Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

air flow measurement stock vs modified hooker y-pipe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 12:10 AM
  #1  
nevernamed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 434
Transmission: TKO600
air flow measurement stock vs modified hooker y-pipe

This post is related to the ugly internal weld post:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/exha...pipe-ugly.html

There was a request at the end to see the results of the modified y-pipe. I'm not very happy with these results yet but they do show a difference between the original y-pipe and the modified version. I have decent flowing heads but still have the stock lower intake and stock plenum, stock air flow sensor, and stock intake ducts. I do have SLP intake runners and a 58 mm BBK throttle body.

This summer I replaced the headers and exhaust. The car had some 1.5 inch headers with 2.5 inch collectors that were on it when I bought it. It also had a true dual exhaust with 2.25 inch pipe but the bends were not done very well (not mandrel bent) and had some rattles. I wasn't crazy about the sound either. I knew the headers were too small for the 383 when I put it in but didn't have the money at the time to upgrade them.

So this summer I went with the hooker 2460's and the 16767 y-pipe with a Borla 3.0 inch cat back. The graph shows measured air flow with the original headers and exhaust (dark blue trace), the new headers, y-pipe, and cat back (red trace), and the modified y-pipe (light blue trace) which now has 3.0 inch mandrel bent pipe from the modified y-pipe all the way back.



So you can see that the new headers with the unmodified y-pipe reduced the flow past ~ 3500. With the modifed y-pipe to 3.0 inch outlet the air flow is better across most of the RPM range. I was a little surprised that the increase wasn't larger after fixing that choked off cross section.

Probably should have made it more clear that the "stock" condition here is referring to the hooker y-pipe as delivered (red) vs the modified version with 3.0 inch outlet (light blue).

Last edited by nevernamed; Oct 29, 2008 at 06:54 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 02:47 PM
  #2  
TA's Avatar
TA
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: Carson, CA
Car: '88 GTA, 90 Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI, fed growth hormones
Transmission: 700r4 4u2?
Axle/Gears: 9bolt
Re: air flow measurement stock vs modified hooker y-pipe

I'm curious, how did you measure airflow vs RPM? Was this done with the car running?

TA
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 06:51 PM
  #3  
nevernamed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 434
Transmission: TKO600
Re: air flow measurement stock vs modified hooker y-pipe

measurements made using autoprom in second gear
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 06:59 PM
  #4  
TA's Avatar
TA
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: Carson, CA
Car: '88 GTA, 90 Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI, fed growth hormones
Transmission: 700r4 4u2?
Axle/Gears: 9bolt
Re: air flow measurement stock vs modified hooker y-pipe

The problem with that is that the exhaust is almost certainly not be the limiting factor anymore. For example, if the intake is restricting the engine (and we know it is), the exhaust cannot flow more air out of the engine than the intake can supply in. You are not measuring the flow increase of the exhaust, you're measuring the increase in flow of the entire engine system. Take heart, if you get a good base/runners and do the siamesing mods, after proper tuning you will think you were launched off of a aircraft carrier catapult.

TA
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 11:01 PM
  #5  
Shadygrady's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
From: Flowood,MS
Car: 87 IROC Z
Engine: 5.7 L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4,2500 stall
Axle/Gears: G80,10 bolt 3.42's
Re: air flow measurement stock vs modified hooker y-pipe

The stock lower manifold is the bottleneck now.You have a big ole TB,larger runners going into a stock base.Really gonna choke a 383.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2008 | 11:45 PM
  #6  
nevernamed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 434
Transmission: TKO600
Re: air flow measurement stock vs modified hooker y-pipe

So what kind of flow can the stock lower intake support? When you say a good base, how much flow would that be and which one do you think is best? Are there any that can be purchased as a stand alone, as I already have the SLP intake runners and a ported plenum. Looking at some of the threads on this it's not at all clear.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 12:15 AM
  #7  
Shadygrady's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,489
Likes: 0
From: Flowood,MS
Car: 87 IROC Z
Engine: 5.7 L98 TPI
Transmission: 700r4,2500 stall
Axle/Gears: G80,10 bolt 3.42's
Re: air flow measurement stock vs modified hooker y-pipe

If you havent already do some searching about the before mentioned porting to the SLP runners.Have you ported the (upper manifold)plenum?I`m sure you have if you have those runners and a 58 mm TB.Look at the edelbrock or TPIS manifold base.They are the same casting I`ve heard but the TPIS might be cleaned uip a little bit more and a lil more expensive.I dont think the accel/SupperRam base is made anymore but you may be able to find it on ebay or something.Check out the FIRST system.I cant remember if the base is compatible withother TPI components but its supposed to flow the best IIRC.It has a monoblade TB and is pretty expensive.For your 383 have you considered any of the higher flowing type intakes HSR,SR,MR.I just saw a complete HSR sell on ebay for about 450 or 500 bucks last week.Any of the LTR setups will PROBABLY be a restriction on a 383.As for airflow I dont have any numbers but I know you can find them in the archives if you look a little.Someone may post up with some.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 11:14 AM
  #8  
TA's Avatar
TA
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: Carson, CA
Car: '88 GTA, 90 Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI, fed growth hormones
Transmission: 700r4 4u2?
Axle/Gears: 9bolt
Re: air flow measurement stock vs modified hooker y-pipe

Check out this thread:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/alte...fications.html
I know it's for a superram, but pay attention to how the base is welded up around the injector holes and opened up at that pinch point, it seems to make a big difference even on aftermarket bases, as 383s are very air hungry.

TA
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2008 | 06:18 PM
  #9  
nevernamed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: minnesota
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 434
Transmission: TKO600
Re: air flow measurement stock vs modified hooker y-pipe

very cool, thanks

Looks like this is where I need to focus my efforts next. What kinds of mods are required for the intake ducting then? Is it pretty much home built cold air intake or ram air hood?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eightsixseven
Tech / General Engine
2
Dec 16, 2024 01:50 PM
TreDeClaw
Theoretical and Street Racing
11
Jun 22, 2021 08:21 PM
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
Jan 10, 2020 05:33 PM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
40
Aug 21, 2015 02:12 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 AM.