DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

Anything being done for us MAF guys so we can see above 255 gms/sec?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2001 | 11:39 AM
  #1  
branz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Red Bud, Illinois
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383
Transmission: Pro-Built 700R4 2400 ACT Stall
Axle/Gears: 2.77 Borg Warner 9-Bolt
Anything being done for us MAF guys so we can see above 255 gms/sec?

I was just wondering if there were any developments in a translator or something of those sorts....figured it'd be interesting to hear about.

------------------
89 IROC-Z 350 TPI

-Flowmaster Catback
-Performance Resource Chip
-700R4 (Rebuilt) Too much done to actually list
-K&N Airfilters
-Ported Plenum
-2.77 Gears (not much to brag about but eh, its there)
-MSD 8.5 mm plug wires
-Gutted cat
-!AIR
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2001 | 11:39 PM
  #2  
Craig Moates's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
Run parallel ducting to your MAF, lie to your ECM and tell it you have smaller injectors, get as much air in that engine as you like. Want 1000gm/s? No problem! Just let your ECM live in a fantasy world. Tell me I'm wrong, I'm really kind of looking forward to taking this one to the mat. Why won't it work? Tell me that. Anyone tried it?
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2001 | 05:31 AM
  #3  
F22Raptor's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
It won't work!!!!!!
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2001 | 06:11 PM
  #4  
Craig Moates's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
I'd really like to hear from Bruce on this one...
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2001 | 06:21 PM
  #5  
Grim Reaper's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
There is merit in Craig's idea. In fact, his idea of "fudging" using the Injector Flow Constant to compensate for the double flow is quite conceivable for SD cars that wish to use a 2 BAR MAP in place of the 1 BAR MAP.

Perfect? No. Will there be hidden surprises? I would be surprised if there weren't. But by adjusting the various KPA factors to recognize the half values when using a 2 BAR MAP, and then "fudging" the Injector Flow Constant such that 100 VE (when at 2 BAR) and giving the proper fuel levels could allow you to modify the VE tables adequately for a "quick and dirty" fix.

Yes, your resolution will be cut in half and you have a problem with the VE table now having a minimum of 40 kpa (20 x 2), but I think for an SD owner looking for a solution to to the 7730 with a power adder, this could be made to work as a "starting point". Get into Asssembly Language Programming, and then the VE table problem can be fixed.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2001 | 06:32 PM
  #6  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Craig Moates:
I'd really like to hear from Bruce on this one...</font>
The intake tract, and it's flow characteristics ain't totally linear, merging two air colums so they are exactly 50/50 is impossible. tinker with the MAF stuff some and you'll see what I mean.

You really need to write Bob Bailey at Bailey Eng., to make a FBody translator. They are just soo good.

But, it also gets to what is practical. For the price of a translator you could do the 730 conversion. An LT1 MAF is $99, and LS1 $259, plus the actual translator.

TWO WISHES LEFT LOL

Reply
Old Apr 16, 2001 | 08:13 PM
  #7  
branz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Red Bud, Illinois
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383
Transmission: Pro-Built 700R4 2400 ACT Stall
Axle/Gears: 2.77 Borg Warner 9-Bolt
oh for the love of god!!! someone make a MAF translator! heh, although i probably don't need it...sure would be kewl though

------------------
89 IROC-Z 350 TPI

-Flowmaster Catback
-Performance Resource Chip
-700R4 (Rebuilt) Too much done to actually list
-K&N Airfilters
-Ported Plenum
-2.77 Gears (not much to brag about but eh, its there)
-MSD 8.5 mm plug wires
-Gutted cat
-!AIR
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2001 | 08:26 PM
  #8  
88 350 tpi formula's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 19
From: WI,USA
Car: 89 FORMULA 350, 91 Z28 Convertible
Engine: ls1, LB9
Transmission: t56, Auto
Axle/Gears: S60/ 3.73
I thought the lt1s switched from map to mass at wot. don't go ape $#!+ if i am wrong but, I could swear they did that.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2001 | 10:51 AM
  #9  
87Z-ya's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Marysville OH
I dont know the merit to it but the new carcraft states that granetelli makes something to alow the 165 ecm to use a different maf than the bosch. It either lets you use a 5.oh one or a lt1, cant remember. Im at school and will look when I get home.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2001 | 03:12 PM
  #10  
87IROC350's Avatar
Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Land O Lakes, FL
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
I called Granettelli yesterday and they stated that they are not selling the conversion for the MAF yet. They stated they are still testing and it will be a couple of months before they are ready to release. The guy wouldn't say much else about it. FYI

------------------
87 Iroc 5.7, AFR190, SLP Cam(218/224), SLP 1 5/8 headers & cat back, Random CAT, SLP Runners (matched intake-runners-plenum), 48mm TB, 6E(arap) chip, Vigilante & Probuilt trans.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2001 | 06:04 PM
  #11  
branz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Red Bud, Illinois
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383
Transmission: Pro-Built 700R4 2400 ACT Stall
Axle/Gears: 2.77 Borg Warner 9-Bolt
now that's what i wanted to hear...but i don't exactly understand how a translator works...since the ECM only see's 255 gram/sec how is the translator going to help those needing the extra flow?

------------------
89 IROC-Z 350 TPI

-Flowmaster Catback
-Performance Resource Chip
-700R4 (Rebuilt) Too much done to actually list
-K&N Airfilters
-Ported Plenum
-2.77 Gears (not much to brag about but eh, its there)
-MSD 8.5 mm plug wires
-Gutted cat
-!AIR
-Gutted Air Boxes
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2001 | 09:23 PM
  #12  
NickG's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
I've had some thoughts about how to go about doing this. Here's what I've come up with.....

First, get a Ford MAF that is calibrated to read up to 512gms/sec. Here is an example of the transfer function of such a meter:

http://www.pro-flow.com/36flow.htm

Now come the chip modifications. First, change the transfer function and scalers in the chip to represent HALF of what the MAF actually outputs. In other words, in the above mentioned link, 2.00v represents 56.85gms/sec of mass airflow. Make the transfer function in the chip report 28.425gms/sec @ 2.00v. Then, change the injector constant to be half of what the actual injector size is. Thus, if the injectors are 22lb/hr units, program the chip for 11lb/hr injectors.

What will effectively happen is that when the engine is taking in 56.85gms/sec of airflow (as an example), the ECM will interpret it as 28.425gms/sec (half of the actual mass). Now, if the ECM was programmed with the actual injector size, only half of the required fuel would be sprayed. But, since the injector constant is half of the correct value, the ECM will double the injector on-time, thus spraying the proper amount of fuel to go with 56.85gms/sec.

The thing to remember though is that the spark table will have to be redone, as now the columns that once were for 128gms/sec, are actually for 256gms/sec, etc.

Theoretically, this method should work. Any guinea pigs out there??

Nick
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2001 | 10:21 PM
  #13  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Nick,

I had proposed a method similar to this a long time ago. My method was to run parallel ducting and then cut the injector constant in half. There are some things to consider. The major consideration is that limp home mode will not work. However, with the parallel ducting route you could always close off one duct for limp home mode. There were other considerations too ... they are eluding me at this moment because I am really tired ... just got done working on the car for the 2nd weekday night in a row.

Tim

------------------
TRAXION's 1990 IROC-Z
Best Time = 12.244 @ 112.51mph (1.778 60' / 7.819@88.32mph in the 1/8)
All Natural. No Force. No Drugs. Stock Bottom End. Stock Body Panels.
Gunning for NA 11's with bigger cam, bigger stall, and bigger exhaust.
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Moderator: PROM board at thirdgen.org
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2001 | 06:49 AM
  #14  
afgun's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 629
Likes: 10
From: New Yuck
Car: Non F-body :(
Engine: Pontiac 301
Transmission: TH350
Does limp-home mode even read the MAF? I thought that it was a simple alpha-N system...
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2001 | 07:00 AM
  #15  
NickG's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Tim,

My method doesn't require/use a second intake tract or duct. I'm suggesting replacing the factory mass air meter with another (possibly physically larger for less restriction) meter than has a different transfer function.

FYI, I've tested a few of the Ford MAF meters on the flowbench. The ones with a 'bridge' in the middle (to protect against intake tract reversion) with an outlet size of about 70mm flow pretty darn well. Somewhere like 750cfm @ 28" of H20 (I have the notes somewhere around here ). They can be found used for $20-$50. Then all that's needed is to have them recalibrated ($75-$100) to output 5v at 512gms/sec.

As far as limp home mode is concerned, I haven't really looked into that part of the equation. I'm sure there are other things that need to be evaluated.

Nick
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2001 | 09:00 AM
  #16  
TRAXION's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
Now that I am thinking clearly again (well rested) ....

Limp home doesn't use the MAF
The Ford MAF is obviously the better route because its bigger and would flow more

If I had a MAF system I would try this.

Tim

------------------
TRAXION's 1990 IROC-Z
Best Time = 12.244 @ 112.51mph (1.778 60' / 7.819@88.32mph in the 1/8)
All Natural. No Force. No Drugs. Stock Bottom End. Stock Body Panels.
Gunning for NA 11's with bigger cam, bigger stall, and bigger exhaust.
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Moderator: PROM board at thirdgen.org
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2001 | 09:14 AM
  #17  
Bob Wooten's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Glenn,

does what Nick said, sound familiar?

BW

------------------
Bob Wooten
71 Camaro, 91 EFI
r71chevy@earthlink.net
www.r71camaro.homestead.com
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2001 | 04:53 AM
  #18  
F22Raptor's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by branz28:
oh for the love of god!!! someone make a MAF translator! heh, although i probably don't need it...sure would be kewl though

</font>

that was some funny $hit
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2001 | 12:14 PM
  #19  
irocz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: Jackson, Miss., CSA
Car: '87 IROC-Z
Engine: 406 Superram/DFI
Transmission: Auto BTE 3000 conv
I know I will be one of the first guys to buy one. If they build it, my wallet will come!



------------------
87 IROC-Z, 5.7, auto, 3.27, leather, !cat, Holley fpr, K&N'S, SLP 1-3/4" Jet-Hot coated headers, SLP .218/.224 .495/.502 cam, Comp 1.5 roller tip rockers, $uperPITAram, Edelbrock lower intake, Holley 52mm tb, Dynomax\Flowmaster catback. Coming Soon(?)- Fasttrack/Accell DFI

1989 Pontiac 20th Anniversary Turbo Trans Am - 161,000 miles, !cat, 9" K&N
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2001 | 08:07 PM
  #20  
branz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Red Bud, Illinois
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383
Transmission: Pro-Built 700R4 2400 ACT Stall
Axle/Gears: 2.77 Borg Warner 9-Bolt
heh, i think they'll be swamped with orders...especially the super/turbo charged guys with MAF systems. If any of them are left that is...

------------------
89 IROC-Z 350 TPI

-Flowmaster Catback
-Performance Resource Chip
-700R4 (Rebuilt) Too much done to actually list
-K&N Airfilters
-Ported Plenum
-2.77 Gears (not much to brag about but eh, its there)
-MSD 8.5 mm plug wires
-Gutted cat
-!AIR
-Gutted Air Boxes
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 25, 2015 11:49 PM
nuggie
DFI and ECM
3
Aug 25, 2015 01:27 PM
Bert87
Electronics
3
Aug 23, 2015 03:50 PM
Street Lethal
Interior
7
Aug 14, 2015 08:25 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 PM.