Running without a MAF? Good? Bad?
Running without a MAF? Good? Bad?
Well I've read in the forums that running without one causes the mixture to become Rich
but how is this harmful to your engine to burn some extra gas? are there some other harmful side affects when you run without a MAF?
My maf has most likely kicked the bucket so it's a pain to start my car with it, I'll have to get a new one on ebay
but how is this harmful to your engine to burn some extra gas? are there some other harmful side affects when you run without a MAF?
My maf has most likely kicked the bucket so it's a pain to start my car with it, I'll have to get a new one on ebay
Guest
Posts: n/a
I thought the idea of running without a MAF died a long time ago along with the oiled seat-foam air filter idea.
Its bad to run without one. If you have to drive it to the parts store to get a new one thats ok, but I wouldnt go driving it as usual, the engine has little clue how much fuel to feed it, and generally speaking its way wrong.
Its bad to run without one. If you have to drive it to the parts store to get a new one thats ok, but I wouldnt go driving it as usual, the engine has little clue how much fuel to feed it, and generally speaking its way wrong.
well considering the maf measures the amount of air going in, it wont be getting the right fuel to air mixture because it has no idea how much air is going in, i had to run mine without it for a little while and it seems to run a little better, but i wouldn't go doing this......
Re: Running without a MAF? Good? Bad?
Originally posted by TRIGGA
Well I've read in the forums that running without one causes the mixture to become Rich
but how is this harmful to your engine to burn some extra gas? are there some other harmful side affects when you run without a MAF?
My maf has most likely kicked the bucket so it's a pain to start my car with it, I'll have to get a new one on ebay
Well I've read in the forums that running without one causes the mixture to become Rich
but how is this harmful to your engine to burn some extra gas? are there some other harmful side affects when you run without a MAF?
My maf has most likely kicked the bucket so it's a pain to start my car with it, I'll have to get a new one on ebay
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=1831427541
And what is it that leads you to belive your MAF has failed?
Last edited by Vader; May 29, 2002 at 12:05 PM.
When I was running with it, it was very hard to start the car
gave out a 34 code
unplugged the maf and then started the car and plugged it back in.. etc gave a 33 code
I really should replace the relays along with the MAF
which I'll probably have to do
does anyone know the price on a Wells MAF at pepboys and do they keep them in stock?
and do they have a core charge?
gave out a 34 code
unplugged the maf and then started the car and plugged it back in.. etc gave a 33 code
I really should replace the relays along with the MAF
which I'll probably have to do
does anyone know the price on a Wells MAF at pepboys and do they keep them in stock?
and do they have a core charge?
Trending Topics
Originally posted by Jester
It'll drown it in fuel. Aside from fouling plugs in no time flat, it'll seep past the rings, contaminate your oil, and eventually wipe your bearings
I'd fix it sooner rather than later.
It'll drown it in fuel. Aside from fouling plugs in no time flat, it'll seep past the rings, contaminate your oil, and eventually wipe your bearings
I'd fix it sooner rather than later.
And had no problems ...Although , I DON'T recommend to anyone removing it b/c I have heard of guys having problems without it . But not those types of problems . Originally posted by TRIGGA
When I was running with it, it was very hard to start the car
gave out a 34 code
unplugged the maf and then started the car and plugged it back in.. etc gave a 33 code
When I was running with it, it was very hard to start the car
gave out a 34 code
unplugged the maf and then started the car and plugged it back in.. etc gave a 33 code
If your ECM locked a DTC 34, and then a 33, the problem may not be with the MAF sensor itself. If you're getting both error codes, I'd start looking at the connections, relays, and TPS sensor.
I really should replace the relays along with the MAF which I'll probably have to do
does anyone know the price on a Wells MAF at pepboys and do they keep them in stock?
and do they have a core charge?
and do they have a core charge?
Originally posted by Vader
It also doesn't have a hot wire, but uses a thick film sensing element like the LT1/LS1 MAFs. It also has a larger diameter body for more flow, and no round wire screens or heat sink fins to impede air flow. THAT'S why it's worth &170.00 instead of getting another inferior, smaller hot-wire reman unit or used unit.
It also doesn't have a hot wire, but uses a thick film sensing element like the LT1/LS1 MAFs. It also has a larger diameter body for more flow, and no round wire screens or heat sink fins to impede air flow. THAT'S why it's worth &170.00 instead of getting another inferior, smaller hot-wire reman unit or used unit.
~M~
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
For $170 you can convert to Speed Density and never have to worry about a MAF again.
Originally posted by Morley
But will it work on the '85 and up MAF systems? And if it does I suppose you need to diable MAF burn off on the PROM?
~M~
But will it work on the '85 and up MAF systems? And if it does I suppose you need to diable MAF burn off on the PROM?
~M~
'85s are a lone wolf. They used a digital (FM) MAF sensor. '86-89 used the more common analog Bosch MAF. The Wells SU-145 will not work on those systems, but there are similar replacements for the '85.
There is no need to disable anything. There is a resistor (dummy load) in the MAF electronics package to emulate the hot wire for the purpose of satisfying the burn off circuit. The ECM will never know the difference.
And John is correct. For the cost of a replacement, you can install a MAP sensor and used ECM to convert to S/D,and still have money left to go toward a Pocke Programmer and raw PROMs. Of for a couple bucks more and a little more time, you can convert to OBD-II from a '93 and use both a FM MAF and MAP sensor, where the sky is the limit.
Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 841
Likes: 3
From: Silverhill,Al
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by WaynesRS
NO flame intended . But , are you serious ? Ive been running two years without mine !
And had no problems ...Although , I DON'T recommend to anyone removing it b/c I have heard of guys having problems without it . But not those types of problems .
NO flame intended . But , are you serious ? Ive been running two years without mine !
And had no problems ...Although , I DON'T recommend to anyone removing it b/c I have heard of guys having problems without it . But not those types of problems . Just from general mechanical experience, a sensor does just what it's name implies, senses a condition which results in changes in the way the engine operates. Why would you disable an object which has an effect on the way that your engine tunes itself. Just my .10 cents, my .02 cents is free.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 25, 2015 11:49 PM








