A.I.R. emissions system question?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2024
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: missouri
Car: 1992 chevrolet camaro rs
Engine: tbi 305 v8
Transmission: 700r4
A.I.R. emissions system question?
i know theres already a ton of threads asking about the air emissions system, but i dont think thie question i have is on here.
so basically, i tried taking off those air injection pipes from my headers, because i wanted to free up some space, and ive also heard people say you can do that cause it frees some hp and gas milage, but i found out that was bs. i started getting codes, and the car runs like crap. so im putting those air injection pipes back on. but my question is i only have the pipes on the driver side headers right now, (which is where the 02 sensor is located) but not the passenger side ones. i though just having that one side with pipes would fix it, but its throwing a code saying its running too lean (which is code 44), and im getting a code for either an alternator fault, or an egr fault, (code 53).
now i know theres 2 ports on the air pump diverter valve, and i know that the right port is supposed to go to BOTH injection pipes, but i just have that one port running to that one on the driver side. is there too much air going through those pipes that makes the 02 sensor tell me its running too lean?
sorry if my descriptions are too confusing, i tried my best.
so basically, i tried taking off those air injection pipes from my headers, because i wanted to free up some space, and ive also heard people say you can do that cause it frees some hp and gas milage, but i found out that was bs. i started getting codes, and the car runs like crap. so im putting those air injection pipes back on. but my question is i only have the pipes on the driver side headers right now, (which is where the 02 sensor is located) but not the passenger side ones. i though just having that one side with pipes would fix it, but its throwing a code saying its running too lean (which is code 44), and im getting a code for either an alternator fault, or an egr fault, (code 53).
now i know theres 2 ports on the air pump diverter valve, and i know that the right port is supposed to go to BOTH injection pipes, but i just have that one port running to that one on the driver side. is there too much air going through those pipes that makes the 02 sensor tell me its running too lean?
sorry if my descriptions are too confusing, i tried my best.
Supreme Member




Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,011
Likes: 816
From: Colorado USA
Car: '83 Firebird (T/A Clone)
Engine: 350 with L-69 components
Transmission: 700R-4, 2000 RPM stall converter
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt/3.73 ..
Re: A.I.R. emissions system question?
Removal of the A.I.R. shouldn't throw any codes. You have some other problem...
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,899
Likes: 2,437
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: A.I.R. emissions system question?
Not related.
Sounds like maybe you disturbed an electrical connector or a vacuum line somewhere along the way.
Go back and check your work CAREFULLY. Leave behind your personal pride about what a good job you did.
Sounds like maybe you disturbed an electrical connector or a vacuum line somewhere along the way.
Go back and check your work CAREFULLY. Leave behind your personal pride about what a good job you did.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2024
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: missouri
Car: 1992 chevrolet camaro rs
Engine: tbi 305 v8
Transmission: 700r4
Re: A.I.R. emissions system question?
are you sure? i have a haynes repair manual, and im looking at the symptom for rough or erratic idling, (which i have) and it says defective or damaged emission compnents could cause it. i have a hard time beleiving the system will be fine without the amissions system, specifically because the o2 sensor tell you if your air/fuel ratio is lean or rich, and im thinking the extra air blowing into the headers would be coded in with it. you know what i mean?
Last edited by Keaton06; Oct 30, 2024 at 10:53 PM.
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 322
From: South Windsor, CT
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: ZZ6TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 3.70:1
Re: A.I.R. emissions system question?
are you sure? i have a haynes repair manual, and im looking at the symptom for rough or erratic idling, (which i have) and it says defective or damaged emission compnents could cause it. i have a hard time beleiving the system will be fine without the amissions system, specifically because the o2 sensor tell you if your air/fuel ratio is lean or rich, and im thinking the extra air blowing into the headers would be coded in with it. you know what i mean?
If your AIR system was injecting into the exhaust manifolds all of the time, then you would definitely have an issue with the O2 sensor reading correctly when the ECM goes to closed loop.
Supreme Member




Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 449
From: WA
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: BW 9 Bolt / 2.77 Posi
Re: A.I.R. emissions system question?
Having it partially hooked up could be a problem. You should either have the entire system hooked up, or the entire system removed with holes plugged. As long as the side with the o2 sensor is plugged nice and tight, removal won't throw any codes and it doesn't affect how it runs.
Trending Topics
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 659
From: Franklin, KY near Beech Bend Raceway, Corvette Plant and Museum.
Car: 1992 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 5.0L L03 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: A.I.R. emissions system question?
Removing a properly functioning emission control system on a stock L69/TPI 3rd gen that is new enough not to have the pancake style catalytic convertor with the pellets in it doesn't make the car run better or have a significant amount more power. I don't even think any of these cars equipped with these engines had that old style catalytic convertor.
Removal Equals
A.I.R. system = About 1.3 HP at 5,500 RPM.
EGR = No power gain and reduced fuel economy.
Charcoal Canister & Evaporative Emissions System = No power gain and stinky garage.
Catalytic Convertor = About 5 to 8 HP L69, LB9 H.O. Cam, L98 with a H.O. single cat exhaust system and a stinky car.
Removal Equals
A.I.R. system = About 1.3 HP at 5,500 RPM.
EGR = No power gain and reduced fuel economy.
Charcoal Canister & Evaporative Emissions System = No power gain and stinky garage.
Catalytic Convertor = About 5 to 8 HP L69, LB9 H.O. Cam, L98 with a H.O. single cat exhaust system and a stinky car.
Last edited by Airwolfe; Nov 7, 2024 at 07:44 PM.
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 659
From: Franklin, KY near Beech Bend Raceway, Corvette Plant and Museum.
Car: 1992 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 5.0L L03 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: A.I.R. emissions system question?
Yeah A.I.R. gone cleans up the engine bay and makes sparkplug changes so much easier.
Supreme Member




Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,011
Likes: 816
From: Colorado USA
Car: '83 Firebird (T/A Clone)
Engine: 350 with L-69 components
Transmission: 700R-4, 2000 RPM stall converter
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt/3.73 ..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
G92Joe
Tech / General Engine
11
Dec 24, 2000 04:44 AM







