Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
302
305
350
377
I would say that is 4 versions ?
In any case ,
this thread is a complete waste of bandwidth because you have had the best info from some of the most knowledgeable minds online
( there is reason many non 3rd Gen owners come to this site for help )
and you still have your original
" i wanna b different " mindset
Stop the
BS and just go and do what you want.
As has been noted ; is your car / your $$$ / your choice
305
350
377
I would say that is 4 versions ?
In any case ,
this thread is a complete waste of bandwidth because you have had the best info from some of the most knowledgeable minds online
( there is reason many non 3rd Gen owners come to this site for help )
and you still have your original
" i wanna b different " mindset
Stop the
BS and just go and do what you want.As has been noted ; is your car / your $$$ / your choice
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Trumbull Country, Ohio
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: three 350s, all casting #370010
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
The engine that is supposed to be being discussed in this thread is my 350 block. Which I was thinking about building into a 302, but decided it would be better to build into a 377. I have a 350 that is staying a 350 and I planned before this thread that I was going to put a 305 in my Camaro.
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
Why are you afraid to bore it out? You do realize boring isn't really a choice, so much as it is a repair, right? The bores oval out over years of use. You bore them out to get them perfectly round again which helps ensure proper ring seal. You bore the block as much as is necessary and if you go to a machine shop that's one of the main operations they do. If it has to go .040 or .060 over then it's not a bad idea to find a different block. If it has to go .030 or less that's great news.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Trumbull Country, Ohio
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: three 350s, all casting #370010
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
Why are you afraid to bore it out? You do realize boring isn't really a choice, so much as it is a repair, right? The bores oval out over years of use. You bore them out to get them perfectly round again which helps ensure proper ring seal. You bore the block as much as is necessary and if you go to a machine shop that's one of the main operations they do. If it has to go .040 or .060 over then it's not a bad idea to find a different block. If it has to go .030 or less that's great news.
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 7
From: Clinton Township, Michigan
Car: 91 GTA, 73 Z28
Engine: 355, 6.0L
Transmission: TH350, 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.73
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
did they check if it was ovaled?
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Trumbull Country, Ohio
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: three 350s, all casting #370010
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Car: 85 camaro z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
383 stroker difficult to build? Thats hilarious, in fact the Small Block Chevy is quite possibly one of the easiest engines to build, or any pushrod engine for that matter. All it takes is your sweet time and checking those clearances.
Last edited by five7kid; May 23, 2012 at 11:32 PM. Reason: rules violation
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,092
Likes: 7
From: Clinton Township, Michigan
Car: 91 GTA, 73 Z28
Engine: 355, 6.0L
Transmission: TH350, 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.73
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
so you came on here to be an ***? i have checked clearances and somehow **** keeps changing. not many people know that theres grinding involved on rods or the block or both or one or the other. so if you have a negative comment keep it to yourself i was trying to spare him from jumping the gun on anything and having as difficult of a time as i am
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Car: 85 camaro z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
so you came on here to be an ***? i have checked clearances and somehow **** keeps changing. not many people know that theres grinding involved on rods or the block or both or one or the other. so if you have a negative comment keep it to yourself i was trying to spare him from jumping the gun on anything and having as difficult of a time as i am
Check your oil pressure? Are you just breaking in the engine? Fresh built engines are usually gonna have metal shavings in the oil pan as parts break in, which is why an oil change is recommended at 1xxx miles.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Trumbull Country, Ohio
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: three 350s, all casting #370010
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
I am pretty sure tylercamaro is right. When I researched about making a 383 it said that you have to grind the rods and block.
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Car: 85 camaro z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
I am pretty sure tylercamaro is right. When I researched about making a 383 it said that you have to grind the rods and block.
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
That's hardly a lot of work. At most, it means that you have to pre-install the rotating assembly one or 2 times to mark the spots to grind and then re-check after you grind it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 31
From: IL
Car: 1988 Formula
Engine: 421 Little M block
Transmission: TH400 w/brake
Axle/Gears: 9" 4.30s, Wilwood discs, 28X10.5-15
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
Ever hear of E85 ? you don't need $9 race gas if you plan you build accordingly.
Also keep in mind the original 302 Chevy's were high-RPM motors built for ASSC road course competition.. The original 302 Z28s were built in small quantities to meet ASSC rules for their "stock" car class which at the time was dominated by Mustangs... and this is how the Pony car wars began.
They were not mass-produced for a reason, and will not fare well on the street and kinda embarrasing when a low RPM torquey "steet motor" beats your "race motor" . The open highway or a track is another matter and I won't condone street racing, that is your business.
Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: San Tan Valley, AZ
Car: 92 25th anniversary edition
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 2.73's
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
I am pretty sure tylercamaro is right. When I researched about making a 383 it said that you have to grind the rods and block.
Point is it's not all that bad...the machine shop can do it if you have them assemble the engine.
With respect to tyler sounds like he had the worst case scenario, I had to kiss the rod bolt heads on one rod in my 383 but thats it.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 714
Likes: 1
From: Pennsylvania
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: Carb'd 383
Transmission: Built T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
Usually you will need some grinding done on the block, but with a small base circle can you should be ok with the rods
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
If you're the one building the engine there's no reason why you can't do it yourself... so nothing.
Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: San Tan Valley, AZ
Car: 92 25th anniversary edition
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R-4
Axle/Gears: 2.73's
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
very little grinding involved. For the rod bolts you just touch the inner bolt that comes in contact with the cam, just enough so it clears, some say .050" minimum clearance. Same clearance spec for the pan rail to rod bolt area. Most 350 blocks have the area where the outer rod bolt passes the pan rail already clearanced for it.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 714
Likes: 1
From: Pennsylvania
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: Carb'd 383
Transmission: Built T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
Not more than $120 at a machine shop, probably less unless a lot of clearancing needs to be done
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Trumbull Country, Ohio
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: three 350s, all casting #370010
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
Yeah I am just trying to think if I have the tools to grind a block
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
Carbide burr in a cheap die grinder. Or a Dremel-type rotary tool if you've got time on your hands.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Trumbull Country, Ohio
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: three 350s, all casting #370010
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
I got all sorts of time coming up here. haha I got a dremel just wasn't sure if that would cut it.
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio,Tx
Car: 91 Firebird Dark Green
Engine: 350 Victor Jr. 2V 2000 CFM TB EFI
Transmission: 700R4 BM 2500 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Zexel torque sensing Posi
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
The only parts spacific to the 302 are the piston and crank everything els can be salvaged from the 350 the heads are probable 76cc as apposed to the 64ccdon't forget they ran alot more compression back then than we can now so that helped the small displacment eng tolerate the thumper cam better; but cam science has come lightyears beyond what was even dreamed back then not to forget heads have evolved also even the much respected rectangular port bbc on the good ports intake flow was only about 266 at.500 oem bbc heads have good & not so good intakes 4 of the intake ports open up into the middle of the bore the others hit the cylinder wallthe intakes port passage are also different length Warning going off on a tangentdoes anyone else remember the early canam cars and series this was bigballs hairychested racing thewhole rule book number less than 20 pages this was run what ya brung take no prisoners racing imagine cars that wieghted2500 lbs or less with 6 to 7 hundered HP CHEVY BB RULED ESPECIALLY AFTER I THINK IT WAS REYNOLDS BEGAN CAST BBC IN AL THEY POKED STROKED THOSE BAD BOYS OUT 494 CID THEY HAD NODULAR IRON LINERS PRIMATIVE AERO BACK THEN EVERYONE COULD GET ONE OF THE UNUBTAINABLE BLOCKS WAS HAPPY EXCEPT FOR FORD &PORSCHE FORD TRIED TO COUNTER W THIER OWN ALUM BB BUT 385 LIMA SERIES 429 & 460 HAS A CRAP OILING SYSTEMCAN YOU SAY 100 PLUS PSI TO KEEP EVEYTHING LUBEDPORSCHE CAM BACK WITH THE LEGENDARY917 TURBO POWER HAD ARRIVED 30PSI OR 2BAR AND NOW YOU NEED 1000HP TO RUN WITH THE BIG DOGS PARNELL JONES WROT ABOUT HIS EXPERENCE TEST DRIVING A 917HE SAID IT HAD ALL FINESS OF A SLEDG HAMMER TO THE BACK OF YOUR HEAD STOMP THE GO PEDAL AND NOTHING NOTHING WAIT FOR IT AND GO FROM LIKE 275HORSE OR 300 TO 1000 IN THE SPACE OF 2 OR 3 SECOUNDS OMGTHE THING WAS A DEATH TRAP NOT ENOUGH TIRE ALMOST NO BRAKES NO WAY TO REGULATE HOW HARD THE TURBO HIT NO ELECTRONICS OR EVEN WASTGATES AT FIRST THEY HADN'T BEEN INVENTED YET. THE ONLY OTH ER RACING SERIES USING TURBOS WAS INDY ON THERE BIG THUMPER OFFY FOURS THEY USED A POPOFF VALVE TO LIMIT BOOST BUT NOT REGULATE ITONCE YOUR OUT ON THE TRACK AND ON BOOST STAYED ON TILL YOU HAD TO PIT NO SHIFTING OR ON AND OFF THE THROTTLE ENGINE SPEED DIN'T VARY MUCH BETWEEN STRAIGHT AND BANKED TURNS SORRY JUST REALIZED CAP LOCK HAS BEEN ON THRUOUT THIS WHOLE LONG ERELAVTANT RANT THAT NONE CARES TO READ ANYWAY.
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
Maybe i should explain this a little further. If the motor is out of the car, yes a 350 is the way to go. No point in dropping in a 305 when its just a de-bored 350 and they both rev the same. A 302 however can be built to rev higher so there may be a reason to drop that in instead of a 350. But if you have a 305 in your car already, especially if its a roller-cam motor, honestly a top-end swap will get you very very close to a full 350 build and swap and will be much cheaper and much easier since the shortblock will stay in the car, plus at that point if you ever do decide to swap to a 350 the whole new top-end will swap right over just as easily. However. as said before, if the block is out already, yeah i agree a 350 or 383 would be the most cost-effective route. Its all about being cost-effective
Supreme Member




Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,846
Likes: 779
From: 212 is up in this Bit@#
Car: Resto-Mod 1987 IROC-Z Clone
Engine: Alky fed L92 Vortec Twin-Turbo 6.8L
Transmission: My own built/ design 4L80M
Axle/Gears: Custom 12 bolt (4.10:1)
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
No amount of anything will Ever get a 305 output anywhere near what a 350 will do. As for the original question, the 302 was created by gm with a 350 block and a 283 crank. The leftover parts created the 307, another boat anchor. A good running 283 will trounce a 305 or 307 in power.
The 302 SBC was assembled with a 327 Cylinder-Block due to its 2.300" size Main-Journal dimension... Not a 350 Cylinder-Block.
The 283 SBC and the Early-327 SBC both use a 2.300" size Main-Journal dimension.
Where the 350 SBC uses a 2.45" size Main-Journal dimension.
For a 350 SBC to use an actual 283 SBC Crankshaft, Main-Journal Spacers/ Bearing-Inserts would need to be used to make up the difference in size.
This is far from ideal.
Today, with the high availability and affordability of custom SBC Crankshafts...
A Crankshaft for a 350 SBC Cylinder-Block can be ordered in the same Stroke as the original 283 SBC used (or many other Stroke dimensions for that matter) and not require Main-Journal Spacers/ Bearing-Inserts.
Also, in case you were not familiar...
The 400 SBC Cylinder-Block uses a 4.65" size Main-Journal dimension.

O... and please try not to Post on Threads that have not had any activity for several years.
Thanks!
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,403
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: Using a 350 block as a base for a 302
Actually No.
The 302 SBC was assembled with a 327 Cylinder-Block due to its 2.300" size Main-Journal dimension... Not a 350 Cylinder-Block.
The 283 SBC and the Early-327 SBC both use a 2.300" size Main-Journal dimension.
Where the 350 SBC uses a 2.45" size Main-Journal dimension.
For a 350 SBC to use an actual 283 SBC Crankshaft, Main-Journal Spacers/ Bearing-Inserts would need to be used to make up the difference in size.
This is far from ideal.
Today, with the high availability and affordability of custom SBC Crankshafts...
A Crankshaft for a 350 SBC Cylinder-Block can be ordered in the same Stroke as the original 283 SBC used (or many other Stroke dimensions for that matter) and not require Main-Journal Spacers/ Bearing-Inserts.
Also, in case you were not familiar...
The 400 SBC Cylinder-Block uses a 4.65" size Main-Journal dimension.

O... and please try not to Post on Threads that have not had any activity for several years.
Thanks!

The 302 SBC was assembled with a 327 Cylinder-Block due to its 2.300" size Main-Journal dimension... Not a 350 Cylinder-Block.
The 283 SBC and the Early-327 SBC both use a 2.300" size Main-Journal dimension.
Where the 350 SBC uses a 2.45" size Main-Journal dimension.
For a 350 SBC to use an actual 283 SBC Crankshaft, Main-Journal Spacers/ Bearing-Inserts would need to be used to make up the difference in size.
This is far from ideal.
Today, with the high availability and affordability of custom SBC Crankshafts...
A Crankshaft for a 350 SBC Cylinder-Block can be ordered in the same Stroke as the original 283 SBC used (or many other Stroke dimensions for that matter) and not require Main-Journal Spacers/ Bearing-Inserts.
Also, in case you were not familiar...
The 400 SBC Cylinder-Block uses a 4.65" size Main-Journal dimension.

O... and please try not to Post on Threads that have not had any activity for several years.
Thanks!

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jammen Firebird
Tech / General Engine
10
Aug 23, 2007 12:25 AM







