weiand 142?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: IA
Car: 1984 z28 camaro / 2019 accord sport
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
weiand 142?
I have been thinking of getting a weiand 142 supercharger for a while now and was wondering whether it would fit under an ascd big block hood. Filter size doesn’t bother me if I have to I will run a 2” filter on a 2” drop base with filtered top.
Is there any place that rebuilds them in case I decide to get one off ebay and how much dose it cost to rebuild?
If any one has one for sale let me know
I did search they all say decent size filter.
Is there any place that rebuilds them in case I decide to get one off ebay and how much dose it cost to rebuild?
If any one has one for sale let me know
I did search they all say decent size filter.
I MYSELF HAVE WANTED ONE BUT AFTER SOME THREAD SEARCHING AND E MAILS FROM PEOPLE I THINK NITROUS IS PRETTY EASY ..... BUT THE BOTTLE DOES GET EMPTY LOL OH IM USING A 300 HP SHOT FROM A BIG SHOT KIT
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: IA
Car: 1984 z28 camaro / 2019 accord sport
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I have been thinking a bought the edelbrock kit for some time now. But nothing is as cool as seeing a supercharger when you pop the hood. How a bought a dual carb system and a nitrous plate under both carbs, would that fit under the hood. Or would I be flirting with a tuning nightmare.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 1
From: Bloomingdale,IL
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 Tbi (L03)
Transmission: 700r4
As long as you go with a wet nitrous kit tuning isnt an issue because the extra fuel goes in with teh nitrous everytime you hit the button.
Trending Topics
Originally posted by dankhound
As long as you go with a wet nitrous kit tuning isnt an issue because the extra fuel goes in with teh nitrous everytime you hit the button.
As long as you go with a wet nitrous kit tuning isnt an issue because the extra fuel goes in with teh nitrous everytime you hit the button.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: IA
Car: 1984 z28 camaro / 2019 accord sport
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
That is what I wanted to do. Weiand 142 with a top shot system. But will that fit under the hood. I think the big block hood is a 3” cowl.
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Hungary
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: built NOS 350
Transmission: manual 700r4
Get a 6-71 if You want boost and visibility. Get turbos if You have the cash and patience to tune it. Get NOS if You want big power reliably and hidden. My preference would be the turbo first,NOS second , centrifugal blower third and roots last.
Also,small roots blowers are lame. If its a decision between a small roots or NOS, I would go with the NOS.
Also,small roots blowers are lame. If its a decision between a small roots or NOS, I would go with the NOS.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
Originally posted by tommyt
Also,small roots blowers are lame.
Also,small roots blowers are lame.
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Hungary
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: built NOS 350
Transmission: manual 700r4
True,but to make serious power 9 pounds is not enough...and the small blower is pretty much done by the time it makes 9 pounds on a smallblock. Installing it You go through almost the same hassles as a big blower (I admit,little less) with far less return. Of course it will do OK for someone who just wants a bit more power, nothing extreme.
Biggtime, since we both own SyTy as well we both know that 9 PSI is not a lot of boost, and that a bigger compressor would move more air more efficiently at the given PSI. It would all depend on personal preference I guess, opinions may vary, there are different ways to achieve similar goals.
LOL, I am not planning to lose races to
142 blown smallblocks anytime soon...
Biggtime, since we both own SyTy as well we both know that 9 PSI is not a lot of boost, and that a bigger compressor would move more air more efficiently at the given PSI. It would all depend on personal preference I guess, opinions may vary, there are different ways to achieve similar goals.
LOL, I am not planning to lose races to
142 blown smallblocks anytime soon...
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
biggtime,
I was talking to a friend of mine the other day about the "9lbs is 9lbs" no matter how you get it and the discussion got into outlet temps.... now just pulling #'s out of the air for theory, I would think that 9lbs out of a 6-71 turning at 5k rpm would be a cooler charge than a 142 at 12k rpm or a centrifugal at 20k rpm and in that theory the cooler 9lbs would be a more dense charge than the hotter 9lbs. Have you seen any info on outlet temps between types of superchargers?
I was talking to a friend of mine the other day about the "9lbs is 9lbs" no matter how you get it and the discussion got into outlet temps.... now just pulling #'s out of the air for theory, I would think that 9lbs out of a 6-71 turning at 5k rpm would be a cooler charge than a 142 at 12k rpm or a centrifugal at 20k rpm and in that theory the cooler 9lbs would be a more dense charge than the hotter 9lbs. Have you seen any info on outlet temps between types of superchargers?
I personally do not like the roots type of compressors. I have built one for a guy who's car did run good though.
The outlet temps do depend on the compressor side of the blower. Naturally a larger wheel will make less heat for the same boost.
I did not mean to compare that way only meaning that basicly 9lb is 9lbs. Although the 142 9lbs is probably the same as a 6-71 9lbs. one would make a little more heat but the other would have more parasitic loss...............
I do know my centrifical and my turbo both create the same heat to the intake. But I think my intercooler is better on the blower. When I convert my TY to A/A this winter I will have a better idea.
I believe what you stated to be true but have no eway to test (or time)
The outlet temps do depend on the compressor side of the blower. Naturally a larger wheel will make less heat for the same boost.
I did not mean to compare that way only meaning that basicly 9lb is 9lbs. Although the 142 9lbs is probably the same as a 6-71 9lbs. one would make a little more heat but the other would have more parasitic loss...............
I do know my centrifical and my turbo both create the same heat to the intake. But I think my intercooler is better on the blower. When I convert my TY to A/A this winter I will have a better idea.
I believe what you stated to be true but have no eway to test (or time)
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Western Ky
Car: Z/28..39 Plymouth truck in progress
Engine: S/B
Transmission: Manual
lol, I guess we did have too much time on our hands last weekend to get into that discussion but it would be nice (but probably never happen) to see a graph of all types of forced induction that factored in heat and parasitic loss at the same amount of boost. I have only had experience with roots induction so it’s hard to compare to centrifugal or turbo.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
From: IA
Car: 1984 z28 camaro / 2019 accord sport
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I am not out for a 9 second car. I want a car that can run a const 12 flat at the track and not have to worry a bought breaking things all the time.
To me I seams that a small supercharger and maybe a small shot of N2O to act as an intercooler fits the bill
If my memory is right nitrous in the bottle is a liquid, in the faze change from liquid to would absorb some heat like an intercooler. Correct me if I am wrong.
To me I seams that a small supercharger and maybe a small shot of N2O to act as an intercooler fits the bill
If my memory is right nitrous in the bottle is a liquid, in the faze change from liquid to would absorb some heat like an intercooler. Correct me if I am wrong.
I have pretty good expereince with the little 142 blower. Shoot me an email if you're interested and I'll see if I can help you out.
Here's a few things I'll throw at you from the start....
1. The little 142/144 blower is all done around 500HP. It just can't move enough air to make more than that. Small cubes, high boost. Larger cubes, low boost. Makes little difference. Over 450HP you're pushing the envelope. 500HP you're done. This blower was originally designed to turn a stock 250HP V8 into a 350HP V8. Massive HP wasn't it's design criteria.
2. DO NOT overlook the importance of hood clearance. You need around a 4" cowl hood to fit one of these things in a 3rd gen, at least if you plan on running a carburetor. No matter what you do you MUST have at least 1" of free clearance over the top of the carb if you expect it to meter fuel correctly. Filter-type lids make the situation WORSE, not better, with a low profile air cleaner since the pleats stick down more than 3/4" on the inside of the lid. 14x2.5" on a 1.5" drop base with a plain metal lid is as low an air cleaner as you dare try- and beleive me, I've tried lots of them.
3. Holley charges $700 to rebuild one of these little blowers. Gotta talk to the guys in their reman department about that. BDS might also rebuild them, but I've never asked.
My 78 Malibu has this blower with a 383 stroker, AFR heads and a small Comp Cams blower cam makes around 400HP to the rear wheels (dyno verified) through a TH-350 automatic trans which would put flywheel HP around 480. Fast, but not outrageous. But please realize I do this with a smooth idle, reasonably fuel economy, and no need to take the engine over 5500 RPMs. It gets it done with big torque, not high RPMs and a lumpy cam.
Here's a few things I'll throw at you from the start....
1. The little 142/144 blower is all done around 500HP. It just can't move enough air to make more than that. Small cubes, high boost. Larger cubes, low boost. Makes little difference. Over 450HP you're pushing the envelope. 500HP you're done. This blower was originally designed to turn a stock 250HP V8 into a 350HP V8. Massive HP wasn't it's design criteria.
2. DO NOT overlook the importance of hood clearance. You need around a 4" cowl hood to fit one of these things in a 3rd gen, at least if you plan on running a carburetor. No matter what you do you MUST have at least 1" of free clearance over the top of the carb if you expect it to meter fuel correctly. Filter-type lids make the situation WORSE, not better, with a low profile air cleaner since the pleats stick down more than 3/4" on the inside of the lid. 14x2.5" on a 1.5" drop base with a plain metal lid is as low an air cleaner as you dare try- and beleive me, I've tried lots of them.
3. Holley charges $700 to rebuild one of these little blowers. Gotta talk to the guys in their reman department about that. BDS might also rebuild them, but I've never asked.
My 78 Malibu has this blower with a 383 stroker, AFR heads and a small Comp Cams blower cam makes around 400HP to the rear wheels (dyno verified) through a TH-350 automatic trans which would put flywheel HP around 480. Fast, but not outrageous. But please realize I do this with a smooth idle, reasonably fuel economy, and no need to take the engine over 5500 RPMs. It gets it done with big torque, not high RPMs and a lumpy cam.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






