gm goodwrench 350
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 43
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Yes, I have an opinion about that engine.
Not much money, but not much for your money.
Low compression because of dished pistons and large chamber heads. Oh, yeah, those heads have very poor ports, castings are thin and crack-prone. Flat tappet cam. 2-piece RMS, perimeter bolt valve covers, both of which make the engine leak prone.
If your car is '82-'85, it's a little bit of an upgrade. If it's '87-later, it's not much of an upgrade, and in some ways, a downgrade. The engine was made for appliance service van fleet type vehicles when the owner wants to get a little more life out of the vans before replacing them. Wasn't intended for "sports cars".
For a couple hundred more, you can get the 290 horse version of the engine, which has a little better cam. But, for less than $100, you can get a better cam to put in the 260 horse version. You still don't have much, though. Remember, those power ratings are gross flywheel HP, while the rating in the car is net flywheel HP - take ~80% of the GFWHP and you'll get a good ballpark of NFWHP.
A little more information about your car would be nice - year, induction type, modifications, intended use, etc.
Not much money, but not much for your money.
Low compression because of dished pistons and large chamber heads. Oh, yeah, those heads have very poor ports, castings are thin and crack-prone. Flat tappet cam. 2-piece RMS, perimeter bolt valve covers, both of which make the engine leak prone.
If your car is '82-'85, it's a little bit of an upgrade. If it's '87-later, it's not much of an upgrade, and in some ways, a downgrade. The engine was made for appliance service van fleet type vehicles when the owner wants to get a little more life out of the vans before replacing them. Wasn't intended for "sports cars".
For a couple hundred more, you can get the 290 horse version of the engine, which has a little better cam. But, for less than $100, you can get a better cam to put in the 260 horse version. You still don't have much, though. Remember, those power ratings are gross flywheel HP, while the rating in the car is net flywheel HP - take ~80% of the GFWHP and you'll get a good ballpark of NFWHP.
A little more information about your car would be nice - year, induction type, modifications, intended use, etc.
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: tacoma washington
Car: 1990 camaro rs
Engine: 305 tbi-slug
Transmission: automatic 4spd
Re: gm goodwrench 350
i am also looking to put this in my 1990 rs v8 as a replacement for the sluggish 305 tbi thats in it..seems to me it would be an upgrade from the 305.
Trending Topics
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 199
Likes: 1
From: Allegan, MI
Car: 89' camaro RS TTOP
Engine: 92 5.0tpi Bosch III, headers, msd
Transmission: 700r4 built. trans go. 2,300 stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 posi ls disc brake conversion
Re: gm goodwrench 350
Converting to tpi would be another option...
Re: gm goodwrench 350
I have been told on here that engine is slower than my 305 tpi im not sure about yours being that it is a tbi i just bought a rebuilt 350 out of a 79 camaro 4 bolt main with mild ca? Edelbrock ai1 gap intake and a holley carburator any guesses on hp
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post










