stupid a arm question
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
stupid a arm question
Stupid question, are our a arms shared with other models? They sure look like the 2nd gen ones but I'm not sure if they are the same, almost looks like the 2nd gen ones have the bushings a little further apart but I can't confirm.
Does anyone have dimensions or an old GM part #? I have a lead on some arms but the seller doesn't know what they are from. Any help would be appreciated.
Does anyone have dimensions or an old GM part #? I have a lead on some arms but the seller doesn't know what they are from. Any help would be appreciated.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: stupid a arm question
Really...no one?
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 2
From: Norfolk VA
Car: 85 Camaro IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: open rear, 3.42 gears
Re: stupid a arm question
pa racing sells 2nd gen tubular a arms in sets (upper and lower) for around 800 dollars.
im not an expert, but it seems to me that if it requires upper and lower, and ours only have lower, then they must be different, but i dont know for sure.
contact them and ask...
im sure they would have an answer
im not an expert, but it seems to me that if it requires upper and lower, and ours only have lower, then they must be different, but i dont know for sure.
contact them and ask...
im sure they would have an answer
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: stupid a arm question
2nd gens use double a arms, ours uses a McPherson strut but the old style spring is still retained, the holes are even there for the shock in the center of the spring, the shock is just not there because of the strut (GM cheaping out)
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 2
From: Norfolk VA
Car: 85 Camaro IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: open rear, 3.42 gears
Re: stupid a arm question
yeah, i dont know.
i wasnt aware that shocks and double arms would be more expensive than single arm/strut.
i figured the reason was for handling...
although i guess double a arms can be tuned much more easily by reloacating the upper arm and installing taller spindles.
we are pretty much stuck with our geometry
i wasnt aware that shocks and double arms would be more expensive than single arm/strut.
i figured the reason was for handling...
although i guess double a arms can be tuned much more easily by reloacating the upper arm and installing taller spindles.
we are pretty much stuck with our geometry
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: stupid a arm question
The arm is set up for a spring and shock, so it must be someething GM either had lying around or is used in a car with no McPherson strut. The McPherson system is a compromise that offers more room in the engine bay but the suspension geometry is not as good as a properly set up double a arm system.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 2
From: Norfolk VA
Car: 85 Camaro IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: open rear, 3.42 gears
Re: stupid a arm question
which would give more negative camber correct?
it would also push the wheels out about half an inch or so.
it would also push the wheels out about half an inch or so.
Re: stupid a arm question
Yes, I was talking to soultron about this a few months ago. Basically the drift crowd of 3rd gen owners was looking at using the 2nd gen lowers to get a little more tire to chassis clearance so they could improve the steering angle on their cars.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: stupid a arm question
Do these numbers mean anything to anyone? 461860 & 461859
They must be old GM part numbers, can't find anything on them.
They must be old GM part numbers, can't find anything on them.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
Apr 25, 2016 09:21 PM





