History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2013, 10:03 AM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Base-...#ht_500wt_1182



Sorry guys, I'm having trouble posting pics.

Last edited by chazman; 03-27-2013 at 10:06 AM.
Old 03-27-2013, 10:51 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
yaj15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northern California - Bay Area
Posts: 1,376
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: L98 - full intake & exhaust boltons
Transmission: Bowtie 700r4, 2400 rpm stall
Axle/Gears: Borg-Warner 9bolt, 3.45 gears, posi
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

It's a very nice looking car. It's very hard to find 1982 model year thirdgens that are in really good shape like that.

I couldn't stand that 4-cylinder though. I've got to have a V8 in my thirdgen or a turbo 6 like in the 1989 Trans-Am pace car.

Thirdgens look so sleek and not having a V8 to back up the looks of the car kind of spoils the fun for me. Nothing can replace the sound of a good strong running Gen 1 V8 small block either. The V8 is a big part of what makes up the character of these cars and I wouldn't want to be without that.


Originally Posted by chazman
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Base-...#ht_500wt_1182



Sorry guys, I'm having trouble posting pics.
Old 03-27-2013, 11:40 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by yaj15
It's a very nice looking car. It's very hard to find 1982 model year thirdgens that are in really good shape like that.

I couldn't stand that 4-cylinder though. I've got to have a V8 in my thirdgen or a turbo 6 like in the 1989 Trans-Am pace car.

Thirdgens look so sleek and not having a V8 to back up the looks of the car kind of spoils the fun for me. Nothing can replace the sound of a good strong running Gen 1 V8 small block either. The V8 is a big part of what makes up the character of these cars and I wouldn't want to be without that.
True. But a nice, 4 speed, Iron Duke Bird with hubcaps is certainly not something you see every day.
Old 03-27-2013, 11:42 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
yaj15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northern California - Bay Area
Posts: 1,376
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: L98 - full intake & exhaust boltons
Transmission: Bowtie 700r4, 2400 rpm stall
Axle/Gears: Borg-Warner 9bolt, 3.45 gears, posi
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Yes thats true too. Are you thinking about buying it and adding it to your fleet?

Originally Posted by chazman
True. But a nice, 4 speed, Iron Duke Bird with hubcaps is certainly not something you see every day.
Old 03-27-2013, 12:03 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by yaj15
Yes thats true too. Are you thinking about buying it and adding it to your fleet?

Could be. Eventhough I swore I wouldn't buy any more 3rd gens.
Old 03-27-2013, 12:06 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
yaj15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northern California - Bay Area
Posts: 1,376
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: L98 - full intake & exhaust boltons
Transmission: Bowtie 700r4, 2400 rpm stall
Axle/Gears: Borg-Warner 9bolt, 3.45 gears, posi
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Ha ha yeah I understand. Once you get into these cars you want to have different versions of them so you can sample and enjoy the differences between the different models.

Originally Posted by chazman
Could be. Eventhough I swore I wouldn't buy any more 3rd gens.
Old 03-27-2013, 06:56 PM
  #7  
Member

 
jdracer13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1982 Camaro
Engine: LTX Carb
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Buy it and put some boost to it
Old 03-27-2013, 07:26 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
TTOP350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,688
Received 745 Likes on 505 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

I went to a junk yard in MO that has about 4-5 82ish Iron duke birds, most of the motors were all there..
Old 03-27-2013, 07:45 PM
  #9  
Member

 
kymmee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 82 MSE/89 TTA/89 Formula/99 TA
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

I think it would be cool to own it. Just because its different and not many are left in that condition. But I'm sure its a dog because I have the 82 v-6 and its slow, so I can imagine the 4 cylinder is worse.

But its good to have different versions of 3rd gens. When i want to go fast I drive my TTA, the v-6 is good for errands and stuff like that. I have a 84 Fiero duke 4 speed and it is fun to buzz around in.

Good luck Chazman if you bid, I hope you get it. That car needs to go to an enthusiast.
Old 03-27-2013, 07:47 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
project89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

if it was close id buy it for ***** and giggles just so i could turbo charge it
Old 03-27-2013, 08:11 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
TTOP350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,688
Received 745 Likes on 505 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

I think I would do a 500hp turbo ecotec with a 6spd in one b4 i messed with a ole duke motor.
Old 03-27-2013, 08:35 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
82tarecaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,708
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: 1982 Recaro TA, 1989 TTA#948
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

I think it's slow. It would be painful to drive. I never saw the allure of owning something like that. I owned an Iron Duke in an X body years ago, and aside from being indestructible, it was a pig.
Old 03-27-2013, 11:09 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by 82tarecaro
I think it's slow. It would be painful to drive. I never saw the allure of owning something like that. I owned an Iron Duke in an X body years ago, and aside from being indestructible, it was a pig.
What are you trying to say? 90 hp isn't enough for you?
Old 03-27-2013, 11:56 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
dctrouant1995's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: dothan, al
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 pontiac trans am
Engine: None
Transmission: None
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

It may be a 4 cylinder, but that is still a nice example of a really early 3rd gen, and the fact that its all original is cool
Old 03-28-2013, 12:01 AM
  #15  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by dctrouant1995
It may be a 4 cylinder, but that is still a nice example of a really early 3rd gen, and the fact that its all original is cool

Believe it or not...I'm diggin' the factory spoke hubcaps.
Old 03-28-2013, 01:52 AM
  #16  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
project89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by TTOP350
I think I would do a 500hp turbo ecotec with a 6spd in one b4 i messed with a ole duke motor.
that would be a nice setup fallen on here is doing one currently

i would keep the iron duke just cause.i know i could bring it upto around 200 hp and 250 tq for a couple hundred bucks

then the only thing id be missing would be a turbo 305 f-body
Old 03-28-2013, 02:32 AM
  #17  
Member
 
brando54009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: St. Croix Falls WI
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 82 firebird
Engine: a few
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: wondering this myself
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

daily duties await this one. i would lower it a bit and drive the wheels off of it
Old 03-28-2013, 03:04 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
LHernandezJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

...

Last edited by LHernandezJr; 07-17-2014 at 06:08 PM.
Old 03-28-2013, 06:13 AM
  #19  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
82tarecaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,708
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: 1982 Recaro TA, 1989 TTA#948
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by chazman
What are you trying to say? 90 hp isn't enough for you?
I think it wouldn't be comfortable making 90 hp. It is funny that Pontiac was able to get over 200 hp out of them.
Old 03-28-2013, 06:21 AM
  #20  
Supreme Member

 
eseibel67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Total stripper except the two most expensive options - T top and A/C. This configuration is quite strange becase you would expect the middle aged woman that first owned it would prefer an auto trans over the risk that the old school Z-bar clutch linkage might kick the high heel off her left pump.

The biggest immediate issue is the seats, but they could easily be recovered properly. At 31 years old, you never know if this car lived it's entire life in NC, but it's likely rust free. Especially since it's claimed to be original paint. If it was mine, I would defintiely downgrade the wire wheel hubcaps to the dog dish type in order to keep the theme of this car consistent.

A toy car doesn't have to run with Ferraris to be fun. Every guy I see holding up traffic in a Model A is smiling.

I love it, if it checks out - go for it.
Old 03-28-2013, 08:18 AM
  #21  
Member

iTrader: (6)
 
Jason444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tifton GA
Posts: 268
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: '92 Formula, '92 TA, '91 ZR-1
Engine: 350, 305, LT-5
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by chazman
Believe it or not...I'm diggin' the factory spoke hubcaps.
I'm glad that I'm not the only one that thought those were cool too!
Old 03-28-2013, 09:15 AM
  #22  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
82tarecaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,708
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: 1982 Recaro TA, 1989 TTA#948
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

I think that car would get old in a hurry when you get passed by a Hyundai Elantra.
Old 03-28-2013, 09:28 AM
  #23  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by 82tarecaro
I think that car would get old in a hurry when you get passed by a Hyundai Elantra.
Elantra? How about a Smart Car?
Old 03-28-2013, 09:32 AM
  #24  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
82tarecaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,708
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: 1982 Recaro TA, 1989 TTA#948
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by chazman
Elantra? How about a Smart Car?
Old 03-28-2013, 09:48 AM
  #25  
Member

iTrader: (6)
 
Jason444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tifton GA
Posts: 268
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: '92 Formula, '92 TA, '91 ZR-1
Engine: 350, 305, LT-5
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by chazman
Elantra? How about a Smart Car?
I'd take the Firebird every time over either one....really.
Old 03-28-2013, 09:52 AM
  #26  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by Jason444
I'd take the Firebird every time over either one....really.
I think that we have to put things in perspective. Even the fastest 3rd gens would be given a run for their money by a well driven modern Accord.
Old 03-28-2013, 09:54 AM
  #27  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
82tarecaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,708
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Car: 1982 Recaro TA, 1989 TTA#948
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Yes what we considered fast is now just acceptable. But what was slow back then is dangerous now.
A good example is a Volkswagen Bug. Would you want to be caught on a highway in that with a big rig creeping up behind you and you have all of 30 HP?
Old 03-28-2013, 09:59 AM
  #28  
Administrator

iTrader: (1)
 
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a mint Third Gen!
Posts: 7,386
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

I hope you plan on driving down alot of hills! I have a V6 Camaro and I just can't imagine it being any slower LOL. Even with that engine, merging on a busy street can be difficult.
Old 03-28-2013, 10:43 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
LHernandezJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

...

Last edited by LHernandezJr; 07-17-2014 at 06:09 PM.
Old 03-28-2013, 10:59 AM
  #30  
Supreme Member
 
2007xl50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Streetsboro Oh
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1987 T/A WS6 T-Tops/92 RS
Engine: LB9/3.1
Transmission: 700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73/3.23
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

I dig the car, the hubcaps are a bit out of place looking-I know they are stock, but still. I love the color and the fact that it has T-tops. Sure the car is slow, my 3.1 RS is slow, but I still like driving it. I think it would be a neat car to have and take to little shows just to see the WTF look as people look under the hood. You always see a ton of v6 and v8 3rd gens, nut Iron Dukes are not a dime a dozen. Go for it if you like and can afford it, but I would not pay over $2500ish for it.
Old 03-28-2013, 02:36 PM
  #31  
Supreme Member

 
navy02ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,208
Received 63 Likes on 52 Posts
Car: '02 T/A WS6, '91 T/A, '91 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1, LB9, L03
Transmission: T56, 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 10 bolt, 2.73 10 bolts
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by Jason444
I'm glad that I'm not the only one that thought those were cool too!

That's actually one of my favorite hubcaps ever...I had them on my '85 Parisienne wagon. They took about 30 minutes each to properly clean with a tootbrush, but man did they look nice when they were done. They look totally out of place on this car though, even though they're stock.
Old 03-28-2013, 07:30 PM
  #32  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

I was the high bidder and just retracted my bid. You guys notice those dark spots on the passenger side rocker panel? What's that? I tried contacting the seller twice on that and haven't heard back. Earlier today I emailed him that if I don't hear back I'd be retracting my bid. I didn't hear back, so that's that.
Old 03-28-2013, 08:02 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
LHernandezJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

...

Last edited by LHernandezJr; 07-17-2014 at 06:09 PM.
Old 03-28-2013, 08:18 PM
  #34  
Member

iTrader: (2)
 
TheGr8erG00d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Ew, good catch, Chaz. Almost didn't see that rocker. That looks potentially pretty nasty. Too bad. The rest of the car looks pretty good and I shudder at the idea of someone else picking up and molesting an otherwise pretty neat little stock Iron duke.
Old 03-28-2013, 08:20 PM
  #35  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

One thing I've learned (the hard way) is that cars look MUCH better in pictures than they do in the flesh.
Old 03-28-2013, 08:35 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
LHernandezJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

...

Last edited by LHernandezJr; 07-17-2014 at 06:09 PM.
Old 03-28-2013, 08:46 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
LHernandezJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

...

Last edited by LHernandezJr; 07-17-2014 at 06:09 PM.
Old 03-28-2013, 09:16 PM
  #38  
Senior Member

 
StevenB L98/LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: pensacola florida
Posts: 710
Received 31 Likes on 20 Posts
Car: 1989 Firebird Formula
Engine: 5.7 LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Those iron dukes are indestructible. But i will never own one. They were loud, slow, not much of a difference on gas in a v6 5speed setup. My dad owned a 86 s10 with the 2.5 iron duke and it was just awful. Plus always expierenced idle problems with it, but it was pretty hard to kill.
Old 03-28-2013, 09:46 PM
  #39  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by motobooks
Yeah, there's something there, and it looks questionable.

I don't mind getting a car which needs a little fixing, but when you factor in $800-$1000 for shipping, I don't want to get too upside down.
Old 03-29-2013, 07:41 AM
  #40  
Supreme Member
 
2007xl50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Streetsboro Oh
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1987 T/A WS6 T-Tops/92 RS
Engine: LB9/3.1
Transmission: 700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73/3.23
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

I missed that the first time, but it does look like rust, the car looks like it was washed before the pix so to miss that much dirt and that much dirt on the car does not make sense. I do agree that cars always look better in pix, I know both mine do. Well better safe than sorry. If the shipping was not a factor I might say go for it anyways, but I do think you would be upside down in that car by the time you got it in your driveway without any repairs.
Old 03-29-2013, 10:42 AM
  #41  
Supreme Member

 
KMK454's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 1,337
Received 47 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

It's cool from a thirdgen history/nerd perspective, but not cool from a financially invested in it perspective. I'd stick to V8 cars.
Old 03-29-2013, 10:52 AM
  #42  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by KMK454
It's cool from a thirdgen history/nerd perspective, but not cool from a financially invested in it perspective. I'd stick to V8 cars.
But I'm pretty sure that I'd be the only guy on the planet with both a Crossfire and an Iron Duke.
Old 03-29-2013, 12:44 PM
  #43  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Weird. The seller has answered other questions but not mine about the rocker panel. Also, since I retracted my bids, the car has gone down in price substantially. From $2400 to $1500.

Last edited by chazman; 03-29-2013 at 01:08 PM.
Old 03-29-2013, 03:08 PM
  #44  
Supreme Member

 
eseibel67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by chazman
Weird. The seller has answered other questions but not mine about the rocker panel. Also, since I retracted my bids, the car has gone down in price substantially. From $2400 to $1500.
The rocker panel problem looks like road blast. If it only took off the paint without rotting out the metal, the new price plus shipping doesn't sound too bad for something exclusive.
Old 03-30-2013, 12:19 AM
  #45  
Supreme Member

 
KMK454's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 1,337
Received 47 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by chazman
But I'm pretty sure that I'd be the only guy on the planet with both a Crossfire and an Iron Duke.
Yes, at which point you'd be the Official Connoisseur of Malaise Era Motors.
Old 03-30-2013, 12:42 AM
  #46  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
chazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 9,666
Received 546 Likes on 376 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?

Originally Posted by KMK454
Yes, at which point you'd be the Official Connoisseur of Malaise Era Motors.

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
InfinityShade
Tech / General Engine
2
02-21-2016 01:29 PM
InfinityShade
Body
3
09-05-2015 06:38 PM
InfinityShade
Transmissions and Drivetrain
15
08-22-2015 08:00 PM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
40
08-21-2015 02:12 PM



Quick Reply: What does the TGO committee think of this Iron Duke Firebird?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 AM.