Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Please help with 4thgen rack installation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 02:14 PM
  #1  
pff300's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
Car: '91 Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-R4
Please help with 4thgen rack installation

Hello to everybody,

I decided to put a steering rack from 4th gen to my '91 Formula, but unfortunately didnt realize that because of difference between knuckles turning angle of the wheels decreased by half

So, now I have three options:

1) Get another rack,which is longer, to compromise old knuckles, but I dont imagine what rack can I use for it
2) Somehow fabricate knuckles that will work, but I don't know is it possible to do, because they are made from iron
3) Install other components from 4thgen, but what do I need ?

Since search doesnt work, I ask these questions, sorry if they were answered earlier
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 06:36 PM
  #2  
Lo-tec's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 2
From: Gambrills, Md
Car: clapped out 84Z
Engine: 355 efi roller
Transmission: tremec TKO
4)return to original steering linkage setup and sell rack

What are you trying to accomplish by switching to a rack? I have researched this and have been unable to justify this swap because of all the problems you are encountering.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 01:37 AM
  #3  
pff300's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
Car: '91 Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-R4
Rack setup is much sharper. I've replaced everything: steering column, steering box. Added Spohn SFC's, wonderbar, I replace front end parts every 6000 miles, and steering still sucks compared to my wife's Toyota MR-2.

Original sysytem will never behave like steering rack, that is the problem

And I think that switching to 4thgen-style front end will solve it plus I will be able to put bigger front brakes.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 08:13 AM
  #4  
Lo-tec's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 2
From: Gambrills, Md
Car: clapped out 84Z
Engine: 355 efi roller
Transmission: tremec TKO
I think you need to take a step back and review your entire frontend combo. You don't need a 4th gen frontend to run big brakes (up to 13" easily), just a larger wheel that will fit over the setup. You might want to post your entire setup, and maybe some board members can offer some suggestions. Alignment can also make or break the way your car handles. You can throw all the $$ in the world at it, but if your alignment sucks you won't get the max potential out of it.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 05:17 PM
  #5  
TZFBird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 2
From: Lincoln, Nebraska
Car: 1988 Firebird, 2000 GTP
Engine: 327
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9" posi, 4.11
You seriously think you can get a car this big and heavy to perform like a car that is smaller and lighter? They have completely different suspensions. Unless you are going to totally rebuild it with a tube frame like the T/A guys and drop in a huge motor so you can take corners at 50-60 then come out and get up to 100. I don't think a rack will help with handling as much as you think. About the only thing you will get is a better looking setup. You didn't say if you had a strut tower brace or not. If you go to by sig, I have a link to my site. I made one for about $10.

I have been able to get the tires to squeel by changing lanes to avoid the idiots that cut me off and hit the brakes during rushhour. I might just have bad tires also though.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 01:42 AM
  #6  
pff300's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
Car: '91 Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-R4
Ok, thats my suspension mods:

Spohn SFC's
Spohn adjustable wonderbar (now eliminated)
Tower brace
Quick ratio steering box
Eibach sport springs
Koni sport shocks

I think I put almost everything and I'm still not happy with steering responce

Because of that I decided to go for rack
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 11:56 AM
  #7  
Shagwell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 3
From: Southwest Florida
Car: projects.......
look into the mid 80's ford t-bird rack. You can go power or manual very easily, plus the width is pretty decent. The power racks utilize regular inverted flare on the hoses(common, so easy to hook-up) They also come out to american threads, so outer tie rods are easy to find, plus you can easily run male thread tie rods and build sleeves for more accurate length.
- that's what I'm doing...but I'm one of those guys going full frame. - It will be power for me, because this is still a true street car, meaning full power and a/c are a must.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 12:12 PM
  #8  
Joez88Camaro's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe Convertible
Engine: Your Momma
Transmission: I can go forwards and backwards
So I'm going to guess that the car is semi high mileage.
Do you know how to inspect (or have someone else):
Check the balljoints, A-arm bushings, strut mounts, Intermediate shaft rag joint, excess play in the steering box, etc?

There has yet to be a good enough R&P setup for thirdgens for street racing/use.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 12:31 PM
  #9  
Joez88Camaro's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe Convertible
Engine: Your Momma
Transmission: I can go forwards and backwards
For road racing and street use no R&P design can truely solve tire scrub issues that would occur. That's why only pure drag cars use them, because of how light they are. You really can't get the feel of R&P, but you can make the steering just as accurate and responsive with quality new components on the front suspension and steering system. Although the front end of my camaro doesn't feel like my honda, it has less play (yup!) and is very accurate. I've got:
New A-arm bushings, balljoints, spohn strut mounts, new springs/struts, tierods, idler arm, centerlink, solid tie rod sleeves, a STB, TDS wonderbar, checked the steering box for play (none) as well as the ragjoint.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 12:39 PM
  #10  
pff300's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
Car: '91 Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-R4
I have my front end rebuild with all new components every 6000 miles, I've got new steering box also, but it's still sloppy.

I hate that feeling, when I turn wheel a little bit to the right, than quickly to the left, but car doesnt respond as quick and it takes age to follow steering wheel
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 07:40 PM
  #11  
Shagwell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 3
From: Southwest Florida
Car: projects.......
why is it you need new components every 6K? You've gotta be kidding me. If you're wearing everything out in 6k, you've got issues.
- anyhow, the proper rack with the proper set-up is just as good as a box and linkage. Problem is that most aren't set-up exactly right and you end up with less than perfect.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 10:13 PM
  #12  
pff300's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
Car: '91 Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-R4
I'm not kidding ! A lot of mud, dust and snow plus very bumpy roads, just look where I live.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 06:41 AM
  #13  
wdigitog's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: Deer Park, N.Y.
Car: 1983 z-28/SFC/bilsteins/adj.arms
Engine: 355sbc/Demon650dp/hedmanheaders/
Transmission: t-5, alum DS
Axle/Gears: 3.42 torsen posi, baer discs
rack and pinion gives you: lighter weight, less slop, less moving parts, and more accurate steering inputs. the complex series of links involved in our 3rd gen cars offers many points where loosness may come into play. i've heard that the 4th gen racks are too long for our cars.....and that fox mustang or pinto racks are better suited.......
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 02:34 PM
  #14  
z28evans's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 155
Likes: 5
From: College Station, TX
Car: 89 iroc
As far as fixing the steering angles, what we did on our 'race' car was cut the ball joint mount off, cut a section of the arm off, and then re-welded the mount back on. You have to keep the geometery correct and do a good job of welding. This will give you the steering angle back. Make sure the shorter arms clear the frame/control arms at lock. Our setup has taken a lot of abuse for a couple of years, but don't sue me if you do this on the street.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 03:36 PM
  #15  
pff300's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
Car: '91 Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-R4
I don't think that is the way for street car I reckon some custom bracket which mounts to original ball joint mount ear and has an ear on the other side in a correct place. Or may be the rack with different ratio is the way to go
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 12:32 AM
  #16  
Joez88Camaro's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe Convertible
Engine: Your Momma
Transmission: I can go forwards and backwards
Your trying to do some engineer's job with your suspension. And if your using good high quality components you shouldn't have to replace your suspension every 6k miles. You've probably got OCD, or obsessive compulsive disorder. I recommend seeing a good doctor to have yourself examined.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 01:38 AM
  #17  
pff300's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
Car: '91 Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-R4
Well...after all, I've decided to go back to steering box

As for suspension issue, come and see our roads, then you can tell if I'm right or wrong.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 02:05 AM
  #18  
xplane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Car: 85 camaro sport coupe
Engine: 2.8 MFI
Transmission: v6 700R4 wish it was a 5spd Stick
Axle/Gears: Stock non posi 3.42s
do you use the Super elcheapo parts or good ones? say moog or better? even if ya use cheap ones they will last for atleast 40 or 50K miles even on the worst of roads.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 03:01 AM
  #19  
pff300's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
Car: '91 Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-R4
I use original GM parts and used Moog last time. And what do you mean by "last" ? After 6k the parts are worn, they won't break, of course, but there will be no responsive steering.

Last edited by pff300; Apr 5, 2006 at 03:20 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Jun 13, 2021 01:13 PM
jbates346
Car Audio
25
Jun 10, 2020 08:27 PM
Thomas
Exterior Parts for Sale
21
Oct 7, 2015 05:33 PM
Thomas
Interior Parts for Sale
12
Oct 3, 2015 05:34 PM
overdriv
Camaros for Sale
0
Aug 20, 2015 03:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 AM.