TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

590 cfm TBI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 29, 2005 | 05:27 AM
  #1  
tomc1500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Car: GMC c1500 stepside 1989
Engine: 350TBI
Transmission: 700r4
590 cfm TBI

Hi,

i know this seller is already talked about on this board but i've a question.
i want to buy from ebay the 590cfm tbi from Xtremefi/.
tbi

is this really e performance step further for me?
i have now a stcok tbi with the 65pph injectors but at higher rpm i think i've got too less air.
they say that i 'won't bore my edelbrock performer maniold out.
can this tbi really handle 340hp?
i think i've got around the 300hp now.

Thanks Tom
Reply
Old May 29, 2005 | 08:41 AM
  #2  
BMmonteSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
You can get a used big block throttle body for about 150 bucks on ebay right now, they have 2" thorttle bores supposedly flow around 700 cfm and you don't have to worry about crappy craftsmanship because it's a factory piece. Also you'll probably end up with the big injecotors (either 80 or 90 lbers).

I say your tune is more responsible for the flattening out than the TB. With your combo I would look into getting a bigge TB, but not before I worked on getting my tune perfect. If your datalogging you should see the map values starting to drop in the upper rpm ranges when your TB is too small. Anything more than 5 or 6 KPA is too much.

I'll make a wild guess and say your running out of fuel in the upper RPM range. I'm running 70 lb/ers and I have to run 20 psi + to feed my motor that makes ruffly 300 hp. JP runs 65 lbers at around 28 psi to feed his 330 hp crate engine. Both of these engines need lots of hands on tuning, and I say yours does too.
Reply
Old May 29, 2005 | 10:23 AM
  #3  
tomc1500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Car: GMC c1500 stepside 1989
Engine: 350TBI
Transmission: 700r4
Hi,

i think my tune is not bad.
maybe you can take a look at?
i can't figure out the map values.
Tom
Reply
Old May 30, 2005 | 01:49 PM
  #4  
BMmonteSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
If you have any data logs I'd be more than willing to take a look.
Reply
Old May 30, 2005 | 02:40 PM
  #5  
tomc1500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Car: GMC c1500 stepside 1989
Engine: 350TBI
Transmission: 700r4
i have 2 nice logs.

how can i show them to you?
thanks Tom
Reply
Old May 31, 2005 | 08:27 AM
  #6  
BMmonteSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
if they are .txt files, I think you can post them here directly. If you can't then just e-mail them to me at BMmonteSS@aol.com
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2005 | 04:23 PM
  #7  
seanof30306's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 10
From: Tulsa, OK
Car: 1989 Formula WS6
Engine: L03 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt; 3.42 Posi
over 15 years ago, hot rod magazine made 300 (crank) horsepower with an l03, a stock throttle body and 65# injectors. I think the stock throttle body moves enough air for a 305 in all but the most extreme applications. I agree with bmonte, it's surely the tune.

That said, however, I think there are benefits to having additional air if your cam and heads need it at higher rpms, and I disagree with Bmonte on the BB TB over the xtremeefi guys units. I own one. The workmanship is excellent and, because I sent him pics of my throttle body before buying, everything matches. it's a direct bolt on, which the big block throttle body is not.

Before you go worrying about swapping throttle bodies, however, I think it's critical that you get a handle on tuning. Every time you make a change, it requires different tuning. If you can't do that, you're just wasting your time.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 08:35 AM
  #8  
contact's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
Engine: sbc 350
With this issue ,it would seem to me that the thing
to measure is the vacuum, just behind the TB.

Has anybody ever done this?
Vacuum gauges, were once common.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 09:13 AM
  #9  
BMmonteSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
it's just as easy to take a look at your map sensor if your datalogging, it's just an electronic vacume guage that reads in metric.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2005 | 01:19 PM
  #10  
tomc1500's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Car: GMC c1500 stepside 1989
Engine: 350TBI
Transmission: 700r4
Originally posted by BMmonteSS
if they are .txt files, I think you can post them here directly. If you can't then just e-mail them to me at BMmonteSS@aol.com
hi,
have you already looked at the logs?
i'm just curious

Tom
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
InfernalVortex
Electronics
10
Apr 20, 2021 11:31 AM
Falcon50
DFI and ECM
81
Aug 22, 2020 03:26 PM
okfoz
History / Originality
27
Oct 13, 2015 02:19 PM
Gordonr1973
Electronics
0
Sep 29, 2015 11:59 AM
Dragonsys
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Sep 25, 2015 03:51 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 AM.