TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

14 sec or faster TBI cars. Post timeslips and modss

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 03:40 PM
  #1  
Beast5spdGTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, FL
Car: 2007 Corvette Z06
Engine: LS7
Transmission: 6 speed
14 sec or faster TBI cars. Post timeslips and modss

There seems to be only 1 guy on the entire TBI board that ran a decent time in a N/A 305 TBI on the fastest TBI thread, 14.2@96mph. Post times and mods, NO BS. I'm very interested in what a TBI can actually(timeslips) do.

Last edited by Beast5spdGTA; Sep 11, 2002 at 03:42 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 08:27 PM
  #2  
arrowcamaro's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: Chester, VA
Car: '88 GTA
Engine: L-98
Transmission: T-56
wow not everyone at once
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 08:30 PM
  #3  
Dominic Sorresso's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,997
Likes: 12
From: Bartlett, IL
Car: 92 ZR-1
Engine: LT-5
Transmission: ZF-6
Axle/Gears: SuperDana 44 4.10
13.8/102mph(Oct 01)
2.195 60"/.7sec RT
3.07 rear/Stock Tires at 35psi
Xfire Corvette/4+3 Trans/Z-51
2.0" TB's(Now 2.13")
Comp Cams Hyd Rlr(Now using 1.6rockers)
TPIS Headers
TFS 23d Heads
MSD 6A
Ported and EH'd manifold
Stock Injectors(Now 80# Parallel Plumbing)
K&N Air Filter
All Emissions operational and passed Illinois drive cycle
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 09:16 PM
  #4  
Gunny Highway's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
what?
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2002 | 11:29 PM
  #5  
vic_V8's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
From: Dixon, IL
Car: RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
must be a vette cross fire
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2002 | 03:31 PM
  #6  
NJ SPEEDER's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
From: Ewing, NJ
14.209 @ 95.5mph
ultimate tb
edelborck tbi intake
edelbrock centerbolt heads (60cc chamber, 2.02/1.60 valves)
roller tipped 1.6 rockers
edelbrock tes headers
no cat
borla cat back(open plate)
posi w/ 3.54 gears
2000 stall convertor(waaayyy too small to get the job done)
transgo shift kit

cam and chip were stock

chip woudl have easily put the car into teh 13's and spending all taht money on heads was a mistake, a cam woudl have been a much better choice.

later
tim
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2002 | 03:58 PM
  #7  
Gunny Highway's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
NJ Speeder : So would have gone with the LT1 cam??? or something different?

I hear that the S/R Torquer heads with the LT1 cam is a nice setup, but I can't confirm that. How was your daily commuting affected? If I could get into the 14's that would be sweet, but I don't think I can use that tall of a converter for my daily driving. One last thing....do you know anybody who would do the ultimate tb mod for me? I keep sending that Camaroracer1992 emails, but he never responds.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2002 | 05:13 PM
  #8  
vortecss's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk,NE
Don't waste your time on the " ultimate " TBI mods. They are worthless.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2002 | 05:20 PM
  #9  
Beast5spdGTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, FL
Car: 2007 Corvette Z06
Engine: LS7
Transmission: 6 speed
NJ Speeder, You said stock cam with those heads 2.02/1.60" valves? No problems with the big valves and the cylinder walls? I wonder how much clearance there was left, for a bigger cam.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2002 | 07:05 PM
  #10  
CAMp3RO's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
From: Lowell, MA
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: sbc 400
Transmission: th350
vortec, care to explain? pretty ballzy comment. i'd disagree just from what i noticed when i did mine, but maybe you can prove me wrong
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2002 | 07:18 PM
  #11  
arrowcamaro's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: Chester, VA
Car: '88 GTA
Engine: L-98
Transmission: T-56
i agree camp....that was pretty balzy they worked 4 me
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2002 | 08:47 PM
  #12  
91Bird305's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 1
From: Davison / Troy ,Michigan
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 3.8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Dana 60
It worked for me too. :lala:
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2002 | 09:11 PM
  #13  
Chuck!'s Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 14
From: Dayton, O.
Car: 91 Camaro Z28
Engine: LS7
Transmission: M12/T56
Axle/Gears: 3.79
Originally posted by vortecss
Don't waste your time on the " ultimate " TBI mods. They are worthless.
100% totally absolutely wrong.

Grinding the tbi, shaving the throttle shafts and advancing my timing 6* gave me .4 and 2.5 mph in the 1320 boogie.

I have time slips to back that up, too.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2002 | 11:38 PM
  #14  
TonyC's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Car: A Camaro
Engine: Weak
Transmission: Weaker
I agree, boo that man!!!

Ultimate TBI worked real nice...real nice.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2002 | 01:48 AM
  #15  
BahamutRS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
From: Parlin, NJ
My car ran consistent high 16s with the mods in sig and the ultimate TBI mods. Must have had something wrong with her...
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2002 | 01:22 PM
  #16  
CAMp3RO's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
From: Lowell, MA
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: sbc 400
Transmission: th350
ok, so i'm guessing he doesnt feel like justfying his response. but the ultimate mods are not a waste as everyone else agrees with. granted, on their own, they may not make much of a difference, but they'll help when you really start making other changes
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2002 | 01:34 PM
  #17  
Slade1's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Brampton, Ontario
I have yet to do the ultimate tbi mods and I'm in the 15's....

Then again I also built a pretty effective ram air setup to offset my lazyness in not doing the ultimate tbi mods...
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2002 | 03:08 PM
  #18  
BillD91RS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Boise ID
Slade what did you do for your ram air setup? do you have any pictures?

Thanks
Bill
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2002 | 06:16 PM
  #19  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by Beast5spdGTA
NJ Speeder, You said stock cam with those heads 2.02/1.60" valves? No problems with the big valves and the cylinder walls? I wonder how much clearance there was left, for a bigger cam.
You can push 2.02/1.60 valves on a 305 with around .600" lift. I've mocked up a .030" over 305 with 462 2.02/1.60 heads before and played around with a few cams. Shrouding occurs (roughly) at like .560-.580" lift.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2002 | 10:49 PM
  #20  
TonyC's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Car: A Camaro
Engine: Weak
Transmission: Weaker
I think someone should make a

3rd generation timepost registry!

or something like this so that every time this question comes up, someone can just be like "check out the registry." It would be convenient to have altitude, 60', method (strip vs. tazzo/gtech) and mods. I would do this but I have no idea how to make a web page although I could make a spreadsheet in Excel that we could link to and store it on the web. I think this would be very helpful in showing what TBI can do and for how much money.

sorry I posted the same thing in two messages but it seems like such a simple thing could save so much time, just like Eric's website.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2002 | 10:59 AM
  #21  
NJ SPEEDER's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
From: Ewing, NJ
iroc22, you hit it right on the head. i didn't have the opportunity to mock anythign up, but i mesured the heads and compared it to the cyl bore before i bough tht eheads. it really works out very nicely. i do think that saying shrouding doesn't occur until 560 lift may be pushing it though. the turbulance created by the loss of spce will actually occur at lower lifts and cause a drop in intake charge draw. yes, you can go with a huge cam for racing, but for a driver i woudl try to stay below .500 lift, preferably below 480 with big vavles. the interference does not cause a loss of rpm or ability to make power, just a loss of vacuum that will call for a higher idler, poor idle quality, and can cause a loss of throttle response.
vortecss, the ultimate mods have been proven time and againto be well worth the effort. i personally gained a full mph of trap speed from my first tb(which was very pooly done). teh tb's i can put otu now that i have practice are prolly worth a lot more(i have done about 20 of them)
gunny highway, i wodl have liked to find a LT4 cam(a little bigger tahn teh LT1 cam). the LT1 cam will certainly get the job done though, it is a proven piece and shows a big gain every time. you can go with more cam too. a few guys have messed around with zz4 cams and other grinds intended for a bit more rpm with great success. just remeber, teh bigger the cam the more time you are gonna spend working on getting eth whole power band right. with the stock heads or aftermaret small valve heads you can easily get into teh 520 lift range and keep a good idle under 750 rpm.
the car drove pretty good mos tof the time. since i didn't have a chip the car ran rich at idle and loaded up a bit if i sat in traffic. teh idle was pretty good and mileage stayed aroudn 20 on the highway.

a few things i woudl liek to see everyone look out for in all this though.
1. et is abotu teh car, mph is about the engine. all the power in theworld is worthless if you don't hook. the first time i went to the track with this set up i went 14.8's. i got a set of hoosiers and went 14.3 the next time out. 14.2's cam after messign with teh base timing and fuel pressure.
2. teh ecm is the key to a happy engine. if you can keep the chip tuned to waht you have in the engine, even if the engien is stock, you will see a huge improvement in power, throttle response, and mileage. you want a real custom chip, not some off the shelf or mail away junk. you can not tune your car from a chip company submission slip, you need to data log and adjust from there.

later
tim
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2002 | 11:00 PM
  #22  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by NJ SPEEDER
i do think that saying shrouding doesn't occur until 560 lift may be pushing it though. the turbulance created by the loss of spce will actually occur at lower lifts and cause a drop in intake charge draw.
You know, you are probably right. Like I said, it was just a mock up and there was no dyno tests for the heads. So shrouding could occur at different lifts.

Hey I'm no expert
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 06:25 PM
  #23  
vortecss's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk,NE
Ummmmmm, I had a 14 second TBI Formula without the "ultimate" mods.

It's all in your head timeslips or not, The flow characteristics of the TBI base are really messed up with these mods. The mods to the blades themselves may work but grinding the flow vains on the top is a bad idea. These direct air into the TBI base. If you remove them the result is crossflow turbulence.
Reply
Old Sep 19, 2002 | 10:46 PM
  #24  
NJ SPEEDER's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
From: Ewing, NJ
vortecss, i don't know where you are coming from on this one. what othe rmods did you have on tha tmotor? did you try that eengien with an ultimate tb?
unless you have made before and after comparisons on the same motro you can't even begin to think anyone is gonna buy into what you are saying.
i have seen my car and several others before and after ultimate tb's. i can tell you for a fact that a stock or very mild(exhaust/air cleaner) LO3 will gain a whole mph of trap speed from it.

later
tim
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 12:51 AM
  #25  
Beast5spdGTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, FL
Car: 2007 Corvette Z06
Engine: LS7
Transmission: 6 speed
I would like to see some other combos, but I can get a stock TBI to modify and I will post before and after times after i do it. The car is running 15.7 @87 mph with stock t/b on down to the cat. K&N filter and hooker 2 and 1/4" exhaust to 3" later. Looking for mid 15s with custom chip aka coolant temps in the less than 200* range instead of 220+ like I've been running
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 03:33 PM
  #26  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Beast do you have Hooker headers or the stock manifolds?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 04:45 PM
  #27  
vortecss's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk,NE
Well my name is Cody ring any bells?

I was the one who did all of the "duh" mods on my 1991 Formula TBI 5-Speed and ran a best of 14.9

And yes I have seen several variations of TBI mods at the dyno three months ago. It was an engine dyno too.

The only things that the "Ultimate" TBI mods did was throw off the powerband characteristics. And limiting top end power.

These tests were all performed to prove a point that some "mods" aren't really mods at all. We also tested the air foil, GM TBI Vortec kit and the larger TB's.

By the way the GM TBI Vortec kit had amazing results!!!!
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 05:00 PM
  #28  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally posted by BahamutRS
My car ran consistent high 16s with the mods in sig and the ultimate TBI mods. Must have had something wrong with her...
yeah a LS1 running high 16s WTF
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 07:09 PM
  #29  
Gunny Highway's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by vortecss
Well my name is Cody ring any bells?

I was the one who did all of the "duh" mods on my 1991 Formula TBI 5-Speed and ran a best of 14.9

And yes I have seen several variations of TBI mods at the dyno three months ago. It was an engine dyno too.

The only things that the "Ultimate" TBI mods did was throw off the powerband characteristics. And limiting top end power.

These tests were all performed to prove a point that some "mods" aren't really mods at all. We also tested the air foil, GM TBI Vortec kit and the larger TB's.

By the way the GM TBI Vortec kit had amazing results!!!!
GM TBI Vortec kit....what's that? and where would I get one?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 07:45 PM
  #30  
NJ SPEEDER's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
From: Ewing, NJ
Originally posted by vortecss
Well my name is Cody ring any bells?

I was the one who did all of the "duh" mods on my 1991 Formula TBI 5-Speed and ran a best of 14.9

everyone here can ignore anything vortecss has to say. he has been caught in lies several times before and is not known to bring anything constructive to teh board.
goodbye again cody.

later
tim

Last edited by NJ SPEEDER; Sep 20, 2002 at 07:50 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2002 | 07:40 PM
  #31  
Beast5spdGTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, FL
Car: 2007 Corvette Z06
Engine: LS7
Transmission: 6 speed
The stock manifolds and cat. 2 1/4" lol it's pathetic compared to the 3" on my T/A
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2002 | 07:54 PM
  #32  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally posted by Beast5spdGTA
The stock manifolds and cat. 2 1/4" lol it's pathetic compared to the 3" on my T/A
and..............
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 04:18 PM
  #33  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by brodyscamaro
and..............
I asked him what he was runnin. Beast you gotta get that exhaust outta there.....
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 07:45 PM
  #34  
Beast5spdGTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, FL
Car: 2007 Corvette Z06
Engine: LS7
Transmission: 6 speed
yeah I know, but i have a free set of edelbrock's, 3" cat and hooker cat-back sitting in NY in my other car that I'm going to swap during winter break.

It sucks having one car with a blown up 305 sitting in NY and me living in FL right now.

My plans are to take the exhaust mentioned above, the TPI heads(home port/valve job) 1.6RR, I think a LT1 cam, (crane 2032 I think is a little big, although it worked well in my TPI w/o a custom chip) I haven't decided which intake to go with yet the TBI(edelbrock) or a carb w/ adapter. This car WILL remain very streetable, A/C, some emissions, my T/A was still a daily driver, A/C, full emissions, but I wouldn't want someone else driving(no power below 1500 rpm, hard brakes near idle, etc.)
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 09:59 PM
  #35  
Gunny Highway's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Beast5spdGTA
yeah I know, but i have a free set of edelbrock's, 3" cat and hooker cat-back sitting in NY in my other car that I'm going to swap during winter break.

It sucks having one car with a blown up 305 sitting in NY and me living in FL right now.

My plans are to take the exhaust mentioned above, the TPI heads(home port/valve job) 1.6RR, I think a LT1 cam, (crane 2032 I think is a little big, although it worked well in my TPI w/o a custom chip) I haven't decided which intake to go with yet the TBI(edelbrock) or a carb w/ adapter. This car WILL remain very streetable, A/C, some emissions, my T/A was still a daily driver, A/C, full emissions, but I wouldn't want someone else driving(no power below 1500 rpm, hard brakes near idle, etc.)
What's the difference between the TPI heads and ours? I wasn't aware that they were interchangable?
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 10:48 PM
  #36  
Beast5spdGTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, FL
Car: 2007 Corvette Z06
Engine: LS7
Transmission: 6 speed
someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that TBI heads have a hump in the casting to induce swirl(kill flow) and more than likely weaker valvesprings(mine are aftermarket anyways)
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 12:25 AM
  #37  
jc92camaro's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Corning, NY
Hey guys, ok i just ran my car about a month back, i ran a 14.16 at 96mph with a 2.2 60ft, but then again my car is a 350 tbi, so i dont know if all my info is relevant to this thread, all my mods are posted in my sig. I think i can hit 13's fairly easily in better weather, and with better tires, the ones i raced on were really bald.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 12:41 AM
  #38  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by Beast5spdGTA
someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that TBI heads have a hump in the casting to induce swirl(kill flow) and more than likely weaker valvesprings(mine are aftermarket anyways)
Yes they have huge valve shrouds that hinder flow big time. They have nice big valve openings, but that doesnt make up for the cast in swirls and valve shrouds.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 08:03 AM
  #39  
Gunny Highway's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by iroc22
Yes they have huge valve shrouds that hinder flow big time. They have nice big valve openings, but that doesnt make up for the cast in swirls and valve shrouds.
Can those be removed by a machine shop?
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 10:02 AM
  #40  
Beast5spdGTA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: Palm Bay, FL
Car: 2007 Corvette Z06
Engine: LS7
Transmission: 6 speed
jc92camaro are you using a custom chip or stock? The heads are the stock ones that come w/tbi crate I assume?
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2002 | 03:31 PM
  #41  
jc92camaro's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Corning, NY
Im using a 8746 computer with a custom burnt chip i had done by brian harris, he is on this site, and he is pretty ***, he will work with you on getting a chip done to your specs. The car might not be perfect, because it will never be perfect without data logging it, but he made it run a ton better, and i was very satisfied. The heads are just the stock L98 heads.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2002 | 05:08 PM
  #42  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by Gunny Highway
Can those be removed by a machine shop?
Doubt it. Water jackets extend down and might be run into. The cast in valve swirls might be removed (I believe a member here tried to eliminate them) but the shrouds cant really be eliminated.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Azrael91966669
DIY PROM
25
Jun 20, 2017 04:04 AM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
40
Aug 21, 2015 02:12 PM
86White_T/A305
LTX and LSX
0
Aug 17, 2015 12:16 AM
Armored91Camaro
DIY PROM
3
Aug 12, 2015 09:41 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 AM.