History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

firebird or camaro first?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 08:09 PM
  #1  
Dante93GTZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 5
From: East Tennessee
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
firebird or camaro first?

I'm just wondering - Was the 3rd-Gen FBODY designed FIRST (ie. 81-82 whenever design began...) as a Camaro or a Firebird?

Just from looking at both, the Camaro's lines seem to be smoother and more subtle, whereas some of the Firebird's lines seem to be disproportionate and "slapped on"

Please, no flames, as its just a simple question, not an attack on either platform.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 08:19 PM
  #2  
Krazzycowgirl's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,134
Likes: 1
From: Washington state
Car: 87 Irocz, 95 Z28, 71 Z28 /RS
Engine: 355 Tpi, LT1, 355
Transmission: Auto, Auto, 4sp
The design was started back in 79 I have a Laser disc that was made in 1980 that shows off the 82 camaros.

I think since the camaros came first in to this world that it would have been the camaros. but I dont know that would be something someone would have to ask someone like Scott Settlemire.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 12:36 AM
  #3  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
Yup, the F-Body was started and made by Chevrolet. The Third Gen also started as a Camaro, by this dude: http://www.corvettemuseum.com/librar...f/palmer.shtml who's design would become the new Third Gen Camaro and obviously Pontiac would as always do their version for the Firebird. The Z28 was the 1st model designed, the lower models (SC, Berlinetta) were done later. They could use designers like that today.

Last edited by IROCZTWENTYGR8; Mar 6, 2003 at 12:58 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 02:31 AM
  #4  
kizz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 960
Likes: 1
From: Fletcher, NC, USA
Car: 1982 Recaro T/A
Engine: LU5 CFI 305 V8
Transmission: TH-200C
Axle/Gears: 3.23 F-body Fanatic: Yes
Actually the thirdgen program started life as early as '75. There's a great book by Gary Witz that goes into it. Can't remember the title. I'm not sure which came first for the thirdgen, but the Camaro came first for the firstgen.

Regardless, Firebird has always been a more refined, more upscale (and more expensive) model.. so all you Camaro owners stop being jealous

GT
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 06:46 AM
  #5  
TPIterror's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 506
Likes: 1
From: N.J. USA
Car: Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: M5
Originally posted by kizz
Actually the thirdgen program started life as early as '75. There's a great book by Gary Witz that goes into it. Can't remember the title. I'm not sure which came first for the thirdgen, but the Camaro came first for the firstgen.

Regardless, Firebird has always been a more refined, more upscale (and more expensive) model.. so all you Camaro owners stop being jealous

GT
Right said! I've seen drawings from the mid-70's that pretty much pegged 75 percent of the 82 Firebird design. I'm not saying the Firebird was first, but I believe it was a joint venture from the inception.

And I strongly disagree with the earlier statement about the Firebird looking like an afterthought compared to the Camaro. Nothing looks tacked on in either car, but the Firebird has smoother and more sylish integrated lines.

And being a graphic artist, I think my opinion might hold some weight
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 11:05 AM
  #6  
B4C Hawaii's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Originally posted by kizz
Actually the thirdgen program started life as early as '75. There's a great book by Gary Witz that goes into it. Can't remember the title. I'm not sure which came first for the thirdgen, but the Camaro came first for the firstgen.

Regardless, Firebird has always been a more refined, more upscale (and more expensive) model.. so all you Camaro owners stop being jealous

GT
You forgot to mention slower.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 12:15 PM
  #7  
Skatepunk60's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
From: Smithfield RI
Car: Hardtop 84' z/95' Cheyenne
Engine: 305 H.O./4.3L
Transmission: 5-speed manual/Auto
You forgot to mention slower
What about the TTA .. that was the fastest stock thirdgen and a birdie I got a bird and i love the lines but i like the camaro lines a little better. Wasent the F-body platform started with the pontiac banshee? way back in 67
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 12:22 PM
  #8  
TPIterror's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 506
Likes: 1
From: N.J. USA
Car: Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: M5
Originally posted by B4C Hawaii
You forgot to mention slower.
Now thats funny.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 01:10 PM
  #9  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
The Firebird parts were anything but disproportionate and "slapped on".

The body parts on the Firebird were designed to be aerodynamically functional, in addition to improving the appearance. As far as the body goes, the only parts that are interchangeable between the two cars are the doors and hatch.

And as far as which was faster... no one here is stock anyway, so what does it matter? In my experiance the fastest times posted for a stock thirdgen would belong to the Firebirds. I'm not including TTA's and Firehawks either. Stock for stock, L98 to L98, the bird times typically are faster then the Z28 times.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 01:28 PM
  #10  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
In my experience I've seen more faster Camaros. But lets not turn this into another Camaro vs. Firebird post. Each car has their own personality and characteristics. Whether they both use Chevy engines or not.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 02:17 PM
  #11  
kizz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 960
Likes: 1
From: Fletcher, NC, USA
Car: 1982 Recaro T/A
Engine: LU5 CFI 305 V8
Transmission: TH-200C
Axle/Gears: 3.23 F-body Fanatic: Yes
yeah well stock for stock, gimme an options-stripped L98 Formula ANY day, against any L98 Camaro, and I'm confident I'd win consistently due to aerodynamics and lower weight.

I can foresee this going even more off-topic, but hey, gotta set the record straight, or at least egg on you Camaro fans even more
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 04:40 PM
  #12  
CamaroFreak406's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 674
Likes: 2
From: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
Originally posted by IROCZTWENTYGR8
In my experience I've seen more faster Camaros. But lets not turn this into another Camaro vs. Firebird post. Each car has their own personality and characteristics. Whether they both use Chevy engines or not.


I agree hehe, Both cars do have different defining characteristics (sp). I like both styles (but prefer Camaro's, no true great lines like the Firebird) The Camaro just has in you face testostirone and the ***** to back it up, so does the Firebird. But I just personally like the Camaro better.

But eveyone is entitled to there own opinion, If everyone had the same opinion life wouldn't be much fun Come on doesn't Everyone, Agree ????


Later, Garrett
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 04:44 PM
  #13  
B4C Hawaii's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Originally posted by kizz
yeah well stock for stock, gimme an options-stripped L98 Formula ANY day, against any L98 Camaro, and I'm confident I'd win consistently due to aerodynamics and lower weight.

I can foresee this going even more off-topic, but hey, gotta set the record straight, or at least egg on you Camaro fans even more
Not a chance.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 05:03 PM
  #14  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
Alright, enough bull****. I'm starting to feel ban happy. Anyone that has been around here for any significant length of time knows that when a similarly equipped Z28 is matched to a L98 Firebird that the times are going to be close enough to not warrant a pissing match. The pro's and con's of one or the other cancel each other out.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 05:22 PM
  #15  
TPIterror's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 506
Likes: 1
From: N.J. USA
Car: Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: M5
Originally posted by B4C Hawaii
Not a chance.
Did you ever consider comedy professionally?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 06:10 PM
  #16  
kizz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 960
Likes: 1
From: Fletcher, NC, USA
Car: 1982 Recaro T/A
Engine: LU5 CFI 305 V8
Transmission: TH-200C
Axle/Gears: 3.23 F-body Fanatic: Yes
After all, firebird & camaro are the SAME car, in different packages. The difference is negligible. They're the same car. same motor. same basic options. Different cosmetics and personalities, but that's just for variety to customers. Built on the same assembly line back to back with each other, etc. I hate to be the one to take the hippy approach out of it, but it's a futile debate. Read a good variety of road tests from the 80s and you'll see they're pretty much undecided or split 50%/50% on it.

Individual people's brand loyalty and personal experience is what leads us to say "X is faster, Y is slower", etc. You'll never convince anyone who disagrees with you, just like they'll never convince you.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 07:16 PM
  #17  
David M's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 6
From: Marietta, GA
Car: '84 Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by kizz
Actually the thirdgen program started life as early as '75.

GT
GM management approved Design Staff's fiberglass 1/1 scale model Z28 on Dec. 12, 1978. It looks exactly like an '82 Z28 except for the indents in the hood, and the Z28 nameplate on the rear fascia looks a little different.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2003 | 01:06 PM
  #18  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
I'll say it again. Stop arguing about firebird vs camaro crap.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2003 | 11:21 AM
  #19  
Big P's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: the internet
who's arguing?? sounds like a legitimate discussion to me
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2003 | 01:02 PM
  #20  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,068
From: Salina, KS
Originally posted by Big P
who's arguing?? sounds like a legitimate discussion to me
That's cause I deleted most of the more questionable posts.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
Exterior Parts for Sale
5
Apr 4, 2016 12:50 PM
ASE doc
Alternative Port EFI Intakes
5
Aug 25, 2015 09:14 AM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
40
Aug 21, 2015 02:12 PM
antares57
History / Originality
4
Aug 6, 2015 07:47 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 PM.