Simple Dual exhaust concept!
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: 1984 firebird S/E
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Simple Dual exhaust concept!
Hey guys, I plan on doing a dual exhaust setup for the winter and this is what my idea is. My original idea is to hack up the original y-pipe and fabricate downpipes that would lead underneath the car on each side. as many of you know, there is not much room underneath these thirdgens. I though of a new and relatively simple way to do a dual exhaust. no i do not want to put headers in, i TRIED... i have long tubes and short tubes, neither of them fit. what i plan on doing is where the original cat was [for cars that had single cats] put in place a cherry bomb 2.5" single inlet dual outlet center 2.5" muffler. i forget what the exact name of it is, its in my jegs magazine and it is about $57.00. I then plan on ordering the 2.5" hotrod exhaust kit which is about $219.00 and includes alot of piping in order to do custom exhaust. i plan on having the pipes run along each other on the passenger side of the frame, over the axle and then exit as dual exhaust. one tip will extend to the rear drivers side and the other will continue to the rear pass. side. let me know what you think. i currently have a flowmaster 80 series muffler 2.5" to dual 2.5" tips, but since i did not order the complete kit, i had forgotten when i had my original exhaust piping fixed, the stock exhaust is 2" or 2.25" so i am getting a farly nice sound considering i have no cats, but maybe 5 to 10 hp at max from this setup. my goal is to get a louder, deeper and more agresssive tone while increasing my hp & torque just alittle bit more without having to break the bank. let me know what you guys think! thanks-matt!
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 132
From: Fayette County, OH
Car: basic third gens
Engine: that I like
Transmission: to restore
Axle/Gears: and enjoy
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
1. That's been done many times (dynomax even sold a similar setup for years).
2. That's not true duals if it's a single inlet at the muffler.
3. Installing headers and single exhaust will increase the power much more than having log style manifolds and duals.
Some headers fit well, some don't. You get what you pay for.
2. That's not true duals if it's a single inlet at the muffler.
3. Installing headers and single exhaust will increase the power much more than having log style manifolds and duals.
Some headers fit well, some don't. You get what you pay for.
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 6
From: Wyoming
Car: 1995 Formula
Engine: LT1 350
Transmission: Built 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, Eaton posi, 3.73's
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
There's really no need for a true dual exhaust, anyway. It's not worth the extra expense.
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 287
Likes: 1
From: NC
Car: 87' Firebird Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
here is my setup before they were installed of course. a guy had them in his shed with a ton of other car parts he wanted to part with. they were originally on his iroc with headers. stops right before the axle. just a template for ya.
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 132
From: Fayette County, OH
Car: basic third gens
Engine: that I like
Transmission: to restore
Axle/Gears: and enjoy
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
My goodness, that guy went to autozone and wiped out their supply of bends and extensions! At least he welded it up.
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 287
Likes: 1
From: NC
Car: 87' Firebird Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 6
From: Wyoming
Car: 1995 Formula
Engine: LT1 350
Transmission: Built 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, Eaton posi, 3.73's
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
In my opinion, a lot of work for no gain. If it were a 1000 horsepower car then maybe it would be worthwhile to go true duals. Talk to Don on these forums...he builds headers for our cars....he's been building exhausts for decades
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 287
Likes: 1
From: NC
Car: 87' Firebird Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 6
From: Wyoming
Car: 1995 Formula
Engine: LT1 350
Transmission: Built 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, Eaton posi, 3.73's
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
I don't have it yet, but I will have a 383 stroker, when it is finally finished here soon.
I talked to Don aka "dyno Don" and he said with my 383 even at 550 horsepower, a single system is more than ample and works great. He hasn't noticed any worthwhile gains running a dual exhaust on engines in this horsepower range.
I think he told me he picked up 3 horsepower running long tubes and true dual exhaust.
I talked to Don aka "dyno Don" and he said with my 383 even at 550 horsepower, a single system is more than ample and works great. He hasn't noticed any worthwhile gains running a dual exhaust on engines in this horsepower range.
I think he told me he picked up 3 horsepower running long tubes and true dual exhaust.
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 287
Likes: 1
From: NC
Car: 87' Firebird Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
I don't have it yet, but I will have a 383 stroker, when it is finally finished here soon.
I talked to Don aka "dyno Don" and he said with my 383 even at 550 horsepower, a single system is more than ample and works great. He hasn't noticed any worthwhile gains running a dual exhaust on engines in this horsepower range.
I think he told me he picked up 3 horsepower running long tubes and true dual exhaust.
I talked to Don aka "dyno Don" and he said with my 383 even at 550 horsepower, a single system is more than ample and works great. He hasn't noticed any worthwhile gains running a dual exhaust on engines in this horsepower range.
I think he told me he picked up 3 horsepower running long tubes and true dual exhaust.
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 6
From: Wyoming
Car: 1995 Formula
Engine: LT1 350
Transmission: Built 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, Eaton posi, 3.73's
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
I could be mistaken. He said either 3 or 9 horsepower. I do know that it wasn't much of a gain.
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 287
Likes: 1
From: NC
Car: 87' Firebird Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
yea, maybe 9 sounds a little more like it. when you get your 383, will you be running a single or dual setup? cat?
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
There's a reason that almost every name in exhaust offers a single 3" exhaust for our cars, and only one offers a dual exhaust system. It's not needed. Especially not on a 150hp 305. A mandrel bent 3" setup with a good aftermarket muffler is going to flow better then a hack-job, crush bent true dual system that reduces ground clearance.
Our cars all sit low as it is, every dual exhaust illustrated in other threads on here cost ground clearance. It's fine if you don't mind rubbing on everything, or pulling over to go pick up your mufflers that just fell off, but if you want a system that fits, maintains ground clearance, and is emissions legal, just pick one of the MANY stock style cat-back exhausts that are available.
Our cars all sit low as it is, every dual exhaust illustrated in other threads on here cost ground clearance. It's fine if you don't mind rubbing on everything, or pulling over to go pick up your mufflers that just fell off, but if you want a system that fits, maintains ground clearance, and is emissions legal, just pick one of the MANY stock style cat-back exhausts that are available.
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 287
Likes: 1
From: NC
Car: 87' Firebird Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
There's a reason that almost every name in exhaust offers a single 3" exhaust for our cars, and only one offers a dual exhaust system. It's not needed. Especially not on a 150hp 305. A mandrel bent 3" setup with a good aftermarket muffler is going to flow better then a hack-job, crush bent true dual system that reduces ground clearance.
Our cars all sit low as it is, every dual exhaust illustrated in other threads on here cost ground clearance. It's fine if you don't mind rubbing on everything, or pulling over to go pick up your mufflers that just fell off, but if you want a system that fits, maintains ground clearance, and is emissions legal, just pick one of the MANY stock style cat-back exhausts that are available.
Our cars all sit low as it is, every dual exhaust illustrated in other threads on here cost ground clearance. It's fine if you don't mind rubbing on everything, or pulling over to go pick up your mufflers that just fell off, but if you want a system that fits, maintains ground clearance, and is emissions legal, just pick one of the MANY stock style cat-back exhausts that are available.
Last edited by jahblah; Nov 10, 2011 at 12:13 AM. Reason: forgot to say "thank you"
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
The only reason to do dual exhausts is long tubes. The only advantage of long tubes is that although they dont make that much more peak power, they do make more power earlier in the RPM range. The increase low end torque and therefore horsepower and as you get closer to peak HP, the gain is pretty modest. At high RPMs LTs and shorties are theoretically about the same as far as performance.
If you dont have long tubes that necessitate the driver's side bank staying on the driver's side of the car, there is NO REASON to go duals, IMO. Running duals along the stock location is fine, but I dont think you'd gain anything from going from a single mandrel bent 3 inch catback to a 2.25 inch (thats what I usually see) dual setup, especially with all those tight bends in it all the way through the car.
I have long tubes and I run a single 3.5 exhaust. I did the dual 3 inch deal for a little while... hated it.
So to address the OP's idea. That's pretty much the worst of both worlds. The farther back from the engine you get, the less your power gains are. The farther back from the engine the slower the exhaust is, the cooler it is, the more insignificant it becomes to the engine way up in the front. Im not saying there are no gains in a good catback, but I am saying that MOST of the gains come from headers and a good y-pipe. The catback is there just to make sure the headers and y-pipe flow to their potential.
What you're doing is the equivalent of attaching a garden hose to a culvert and expecting the hose to flow more water. Worse than that, all the bends and piping cost money after a while - dual 2.5 pipes and mandrel bends all the way out the back - ouch. Plus extra friction that comes with more piping. It'd be not so bad if it was just a straight shot out the back of the car, but you're gonna try to follow the stock routing.
I dont think it's going to accomplish much in performance or sound or cost. you've got the performance of log manifolds and factory piping and the effort and expense of a complicated dual exhaust system with no performance gain.
If you dont have long tubes that necessitate the driver's side bank staying on the driver's side of the car, there is NO REASON to go duals, IMO. Running duals along the stock location is fine, but I dont think you'd gain anything from going from a single mandrel bent 3 inch catback to a 2.25 inch (thats what I usually see) dual setup, especially with all those tight bends in it all the way through the car.
I have long tubes and I run a single 3.5 exhaust. I did the dual 3 inch deal for a little while... hated it.
So to address the OP's idea. That's pretty much the worst of both worlds. The farther back from the engine you get, the less your power gains are. The farther back from the engine the slower the exhaust is, the cooler it is, the more insignificant it becomes to the engine way up in the front. Im not saying there are no gains in a good catback, but I am saying that MOST of the gains come from headers and a good y-pipe. The catback is there just to make sure the headers and y-pipe flow to their potential.
What you're doing is the equivalent of attaching a garden hose to a culvert and expecting the hose to flow more water. Worse than that, all the bends and piping cost money after a while - dual 2.5 pipes and mandrel bends all the way out the back - ouch. Plus extra friction that comes with more piping. It'd be not so bad if it was just a straight shot out the back of the car, but you're gonna try to follow the stock routing.
I dont think it's going to accomplish much in performance or sound or cost. you've got the performance of log manifolds and factory piping and the effort and expense of a complicated dual exhaust system with no performance gain.
Last edited by InfernalVortex; Nov 10, 2011 at 02:03 AM.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 41
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
WOW. Thats a horrible exaust system. Look at all those bends in the pipes.
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 287
Likes: 1
From: NC
Car: 87' Firebird Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
well most people that go for a true dual setup doesnt have ground clearance as a priority in the first place. and a hack job crush bent exhaust for free is wayy better than a $300+ single exhaust which i started with. and its only on the 305 until i finish my vortec 383 but heyy, thats just IMO. like i said earlier, maybe its just what someone wants, piece of mind if you will. if the numbers dont add up to you, then heyy, save yourself some time, money, and GROUND CLEARANCE by not getting duals..simple. the OP wanted a "simple dual exhaust concept" as the title clearly states, not a class on why duals arent necessarily or a number crunching horsepower course. ok? 


Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: 1984 firebird S/E
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
okay so it probably wouldnt be worth the money, but i atleast want to change the cat-back piping. the piping from the muffler to the cat is 2". would i have buy the whole entire kit all over again if i want to upgrade to 3"? the muffler is 2.5". Also Another neat idea i want to fab up, is 2nd gen trans am exhaust tips. i want to fabricate them so they exit the same way on 2nd gen, onto a 3rd gen. considering now I am going to stick to single exhaust, dual outlet
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 41
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
One thing is for sure. Your gonna have to get a mandrel bent 3" cat back. That'll cost you under $400. Then you would have to buy shorty headers with matching y pipe. I myself have the Edelbrock TES header and y pipe system but it's not as good as other header systems because the y pipe and headers are crushed to fit in the collector. Still it is better than OEM. So regardless, it's cheaper to buy a complete system from Summit Racing than to have one fabricated at a shop. Talk to DYNO Don about the header and y pipe. Header system and y pipes are also made by flowtech that is pretty much plug and play.
Last edited by Chevy86 IROC-Z; Nov 10, 2011 at 09:45 AM.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: 1984 firebird S/E
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
i have the right tools to fabricate it myself. i just want to get the best sound& performance to money ratio. ill figure something out. thanks guys for the suggestions and help!
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 41
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
Well if you what hard aggressive sound, I suggest you get a header and y pipe system. And then get an electric motor cut out system in between the cat and motor.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 41
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
There isn't a lot of power to be gained from a cat-back exhaust. The choke points in the stock system are the manifolds, Y-pipe, converter, and muffler. The LG4 exhaust is basically the same as the V6, tiny pipes from start to finish. A 3" cat-back isn't going to bolt up to the existing cat, and it's not going to address the restrictive manifolds and Y-pipe.
If you want louder you can just change the muffler. If you want more power, I'd start by finding a set of high output manifolds, matching Y-pipe (either single or dual converters), and then bolt up a matching cat-back. It'd fit, sound good, and increase performance.
If you want louder you can just change the muffler. If you want more power, I'd start by finding a set of high output manifolds, matching Y-pipe (either single or dual converters), and then bolt up a matching cat-back. It'd fit, sound good, and increase performance.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 41
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
I would take Drews advice. Drew is a no Bull Dung type of guy. Drew knows his stuff.
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: abq nm
Car: 1988 TransAm
Engine: sbc 9:8:1 cr 40os slugs rhs heads
Transmission: th400 3800stall b&mkit manual vb
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
sleeve in order too retain your current ehaust that flowmaster flows great take it to a muffler shop and have em sweg the inlet to three in cheap and btw dont listen to no one do what u like thats what matters the most check the system i just built on the post one off long tubes cackles and flames

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 132
From: Fayette County, OH
Car: basic third gens
Engine: that I like
Transmission: to restore
Axle/Gears: and enjoy
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
I have to stick up for the Edelbrock headers. I have had a few sets of them over the years, and even though they aren't the best flowing design, they are fine for a stock to mild engine. What I love about them is they fit great and seem to be a very good quality, I've never had problems with any of them.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,946
Likes: 644
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
First, I'm glad you didn't spell it "Duel". Second, take everyone's advice.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: 1984 firebird S/E
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
thanks for the advice guys! i actually have a set of edelbrock TES headers. I tried to fit them in and i couldnt get them to fit. I only tried the drivers side and then gave up. is there a special technique to get them in. I.E raise the block?? & yeah Drew, you're right, there are alot of restricting components on the LG4 like as you stated the exhaust but also the cam, compression and heads. the stock intake isnt too shabby & the carb is imo a great piece of equipment. but the parts that are necessary to gain power from, GM had greatly de-tuned the motor by putting in more restrictive parts. So yeah just let me know if any of you guys had any problems using the edelbrock TES headers. The ones i have had the air tubes, but i had just recently cut them off and welded up the holes since i have no more emmisions equipment on the block. thanks- matt
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 287
Likes: 1
From: NC
Car: 87' Firebird Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 132
From: Fayette County, OH
Car: basic third gens
Engine: that I like
Transmission: to restore
Axle/Gears: and enjoy
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
thanks for the advice guys! i actually have a set of edelbrock TES headers. I tried to fit them in and i couldnt get them to fit. I only tried the drivers side and then gave up. is there a special technique to get them in. I.E raise the block?? & yeah Drew, you're right, there are alot of restricting components on the LG4 like as you stated the exhaust but also the cam, compression and heads. the stock intake isnt too shabby & the carb is imo a great piece of equipment. but the parts that are necessary to gain power from, GM had greatly de-tuned the motor by putting in more restrictive parts. So yeah just let me know if any of you guys had any problems using the edelbrock TES headers. The ones i have had the air tubes, but i had just recently cut them off and welded up the holes since i have no more emmisions equipment on the block. thanks- matt
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 41
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
I'm satisfied with my flea market exhaust, thank you very much. And yes I understand the concept of a discussion forum. I was participating in the discussion by giving the OP an example of a dual exhaust and apparently a couple people wanted to bash my exhaust cause its not a professional $400+ exhaust. Who cares what it looks like. Its on my car and it was free. If I had a problem with what it looked like, I obviously wouldn't have even took them. Sooo, if that's all you and your people have to say about my exhaust then whoopty doo. Hope your sheepish comments keep your lungs pumping. If not, PLEASE, get off my d**k before you over ride it. 

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 41
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
thanks for the advice guys! i actually have a set of edelbrock TES headers. I tried to fit them in and i couldnt get them to fit. I only tried the drivers side and then gave up. is there a special technique to get them in. I.E raise the block?? & yeah Drew, you're right, there are alot of restricting components on the LG4 like as you stated the exhaust but also the cam, compression and heads. the stock intake isnt too shabby & the carb is imo a great piece of equipment. but the parts that are necessary to gain power from, GM had greatly de-tuned the motor by putting in more restrictive parts. So yeah just let me know if any of you guys had any problems using the edelbrock TES headers. The ones i have had the air tubes, but i had just recently cut them off and welded up the holes since i have no more emmisions equipment on the block. thanks- matt
http://static.summitracing.com/globa.../edl-68723.pdf
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
That crinkle system looks fine to me. Ive seen FAR FAR FAR worse come out of real exhaust shops.
A mandrel bent y-pipe setup would clearly be better, but I dont know how much he paid for that setup either. could be a great bang for the buck. Unless he's racing at the drag strip all the time I dont see it as a huge encumberance. The crinkle bends are bad, but still I've seen way worse.
Far worse that cost a friend of mine WAY too much money:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/exha...e-exhaust.html
A mandrel bent y-pipe setup would clearly be better, but I dont know how much he paid for that setup either. could be a great bang for the buck. Unless he's racing at the drag strip all the time I dont see it as a huge encumberance. The crinkle bends are bad, but still I've seen way worse.
Far worse that cost a friend of mine WAY too much money:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/exha...e-exhaust.html
Last edited by InfernalVortex; Nov 11, 2011 at 01:15 PM.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: 1984 firebird S/E
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
i actually just got finished installing the Edelbrock TES headers. i had to remove my valve covers because i have the tall edlebrock valve covers. and the reason why the driver side wouldnt fit before is because the steering column was wider when it was horizontal compared to when it was verticle. i turned the steering wheel slightly and bam! the fit right in. i just ran the car and it runs great and doesnt sound half bad. i just need to find a y pipe for the Edelbrock TES headers. any suggestions?
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 41
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
Yup. It only cost me $127 dollars about a year ago. Hold on while I search for it.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 41
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
here is the part number.... Edelbrock 65930
your gonna have to search and destroy because this part is discontinued. Summit no longer carries it nor other stores....
http://performanceparts.com/part/Edelbrock/65930
your gonna have to search and destroy because this part is discontinued. Summit no longer carries it nor other stores....
http://performanceparts.com/part/Edelbrock/65930
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: 1984 firebird S/E
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
here is the part number.... Edelbrock 65930
your gonna have to search and destroy because this part is discontinued. Summit no longer carries it nor other stores....
http://performanceparts.com/part/Edelbrock/65930
your gonna have to search and destroy because this part is discontinued. Summit no longer carries it nor other stores....
http://performanceparts.com/part/Edelbrock/65930
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 41
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
Glad to help out a fellow member. Ur welcome.
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 287
Likes: 1
From: NC
Car: 87' Firebird Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
That crinkle system looks fine to me. Ive seen FAR FAR FAR worse come out of real exhaust shops.
A mandrel bent y-pipe setup would clearly be better, but I dont know how much he paid for that setup either. could be a great bang for the buck. Unless he's racing at the drag strip all the time I dont see it as a huge encumberance. The crinkle bends are bad, but still I've seen way worse.
Far worse that cost a friend of mine WAY too much money:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/exha...e-exhaust.html
A mandrel bent y-pipe setup would clearly be better, but I dont know how much he paid for that setup either. could be a great bang for the buck. Unless he's racing at the drag strip all the time I dont see it as a huge encumberance. The crinkle bends are bad, but still I've seen way worse.
Far worse that cost a friend of mine WAY too much money:
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/exha...e-exhaust.html
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 6
From: Wyoming
Car: 1995 Formula
Engine: LT1 350
Transmission: Built 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, Eaton posi, 3.73's
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
Single.
I'll be running no cat (don't need it in Wyoming) and 1 3/4" Dyno Don shorties with a 3.5" collector to a single 3.5" exhaust pipe most likely to a Magnaflow dual exit muffler.
My other idea is the Hawk's "Sinister" single 4" exhaust. Rather than just pipe, however, I would add a straight through Magnaflow round muffler about 2 to 3 feet before the exit tailpipe, to mellow out the sound a bit.
I am leaning more towards the Magnaflow because A) it is a frickin' good exhaust for the money and B) it'll have dual exit pipes which is appropriate for an American muscle car.
My 383 will have a choppy idle, and I want it to be muffled enough to not sound too nasty, but I don't want a restrictive exhaust on the beast, so whatever muffler I use, it will be a "straight through" design.
I admit that I love the sound of Flowmaster mufflers but have not heard great things about actual flow performance from a lot of people, but a few people swear by Flowmaster "technology."
And guys who want a dual exhaust, let me tell you that I am no expert, but I HAVE done a TON of research by reading, in person, and via forums and the internet, and a dual exhaust is NOT NECESSARY on our cars.
I guess if you are into serious drag racing and need to squeeze every last bit of hp out of the darn engine, then FINE....go crazy and add a few horses to your 9,000 horsepower top fuel drag car by going long tubes and true dual exhaust.
I used to love wasting Subaru STIs, Vettes, Camaros, etc. in my little SRT-4 (yes, I did lose a lot of races to 600+ hp Vettes and 750 hp STI's and the like), and I had a single 3" Billy Boat exhaust on it coming off of a log style manifold, and many of the V-8 cars I beat had "true dual" exhausts and long tube headers. Big deal!!
The most important thing is to build your engine right and set up your drivetrain and suspension to handle the power.
I'll be running no cat (don't need it in Wyoming) and 1 3/4" Dyno Don shorties with a 3.5" collector to a single 3.5" exhaust pipe most likely to a Magnaflow dual exit muffler.
My other idea is the Hawk's "Sinister" single 4" exhaust. Rather than just pipe, however, I would add a straight through Magnaflow round muffler about 2 to 3 feet before the exit tailpipe, to mellow out the sound a bit.
I am leaning more towards the Magnaflow because A) it is a frickin' good exhaust for the money and B) it'll have dual exit pipes which is appropriate for an American muscle car.
My 383 will have a choppy idle, and I want it to be muffled enough to not sound too nasty, but I don't want a restrictive exhaust on the beast, so whatever muffler I use, it will be a "straight through" design.
I admit that I love the sound of Flowmaster mufflers but have not heard great things about actual flow performance from a lot of people, but a few people swear by Flowmaster "technology."
And guys who want a dual exhaust, let me tell you that I am no expert, but I HAVE done a TON of research by reading, in person, and via forums and the internet, and a dual exhaust is NOT NECESSARY on our cars.
I guess if you are into serious drag racing and need to squeeze every last bit of hp out of the darn engine, then FINE....go crazy and add a few horses to your 9,000 horsepower top fuel drag car by going long tubes and true dual exhaust.
I used to love wasting Subaru STIs, Vettes, Camaros, etc. in my little SRT-4 (yes, I did lose a lot of races to 600+ hp Vettes and 750 hp STI's and the like), and I had a single 3" Billy Boat exhaust on it coming off of a log style manifold, and many of the V-8 cars I beat had "true dual" exhausts and long tube headers. Big deal!!
The most important thing is to build your engine right and set up your drivetrain and suspension to handle the power.
Last edited by New2Chevy; Nov 12, 2011 at 12:03 AM.
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 6
From: Wyoming
Car: 1995 Formula
Engine: LT1 350
Transmission: Built 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, Eaton posi, 3.73's
Re: Simple Dual exhaust concept!
There's a reason that almost every name in exhaust offers a single 3" exhaust for our cars, and only one offers a dual exhaust system. It's not needed. Especially not on a 150hp 305. A mandrel bent 3" setup with a good aftermarket muffler is going to flow better then a hack-job, crush bent true dual system that reduces ground clearance.
Our cars all sit low as it is, every dual exhaust illustrated in other threads on here cost ground clearance. It's fine if you don't mind rubbing on everything, or pulling over to go pick up your mufflers that just fell off, but if you want a system that fits, maintains ground clearance, and is emissions legal, just pick one of the MANY stock style cat-back exhausts that are available.
Our cars all sit low as it is, every dual exhaust illustrated in other threads on here cost ground clearance. It's fine if you don't mind rubbing on everything, or pulling over to go pick up your mufflers that just fell off, but if you want a system that fits, maintains ground clearance, and is emissions legal, just pick one of the MANY stock style cat-back exhausts that are available.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM








lmao thats what i said lmao but its welded pretty darn good. no leaks 



