Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Running without a MAF? Good? Bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2002 | 09:08 AM
  #1  
TRIGGA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: California
Running without a MAF? Good? Bad?

Well I've read in the forums that running without one causes the mixture to become Rich

but how is this harmful to your engine to burn some extra gas? are there some other harmful side affects when you run without a MAF?

My maf has most likely kicked the bucket so it's a pain to start my car with it, I'll have to get a new one on ebay
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 09:22 AM
  #2  
Jester's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
From: Homestead, Fla
It'll drown it in fuel. Aside from fouling plugs in no time flat, it'll seep past the rings, contaminate your oil, and eventually wipe your bearings I'd fix it sooner rather than later.
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 11:51 AM
  #3  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I thought the idea of running without a MAF died a long time ago along with the oiled seat-foam air filter idea.

Its bad to run without one. If you have to drive it to the parts store to get a new one thats ok, but I wouldnt go driving it as usual, the engine has little clue how much fuel to feed it, and generally speaking its way wrong.
Reply
Old May 28, 2002 | 04:35 PM
  #4  
johndo1707's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: webster, ny
well considering the maf measures the amount of air going in, it wont be getting the right fuel to air mixture because it has no idea how much air is going in, i had to run mine without it for a little while and it seems to run a little better, but i wouldn't go doing this......
Reply
Old May 29, 2002 | 11:51 AM
  #5  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,655
Likes: 309
Re: Running without a MAF? Good? Bad?

Originally posted by TRIGGA
Well I've read in the forums that running without one causes the mixture to become Rich

but how is this harmful to your engine to burn some extra gas? are there some other harmful side affects when you run without a MAF?

My maf has most likely kicked the bucket so it's a pain to start my car with it, I'll have to get a new one on ebay
Why risk getting a MAF on eBay? A new, guaranteed, better MAF can be purchased for about $170 from Wells. You'll never buy another MAF again. You're taking a real chance on a used MAF on eBay...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=1831427541

And what is it that leads you to belive your MAF has failed?

Last edited by Vader; May 29, 2002 at 12:05 PM.
Reply
Old May 29, 2002 | 12:30 PM
  #6  
johndo1707's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: webster, ny
$170 is a lot, if it was me personally, i'd find one cheap....
Reply
Old May 29, 2002 | 03:42 PM
  #7  
TRIGGA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: California
When I was running with it, it was very hard to start the car

gave out a 34 code

unplugged the maf and then started the car and plugged it back in.. etc gave a 33 code

I really should replace the relays along with the MAF
which I'll probably have to do

does anyone know the price on a Wells MAF at pepboys and do they keep them in stock?

and do they have a core charge?
Reply
Old May 29, 2002 | 05:03 PM
  #8  
WaynesRS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,398
Likes: 1
From: Baton Rouge ,Louisiana ,USA
Originally posted by Jester
It'll drown it in fuel. Aside from fouling plugs in no time flat, it'll seep past the rings, contaminate your oil, and eventually wipe your bearings I'd fix it sooner rather than later.
NO flame intended . But , are you serious ? Ive been running two years without mine ! And had no problems ...Although , I DON'T recommend to anyone removing it b/c I have heard of guys having problems without it . But not those types of problems .
Reply
Old May 29, 2002 | 05:20 PM
  #9  
TransAm87's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
From: webster ny usa
yea

You can find a MAF for less then 170$ easy
Aj
Reply
Old May 29, 2002 | 05:40 PM
  #10  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,655
Likes: 309
Originally posted by TRIGGA
When I was running with it, it was very hard to start the car

gave out a 34 code

unplugged the maf and then started the car and plugged it back in.. etc gave a 33 code
Trigga,

If your ECM locked a DTC 34, and then a 33, the problem may not be with the MAF sensor itself. If you're getting both error codes, I'd start looking at the connections, relays, and TPS sensor.


I really should replace the relays along with the MAF which I'll probably have to do
You should always test or replace the relays and their wiring first.


does anyone know the price on a Wells MAF at pepboys and do they keep them in stock?
and do they have a core charge?
I doubt that PepBoys has them. There is no core charge, since the Wells replacement is not remanufactured, but new. It also doesn't have a hot wire, but uses a thick film sensing element like the LT1/LS1 MAFs. It also has a larger diameter body for more flow, and no round wire screens or heat sink fins to impede air flow. THAT'S why it's worth &170.00 instead of getting another inferior, smaller hot-wire reman unit or used unit.
Reply
Old May 30, 2002 | 01:01 AM
  #11  
Morley's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 2
Originally posted by Vader


It also doesn't have a hot wire, but uses a thick film sensing element like the LT1/LS1 MAFs. It also has a larger diameter body for more flow, and no round wire screens or heat sink fins to impede air flow. THAT'S why it's worth &170.00 instead of getting another inferior, smaller hot-wire reman unit or used unit.
But will it work on the '85 and up MAF systems? And if it does I suppose you need to diable MAF burn off on the PROM?


~M~
Reply
Old May 30, 2002 | 05:26 AM
  #12  
John Millican's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
For $170 you can convert to Speed Density and never have to worry about a MAF again.
Reply
Old May 30, 2002 | 09:05 AM
  #13  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,655
Likes: 309
Originally posted by Morley
But will it work on the '85 and up MAF systems? And if it does I suppose you need to diable MAF burn off on the PROM?
~M~
Morley,

'85s are a lone wolf. They used a digital (FM) MAF sensor. '86-89 used the more common analog Bosch MAF. The Wells SU-145 will not work on those systems, but there are similar replacements for the '85.

There is no need to disable anything. There is a resistor (dummy load) in the MAF electronics package to emulate the hot wire for the purpose of satisfying the burn off circuit. The ECM will never know the difference.


And John is correct. For the cost of a replacement, you can install a MAP sensor and used ECM to convert to S/D,and still have money left to go toward a Pocke Programmer and raw PROMs. Of for a couple bucks more and a little more time, you can convert to OBD-II from a '93 and use both a FM MAF and MAP sensor, where the sky is the limit.
Reply
Old May 30, 2002 | 12:02 PM
  #14  
DartByU's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 841
Likes: 3
From: Silverhill,Al
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by WaynesRS


NO flame intended . But , are you serious ? Ive been running two years without mine ! And had no problems ...Although , I DON'T recommend to anyone removing it b/c I have heard of guys having problems without it . But not those types of problems .
You may be running ok, but if it's running to rich for to long you risk wearing out your cylinders because the extra fuel washes the oil off the cylinder walls. I've seen more that 1 engine ruined because of this.
Reply
Old May 30, 2002 | 02:19 PM
  #15  
383 rocket bird's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Columbus,Cleveland
Just from general mechanical experience, a sensor does just what it's name implies, senses a condition which results in changes in the way the engine operates. Why would you disable an object which has an effect on the way that your engine tunes itself. Just my .10 cents, my .02 cents is free.
Reply
Old May 30, 2002 | 11:53 PM
  #16  
TRIGGA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: California
=)

well it turned out my MAF was in good working order but one of the relays were shot
:lala: :lala: :lala: :lala: :lala:
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
specialized
TPI
27
Jun 18, 2022 09:26 AM
Reddeath210
Firebirds for Sale
14
Oct 6, 2015 08:20 AM
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 25, 2015 11:49 PM
InfinityShade
Transmissions and Drivetrain
15
Aug 22, 2015 08:00 PM
squiggy2
TPI
4
Aug 9, 2015 09:30 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 AM.