TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

Mid 90's 350 Vortec engines were TBI right??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 10:27 PM
  #1  
LottaBallsCamaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: Hampton Roads. VA
Mid 90's 350 Vortec engines were TBI right??

Topic sums it up.


Thanks!
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 10:33 PM
  #2  
Tas's Avatar
Tas
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 4,310
Likes: 1
kinda, sorta, not really. While GM considered vortec engines to be 1987+, popular opionon has made them 1996+ since it was such a dramatic improvement. The Vortec engines 350(L31), and 305(L30) were not TBI. They have 8 poppet injectors.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 10:34 PM
  #3  
Tas's Avatar
Tas
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 4,310
Likes: 1
lotsaballs, are you on LS1.com or any 4x4 boards? that sig looks familiar.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 10:55 PM
  #4  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
They had TBI up to '95 I believe, although as Tas mentioned they werent considered Vortec (only the 4.3 from '86 until now was). They didnt really get advertised as Vortec until they lost the TBI and got better heads.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 10:58 PM
  #5  
LottaBallsCamaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: Hampton Roads. VA
So the heads on the 350 trucks arent Vortec?

I sometimes post on jeepaholics.com but I dont have the same sig.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2002 | 11:23 PM
  #6  
Tas's Avatar
Tas
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 4,310
Likes: 1
1996-1998 vortec 350 (the L31) and 1996-1998 vortec 305 (the L30) did not have TBI. The 1987-1995 truck 350 (the L05) and 1987-1995 truck 305 (the L03) did have TBI.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2002 | 05:37 PM
  #7  
Keith27's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Conroe,TX
Yeah what Tas said...LOL

And to point out to Iroc22 the 4.3 Vortec'z came out in 93 in the all S-10 Blazer'z and some S-10 trucks and in 94 all were Vortec.
You might be thinking of the 4-Tech 2.5(boat anchor)

Peace
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2002 | 07:52 PM
  #8  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Nope the 4.3 since it came out in '86 was advertised from GM as Vortec. You might be confused with the introduction of CPFI in the Blazers in '93 and it was considered a H.O. Vortec.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2002 | 11:49 AM
  #9  
TBIWorks's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Another note to clear it up.....the confusion comes with all of these motors when you open the hood. Some say vortec and some don't. As a geneal rule, the ones that say it under the hood are the higher output engines despite the fact that all '87 and up were vortec. One example would be comparing an '89 4.3 TBI blazer to a '94 4.3 S10ss. The '94 had the 200hp engine that said vortec on the intake cover. The '89 TBI didn't. Also, the ever popular "vortec heads" are those off '96 and up pickups and SUV's that have a diffenent bolt pattern than a TBI intake manifold.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2002 | 01:25 PM
  #10  
91_hd's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan, Kansas
The folks at GM have told me that they consider all centerbolt heads to be vortec, but the public only refers to the 96 and newer as vortecs.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2002 | 06:06 PM
  #11  
Keith27's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Conroe,TX
4.3 VIN W=Vortec 93 - up
4.3 VIN Z=TBI 93 - down



Checked my Delco book at work today..........
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 12:05 AM
  #12  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
No aghhh they were advertised as 4.3 Vortec motors, the introduction of CPI in '93 was the reason why the VIN code changed. What Delco book is this?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 10:03 AM
  #13  
Tas's Avatar
Tas
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 4,310
Likes: 1
Originally posted by 91_hd
The folks at GM have told me that they consider all centerbolt heads to be vortec, but the public only refers to the 96 and newer as vortecs.
That's what I was trying to say.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 02:43 PM
  #14  
Keith27's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Conroe,TX
I looked in the Delco Ingition Nov 2001 and In the goodwrench motor catalog.............I sell a FULL line of delco partz

The Partz Man Peace
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 05:47 PM
  #15  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
I am the parts man.

I work at an auto parts store here in Canada, and on the computer look-up, it says Vortec on every 4.3 liter. And, I have researched this topic before. Our store also sells a AC/Delco parts but not the Goodwrench engines.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 06:27 PM
  #16  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by 91_hd
The folks at GM have told me that they consider all centerbolt heads to be vortec, but the public only refers to the 96 and newer as vortecs.
We are the public, nobody here gives a **** what GM considers vortec. SO CALL ONLY THE 96 AND NEWER L31 AND L30 ENGINES VORTEC!
If all centerbolt heads are considered vortec then hell, my 305 L03 was a vortec motor HAHAHA, it just doesn't sound right.
In 95 trucks were still using TBI, when they switched to the newer design (vortec) heads, they went to a port injection system similar to the LS1s (plastic, very cool).
So in my opinion, there were no vortec engines with TBI, just plane Jane small blocks, some with and some without roller cams, all came stock with swirl port heads which made TBI look like a crappy induction system. Just like how a pitcher or goalie is usually accused of loosing a game, same thing goes for the intake systems on engines. Nobody bothers to call the LO3, it's TBI or 305. It's a shame so few people understand the differences between all the chevy motors yet they call themselves Chevy fans....why...maybe they just like the transmissions....NOT! Learn the motors, learn the trannys, people will listen
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 06:42 PM
  #17  
Keith27's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Conroe,TX
Hey Iroc22 I dont mean to dis ya, but Ive been sellin partz for 14 Yearz and you never go by what the computers sayz, Read the catalogs they dont lie. The computer only knows what the programer put in.
I work for O'Reilly's and we carry a FULL line of delco and motorcraft.
And to answer your other question better, I looked in the Delco 100A/21 catalog.

Peace
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 07:59 PM
  #18  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Seriously the 4.3 V6 motors were advertised from GM as Vortec V6's ever since 1986. You should know that in 93 they introduced CPI on them and that's the difference. I'm not gonna argue any more because I have researched into this stuff and I know GM advertised the 4.3 V6 as the Vortec motor in the Astro/Safari vans and 1/2 ton trucks since '86.

P.S. yes the computer example was a bad one. But why would catalogs not lie? do GM/Ford historians review the final publications?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 08:30 PM
  #19  
Keith27's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Conroe,TX
In 86 you were 2 years old.
But whatever you say Jr.

I just know what the parts books tell me, and my wife's 93 Jimmy 4.3 VORTEC..............



P.S Im also on the S-10 board as TexasOutlaw...........look me up LOL
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 09:35 PM
  #20  
91_hd's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan, Kansas
Originally posted by JPrevost


We are the public, nobody here gives a **** what GM considers vortec. SO CALL ONLY THE 96 AND NEWER L31 AND L30 ENGINES VORTEC!
If all centerbolt heads are considered vortec then hell, my 305 L03 was a vortec motor HAHAHA, it just doesn't sound right.
In 95 trucks were still using TBI, when they switched to the newer design (vortec) heads, they went to a port injection system similar to the LS1s (plastic, very cool).
So in my opinion, there were no vortec engines with TBI, just plane Jane small blocks, some with and some without roller cams, all came stock with swirl port heads which made TBI look like a crappy induction system. Just like how a pitcher or goalie is usually accused of loosing a game, same thing goes for the intake systems on engines. Nobody bothers to call the LO3, it's TBI or 305. It's a shame so few people understand the differences between all the chevy motors yet they call themselves Chevy fans....why...maybe they just like the transmissions....NOT! Learn the motors, learn the trannys, people will listen
Hmm....GM's facts or someone's opinion on the internet...I think I'll take GM on this one. I do understand the differences in the chevy motors and trannies, it appears you don't. You can question me all you want, but I got this straight from the General.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 09:50 PM
  #21  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by Keith27
In 86 you were 2 years old
But whatever you say Jr.
Yeah I was two years old in 86..what does that have to do with it? I've been researching GM related material since I was 10.


I just know what the parts books tell me, and my wife's 93 Jimmy 4.3 VORTEC..............
So? you're wife owns a 93 Jimmy? Then you'll know that it has the CPI and the different VIN character. It doesnt change the fact that you dont believe the 86-92 Vortec motors were advertised as Vortec V6's


P.S Im also on the S-10 board as TexasOutlaw...........look me up LOL
Ok annnnndddd?? So you're on an S10 board which one? there's a few.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 10:44 PM
  #22  
Keith27's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Conroe,TX
S-Series.org

And my wifes Sayz Vortec right on the motor.
Dude I didnt mean to **** you off, just help you so chill out

Any way Im not into advertising and all I know are MY parts catalogs that I look at 55 hours a week.

Peace

Last edited by Keith27; Mar 14, 2002 at 10:50 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 10:54 PM
  #23  
JPrevost's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by 91_hd


Hmm....GM's facts or someone's opinion on the internet...I think I'll take GM on this one. I do understand the differences in the chevy motors and trannies, it appears you don't. You can question me all you want, but I got this straight from the General.
Lol, and you'll also believe the General when they say it's for the best that they kill the f-body. Or how about when they tell you your oil filter is a PF25 when for the same price you could get a PF35 with more filtration...General didn't tell you that now did they.
Where is it that proves your statement about me not understanding the differences in chevy motors and trannies? Wanna quiz me?
I don't believe half the stuff GM spits out at us. I'm tired of listening to people say this and that can't be done when they never plunked their asses down to try it. BTW, who is the General anyways? I'm whiling to bet it's a group of people that have no idea what they're talking about. They just manipulate facts into idiot proof statements to cover up their you know what just incase somebody stupid does something out of context and sues.
Oh yeah, and don't listen to the guys on the internet...no no no, you should never do that! We're only going faster than the stock "General's design."
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 11:01 PM
  #24  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by JPrevost
. BTW, who is the General anyways? I'm whiling to bet it's a group of people that have no idea what they're talking about. They just manipulate facts into idiot proof statements to cover up their you know what just incase somebody stupid does something out of context and sues.
That's exactly what I think they are...a bunch of know-nothing Lawyers.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2002 | 11:10 PM
  #25  
BlackBird92's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Germany
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: 305 LO3 TBI
Transmission: T-5
I don't want to interfere your discussion, I'm just curious.

What are these "Vortec" heads/engines?? First time I heard of them was in this board.

Andreas
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangBeater20
TBI
11
Oct 29, 2022 09:20 PM
xkingcodex
Engine Swap
14
Feb 12, 2020 07:43 PM
camaro11j
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
Sep 19, 2018 08:49 AM
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 20, 2017 12:16 AM
bradleydeanuhl
DFI and ECM
4
Aug 12, 2015 11:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 PM.