Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - SOLVED!
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Evansville IN
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 350ci "fastburn 385"
Transmission: T56 / Quartermaster clutch
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.11, Auburn Posi
Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - SOLVED!
I have a problem going on with my fuel pump it seems. Car is a LT1 swapped third gen with a 78 mm turbo, all DIY etc..
I used a Quantum Fuel system 340 LPH pump in the tank, which seems to be up to the task of feeding the engine just fine. However, I have a intermittent problem that I'm chasing.
This is the second pump from them. When the first one quit, I pulled it out of the tank (after verifying voltage was getting back there) and applied 12v on the bench it ran just fine. Hmm. Pump isn't fun to change to decided to just buy another one instead. So put that in a couple weeks ago. Everything was fine, no issues whatsoever, until Friday night it just would not work. Relay working but no fuel pump. (had been running and stopped / started several times already that day.). At least it quit in the garage. Nice.
Let it sit for a couple days, worked on some other stuff, then decided to try it just for fun before I dug into what was going on. WOuldn't you know it, pump is now working. WTH? However, now I'm skeptical, and find if I cycle the key on / off a 2 - 3 times every couple seconds, the pump will fail to start on the 3rd or so try. Not sure what's up with that. If I then wait 30 seconds, the pump will fire up fine. Cycle key on/off again, and pump decides to quit again. Again can still hear the fuel pump relay, but the pump isn't running.
So I'm at the point now where I can't hardly trust the pump to behave. Don't really want to get stranded somewhere for hours or whatever.
I still have stock wiring on the car, etc., which I know isn't necessarily ideal. Could that be causing the issue somehow? Seems unlikely but??? Also seems unlikely I got two bad pumps.
Do I just need to bite the bullet and get the Aeromotive version of the 340lph pump ?
Just getting into nice weather and hate that I can't trust it to drive it very far.
I used a Quantum Fuel system 340 LPH pump in the tank, which seems to be up to the task of feeding the engine just fine. However, I have a intermittent problem that I'm chasing.
This is the second pump from them. When the first one quit, I pulled it out of the tank (after verifying voltage was getting back there) and applied 12v on the bench it ran just fine. Hmm. Pump isn't fun to change to decided to just buy another one instead. So put that in a couple weeks ago. Everything was fine, no issues whatsoever, until Friday night it just would not work. Relay working but no fuel pump. (had been running and stopped / started several times already that day.). At least it quit in the garage. Nice.
Let it sit for a couple days, worked on some other stuff, then decided to try it just for fun before I dug into what was going on. WOuldn't you know it, pump is now working. WTH? However, now I'm skeptical, and find if I cycle the key on / off a 2 - 3 times every couple seconds, the pump will fail to start on the 3rd or so try. Not sure what's up with that. If I then wait 30 seconds, the pump will fire up fine. Cycle key on/off again, and pump decides to quit again. Again can still hear the fuel pump relay, but the pump isn't running.
So I'm at the point now where I can't hardly trust the pump to behave. Don't really want to get stranded somewhere for hours or whatever.
I still have stock wiring on the car, etc., which I know isn't necessarily ideal. Could that be causing the issue somehow? Seems unlikely but??? Also seems unlikely I got two bad pumps.
Do I just need to bite the bullet and get the Aeromotive version of the 340lph pump ?
Just getting into nice weather and hate that I can't trust it to drive it very far.
Last edited by hotrodf1; 04-26-2019 at 07:22 AM. Reason: solved
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - why?
Are these crappy pumps? What you are describing is when a factory pump begins to fail. It stops on dead spots and then needs a tap to get it to go once it has been shut off. The dead spots grow in time as the pump is shut off and lands on dead spots more and more often. This usually happens only with older, high mileage pumps.
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (58)
Re: Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - why?
Grab the wiring harness where it enters the yellow bulkhead connector and enters the sending unit. Move the wires around slowly and watch for the continuity to break. Not saying that's what it is, but I've seen that happen with GM cars in the past.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 86' IROC
Engine: Supercharged 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - why?
Sounds like a bad pump. Especially if its all factory wiring. No offense but I wouldn't be trusting a $79 fuel pump for as far as I could throw it, especially if you have all the work done to the engine in your signature. At a minimum i would be putting a Walbro or Aeromotive pump in it.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Evansville IN
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 350ci "fastburn 385"
Transmission: T56 / Quartermaster clutch
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.11, Auburn Posi
Re: Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - why?
Are these crappy pumps? What you are describing is when a factory pump begins to fail. It stops on dead spots and then needs a tap to get it to go once it has been shut off. The dead spots grow in time as the pump is shut off and lands on dead spots more and more often. This usually happens only with older, high mileage pumps.
EDIT - Quantum Fuel pump was not at fault, read last post for more info.
Last edited by hotrodf1; 04-26-2019 at 07:38 AM. Reason: solved issue
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Evansville IN
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 350ci "fastburn 385"
Transmission: T56 / Quartermaster clutch
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.11, Auburn Posi
Re: Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - why?
Ill give this a shot tonight and see if that does anything. Will say though that the pump won’t stop ever (so far) with the car running and driving which I would think would jiggle the wiring somewhat and show the problem as well. But who knows. Worth a shot
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Evansville IN
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 350ci "fastburn 385"
Transmission: T56 / Quartermaster clutch
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.11, Auburn Posi
Re: Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - why?
Sounds like a bad pump. Especially if its all factory wiring. No offense but I wouldn't be trusting a $79 fuel pump for as far as I could throw it, especially if you have all the work done to the engine in your signature. At a minimum i would be putting a Walbro or Aeromotive pump in it.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 86' IROC
Engine: Supercharged 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - why?
Some things are just worth the extra money. I always ask my self what happens if this fails and is it worth the trouble when it does. Just my
#9
Supreme Member
Re: Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - why?
did you try eliminating the wiring and relay and computer?
How do you know it isn't the computers output to the fuel pump relay. Or the relay itself. Did you try putting power directly to the pump?
How do you know it isn't the computers output to the fuel pump relay. Or the relay itself. Did you try putting power directly to the pump?
#10
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Evansville IN
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 350ci "fastburn 385"
Transmission: T56 / Quartermaster clutch
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.11, Auburn Posi
Re: Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - why?
Im sure there’s lots more cars riding around with aeromotive though and of course it’s the negatives that make headlines. Much like the optispark.
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Evansville IN
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 350ci "fastburn 385"
Transmission: T56 / Quartermaster clutch
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.11, Auburn Posi
Re: Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - why?
i swapped the relay out and get the same results. Also tried using the fuel pump bypass wire which sends voltage straight to the pump and get the same results again.
When the pump doesn’t start running I can still hear the pump relay clicking (hood up) but I haven’t verified power at that time with a meter.
EDIT!! -- A little later, I had a helper and we did determine that the computer is in fact shutting the pump off when I cycle the key on/off. Doh!. The sound I heard clicking is in fact something else - not sure what it is. Right as the pump would "stall" after the key on / off routine, my helper hit the fuel pump bypass wire with 12V and the pump would run. So, it wasn't actually stalled under those conditions. Makes a little more sense. EDIT
Ive verified voltage at the connector behind the rear seat but that’s as far as you can really go and that’s with no load.
I think ill turn the pump on manually and then get under the car and wiggle the wiring and connectors in different spots to make sure I don’t have something loose somehow.
It’s weird that it works well even under load and the failure is just failure to start.
Last edited by hotrodf1; 04-16-2019 at 07:19 PM.
#12
Supreme Member
Re: Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - why?
I would put the pump in a bucket and test bench it. Run it the way it runs in the car.
If you hear the relay click but the pump stays off and did all that other stuff. It sounds like it must be either the wiring somehow at or around the pump (as opposed to ecu/relay related) or the pump itself.
Just use a quality pump from now on... Never had an issue like this with aeromotive
Their 'small' stealth pump supports like 550rwhp on gasoline through a 5/16" line (-5an) so its more than most people without FI will ever need
In daily driver and reliable apps, its usually worth the extra $$ with fuel pumps, injectors, turbos, internals, etc...
If the base engine/vehicle is already 'cheap' enough (lots of extra stock engine/trans/diff on the shelf and easy to swap) and the car doesn't need to be reliable (a trailer race car) the cheap parts are viable, people have built at least 9, 8, who knows how fast second cars for around 3k using $380 turbochargers and E85 with almost any engine
you just have to decide first what kind of car you are building or changing into. reliable not necessarily economical daily or engine diaper, t-brake scattershield trailer car thats not necessarily reliable.
It doesn't make any sense to mix the two categories. For example you wouldnt want a $2 turbo with a $8000 engine, the turbo could take out the engine as they share oil supply. You wouldn't put $2 injectors in an 8k engine either, I hope. Or a 3k transmission with a $2 converter. The mismatches possible seem endless
If you hear the relay click but the pump stays off and did all that other stuff. It sounds like it must be either the wiring somehow at or around the pump (as opposed to ecu/relay related) or the pump itself.
Just use a quality pump from now on... Never had an issue like this with aeromotive
Their 'small' stealth pump supports like 550rwhp on gasoline through a 5/16" line (-5an) so its more than most people without FI will ever need
In daily driver and reliable apps, its usually worth the extra $$ with fuel pumps, injectors, turbos, internals, etc...
If the base engine/vehicle is already 'cheap' enough (lots of extra stock engine/trans/diff on the shelf and easy to swap) and the car doesn't need to be reliable (a trailer race car) the cheap parts are viable, people have built at least 9, 8, who knows how fast second cars for around 3k using $380 turbochargers and E85 with almost any engine
you just have to decide first what kind of car you are building or changing into. reliable not necessarily economical daily or engine diaper, t-brake scattershield trailer car thats not necessarily reliable.
It doesn't make any sense to mix the two categories. For example you wouldnt want a $2 turbo with a $8000 engine, the turbo could take out the engine as they share oil supply. You wouldn't put $2 injectors in an 8k engine either, I hope. Or a 3k transmission with a $2 converter. The mismatches possible seem endless
Last edited by Kingtal0n; 04-15-2019 at 04:55 PM.
#13
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Evansville IN
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 350ci "fastburn 385"
Transmission: T56 / Quartermaster clutch
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.11, Auburn Posi
Re: Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - why?
I would put the pump in a bucket and test bench it. Run it the way it runs in the car.
If you hear the relay click but the pump stays off and did all that other stuff. It sounds like it must be either the wiring somehow at or around the pump (as opposed to ecu/relay related) or the pump itself.
If you hear the relay click but the pump stays off and did all that other stuff. It sounds like it must be either the wiring somehow at or around the pump (as opposed to ecu/relay related) or the pump itself.
What remains though is that the pump did in fact not work for 2 days, and then came back to life with no movement, etc happening.
Just use a quality pump from now on... Never had an issue like this with aeromotive
Their 'small' stealth pump supports like 550rwhp on gasoline through a 5/16" line (-5an) so its more than most people without FI will ever need
In daily driver and reliable apps, its usually worth the extra $$ with fuel pumps, injectors, turbos, internals, etc...
Their 'small' stealth pump supports like 550rwhp on gasoline through a 5/16" line (-5an) so its more than most people without FI will ever need
In daily driver and reliable apps, its usually worth the extra $$ with fuel pumps, injectors, turbos, internals, etc...
On another note, it's sometimes hard to know who is actually selling a better part, and not just a rebranded unit like others are selling. I know it happens a lot more than we think. Sometimes the folks selling the stuff should really do a better job differentiating themselves from their competition - it's a marketing thing. If Aeromotive said that they have an exclusive design, and here's why it's better, blah, blah, I would have gladly paid the extra bucks for the stealth at the beginning. I just didn't see that kind of info out there. Holley / Accel does the same thing - pump are slightly different color but look basically the same. ???? The QFS pump I bought has / had a 5 year warranty, each one tested with a individual flow chart with it, which seemed like would stand behind it. Obviously changing out pump after pump for "free" isn't really where anyone wants to be, but I kinda figured they had done enough R&D to feel good about offering a 5 year warranty. Also, sometimes following in the footsteps of "everyone" doesn't necessarily guarantee a better part / outcome. THen again perhaps everyone goes a certain way because they know better. Could be . . .Anyway . . .. .
If the base engine/vehicle is already 'cheap' enough (lots of extra stock engine/trans/diff on the shelf and easy to swap) and the car doesn't need to be reliable (a trailer race car) the cheap parts are viable, people have built at least 9, 8, who knows how fast second cars for around 3k using $380 turbochargers and E85 with almost any engine
you just have to decide first what kind of car you are building or changing into. reliable not necessarily economical daily or engine diaper, t-brake scattershield trailer car thats not necessarily reliable.
It doesn't make any sense to mix the two categories. For example you wouldnt want a $2 turbo with a $8000 engine, the turbo could take out the engine as they share oil supply. You wouldn't put $2 injectors in an 8k engine either, I hope. Or a 3k transmission with a $2 converter. The mismatches possible seem endless
you just have to decide first what kind of car you are building or changing into. reliable not necessarily economical daily or engine diaper, t-brake scattershield trailer car thats not necessarily reliable.
It doesn't make any sense to mix the two categories. For example you wouldnt want a $2 turbo with a $8000 engine, the turbo could take out the engine as they share oil supply. You wouldn't put $2 injectors in an 8k engine either, I hope. Or a 3k transmission with a $2 converter. The mismatches possible seem endless
If I blow up my stock lower end LT1, I can source used stuff pretty cheap and not be out much other than a roll back home. I'd rather not spend a crazy amount of time building motors, so I do tread cautiously with the tune. I kinda hate redoing stuff for some reason. But if it does happen, I'm at least not out a boat load of money.
So I have tried to mix cheap with cheap for the most part, tune it myself, fab it all myself, painted the car myself, etc. etc. cause that's how I roll.
Just so darn frustrating to have one freakin part ruin your day, several times on different occasions. Part of it I guess.
At the very least, I can not at this time recommend the Quantum Fuel System 340 pumps. Perhaps after I run the Aeromotive unit for a while, I can do a follow up.
#14
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Evansville IN
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 350ci "fastburn 385"
Transmission: T56 / Quartermaster clutch
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.11, Auburn Posi
Re: Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - SOLVED!
OK guys and gals.
I finally solved my crazy fuel pump issue. It all started two nights ago. Car was in the garage, and I had it running - was working on the electric cutout having an issue. Shut car down, and the fuel pump would no longer work again. So, I saw this as my opportunity to see what's really going on.
Tested for voltage at the back seat bulkhead connector, and all was well. Took the plastic panels out of the trunk area to get to the G304 ground point by the hatch motor - all checked out OK there too.
Next I checked for continuity between the ground and the +12V wire at the tank connector and found that there was infinite resistance there, as in open circuit. AHA! So at least I can see the problem is from the connector to the pump somewhere. No amount of wiggling etc would change the value.
So I decided to pull the tank yet again. 50 min later I had everything loose and out of the way, but the fuel was still draining into my last can, so I couldn't pull the tank just yet.
Next day (yesterday) I decided to check resistance on that same plug for fun. Hmm. This time it shows like 2 megaohms. Still not a good circuit but it's different than before. So I try rapping on the tank with my hand while watching the meter and I can see the reading bouncing all over when I rap on the tank. OK, getting warmer. . . .
So I zipped the two tank strap bolts out, drop the tank, pull the sender assy. out, and start monkeying with the wires, and wouldn't you know, it's the little plastic connector on the underside of the sender assy. I could wiggle that connector and make the resistance change all over the place.
So, rather than futz with that connector and potentially have the problem again I decided to try to just solder the wires right to the pins on the little bulkhead. Used a little flux to clean, and good solder, and it was not a problem at all to solder some nice joints there.
It's been a long painful journey, but I found the smoking gun, and feel good about the fix. FYI, this was a 1 year old or so sender assy that I got from (can't remember). Anyhow, it was really the last thing I would have suspected given that I had recently replaced it. DOH!!!
ALSO FOR THE RECORD - Quantum Fuel Systems should not have been dragged down by my issue - it was never their fault whatsoever. I guess I still can't speak directly about longevity of their pumps, but now I have an Aeromotive in there hopefully for good. I will say that the pumps actually sound different, so I don't believe the Quantum and the Aeromotive are actually the same pump and just rebranded.
ALso, the resistance reading I got on the pump terminals themselves were different. Quantum aws 4.8 ohms, and the Aermotive was like 0.6 IIRC. Quite a different reading as well. What does that mean ?? I guess I'll let others be the judge of that.
I finally solved my crazy fuel pump issue. It all started two nights ago. Car was in the garage, and I had it running - was working on the electric cutout having an issue. Shut car down, and the fuel pump would no longer work again. So, I saw this as my opportunity to see what's really going on.
Tested for voltage at the back seat bulkhead connector, and all was well. Took the plastic panels out of the trunk area to get to the G304 ground point by the hatch motor - all checked out OK there too.
Next I checked for continuity between the ground and the +12V wire at the tank connector and found that there was infinite resistance there, as in open circuit. AHA! So at least I can see the problem is from the connector to the pump somewhere. No amount of wiggling etc would change the value.
So I decided to pull the tank yet again. 50 min later I had everything loose and out of the way, but the fuel was still draining into my last can, so I couldn't pull the tank just yet.
Next day (yesterday) I decided to check resistance on that same plug for fun. Hmm. This time it shows like 2 megaohms. Still not a good circuit but it's different than before. So I try rapping on the tank with my hand while watching the meter and I can see the reading bouncing all over when I rap on the tank. OK, getting warmer. . . .
So I zipped the two tank strap bolts out, drop the tank, pull the sender assy. out, and start monkeying with the wires, and wouldn't you know, it's the little plastic connector on the underside of the sender assy. I could wiggle that connector and make the resistance change all over the place.
So, rather than futz with that connector and potentially have the problem again I decided to try to just solder the wires right to the pins on the little bulkhead. Used a little flux to clean, and good solder, and it was not a problem at all to solder some nice joints there.
It's been a long painful journey, but I found the smoking gun, and feel good about the fix. FYI, this was a 1 year old or so sender assy that I got from (can't remember). Anyhow, it was really the last thing I would have suspected given that I had recently replaced it. DOH!!!
ALSO FOR THE RECORD - Quantum Fuel Systems should not have been dragged down by my issue - it was never their fault whatsoever. I guess I still can't speak directly about longevity of their pumps, but now I have an Aeromotive in there hopefully for good. I will say that the pumps actually sound different, so I don't believe the Quantum and the Aeromotive are actually the same pump and just rebranded.
ALso, the resistance reading I got on the pump terminals themselves were different. Quantum aws 4.8 ohms, and the Aermotive was like 0.6 IIRC. Quite a different reading as well. What does that mean ?? I guess I'll let others be the judge of that.
#15
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Evansville IN
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 350ci "fastburn 385"
Transmission: T56 / Quartermaster clutch
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.11, Auburn Posi
Re: Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - why?
You were almost spot on with this - but it was the OTHER side of the connector, which I could not wiggle around from outside the tank (and under the car). Had to pull tank again to find it.
#16
Supreme Member
Re: Fuel pump intermittent failure dilemma - SOLVED!
nice man!
The resistance of the device you are measuring will determine how much current it draws usually (simple circuits). So volts/resistance in this case would be
14volts / 0.6 = 23.3 Amps
It gives us an idea of how much current the pump draws when run at 14v, 100%
Newer fuel systems (Direct Injection) use PWM control which is superior for this reason, it can run the same pump at lower % duty cycle while still giving it the full 14v
This saves power, extends pump life, and because a microprocessor is "looking" at the fuel pumps output there is also a system stability/programming involved which improves reaction time/performance of the pump.
just some fun info
The resistance of the device you are measuring will determine how much current it draws usually (simple circuits). So volts/resistance in this case would be
14volts / 0.6 = 23.3 Amps
It gives us an idea of how much current the pump draws when run at 14v, 100%
Newer fuel systems (Direct Injection) use PWM control which is superior for this reason, it can run the same pump at lower % duty cycle while still giving it the full 14v
This saves power, extends pump life, and because a microprocessor is "looking" at the fuel pumps output there is also a system stability/programming involved which improves reaction time/performance of the pump.
just some fun info
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post