PM
IROCtometal
TPI
2
Sep 20, 2015 11:08 PM
Stroopwafel
Tech / General Engine
7
Sep 11, 2015 06:38 AM
IROCtometal
TPI
3
Sep 9, 2015 10:01 AM
greenyone
Tech / General Engine
1
Sep 8, 2015 08:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 PM.